Hello, I'm CuriousGolden. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hüsülü, Lachin‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 07:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thank you for your recent additions of images and historical data to the articles for villages in the Syunik Province of Armenia. There was an issue with some of the images breaking the page and some other issues with the code you used, which I fixed. I would advise you to familiarize yourself a bit more with Wikitext to improve your additions when editing. The clean-up I've done [1] for the Khnatsakh article which you recently edited may be useful as an example. AntonSamuel (talk) 11:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TagaworShah! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karchevan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kura River. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! So, happy that you were able to grasp how disputes are resolved here in Wikipedia. But there are some stuff you should know as well. I've seen you use "@" for tagging, though that does not work. Use ((U)) for such occasions, like ((U|Username)). Also, you don't have to open up a new subjection on the talk page for references. Use ((ref-talk)) for it. The subsections are reserved for discussions. Have a good day. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 16:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for the insights, I will put them to use. Have a good day. Sincerely- TagaworShah (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TagaworShah

Thank you for creating Agulis Massacre.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Celestina007)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007: My pleasure, thank you for the review! TagaworShah (talk) 19:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armenian dress, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bloomington and Christening.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agulis Massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nakhchivan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, since I have pinged you, I have taken to noticeboard.Cristodelosgitanos (talk) 19:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagawor wanted to give you a heads up and express thanks. Despite having a massive head-on confrontation, trading insults, we eventually managed to resolve our disputes and practically reach consensus from diametrically opposed positions. I think that speaks well of both of us and our debate has actually improved the article. Next time I edit flamenco, I'll let you know and I want you to know I will consistently assume good faith with you, even if we have arguments in the future. Multumesc!Cristodelosgitanos (talk) 13:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TagaworShah, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! LouisAragon (talk) 23:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- LouisAragon (talk) 23:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Just to let you know I'm going to start editing the palos section of Flamenco. I won't touch the rest of the article. Cristodelosgitanos (talk) 20:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 02:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sarkis Lole, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sarkis Lole, the Armenian chief architect of Mardin who constructed much of the early modern architecture of the city, never received any formal training and designed his buildings in the sand? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sarkis Lole. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sarkis Lole), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 12:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I removed the part as it was mentioned in article. With the same logic, would it be reasonable to add the same for Kalbajar article as well? Cheers, — Toghrul R (t) 15:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Toghrul R: Hello, the lead section is made to summarize content in the body of the article. Thus, content from the body can be repeated in the lead and everything in the lead should be found in the body of the article, no new information can be introduced in the lead, for more information check out MOS:LEAD. As for Kalbajar, that is a different article and content for that article should be discussed on that talk page, I would check to see if there was already discussion about that. Cheers, TagaworShah (talk) 15:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @TagaworShah, please can you have a look on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_people#Turkish_and_Tatar_Y-DNA_genes_of_the_Muslim_Roma699

the source behind them, says nothing about turkish or tatar Y-DNA, the source says also nothing that muslim romani woman got children from turks or tatars etc., the source is about Genetic impact of the Ottoman occupiers on the Balkan-Roma population and central eastern population, but not especially in muslim roma.

That's why I wanted to fix it but I can't. I'am blocked from editing the Article. But If you read the source, you can understand what I mean. Thanky

--Nalanidil (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nalanidil: I have looked over the source and have fixed the section to correspond to what the source says, thank you for being this to my attention. TagaworShah (talk) 16:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TagaworShah, thank you very much

Nalanidil (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stepanakert you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ActuallyNeverHappened02 -- ActuallyNeverHappened02 (talk) 21:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stepanakert you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stepanakert for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ActuallyNeverHappened02 -- ActuallyNeverHappened02 (talk) 20:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stepanakert you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stepanakert for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ActuallyNeverHappened02 -- ActuallyNeverHappened02 (talk) 18:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tagaworshah, could you help me with this article I'm working on called Muslim uprisings in Kars and Sharur-Nakhichevan? It's about the Muslim/Turko-Kurdish uprisings against the First Republic of Armenia which occurred in 1919–1920. I noticed you are the creator of the Agulis massacre article, which is part of and related to this article, so I thought you might be interested in helping. FYI there is a Russian version of this article. Cheers -𝑵𝒖𝒏𝒖𝒙𝒙𝒙 ✪ 𝑇𝑎𝑙𝑘 10:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Civility Barnstar
	I appreciate your politeness and amicable attitude in a topic area as hostile as AA2. It's a breath of fresh air and an example to all other editors working in the topic area. — Golden call me maybe? 11:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Golden: Appreciate it! :) TagaworShah (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

None 2600:1700:6B54:500:4876:FD4D:D010:8DC7 (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you possibly try to answer my posts with single posts of your own rather than a series? When you post I start to write an answer, I find you have made two more posts in the meantime, and on two occasions I have lost the text I typed due to edit conflicts, and obviously found there were different points to answer than I anticipated. If you take a little time to decide everything you want to say, and then give a single answer, the conversation will be easier. Boynamedsue (talk) 06:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Boynamedsue: I address points as I see them and make comments under each specific point you make, it would be easier if you also only kept your arguments in one single comment as well. I am logging off for the next few hours so you have plenty of time to craft what you want to say. Cheers. TagaworShah (talk) 07:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason the split in my posts occurred was another consequence of your style of splitting your comments into several sections. Really, people have told me not to do it unless there are multiple participants. It creates chaos.Boynamedsue (talk) 08:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello after Qarabağ conflict Stepanakert city is controling by Azerbijan. And by international borders is part of Azerbaijan So it isn't logical that we write artsakh in articles that related to Qarabağ Abolfazlyashar (talk) 17:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As Brandmeister explained to you in the talk page, Stepanakert is still under de-facto rule of the native Armenian government which said it will not disband until it’s residents are safely evacuated. As for the name Artsakh, it’s a well documented historical name for the region, as well as the name the indigenous Armenians use for it, regardless of what Azerbaijan calls it, Artsakh is still a common and historical name for the region. TagaworShah (talk) 17:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi! i've noticed your numerous contributions to artsakh & armenia-related articles, and thought you might be interested in joining WikiProject Artsakh, which has recently been revived. thanks for your hard work! Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

can you please help me with an edit on the Armenia part of the Prehistory page, because when I make a normal edit, the participant simply deletes it without writing why. Armen888 (talk) 15:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey just wanted to say I appreciate your removing the excessive emphasis on Armenia being in Europe in the lede. There seems to be an anti-Asian slant to the edits. It has been stressed repeatedly later in the lede and in the body of the article that Armenia has cultural ties to Europe; there is no need to repeat this. Also, erasing "West Asia" from the statement that Armenia is located in the Armenian Highlands, which are clearly on the Asian side of the Caucasus, seems to deny facts and smacks of anti-Asian bias to me. So thanks for restoring that. Yekshemesh (talk) 06:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]