Archives

/Archive 1 * /Archive 2 * /Archive 3 * /Archive 4 * /Archive 5 * /Archive 6 * /Archive 7 * /Archive 8 * /Archive 9 * /Archive 10 * /Archive 11 * /Archive 12 * /Archive 13 * /Archive 14

On 21 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bear (novel), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Marian Engel's 1976 novel Bear has been called "the most controversial novel ever written in Canada"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bear (novel). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note over at signpost suggestions. FWIW, my dad is from Telkwa, near Smithers. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 01:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! I've got cousins working up there. Haven't visited myself - been as far west as Houston, and to Prince Rupert, but not between. Have you spent much time up there? It's nice country. You should ask your dad if he has any photos - the article needs one! The Interior (Talk) 02:54, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Im in round one of the approved accounts and I havent recived any email. Yoav Nachtailer (talk) 09:59, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yoav Nachtailer, that's no good. You're definitely on the list. Check your spam/junk folder, but I will email JSTOR about your account first thing Monday morning. The Interior (Talk) 18:49, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked it, its not there either. Thank you for helping me. Yoav Nachtailer (talk) 20:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, any news? Yoav Nachtailer (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't live in your part of the world but I traveled somewhat nearby in August 2013. I finally got around to uploading the images now and I see that I have photographs from some tiny communities which don't have articles yet on the stretch of BC95 that I took from the US border to Golden, BC. I'm wondering if you would be willing to start articles for Parson, Castledale and Brisco, BC? The way that municipalities are organized in your part of the world is very different than it is around here. Royalbroil 04:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parso, Castledale and Brisco, like several hundred other places, aren't municipalities. Not sure what your pics are of, exactly, but that area is called the East Kootenay and has a Wikimedia Commons category: here. Only three items in it. From Columbia Lake northwards to Golden, while still part of the East Kootenay, that area is called the Columbia Valley. Your pics may fit in Kootenays (there is no separate East Kootenay article) or Columbia Valley or if of mountains, Purcell Mountains or Canadian Rockies.Skookum1 (talk) 04:36, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Starter stubs can be begun with information found on the BC Names Office search page. See also List of settlements in British Columbia, which redirects somewhere now, maybe List of communities in British Columbia. There are different categories of locations, and municipalities are relatively few and far between in BC history, other than regional districts; many places were company towns, or just ranches or homesteads that have placenames i.e. are places.Skookum1 (talk) 04:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction! It has been very helpful. I didn't understand the precise wording of community names in your area. I visited the upper corner of the United States (Maine) last year and communities are organized very differently there too - if a community is named Plymouth then there's often a East Plymouth and Plymouth Notch nearby. I put up an article (with images) at Brisco, British Columbia and I want to work on Castledale, British Columbia / Parson, British Columbia next. Royalbroil 02:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

situations like Plymouth do occur in BC e.g. West/North Vancouver, or Kelowna/West Kelowna but generally they're rare; often there are places that share the same name, or formerly did, very far apart e.g. Fraser Mills/Lamming Mills; many are named for settlers or postmaster, sometimes re railway-based names they're for company managers or investors, or concocted by realty developers past and present.....there's no consistent pattern, and many aren't in BC Names, also.Skookum1 (talk) 06:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Royalbroil, thanks for starting those, I can add some info over the weekend. (sorry for the late reply, very busy). Our jurisdictions are confusing even to us - we have various administrative divisions for forestry, wildlife, fisheries, electoral areas, regional districts, municipalities, unincorporated settlements, non-official metro areas, Indian reserves, even "resort municipalities"! Many which overlap. It's great! The Wild West of geography. The Interior (Talk) 16:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [2]. keyboard wifi key missing, will inbox you.Skookum1 (talk) 07:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Skookum1, as I've said before, I've become really concerned about your entanglement with WhisperToMe. I have read the discussions, and, to be honest, I find many of your positions overblown, and some even cruel (i.e. your scathing critiques on grammar and very granular local detail). What's the end game here? If you honestly feel that WtM has competence issues (which I'm not sure of at all), you need to get consensus for that, or back off a bit. Otherwise, it will come down to sanctions. Is it not possible to let go here? The Interior (Talk) 16:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The constant grammarian
	Thanks for cleaning up the semi-colon at Owney (dog) File:Cordialgreetings1x pix.gif Cheers 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! and thanks. Colon jokes are fundamental! (got a little sad reading about poor Owney's demise, but I guess he had an interesting run of it) The Interior (Talk) 21:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you enjoyed Owney. While I know I can't "own" it, it is one of my children. Be sure to download the U.S. Postal Service e-book. It's really good! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:14, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Rees, Jerry; Schwartz, Stephen Michael (2011). "Owney: Tales from the Rails" (E-book). National Postal Museum Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved July 26, 2012. Free children's ebook narrated and sung by Trace Adkins. Free children's ebook narrated and sung by Trace Adkins 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Charming! The Interior (Talk) 16:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was approved on the first of February this year, yet I haven't received any email since. I guessed it was delay on their part but I want to confirm from you about what's happening. Yes, I have checked the spam folder as well, nothing, no email for JSTOR. If you could help a bit? Ethically^Yours! 15:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ethically, you are part of the fifth round of applications, which haven't been processed yet by JSTOR. I'll post to WT:JSTOR when the emails go out. Sorry for the long waiting period. The Interior (Talk) 16:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick.

Don't have your email. Don't know how to message you.

Have written draft of Helga Pakasaar and don't know how to move it to SUBMIT.

You have my biz card. Could you pls call or email me.

thanks Carolyn CeeVanArt (talk) 22:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CeeVanArt, I'll take a look! I'll send you an email so you have mine. The Interior (Talk) 22:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eleanor Cripps Kennedy

• ...that Kennedy led a clothing club during the grasshopper plagues?
• ...that The Duchess appealed to Louis Riel?
• ...that after the Sioux forced Kennedy to stay in Manitoba, she imported its second piano?
• ...etc?

Nikkimaria (talk) 23:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I like the grasshoppers! The Interior (Talk) 23:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Interior,

The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problems with the block. You have good judgement. I hope you do not mind that I posted here. It is, if you approve of course, a genuine consideration. It is also a probe. I want to see how he responds to the post. And, if he accepts, and you accept, I would like to see how he conducts himself. Plus, it is a last ditch effort at AGF. By AGF, I mean that really, maybe, the mix of his strong feelings towards certain subjects, and his editing articles on those subjects, causes a chemical reaction and produces a wiki-explosion. Maybe he would be just fine editing less hot subjects. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my experience, Anna, Skookum1 works fine on his own, and when working with people he feels respect him. The problems arise when someone disagrees with him. I don't believe it's topic related so much as related to clashes of personalities. (I've watched him get in fights over things as charged as federal elections, and as tame and apolitical as rivers). But, if you are willing to work with him, I have no problem with that at all. I think you have good judgement as well :) However, I think it's very important that he not engage with WhisperToMe at all in the future. That dynamic is thoroughly poisoned, IMO. Best, The Interior (Talk) 14:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my friend. :) So, not the topic, but rather interaction means risk of clashing. Okay. I agree. Points:

• Wikipedia is usually all about interaction.
• Skookum can only exist here as a lone wolf.
• Some types of editing mean seldom crossing paths with others.
• Blocks are preventative. We cannot punish him for his attacks. We just want him to stop.
• All agree that when the block expires, small chance he will change his ways.
• Some call for indef.
• We have nothing to lose now, but a possible gain -- a long shot. I like long shots. Ninety percent of the time, we have to click a button and call it a loss. Ten percent of the time, Wikipedia makes out nicely. Risk of failure, but at no cost.

So, instead of a block, maybe we should consider offering: Block lifted. He agrees to become a lone wolf. He can dig up images, add infoboxes, format per MOS, add categories, etc. Heck, there are plenty of editors who build this thing with little or no interaction with others. If he cannot help himself, and gets into even one dispute, right or wrong, he's blocked, by me. Period. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm all for it, Anna. Usually, there are so few editors working on British Columbia stuff, one couldn't get in a fight if one tried! Talk about tumbleweeds. And it would be great to get more work done on the many articles that need it. But we need to hear from Skookum1. He's been very opposed to working under any restrictions in the past, and, if I recall, took a voluntary break a while ago rather than discuss it. I'd love to have the knowledgeable, helpful, funny Skookum1 back, but, to be honest, I haven't seen that editor in a while. Things have gotten very angry. Things can change too, of course, and I'd be very happy to see it. If he's okay with your suggestions, I certainly am. The Interior (Talk) 02:47, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BC stuff is indeed tumbleweedy. However, all this may be moot. Skookum's silence is deafening. I do hope he comes back, and as the Skookum we like. I bet he's a really nice person. He's passionate. That's a good thing, as long as it doesn't manifest itself in attacks. All the best. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm a bit worried that we haven't heard from him. BTW, Nice work on the lighthouses list, I see you've got one of my pics in there! I think I have one of two more from the Inside Passage, lemme check the hard drives ... The Interior (Talk) 17:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is none of my business but seeing this editor at ANI so many times over the past two years, this generous offer seems incredibly optimistic. I've never encountered a noncombative Snookum but one who, rather than discussing problems, posts block after block of text, going into repetitive diatribes about the faults of those he objects to. I know he has contributed a lot, content-wise, but he is so easily provoked, I can't see him working on articles without coming into conflict with someone. I think it is admirable though that you are offering him one last, last chance as you are setting up yourselves as his monitors, an unenviable assignment. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Liz. Actually, this offer is not optimistic at all. It is realistic: It has a small chance, but carries almost no cost. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your lighthouse image? Wow. Small wikiworld. I'll check to see which one. Nice. I love image contribs. An image really tells the tale. That reminds me. Someone once said: "Small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it." :) And for some reason, all this reminded me of 9 O'Clock Gun. (I like the ESSO part.) :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You removed my name from the JSTOR application page with an edit summary that said it was being moved to the approved page, but I don't see my name there. It appears that there may have been an editing mix up with the user above me. Can you tell me what my status is? Thanks! --Briancua (talk) 17:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mine also. There were a number of approved requests that were deleted, instead of being moved to Wikipedia:JSTOR/Approved. So what does this mean? I got no notification and would have never known without searching the request page History. Are we now in limbo? — Maile (talk) 17:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, Briancua, — Maile , I distinctly remember saving the approved accounts edit, don't know what happened there. Will fix that. Both of you are approved, and so look for an email this week. Sorry for the confusion, was travelling all day yesterday, and missed the mistake. The Interior (Talk) 17:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm not sure if BrianCUA has gotten anything yet, but I have not. Any idea when it will come? Thanks. --BrianCUA (talk) 00:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Briancua, I haven't gotten anything, either. Guess the waiting is whenever someone gets around to it. — Maile (talk) 12:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BrianCUA, — Maile , I'll inquire. In the past, it can take longer than expected, but the accounts do come through. I'll do an update for everyone at WT:JSTOR when I hear back. The Interior (Talk) 14:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I got an email from you about a week ago and filled out the form, but still don't have log in information. Any idea how long that takes? Thanks for your help with this. --BrianCUA (talk) 14:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused too, when can I expect the email? I would wait patiently but I'm concerned that the email will go to Spam or not even arrive and then I'll never know. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeraphine Gryphon, BrianCUA, — Maile , still stuck in limbo, working on it. Communications are bad. :( Jeraphine, I will post to WT:JSTOR when the emails go out. Sorry for the delays. The Interior (Talk) 16:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, thanks. I can wait patiently now. :p — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All, if you need a specific article while we are waiting, let me know, and I can email it to you. The Interior (Talk) 16:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• The Interior, I got your email with the Google sign-up link two weeks ago on April 10, and filled it out immediately. Nothing else has happened. Do you think it will be much longer? — Maile (talk) 21:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• — Maile , really hoped JSTOR would do the mailout out last Friday, but it looks like not. They said they would do so early this week if it didn't happen on Friday. If I don't hear anything by tomorrow, I'll follow up. But it should be very soon. Sorry for the delay, The Interior (Talk) 20:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, thanks. So far, nothing as of today. — Maile (talk) 21:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• The Interior Still nothing. — Maile (talk) 14:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I got the access just now. Thanks. — Maile (talk) 20:56, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the music barnstar! -Myxomatosis57 (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick—I'm listed as having it, No. 55 in the July 2014 tranche. But no email, so I don't know how to get access. Tony (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tsk, sorry to bother you. I finally dug up an email from them. Thanks for organising. Tony (talk) 15:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, Tony, glad you sorted it out. Let me know if you have any trouble getting in. The Interior (Talk) 16:37, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Did I ever get access? No sign of an email 8-( Andy Dingley (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Andy, as far as I can tell, you didn't fill out the email form (may have gotten lost in your spam folder). Can you email me at earleypathotmail.com and I will get your address into the next mailout? The Interior (Talk) 16:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, email sent Andy Dingley (talk) 16:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Cheers, got it. The Interior (Talk) 16:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Andy, haven't forgotten about you, you'll be in the next Round, hopefully going out in the next week or two. The Interior (Talk) 20:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Andy Dingley (talk) 21:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any progress on this? Andy Dingley (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Sent you a mail, [User:Andy Dingley|Andy]], The Interior (Talk) 18:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

librarian
Thank you for expanding our knowledge about the interior of libraries and books, and for silent support and understanding, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:50, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were the 105th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gerda! Hope all is well with you! The Interior (Talk) 16:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"All" would be saying too much, see my talk ;) - but I am fine, stubbornly staying while others give up or are at least frustrated, - had my most successful DYK yesterday, DYK? - How about you? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eight years ago, you were recipient no. 105 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:43, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I talked about Wikipedia Library on GLAM Wiki Conference with Sadad. He told me that you are hosting a conversation about this other spanish wikipedians. In Wikimedia ES we are exploring the possibility of developing Wikipedia Library-ES. We may contact... Tramullas (talk) 10:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

Thanks for blocking that IP vandal. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 21:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A guy saved by Jesus, no problem! And thank you for the reversions. The Interior (Talk) 21:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The latest library newsletter mentioned that "We are preparing to have a booth at ALA in San Francisco, host an editathon and give a talk." I live just an hour's drive north of San Francisco, and I've available during all the days (except Sunday) of the conference. I'd be happy to help out with the editathon and/or the booth. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 23:37, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent John! The talk is on the Sunday, so unfortunately you'll miss that. But we've got the Editathon on Friday afternoon at the WMF office, and we'd love to have you on hand at the booth whenever you're available. I'll get you more details as things come together. Look forward to meeting you in person! The Interior (Talk) 23:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. I'd love your presence at the Friday editathon and you can also join us Friday evening for the opening gala at the exhibit hall in Moscone center, as well as Saturday at our booth in Moscone. If you want to be a part of that venue I will happily add you as one of the Wikipedia Library exhibitors (you need a badge to enter the exhibit hall). If you're interested in that part of it, will you email me at jorlowitzwikimedia.org with the username you'd like me to register you with (there's no cost, of course). Hope to see you soon! Best, Jake Ocaasi ^{t | c} 02:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ocaasi: Jake - I'm interested in both events on Friday, and helping at the booth on Saturday. I've emailed you, as requested. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was accepted last year, and if my memory serves, I filled out the email form and have login access. My question is, when I want to read certain pages of an article, I am still required to pay for the access, although I have free access to abstracts and searches. Is that how it's supposed to work, or have I done something incorrectly? Atsme☯^Consult 14:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I received access just recently, though a lot, and I mean a LOT, of articles are still behind a paywall. I was so disappointed I thought I'd come back here like, "nevermind, I don't want this, thanks", but looking around more it does seem like I have more access than I did before. Maybe. Not completely sure though what the difference is. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeraphine Gryphon, Atsme, first, the bad news - there are two current limitations on the content with JSTOR. The first is the books content, and the second is the "moving wall" of recently published titles. There's a post on JSTOR talk that outlines this, but I should put that on the main page. (will do this weekend once the yard is cleaned up.) The good news is that we are trying to get at least the books content added - talking to JSTOR about that. Atsme, you should be able to access full text for archive journals - one way to be sure you're linked up with the Wikipedia account is to look in the right margin for the "Your access to JSTOR provided by JSTOR, in collaboration with the Wikimedia Foundation" text. If you are in, one way to avoid abstract-only and restricted results is to select the "Include only content I can access" button in the search window. All that said, there could be an issue with your accounts. Let's test - search "Fraser River" in the advanced search with the "Include only content I can access" button ticked. First result should be "The Fraser River Humbug: Americans and Gold in the British Pacific Northwest", Robert E. Ficken. Let me know whether you can access that full-text. The Interior (Talk) 16:52, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 17:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...I don't see anything in the right margin that says "Your access to JSTOR provided by JSTOR, in collaboration with the Wikimedia Foundation". All I have is login info in a box in the top right corner. I'm allowed to keep up to 3 items on my "shelf" and have to wait 14 days before they can be removed. I'm using the most recent Safari browser on a Mac. Atsme☯^Consult 19:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The access lasts for one year, did that year pass already? — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 06:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet, but it's getting close. Atsme☯^Consult 20:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All accounts should be good until December 2015, they were just extended. Atsme, it doesn't sound like you are signed in. Search your inbox for the email from JSTOR, and try loggin in using those instructions. If you can't find that email, or your login isn't getting you the Wikipedia access, we'll have to touch base with JSTOR this week and see what the issue is. The Interior (Talk) 20:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, TI. I cannot find that email. I did not do a good job archiving last year, but am much better at it now. Atsme☯^Consult 20:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, my archives are a mess. Will look into your account this week Atsme. The Interior (Talk) 21:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on. Thank you so much for your help and time. Atsme ^{☎️ 📧} 22:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alexander Zaldostanov, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Russian biker and political activist Alexander Zaldostanov is a former surgeon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alexander Zaldostanov. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Skookum has returned from his three month block and started right back up with the same battleground behavior, incivility, personal attacks, and general rudeness, just as before.[3] I think an "unblock" review is called for here to prevent further disruption. Viriditas (talk) 03:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Interior, I appear to have got sanctioned access to Jstor (in round 5, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:JSTOR/Round_5_target_list ) Looking forward to using this facility. Please let me know if I need to do something to initiate this process, or just wait. Thanks! fredericknoronha (talk) 23:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know this to. I was approved in January 2015 but since haven't received an email with information about how to access it. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

fredericknoronha, working on it! We've had a bit of a hold-up. You should get a JSTOR email within the next two weeks or so (I'm trying to recycle old, unused accounts as we're at our limit, but it's taking a while - but Round 5 people will definitely get theirs). Liz! I'm sure we mailed one out to you in the early spring, you're on the confirmed list. Maybe search your inbox? If not, let me know, and I'll get you in with this next group. The Interior (Talk) 13:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very muchThe Interior, really appreciate the work you guys put in.fredericknoronha (talk)

I've been told to check my spam folder but I clean that out at least once a week so if was there, it is no longer. But I have some email filters and I'll see if it got sent to one of my Wikipedia mailing list folders. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, try this - Go to https://www.jstor.org/action/myJstorSettings

1. Complete the required fields to register a username and password.
2. Click 'Submit' to complete your registration.

Might just work that way, as your email is on file. The Interior (Talk) 14:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe it...I actually found the original email message! I thought it might have come in January or February but it was December, hence my fruitless efforts to go back into all of these email folders, looking for it. The JSTOR page said I was already registered (it had my email address already) so I'll have to look into it and make sure it's a WikiMedia account and not an account from when I was in graduate school. I'll let you know if I have any problems. Thanks for all of the work you do! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:The InteriorAnytime you could help, I'd really be grateful. Sorry to badger, but am working on this page currently and am stuck for suitable references to build and introduction to the topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poets_in_(and_from)_Goa fredericknoronha (talk) 12:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

fredericknoronha, sorry for the no reply - I have been travelling. Will see if I can find some sources for you, I'll drop by your talk if I find something good. JSTOR accounts should be ready within 10-15 days. The Interior (Talk) 16:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Interior Just a polite reminder.... pls see when this might be possible. Am working on some pages of Konkani litterateurs from Goa, and this could really help. Thank you! fredericknoronha (talk) 21:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The Interior, nice to talk with you. Maybe you can help me. My application for JSTOR was approved on 21 february, I received the mail on 11 april and immediately I filled the Google form. But I don't have the email with the access information yet. Should I wait a little more or is there something wrong? Thanks. Falconaumanni (Carlos for friends) 02:46, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Falconaumanni, we're still hung up recycling accounts (very sorry this is taking longer than I hoped). You are on the list for the next mailout. I really hope to get this sorted by the end of the month, so hang in there. :( The Interior (Talk) 22:33, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had done something wrong :P. I will wait as long as it's necessary. Thanks for your work and thanks for spending time helping us.-Falconaumanni (Carlos for friends) 09:20, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear The Interior, tnx for starting dialogue today by email according my JSTOR account. Indeed, since a year or so I do not have access anymore, reason unknown. I went 3 or 4 times through this registration process, but none of the logins will be accepted.

Yes, I want to keep my account. - But how? Maybe we should start from scratch: New login Name new login Password provided by JSTOR themselves or by WMF. I would kiss shoes if necessary :-).

Kindly yours, --Emeritus (talk) 20:55, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emeritus, sent you a mail on this, let me know if it works for you. The Interior (Talk) 22:34, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye to Language, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

Was wondering if you'd be willing to look over the articles recent GA review and possibly comment on it. --Deoliveirafan (talk) 04:31, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior 15:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a JSTOR account through the Wikipedia library. I find that I don't make frequent use of it. If helpful, I would like to relinquish the account to someone else who could make better use of it. My JSTOR username is kvngrss. ~Kvng (talk) 14:34, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kvng, thanks so much for being proactive, I'll let JSTOR know. This will give me one more account to get to a new applicant. Best, The Interior (Talk) 16:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. For now I have something else I'm working on. But I will let you know. Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Interior!

We talked at Wikimania about meeting up sometime in the next two weeks in Vancouver, maybe with some other Wikipedians. Do you still have time for that? Next week would be ideal. Cheers! Braveheart (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2015 (UTC) (aka Philip)[reply]

Braveheart, let's see what we can do. I'm fighting off a cold today, but let's chat tomorrow and see if we can get some folks together. The downtown library has meeting rooms we can book for 2 hours - might be a good location. The Interior (Talk) 15:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Get well soon, maybe we can arrange a meetup on Wednesday? Braveheart (talk) 00:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Saturday would work too, I'm a bit busy on Thursday and Friday... Braveheart (talk) 21:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's going to have to be Saturday. Busy week, and still trying to get over this cold. What time would work for you? I could get down to the library by about 10- 10:30 and book a meeting room (you can only book them in person and for that day). The Interior (Talk) 00:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(butting into this conversation) Won't we supposed to talk this month, Interior? I forgot until I saw your talk page on my Watchlist. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liz! We definitely were! Wikimania happened, and then I got sick. But on the recovery. When would be a good time for you? The Interior (Talk) 00:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Heya - anytime on Saturday, haven't planned anything yet - whenever it suits you guys best! :-) Braveheart (talk) 03:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shall we just set a time for Saturday, say 11 AM at the library, and see who shows up? Braveheart (talk) 21:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Braveheart, let's do that. I'll get there at opening, and book a meeting spot. I'll send you a mail with my cell number just in case. Quiddity, Jon, you guys interested? We should post to WikiProject Vancouver too. The Interior (Talk) 00:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would love to, but I have plans for the next few weekends (outdoors! and DIY stuffs). Please do ping me for the next one though. :) Quiddity (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Outdoors? Has this account been compromised? The Interior (Talk) 20:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Me, am on the plane to Chile right now. And then when I get back, I'm off to Hawaii. It's a tough life. Back August 22. Happy to meet up thereafter. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 22:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have talked with 2 trekkers about your active interest in Wikipedia Treks Mountains project. They will contact you in near future for possible collaboration. Thanks for your kind help in Wikimania 2015. Take care. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bodhisattwa, wonderful! I will do more postings about the project here on en.wiki this week. It was great to meet you in Mexico! The Interior (Talk) 15:35, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a team from West Bengal recently went for a high altitude trek to Kalindi Khal pass in Garhwal Himalayas under the Wikipedia treks Kalindi Khal project. They asked for grants from WMF and to my utter surprise, it was approved. I think, it was a hasty and rather immature decision to request for grant from the foundation. There were many valid and embarrassing questions from other users showing the loop holes of the Wikipedia treks Mountains project. Now, to my opinion, we need to questions carefully and act accordingly to turn it into a full-proof project for future endeavors. Regards. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 21:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bodhisattwa, great progress and congratulations to the Kalindi Khal team on the Grant! (I don't feel it was an hasty decision to apply early - sometimes the only way to work out problems is to get things going!) I am very happy to hear about the Kalindi Khal trek, and look forward to seeing the images. Are you going on this trek? The Interior (Talk) 17:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Due to some personal problems, I had to leave my plan for the trek. May be next year. :-) -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:21, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bodhisattwa, that is sad to hear. I hope the problems are being solved :( Maybe next year I can join in! The Interior (Talk) 14:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trans Am Totem, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Trans Am Totem (pictured), a sculpture in Vancouver, Canada, incorporates both a Pontiac Trans Am and a cedar tree? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trans Am Totem. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:46, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Willy Mitchell at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Willy Mitchell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Willy Mitchell used money awarded to him after being shot in the head by a police officer to buy an electric guitar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Willy Mitchell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 September 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Churn Creek Protected Area, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Churn Creek Protected Area in British Columbia has hoodoos and flammulated owls? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Churn Creek Protected Area. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just following up with the Reconciliation Canada article. I was wondering if you needed any more information or had any questions?Jpvancouver15 (talk) 22:06, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed that you're here, and I wanted to say, Welcome. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.--ragesoss (talk) 20:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Finally!  :) :) :) The Interior (Talk) 20:36, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted an anon changing (with poor capitalization) the Thomas Mulcair article to show Justin Trudeau as PM. Although he has won, Harper remains PM until the results are officially confirmed (and perhaps even for some time thereafter). You may want to police that article and possibly may need to lock it down temporarily. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 03:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) He may be too busy celebrating to respond immediately...--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 03:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye on it today. In the interests of staying neutral, I'll just say this about last night - I'm glad we got out and voted. 70% participation is beautiful! The Interior (Talk) 16:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral is so vanilla; it's the taupe of adjectives! That being said, the turn-out was fantastic.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vanilla is so yummy though! My lefty cousins in the Kootenays were all out volunteering registering voters - got their participation rate in their riding up to 75%! The Interior (Talk) 16:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's A Fact: I made ghee whiz popcorn the other day. I'll take a pic next time and send it to you.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This I need to see! TBH, my version didn't get the blending I desired. Sort of stratified on me. The Interior (Talk) 23:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I pop the popcorn in the ghee, then toss with half ghee/half butter topping. Finally, drizzle with Cheez Whiz (ha ha! Spellcheck thinks Cheez isn't a word! Apparently spellcheck has never eaten in a University res cafeteria). It ends up a bit clumpy, but the million calorie intake and insulin spike makes the clumps irrelevant.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, have now tried your method. Had to get new ghee, mine had gone a bit cloudy on me. This is definitely the better approach. It's odd that the whiz really won't mix well with other oils - it's pretty much all oil! But it worked nicely, if a bit clumpy as you say. I even went for a fusion trifecta - added a bit of powdered salsa (yes, it's a real thing) to the butter/ghee - not bad, I must say. We should document this on the Internet or something. The Interior (Talk) 16:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All but one of the books that I requested from McFarland were delivered to me by email. They look excellent, and I have already used some of them to add material to Wikipedia articles. I have had a problem with the remaining book, "Radio Stars" by Thomas A. Delong, however.

Kristal Hamby, Advertising Coordinator at McFarland, wrote me that the PDF file was too large to send as an attachment to email. Instead, she sent me a link to an FTP page from which I could download the file. That, in itself, was not a problem. The download went fine. Unfortunately, when I opened the downloaded file, the type was so blurred as to be illegible.

I wrote to Ms. Hamby asking if she could look into the situation and perhaps arrange for another PDF to be made available for downloading. For some reason, however, my message was returned with the comment, "Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently." I tried writing to her again but received a similar response.

I realize that this is probably beyond your purview as coordinator of allocating books from McFarland, but I wondered if perhaps you know someone at the company who could help with the PDF problem. If you can give me a name and an email address or telephone number, I will be glad to make the inquiry. I'm sure you are already busy enough without having my problem added to your list of things to do.

I will appreciate any help that you can give. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Blick, I'll pass this on to my contact at McFarland today, and see if they have any advice. I'll update you when I hear back. The Interior (Talk) 18:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I appreciate that.Eddie Blick (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Homemade mac and cheese cooked until crispy in individual ramekins, topped with duck confit. Quack and cheese. Boom! extends arm. drops mic.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MenomenaMomsCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Fisk&curid=51608&diff=697040762&oldid=697039301

First of all one of the sources was not a blog, but a book review published in The Guardian

Secondly Blogs are reliable sources if published by experts in the field- such as Brian Whitaker who is a credentialed journalist at The Guardian, and As'ad AbuKhalil who is a Lebanese political scientist and analyst and has been invited many times on different news stations to be interviewed.Rajmaan (talk) 21:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rajmaan. Could you please read the sentences directly following the one you have quoted, especially this one: "Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer." That is pretty clear. As for the book review, it would make a good source for an article on the book in question, but not to make assertions in the biography. This conversation would be better on Talk:Robert Fisk, though - I'd ask you to take it there if you would like to continue. The Interior (Talk) 21:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yes, I haven't been very active for some time, but still pop in now and then. You got Rivers of North America? How nice! I assume it's as much of a tome as it looked to be. On the Thompson River pages, well, I'm not sure. It's a general issue that happens a lot on many river pages. I think I'm the one who made the South and North Thompson pages into actual pages instead of redirects. And I think the main reason I wanted to was so they could have their own geoboxes with stats specific to them at the top of the page. Oh, and so each would have a coordinate locator at the top—so they would show up in things like Google Earth and Maps—though Google Maps removed the Wikipedia links long ago, didn't they? Still, I think there are various sites and tools that use the page-top coordinates to link to pages, generate lists, make maps, etc.

In short, I'm not sure what the best solution is. I guess some river tributaries obviously deserve their own pages while others are not so clear. An example somewhat similar to this one is the Flathead River. I think originally I had the three or four forks as subsections on one page, then Shannon1 made separate pages for them. Then there are difficult things where famous rivers join to form a shorter, less famous river, like the Apalachicola River and the Chattahoochee River. In my area, I could never quite figure out what to do with the Snohomish River, which is among the biggest rivers flowing into Puget Sound near me, but people are generally at least as familiar with the names of its tributaries Snoqualmie (which itself has well-known forks) and Skykomish.

So yea, I don't know what's best. I tended to err on the side of more pages, although that creates the challenge of making some kind of summary/overview for the main stem necessary. I think I had planned to write an overview for the Snohomish River page, but never got around to it. Merry and happy to you and yours too! Pfly (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pratyya ^(Hello!) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2016. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2016 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2016 go well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding ((subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year)) to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.

Happy New Year!

The Interior,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:47, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Hi, can you help me please by moving Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia talk:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/Missing municipalities over the redirect to Wikipedia talk:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/Missing municipalities? This started when I moved Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/Missing municipalities to Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/Missing Indian reserves and the associated talk page before I realized there was one thread on the talk page that was more appropriate to leave behind. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 20:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, could you delete the Canaan No. 255, Saskatchewan that I created by accident? It should have been 225 instead of 255. Hwy43 (talk) 01:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hwy43,  Done. Hope you are having a happy new year, The Interior (Talk) 02:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir, and hope you are having the same as well! Hwy43 (talk) 03:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for deleting the error page Rivier Des Roches.Spidersmilk (talk) 19:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Spidersmilk! The Interior (Talk) 01:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the correctly spelled page I created for the Alberta river: Rivière des RochersSpidersmilk (talk) 21:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, Spidersmilk, I'll try to help out. But I'm focusing on the Thompson River for now! The Interior (Talk) 02:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've just signed up for a new university course so now have access via their library to JSTOR. Therefore, please remove my Wikipedia sponsored JSTOR access and give it to someone else - thanks! QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting us know, QuiteUnusual. I'll try to get your account passed on to one of the waitlisted people. Best, The Interior (Talk) 15:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	Hoping you enjoyed the recently-held in-person Art+Feminism meetup, we cordially invite you continue your participation by joining the worldwide virtual online event hosted by Women in Red. March 2016 (Women's History Month)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:44, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The Interior. Is there a typo and grammar issue here? I do not understand this sentence:

Designed to streamline and standardize how archives are cited in Wikipedia, the template can support a variety of uses, from simply citing a finding aid, to specifying folders, fonds, files and more.

Nice work. Cheers! ((u|Checkingfax)) {Talk} 19:00, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Checkingfax! Does this edit make it a bit more clear? I was trying to convey that the template supports a wide variety of archival terminology/standards used around the world (there is significant regional variation). The Interior (Talk) 20:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) If what you suspected to be a typo is fonds, then no, it’s a “term of art” in the archiving business.—Odysseus1479 21:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, The Interior. That flows much better for my non-archivists mind. I wikilinked fonds so nobody will be likely to change it to fonts. Cheers! cc to: Odysseus1479 ((u|Checkingfax)) {Talk} 21:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Fan For You!

		Fan!
		((subst:REVISIONUSER)) has given you a fan! Fans are good for two reasons: They blow air and allow hot Wikipedians to cool off, and also cheer them on when they need it, Just like a fan of a football or basketball team. Cool off, and enjoy the cheering and the breeze. Hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread "WikiLove" and "WikiCheers" by giving someone else some a fan, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or someone who just needs a some fan to cheer them on and/or a good, refreshing breeze. To spread the goodness of fans, you can add ((subst:fan)) to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

~~~~

Spidersmilk (talk) 02:54, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing this message to you because you put yourself down as a regular admin at DYK.

Per this AN thread, LavaBaron is given editing restrictions on DYK. Any hook nominated or reviewed by LavaBaron must be reviewed by a second editor before it may be promoted to the main page. The restrictions are reproduced below as follows:

1. A DYK article nomination or hook submitted by LavaBaron must be reviewed and accepted by 2 other editors before it may be promoted.
2. Any DYK nomination reviewed by LavaBaron must also be reviewed and accepted by 1 other editor before it may be promoted.
3. Any additional reviews by other editors, which are mandated by this restriction, shall count towards the QPQ of that editor.
4. (To balance the maths) For each article submitted by LavaBaron to DYK, 2 QPQ reviews by LavaBaron are required, at least 1 of which shall be a nomination that had not yet been accepted by another editor.
5. These restrictions shall initially last for a period of 3 months. At the end of the period, this restriction shall be reviewed.

--Deryck C. 13:45, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Interior. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.— Avi (talk) 17:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Your oddities page is amazing. Iazyges (talk) 01:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Interior. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

I am having some worries and frustrations right now with the DYK nomination process--I have nominated the article I recently did a big expansion on and helped push to GA, the Wrecking Crew (music). Let me explain: After nominating that article, and in accordance with the DYK guidelines, I did my part and reviewed another article nominated for DYK, Gustaf Nyström. When picking an article to do a review on, I wanted to select one that I felt was a viable candidate. I had seen a bunch of articles nominated that I did't think I could approve in good conscience, so passed them up--I didn't want to be the bad guy to have to say "no". Whereas, the Gustaf Nyström piece seemed have good potential for DYK. I felt it needed a few extra things, so, in my review I mentioned that it needed more sources (at the time it only had two) and more in-line citations. Another editor, EEng, stepped in and, in a not-so-kind way, told me that two is enough. While taken somewhat aback by his tone and seeming lack of concern for the betterment of the article, I kindly told him that I am not as familiar with the DYK process (I have only done one nomination previously). I generously admitted to him that his point was probably correct, but that my personal feeling was that, since the article is going to be showcased on the front page of Wikipedia, we wanted to make it look extra-good--that was why I asked for more sources. The author of the article initially was very thankful and complimented me for my constructive remarks, but EEng's subsequent comments caused him to become critical of my initial advice. This got me a bit miffed, because, my only intention had been to help him out. I made a remark that I felt that we should be focusing on the betterment of the article, not the "more than two" request--that issue had already been satisfactorily addressed. But, I now felt that my role as a reviewer was being disrespected. I went ahead and approved his article anyway for DYK, because I believe in being fair. But, it left me with a bad taste in my mouth. And, I regarded EEng's comments as not only lecuring and rude, but also counter-productive and even downright disruptive to the process. I had no intention of walking into a hostile situation, but that is exactly what I got.

And, now I am now concerned about the Wrecking Crew article I nominated and its DYK chances. It has been languishing a long time on the nomination page and no one has yet reviewed it. I worry that an unfair editor may get their hands on it and try to sink it--I ask that EEng not be allowed to do the come near my nomination--I need people that will be fair. I worked really hard on the article--I did a massive expansion and helped get it up to GA. I would have thought that a hundred people would be waiting in line to nominate it, or at least review it. I have written over 150 articles and if you look at them, they are of consistently good quality--but I have reserved only two large-scale projects (Garage rock and the Wrecking Crew) for DYK nomination, so no one can say that I am encumbering the DYK page with excessive requests. After my expansion (and GA) of the Garage rock article last year, its DYK process was equally frustrating, though it did eventually go DYK. After its DYK review passed, it sat around forever before it got in the queue--I had to watch all of the more recent and smaller articles pass it by--I ended up having to write a message to the editors begging them to get it onto the queue. There has to be a better way than this for editors who finish big projects. I ask for someone's kind understanding. When you've worked hard as I have to make Wikipedia a better place, stuff like this seems like a slap in the face. Garagepunk66 (talk) 01:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I spoke to Wehwalt and expressed the same concern. He indicated that he would do help me and do the DYK review. I thank both of you for your kindness. Garagepunk66 (talk) 08:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi, quick question, I subscribed for the newsletter but have not received it, when exactly is the next one due? thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This week. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:52, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Interior.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Interior,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. I just signed on to the waitlist for JSTOR access and noticed that the last time an account had been activated was in June of this year. I am curious if the project allowing for JSTOR access is still active or if it has become defunct since it has been so long that new members for the project have been approved. VinceLeibowitz (talk) 16:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, VinceLeibowitz. I'm not directly involved in the accounts dispersal anymore (and really should take my name down!), but the situation last time I was working with them is that we have a "cap" of 500 accounts, and folks are waitlisted until the JSTOR and the TWL team does a review of unused accounts, then transfers inactive ones to to waitlistees. Which can take some time, but does happen. They are very popular accounts. However, Nikkimaria might have more details ... The Interior (Talk) 23:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, we're at the cap so there aren't presently any accounts available - there might be more in the new year. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Interior. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To: The Interior, Neelix, Niikkimaria, Amqui

I have some familiarity with our GLAM and Wikipedians in Residence initiatives, but I have not been closely involved with either project.

I am an OTRS agent and field in an email from an individual associated with the government of Nova Scotia. They are interested in working closely with Wikipedia particularly regarding cultural history issues.

I have already shared links to our COI policy, to the GLAM initiative Wikipedia:GLAM, and to the WiR page (https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedian_in_Residence)

They have responded with interest in pursuing this and I promise to help put them in touch with someone. As you may know, I cannot share the contents of OTRS emails without permission but they have given me permission. If you happen to be an OTRS agent see: ticket:2016121310018191

If not, let me know and I will copy the email.

I see this as a potential exciting new initiative. While we have many examples of Wikipedians in Residence, I do not see any that are representatives of a provincial government, so this may be breaking exciting new ground.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, see User_talk:Amqui#Nova_Scotia.2C_GLAM_and_WiR--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

In addition, the WikiProject is seeking a new facilitator/coordinator to handle the logistics of the award. Please contact L235 if you are interested in helping with the logistics of running the award in any capacity. Remove your name from here to unsubscribe from further EotW-related messages. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Sara Mameni, The Interior!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 22:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! We are students writing an article on Manzanillo Port as part of our class Academic Discourse and Writing at Tec de Monterrey. Since you are an experienced Wikipedia and have an interest in these kind of topics, we would like to know if you could take a few moments to take a look at the article and give us feedback. Thank you for your time.--Arantza Cruz (talk) 21:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charleston Conference is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charleston Conference until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. South Nashua (talk) 21:15, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! I noticed you wrote 2 Canadian biographies for the WIR World Contest. If you'd like, you can add these to the Canada 10k challenge with the link above. Thanks for all your work on the contest! – Reidgreg (talk) 12:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, The Interior. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, your name came up in a search around IP Law and the Domain drop catchanks.hing article. I believe some improvements to the article are in order, particular with a Criminal Law aspect on top of the IP Law aspect, so dropping you a line. Thanks.207.228.171.212 (talk) 23:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! So, I'm not really informed enough to go at that article without some heavy reading, but we'll see. Out of curiousity, where did you see my name come up? The Interior (Talk) 19:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">[[User:The Interior|<font color="brown">The</font><font color="green"> Interior</font>]] [[User Talk:The Interior|(Talk)]]</span> : The Interior (Talk)

to

<span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">[[User:The Interior|<span style="color: brown;">The</span><span style="color: green;"> Interior</span>]] [[User Talk:The Interior|(Talk)]]</span> : The Interior (Talk)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 06:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, I believe. Thanks for the heads up. The Interior (Talk) 18:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 22:00, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — xaosflux ^Talk 17:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• K xaosflux, thanks for the note. The Interior (Talk) 18:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April. April+Further with Art+Feminism
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

Hello!
I'm reaching out to you today to let you know about a project the Yukon Arts Centre is doing, April 28th 2018, called Indigenize Wikipedia.

Valerie Salez is spear heading a project titled Conversations. This New Chapter project centres around activating a document held in the archives of the Trondek Hwechin Heritage Department (The Han Gwich’in Peoples Government in Dawson City, Yukon). The document contains the minutes of an impromptu meeting between Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau and five Yukon First Nations leaders in August of 1977, regarding the then-approved Mackenzie Pipeline. The minutes of this meeting clearly reveal two opposing cultures and two opposing ways of understanding economic, social and cultural development, with the land and its inhabitants as the focus.

While researching events and people connected to this document, Salez noticed there was a lack of information available. Online searches have become a valuable first step to researching any topic. Wikipedia gained its name to fame as a peer sourced online encyclopedia. However, there is little to no information regarding key Yukon First Nations people. Let us indigenize Wikipedia. The goal is to have Yukoners create and/or add to wiki pages that highlight Yukon First Nations leaders, policy makers, politicians, cultural workers, artists/crafters, hunters, gatherers, community contributors, aunties, uncles, grandparents. This can be anyone alive or passed.

We are proposing a drop-in style event to allow people to contribute to Wikipedia. We are inviting people from the public and from organizations to contribute to writing, editing, or posting to Wikipedia about Yukon First Nations people.

If this interests you, I would be excited to hear your thoughts about this. Also, please pass this along if you know of anyone who would be interested! Heathervon (talk) 23:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Interior. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Freddie Neese".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cabayi (talk) 13:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Soopaphilb/Freddie Neese, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Soopaphilb/Freddie Neese and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Soopaphilb/Freddie Neese during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 14:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Patrik,

Can you kindly comment on the length of wait-list as to JSTOR access, over WP Library?!

Best,~ Winged Blades^Godric 09:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: It's been quite some time since new accounts became available. Sam may have more details. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Winged Blades of Godric: - we have quite a long waitlist for JSTOR but unfortunately haven't had any new accounts to distribute for some time. The original plan was to wait for our proxy authentication access method to be ready and then expand the number, but given that we've hit some delays with that I've just inquired as to whether we might be able to get some new accesses in the meantime. I'll let you know if we're able to get some :) Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 11:29, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Borked my ping, so re-pinging here: @Winged Blades of Godric: Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 11:29, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's very much helpful and appreciated:) ~ Winged Blades^Godric 13:10, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90

		An exciting new month for Women in Red! August 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10 Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Notable women, broadly-construed! For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards. It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August. Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Country Winners
• Diversity winner
• High quality contributors
• Gender-gap fillers
• Page improvers
• Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

Thank you very much for signing up to participate in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 200 articles created in over seven (7) languages! The figures soars to up to a thousand, if Wikidata entries are included. Furthermore, there have been about 5 in-person gatherings of Wikipedians in different countries across the world to create articles about African(a) cinema!

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

• Article suggestions can be found here. You can also add to this list.
• Some notable reliable sources for African cinema can be found here. Again, this list needs expansion.
• Interested in Wikidata translation? check out the Occupation Drive, which is being led by Wiki Loves Women, in support of the contest and the project!
• Please remember to list articles you have created or improved in the Article Achievements section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked.

Thank you once again for being part of this global event!

Kind regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Interior. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

The Months of African Cinema Global Edit-a-thon was concluded on 30 November 2018, and we've had amazing results. Over 570 articles were created across 8 language-Wikipedias. 7 in-person gatherings of Wikipedians were organized across different parts of the world.

All our winners have been recognized and you can check the complete list here.

For a pilot event, all our expectations were surpassed and we have you to thank for that. Thank you so much for being part of this global event! Thank you for helping to fix African content gaps on Wikipedia! We hope to see more of your participation in future AfroCine events and activities. Please remember to signup on the main WikiProject participants page, in order to get updated with these activities.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117 Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1000 Women in Religion: A Wikipedia edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver, British Columbia

The 1000 Women in Religion Project is working to improve the coverage of women’s contributions to religious, spiritual and wisdom traditions worldwide. In support of this goal, the edit-a-thon at Atla's (formerly the American Theological Library Association) annual meeting will focus on improving articles about women in religion. We would love to have a few Vancouver area Wikipedians to help us get new editors oriented and editing!! Wednesday, June 12, 2019 8:00am-12:00pm Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre 1088 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2R9 Canada For more details or to sign up, see: Wikipedia edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual Meeting" in Vancouver, British Columbia. For security reasons everyone attending the edit-a-thon must pre-register with Atla here or on our Vancouver Meetup page by May 31st. For questions, please contact: Dzingle1

Dzingle1 (talk)Dzingle1 (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pacific Salmon Commission (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Detox research you are listed as participating in has been mentioned at Wikipedia:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram#Data analysis for tone. DuncanHill (talk) 17:22, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please check or create page: Draft:Aybars İbak Can you create:Aybars İbak? Akagunduzsa01 (talk) 04:37, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Diversity winner
• Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior, I'm trying to do my first DYK nomination on both Bob Hope and Riverside International Raceway, could you give me a hand in getting it fixed so that it can be placed on the main page TIA. Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Hope this is my first time trying this DYK mess :)

TVSRR (talk) 21:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up a citation.

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know § DYK Twitter bot. KCVelaga (talk) 11:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:47, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:InterCanadienLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spiegel & Grau (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]