Discussion Archives |
Home | Talk | Contributions | Toolbox | Sandbox | Homemade Userboxes |
This is Archive 5: May 2007 - April 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
This is an archive of inactive discussions. Please do not edit it. If you wish to revitalize an old topic, bring it up on the active talk page. | |||||
|
Archived discussion | |
---|---|
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tghe-retford.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Hope everything is alright. Wikiwoohoo 14:49, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
It looks like that the cleanup taskforce for the smooth jazz article was a complete failure. The article hardly has had any major changes since it was listed. Is there any other alternatives to fix the article? ANDROS1337 18:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there
I noticed that you made a lengthy comment on the inclusion of schedules within Wikipedia at Template talk:Schedule. There is a current discussion on the merit of including schedules and programme lists within Wikipedia at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not. Please feel free (and I would strongly advise) that you repeat your concerns you noted at the aforementioned talk page there. Regards. --tgheretford (talk) 11:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello there, I am a fellow member of Wikiproject jazz. I was wondering, if you had a moment to spare, if you would be willing to give your opinion on a matter at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 June 15 concerning a category I created. The category is [[Category:Jazz musicians of New Orleans]], and it has been proposed that the article be merged with Musicians of New Orleans and American jazz musicians. This is precisely why I created the category, because it seemed to me the birthplace of jazz music and continous modern symbol of jazz certainly deserves a category unto itself. Regardless of your opinion, I would greatly appreciate your input there so as to have a discussion over the matter. Thanks. (Mind meal 03:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC))
Hello fellow member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Jazz! I am delivering this message to all members of the project to inform them of a major addition to the evolution of this project. Please see Category:Jazz musicians by genre to familiarize yourselves with the new categories for jazz musicians. Most of the genre categories contain sub-genres in their drop-down menus, so be sure to open them up! I am sending this to everyone to speed up the population of these categories. The sub-genres have been carefully researched to ensure they belong under their corresponding "mother genre"! And please, when in doubt do not categorize something via an assumption. Well, that about covers it! Any help in this regard will be greatly appreciated.(Mind meal 05:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC))
Hello, tghe-retford (Gareth),
Last year, you were kind enough to help out with some very useful advice on manipulating wikipedia pages. That helped to give me the confidence to go on to edit and contribute to many biological and other science pages. The advice and help you have freely given has been of great help to other people so thank you for that.
As you also have different issues to deal with, I thought it might be worth mentioning something that's now helping me deal with things. I came across the latest generation of "technological meditation" techniques which have been developed in the US. They work by generating binaural beats derived by feeding slightly different sound frequencies to each ear and that has the result of inducing deep meditational states and making a more efficient brain able to deal with the stresses of life. Despite what I've had to go through, I've found that this type of stuff has made me immune to depression and it's made me more positive and creative when having to face different issues and get additional help. It takes a bit of getting used to at first but I wouldn't be without it now. One version's available direct from the Centerpointe Institute in the US at http://www.centerpointe.com/ or from their UK agents, Lifetools at http://www.lifetools.com/centerpointe/CPlet.html. You can have a look and make your own mind up and it's worth reading the testimonials and letter sections of back issues of the Mind Chatter newsletters, e.g. Issue #130 (January 16, 2004), at http://www.centerpointe.com/newsletter/archives.php.
Anyway, best regards, Tim.
The article Digital radio in the United Kingdom you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Digital radio in the United Kingdom for things needed to be addressed. LordHarris 15:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
The article Digital radio in the United Kingdom you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Digital radio in the United Kingdom for eventual comments about the article. Well done!
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your work on getting Digital radio in the United Kingdom to Wikipedia:GA level LordHarris 21:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC) |
well, what should i do?
this is the first time i have nominated anything for deletion.
maybe Neo jazz could be merged or something. you might know about this, as i saw from your user page that you are pretty involved in jazz.
thanks for your friendliness. Snail Doom 23:20, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
that sounds good. yes, the real reason i came across it was working for the Wikification Drive and i saw it on the list and figured it would be better off deleted than wikified. so, this is a good compromise i think. thanks. Snail Doom 21:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to ((inactive)) and/or ((historical)) status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sky Multichannels.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jazzfm old1.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jazzfm old2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Yorkshire_Radio.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 08:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:SmoothFM london.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I saw that you used my "Has Draft" template, I've added it to the Template Namespace (template:hasdraft) Spud Hai/watidone 20:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)