user:87.20.67.65 has the right to blank her talkpage. Please do not revert her edits anymore unless they are something that can be considered offensive. CLCStudent (talk) 00:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CLCStudent: Except they weren't blanking their talk page. They were removing their signature from their comment on another IP talk. See [1]. Taumata994 (talk) 00:12, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was referring to [[2]]. CLCStudent (talk) 00:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That was a misfire. I mistook one talk page for another. I won't do it again. Taumata994 (talk) 00:14, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CLCStudent: Also, that edit happened after you edited my talk. How were you able to predict? Taumata994 (talk) 00:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I must have looked at that other edit you made to that other talkpage you were talking about. CLCStudent (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You mean this one? Taumata994 (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. CLCStudent (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That was restoring the signature. So I guess no WP:OWNTALK after all? At least not until after you messaged me. And even then accidental. Taumata994 (talk) 00:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Almost undid this one but then realized that actually was their own page. Taumata994 (talk) 00:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No need to keep reporting IP vandalism. Whoever is behind it obviously has the ability to switch IPs at will. and the page has been protected. This is just playing wack a mole. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please... thank you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Missed your initial message. Taumata994 (talk) 03:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for blanking that page. I'm still relatively new to Wikipedia. Cancoveal (talk) 04:59, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cancoveal: Not a problem. You were right to tag that page for deletion. It should not have been created. Thanks! Taumata994 (talk) 05:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Taumata994: Would you mind explaining how exactly you format posts on talk pages? I'm not exactly sure how to do it. Cancoveal (talk) 05:01, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is an invitation to WikiProject New Zealand, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on New Zealand. Please feel free to join us.

Sheldybett (talk) 11:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed mention of Chinese lander being First to land at Lunar South Pole because it did not land in South Pole region it landed far from it at 45.5 degree South latitude which is in Von Karman crater but not in Lunar South Pole region .

This First Second Third words are creating eternal pissing content on many recent moon mission pages .

I can back my claim about Chinese lander landing site latitude with a link to Chinese state media . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smash1617 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring, as you do on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Serbs_of_Croatia&diff=908110374&oldid=908110367 77.191.36.231 (talk) 14:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The user was reverting vandalism (WP:HOAX), which is an exception to the rule. --MrClog (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MrClog, Taumata994 inserts questionable labels ("genocide"), not supported by the title of the target page. That certainly is against WP:SURPRISE 77.191.36.231 (talk) 14:29, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of content is vandalism. --MrClog (talk) 14:30, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MrClog, OK, still WP:SURPRISE should be respected. 78.54.173.21 (talk) 14:35, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Airthess3 (talk) 08:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Your reference to promotional/advertising material is contradicting the links posted on Bordeaux airport table by others.Would you care to explain what exactly are you referring to? Press releases from airlines themselves aren't considered relevant links and are promotional material?Because then you should redo the table, not just my editing and erase Finnair link,the routesonline-link, etc. I posted the Ryanair press release for its new routes.What else exactly do you need to consider it a more valid source other than the airline's?It's the same on hundreds of tables Airthess3 (talk) 08:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed also you reverted my edit of AF seasonal flight to ATH when the source is Bordeaux Airport like the source posted on Easyjet's seasonal flights which you have kept.So what are the grounds of your unfounded discriminatory behaviour because it seems double standards are applied, apart from your threats of blocking..Airthess3 (talk) 18:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain your edit on the Logan River. 50.68.172.46 (talk) 22:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the edit in question because it used non-neutral language (i.e. so-called). Thank you. Taumata994 (talk) 00:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your work reverting the offensive edits by the the IP editor recently. It's much appreciated. KNHaw (talk) 05:38, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Woodroar (talk) 00:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you reverting changes to have a positive connotation citing neutral language? Appropriation is in the name itself "cultural appropriation". (Trulov (talk) 19:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]

@Trulov: Adoption is neutral. It can be positive or negative. Taumata994 (talk) 19:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Traumata944:Appropriation is in the name. Adoption is misleading. (Trulov (talk) 20:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, it's explained. Now the article is normal, not attacked by political activists. 2804:14D:5C83:81A0:81A6:A346:618C:25AE (talk) 08:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems fine from what I can see. Accidental click, maybe? Taumata994 (talk) 15:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting the bio to the old. I am trying to make it current. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MappieGoldberg (talk • contribs) 23:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How do I get help with this. I am new user and Jennifer Sey's bio is outdated. Please do not block me. How do I speak with someone directly that can help me????23:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)MappieGoldberg (talk)

@MappieGoldberg: Try posting at WP:Help desk. Taumata994 (talk) 23:44, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the removal of the external link you just did is wrong (German Frers page, list of ships, Cirrus 3/4), as it refers to an encyclopedia of IOR racing boats (largest IOR racing sailboats list on the Internet)! Hence I think it should not have been removed. It is not a commercial page, it is a (very!) informative page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by EarlyMorningSunrise (talk • contribs) 07:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am doing this because the Macrobiotic Diet is far far from being trendy weight-loss plan that promises dramatic results, which is what FAD implies Hope this helps — Preceding unsigned comment added by Batbuttons (talk • contribs) 22:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]