I will be having wikibreak on English Wikipedia. Some of my edits are rough and not expected as well. Some users have started monitoring my edits. It won't be repeated again. Until 26th September 2022 or more, I will refrain from editing Wikipedia. In the meantime, I will look into exploring rules and regulations in Wikipedia. Then I will come back again. This time no mistakes. --TTP1233 (talk) is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

--TTP1233 (talk) 02:21, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TTP1233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Greetings Sir/Madam, I do like to re-apply for unblock in Wikipedia. It is to inform you that after reading blocking policies and conditions of Standard Offer, I have,

• Not did any sock puppetry on my any blocked accounts mentioned in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_NS_Dibyojyoti for 6 months since my last edit of TTP1233 on 11:01 hrs.; 25 November 2021 (UTC).
• Neither created accounts for further sock puppetry nor for illegal use.

Also,

• I made productive edits on Simple English Wikipedia. I have created around 30 articles (3 deleted due to my interest) and over 1000 edits before and during block on this account, since created.
• Explanation how I was blocked:- A year ago I opened an account named TTP1233 in simple.m.wikipedia.org but I never edited in risk until I confirm that admin Ninjarobotpirate blocked that as well. But after some months past, I started editing Wikipedia and after months I got encouraged to edit here. Moreover no one suspected me. But creating Sujit Bose (politician) and Indranil Sen was the biggest blunder I made. Though they are notable but since I made it, I feared if anyone knows. Second thing I made identified is shortening my original name, Dibyojyoti Roy Chowdhury to Jyoti Roy. And I live in same place (As mentioned in my bio in both the accounts). This is the truth I can say. And I have realized that sockpuppetry is unlawful and useless also I'm not willing to create anymore account. So I had decided that until six months has over, I refrain from editing Wikipedia.

To continue, I think I have aware myself of my misbehavior to the community and I will not continue to do so, henceforth. I also want to assure you that if I be unblock, then I will be working on the basics, means what a normal editor usually do. I will fully focus on creating, editing and updating articles that are completely based on India-related topics. When I will gain experience on the user rights, I will apply but after few years, as my unblocking immediately will not grant me that right.

To conclude, I want to contribute many things and not to spoil the community. I will try my best to get back trust everyone. I hope you will not abandon me. I would request you to please consider my review and then unblock me. If any conclusion comes regarding my un-block, please inform me.

I look forward to your response regarding the request.

Thanking You,

Yours sincerely, --Jyoti Roy (talk) 12:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocking per WP:Standard offer Salvio 17:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note:- I cannot access my master sock account User:NS Dibyojyoti because I have forgotten the password of it. I have tried to reset the password but it failed anyhow. So I chose to request here. Jyoti Roy (talk) 13:09, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No evidence of block evasion, based on checkuser findings. --Yamla (talk) 13:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the ((admin help)) template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Excuse me sir/ma'am, it is weird to tell this but my unblock request is not yet reviewed for nearly a month. I have mailed the blocking admin for asking any progress but I didn't get any response. I'm ready to disclose anything if you suspects anything against me. But I want to get unblocked soon. During this time, I observed there are many misedits has been found in many India-related article including biographical persons. I wish I could correct those edits but I have been blocked. So if my request could be thoroughly review, then at least I would be getting relieved.

I know that some request are reviewed by group of admins through WP:AN. If possible, please transfer my review to there so that a result could come. If it is negative also then fine, but I want to make my request in a faster progress. Now rest of all you decide. Feel free to ask any questions regarding my block.

Have a good day.--Jyoti Roy (talk) 05:55, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry, but we cannot expedite unblock requests; the backlog is large, and we tackle it as we find time and energy. Please be patient. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I do understand @Blablubbs sir. There are many articles and projects in this Wikipedia and many users contribute it. You people are there to monitor it which makes more time to spend. It's ok. I will wait. As this patience makes me to wait 6 months to apply WP:SO.

Please take your time and review when you feel free to do it. Have a good day sir. Jyoti Roy (talk) 16:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Atin Ghosh at Press Interaction on the Occasion of World T.B. Day at KMC Headquarters.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Whpq, thank you for bringing this matter here. I thought that the file must be reviewed and if errors got detected I can understand that. In website of KMC I see no free license is provided. And on the policy, KMC allows the file to be reproduced without prior permission. But I don't understand which non free media tag I must apply for. After many days I came back in Wikipedia so I quite forgotten the policies again.

If possible, please delete this file. I think it fails per the policy.

Thanking you,

--Jyoti Roy (talk) 12:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This fails WP:NFCC#1 in that this image could be replaced with a freely licensed image. Even if a free image of Ghosh does not currently exist, as a living person, a free one could be made. Whpq (talk) 12:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tapan Dasgupta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 15:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

After my harsh editing when unblocked, I got embarrassed. I want to create articles based on India related topics. But I don't know where to start with. I forgot a Wikipedia page where many topics are there with little description. If you could link that page, I will be happy. also I need guidelines of creating articles only. This is the only way I can show productive edits. Explain me as if I'm new to this place. TTP1233 (talk) 06:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Hi TTP1233. If you're looking for stuff to do, WikiProject India has a list of related articles needing cleanup here. If you're wanting someone to teach you how to edit and create articles on Wikipedia, consider mentorship or adoption. And feel free to reply if you have any more questions! ––FormalDude (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @FormalDude, which one is appropriate, mentorship or adoption TTP1233 (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Either. Probably a little easier to find an adopter. ––FormalDude (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for inability to edit constructively and communicate clearly in English. I would suggest focusing more on languages you speak more fluently.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).   -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 17:41, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Please see also my comments here. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 17:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]