As if today, I have merged everything but the most recent stuff to User talk:TheListUpdater/Archive. OK, ground rules.

1) Welcome, first of all. I always enjoy getting new messages.

2) Be civil.

3) I'll try to contact you back at your user page. Unless you've come to complain about some "fair use image" or article you wanted to delete, I will answer back.

4) Eterpah has made note of a big one. Add comments at the BOTTOM of the page, not the top.

4) The more unwritten rules you break, the more I shall add.

!!!!TALK BEGINS HERE!!!!

I was surprised to see you here, and was surprised that the NinDB article got deleted. I do understand it's non-notable, but you know, eventually Wikipedia won't have any more notable subjects left, and will have to expand it's "agenda", if you know what i mean ;)

You can help contribute to some of my articles if your interested in Google Earth and Theme Parks. Currently I'm working on the European theme park article Compagnie des Alpes and are hoping for more contributers to the Google Sky article. FWI, I created both articles. Cheers from Boston! StarfoxRoy 22:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, if you think about it, NinDB is technically owned by the News Corporation. Hah. StarfoxRoy 22:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've made substantial updates to my user page and my signature if you're interested. StarfoxRoy 22:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, funny. :P This makes me wonder, why does Wikipedia let users edit other people's userpages? StarfoxRoy 01:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image you left on my talk page was removed and replaced with that "fair use" crap and it's kind of an eyesore. Could I PLEASE delete it?

Oh, and my blog at my userpage is up Just an FWI, not trying to be annoying. StarfoxRoy 04:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Sorry, Roy, you can't have a blog on Wikipedia for non-Wiki content. See Wikipedia:UP#NOT)

But that's for articles. Userpages don't need to be (and sometimes never are) wiki-related. But if I'm wrong, I can deal. StarfoxRoy 18:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would make the most sense to merge and redirect Blue Ridge Mall to Blue Ridge Crossing, since it's the same property and we only need one page on it. I turned up three good sources in the AfD, and there're probably scads more for a mall that opened in 1958 and was redeveloped only a couple years ago. What say you? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 13:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Wouldn't it make more sense to reflect the current name, though, with the old name being a redirect? Sure, more people know it as Blue Ridge Mall than as Blue Ridge Crossing, but I thought convention was to reflect the current name of a place (such as Wonderland Village instead of Wonderland Mall or Wonderland Center). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 15:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• P.S. ((Infobox stadium)) on a mall? That's new. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 19:36, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's partially why I wanted to delete it. TheListUpdater (talk) 17:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added some references to Mall of the Mainland. --Eastmain (talk) 21:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added some references to Mall of the Mainland. --Eastmain (talk) 21:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Captaineo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:22, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I kinda forgot about that page. Dunno what to do right now. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:34, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm kinda in over my head on this page. Any suggestions? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Bleah. Too much work. I'll get it eventually. Found nothing yet on Office Max, Stix, etc. etc. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:38, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've seen him on other articles. I call him the 'Retail Bug' :P

He isn't necessarily a vandal, just a n00b that needs to check his sources. I'm actually watching what he does, as I'm pretty frequent in the retail subject and I hate people screwing with the articles that I'm trying to keep clean. StarfoxRoy 17:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tower.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 04:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to hit the library sometime. It's possible that the Marshall Field's deli was different from the sit-down restaurant that the old store had. Heck, I haven't even figured out where the Hudson's budget store was. There aren't enough mall editors here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, I know. Mall articles are nearly as desolate as the country music articles (hint, hint). I just happened to luck out on Walden Galleria because there were a *(@#$load of sources on Google News; even Great Lakes Crossing, the biggest mall in Michigan, doesn't turn up a whole heck of a lot. There're still a couple mall holes I want to plug up first (see the red links on my userpage), then I'll work on a few more mall articles. Maybe we should pick one and see if we can get it to GA. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, by the way, regarding that poster who mentioned Woolworth Express, that was me. There were Woolcos that became Kmart, so it could be possible that Woolworth took the old Kresge. I have a listing from a 1989 phone book that at least verifies Woolworth Express. As for this picture, that's looking north from what was then Hudson's. I can tell because Kresge is on the left, where The Limited was most recently. No idea on the Hudson's Budget Store, but looking at old pics found at the mall itself, it seems that it was part of Hudson's proper (maybe the part that became Service Merchandise? Service Merch looks like it was part of the Hudson's building at one point). Finally, as a bonus, here's a map I made of the mall as it looked in mid-2006, with former tenants in orange. I might be able to make a trip down to Waterford on Sunday, but I don't know how late they'd be open if at all. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:16, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The full text of the article is as follows:

The famous El Vado Motel, passes along the U.S. Route 66. The neon lights of the highly stylized is said to have been "beckoning travelers for six decades". The adobe cabins epitomize everything southwestern and capture the spirit of the "Land of Enchantment." Because of the El Vado's unique character it has been placed on the National Historic Register. It truly is one of the best examples of a classic Route 66 motor court to be found along the Mother Road and is an irreplaceable treasure indeed

Built in 1937 by Dan Murphy, former manager of Albuquerque's Franciscan Hotel. In the mid 1980s to the early 1990s, El Vado was run by the very well-liked Ali Hakam, who has was attributed to faithfully preserving the charm and elegance of the historic motel.

There was no mention of its danger of meeting the wrecking ball. Also note the article's total lack of sources. Finally note the language used:

• It truly is one of the best examples of a classic Route 66 motor court to be found along the Mother Road and is an irreplaceable treasure indeed
• "... El Vado was run by the very well-liked Ali Hakam ..."
• The adobe cabins epitomize everything southwestern and capture the spirit of the "Land of Enchantment." -- This is not encyclopedic without decent sourcing. As it is it is mere verbiage (This is sentimental, not anything really substantial).
• The neon lights of the highly stylized is said to have been "beckoning travelers for six decades". -- Again this is an opinion.

I suppose at the time I *could* have stubbed it, I won't say no to your recreating it (and fixing the flaws), but I do think the original reason for deletion was valid (the article reads as a promotion), as a stub would merely read that it was a historic place. —— nixeagle 20:09, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Instead of edit warring over Crossroads Plaza, I have moved the article to Crossroads Plaza (North Carolina). I have recreated Crossroads Plaza as a disambiguation page with links to both Crossroads Plaza (North Carolina) and Crossroads Plaza (Utah). I have not created the article Crossroads Plaza (Utah) but perhaps you would like to. Thank you. --Andrew Kelly (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't change the fact that Crossroads Plaza (North Carolina) isn't really notable. Sure, it may be a vital strip mall, but that's all it is...a strip mall. There's no history, no references...just a list of stores. TheListUpdater (talk) 22:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Crossroads Plaza in Utah does not seem to be any more notable, nor was the article any longer. There are plenty of stubs on Wikipedia. Crossroads Plaza (North Carolina) can be expanded, just as Crossroads Plaza (Utah) can be expanded. --Andrew Kelly (talk) 23:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw on your user page that you wanted a page for bob's game. well I made one a week ago but its Bob's Game with the capitals. so if you really want a page for it then help improve the page because it is going to be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eterpah (talk • contribs) 01:53, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I'm not the one who edited it to say that.

Thanks for posting about the fire. I moved the information you added from List of high schools in Texas to Lockney Independent School District, as there is no article for Lockney High School. If you create the article for Lockney High School, consider using the featured article Plano Senior High School as a model. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Man Cave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Cssiitcic (talk) 21:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Optimax. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optimax. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article City Life (nightclub), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City Life (nightclub) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Spoons Yogurt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add ((hangon)) on the top of Spoons Yogurt and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Breawycker (talk) 19:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering what you thought of this. You abandoned the draft 4 years ago and in the meantime, someone's made a "real" article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheListUpdater/The Mall at the World Trade Center, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheListUpdater/The Mall at the World Trade Center and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TheListUpdater/The Mall at the World Trade Center during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:08, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WTCmall.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spoons Yogurt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoons Yogurt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you plan on doing anything with User:TheListUpdater/Favorite Malls? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:04, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The article 'Latham Circle Mall' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://www.cameronllc.com/PropertyDisplay.aspx?id=1019

• You added this in January 2008.
• The bot tested this link on 4 April, 6 April, 8 April, 13 April, 18 April and today, but it never worked.
• This copy from the archives might be good.

This link is marked with ((Dead link)) in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding ((Bots |deny=BlevintronBot)) to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 00:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheListUpdater/New articles, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheListUpdater/New articles and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TheListUpdater/New articles during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:37, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheListUpdater/Cincinnati Mills, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheListUpdater/Cincinnati Mills and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TheListUpdater/Cincinnati Mills during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you still plan on using this page or not? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:42, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheListUpdater/Northland Center, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheListUpdater/Northland Center and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TheListUpdater/Northland Center during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Short note to explain why I undid your recent edit to this article. There is some disagreement at the moment regarding the chemical involved in the explosion. See the discussion at Talk:West Fertilizer Company explosion/Archive 1#Anhydrous NH3 or Nitrate? Keri (talk) 13:49, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:TheListUpdater/Yoot Tower press release requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheListUpdater/Anchor list, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheListUpdater/Anchor list and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TheListUpdater/Anchor list during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:08, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Galleria Post Oak. Since you had some involvement with the Galleria Post Oak redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:40, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Digging deeper, I found a Chain Store Age article from 1967. But everything else just lists "Galleria, comma, post oak" or "Galleria, slash, post oak", as two different things. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect !!M. Since you had some involvement with the !!M redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ^(chat) 00:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spoons Yogurt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoons Yogurt (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 05:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wii, Page 2. Since you had some involvement with the Wii, Page 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. sst✈ 15:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect !!M. Since you had some involvement with the !!M redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albertsons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Needs table has been nominated for merging with Template:List to table. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheListUpdater. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm working on The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker and saw your name on the list of people who have access to Nintendo Power issues. Would you happen to have access to the Wind Waker review in April 2003, issue 167, p. 132, and/or the article on the "Nintendo Power Awards" from June 2004, issue 180? Thanks,--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albertsons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CVS and ACME. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, TheListUpdater/Albertsons. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Albertsons. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Albertsons – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albertsons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CVS and SuperValu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albertsons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SuperValu and Smith's. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheListUpdater. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheListUpdater. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Safeway Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Farm Fresh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there TheListUpdater, I'm Windyshadow32, a new member of the sadly inactive Wikiproject Shopping Centers. I am trying to revive this project to highlight the unique stories of malls across the country and the world especially as we lose more and more of them. Undoubtedly, we will lose shopping malls due to the challenges we face at this moment. I want to document these stories before it is too late, but I can't do it without your help. I can tell by your contributions to Wikipedia that you care about retail and brands, and will bring the right insight to the project. Please let me know if you'd be willing to help; I really appreciate it!

Windyshadow32 (talk) 06:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Giant-MD and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 14 § Giant-MD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 03:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a friendly reminder about user page categorization.

I've noticed a user page of yours (linked above) is appearing in a regular content category. See Category:Texas navigational boxes under T. This is discouraged. See WP:DRAFTNOCAT and WP:USERNOCAT for additional information.

Usually the situation is remedied by placing a leading colon at the beginning of the category declaration like so:

[[:Category:Texas navigational boxes]]

or, by bracketing category declarations with Template:Draft categories like this:

((Draft categories|
[[Category:Texas navigational boxes]]
))

Either method will disable the category function. Thank you. Cheers! --DB1729^talk 20:12, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...looks like you haven't edited in a while. I took care of it myself.[1] DB1729^talk 22:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]