Hello, Theanonymoustypist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Max H. Vogt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Siepmann, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brendan Fallis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Fallis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 19:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siepmann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siepmann".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Werner Merzbacher has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MaxnaCarta (talk) 00:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Werner Merzbacher, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Samuel Frey, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you please temporarily admit it into Wikipedia? It's written up-to-par with Wiki standards. There are six citations which refer him as Cantonal legislator which is enough to be listed. There are only citations for major newspaper since in Switzerland the archives are not entirely digitalized (therefore I am unable to break it down even further). Theanonymoustypist (talk) 13:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ed McMullen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charleston. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne Meiman Hughes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairfield.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost entirely unsourced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samuel Frey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 07:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Objection. There are reliable sources, one call away in the State Archives of Aargau. I cannot do more than tell you the signature of the archived materials, there was a previous discussion regarding adding this politician on the German wiki (since there are three of them bearing the same name). I was asked to add this article to avoid confusion. Theanonymoustypist (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, that would almost certainly be WP:OR and not useful here - not to mention that telling someone to visit an archive in person is a bit much for the purposes of verifiability! -- asilvering (talk) 17:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, but thats totally unreasonable. There are at least 2-3 sources provided (for a person that understands German) to see that this person was a member of the Grand Council of Aargau between 1901 and 1919. There is an acceptance letter provided in the form as picture (which I obtained from the archives). The notability is there on either side as a politician (see my log, I know what I'm writing about) or as a pioneer of the paper industry. Please watch closely and reconsider. Thanks. Theanonymoustypist (talk) 18:40, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looking back at the draft, I'm not really sure why you're arguing with me in the first place? I declined the article for being almost entirely unsourced. You've since added nearly 5kb of references. I don't see what was unreasonable about my decline, and you've done what was asked of you, which was to add more references. Now, you wait for another reviewer to have a look. -- asilvering (talk) 19:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't get me wrong but that is simply ridiculous. I not only added references, I added literature and several more citations. The most important citations are there now which make the article notable for Wikipedia standards. Never has an article of mine be 'attacked' in this way. I don't know what else you need to have cited to admit the article into the encyclopedia. Normally, if minor issues there is 'citation needed' added behind and not the entire article is being declined. Some of the references are archive based and can only be indicated by signature of the archive. The most important reference due to political activity has been given, therefore the article is admissable. Theanonymoustypist (talk) 20:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, you have improved the article. You have resubmitted it for review. I strongly suspect the reviewer will object to archival sources, but maybe they won't, or maybe they will accept the article and simply remove those parts; I don't know. de-wiki and en-wiki have different standards and WP:V is taken extremely seriously here, whereas de-wiki is more comfortable with uncited material as long as it appears factual and neutral. I'm sorry you feel that your work has been attacked, but I assure you that this is extremely normal and no one is going to think less of you or your draft for being declined. It has not been rejected outright, and is now waiting for a reviewer. -- asilvering (talk) 01:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm briefly following-up here. Is there a way to temporarily admit the article into Wiki until someone else can approve? I can add some alternate sources possibly from literature I've recently consulted. Theanonymoustypist (talk) 15:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mm, technically yes, but it's often frowned upon. I'll explain:

There are two types of "approval" that an article can go through. The first is AfC, where the article is waiting now. While an article is waiting to be "approved" through AfC, it is in draft form and not in mainspace. The second is WP:NPP, which is supposed to happen to all new articles in mainspace, whether they have been AfC reviewed or not. NPP can take several different actions: they can mark the article as "patrolled" (ie, "approve" it), they can add maintenance tags, they can send the article back to draftspace and tag it for AfC, or they can tag it for deletion outright.

So, any new article is "temporarily admitted until approved", in the NPP sense. With AfC, there is no way to "temporarily admit" - the point is that AfC happens before mainspace. You're under no obligation to use AfC, so you can simply remove the AfC tags and move this article to mainspace yourself - nothing is stopping you, technically. But in general, that's often looked down on; once it's in AfC it's typically better to leave it there. Additionally, this article in particular was already moved to AfC by a new page patroller, so NPP won't be happy to see it back without having been accepted through AfC. That said, both the initial NPP patroller and the initial AfC reviewer (ie, me) objected to the lack of clear sourcing in the article, and you've significantly improved that since. It's not like you'd be moving the article straight back to mainspace without improvements after it was draftified.

I'd advise you to leave it in AfC, and to add the additional sources. That it's been in the queue for a month suggests that reviewers don't think it's an easy call (the really obvious declines tend to happen very quickly). -- asilvering (talk) 18:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 07:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kim Lundgren requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.legendseu.com/pages/kim-lundgren. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist,

Thank you for creating Regine Sauter.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I know this is a new article. Please add citations to un-cited paragraphs. To establish notability there needs to be more references. Feel free to remove these tags after addressing the issues. Thanks for contributing!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Bruxton)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 19:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Aeschi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Baar and Licentiate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Theanonymoustypist! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Sm8900 (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Academia Engiadina, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Anna Giacometti is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kimberly Fiorello, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ueli Forster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Licentiate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alexandre Arnault. Thanks! Pbritti (talk) 18:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Dottikon ES, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Werner Merzbacher, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Lenz & Staehelin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Tesei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Tesei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 04:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Werner Merzbacher".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:L. Scott Frantz.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Diamond Garcia.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Kulm Hotel St. Moritz.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Theanonymoustypist, just a heads-up for you: alchetron.com is a Wikipedia mirror and can't be used as a source in a Wikipedia article. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 19:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I have just noticed. Please delete the citation. Theanonymoustypist (talk) 21:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Bateel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AaronWikia (talk) 02:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bateel Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AaronWikia (talk) 02:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Emilia Fester official.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Caraluzzi's, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Mauro Tuena is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Matthias Kleiner, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Susanne Vincenz-Stauffacher, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Throast. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on David Dobrik, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Throast ^{((ping)) me!} (talk | contribs) 12:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Andreas Jacobs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Georg Malin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 23:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bob Neuenschwander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samuel Frey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– bradv 02:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Objection

Hi, I'm terribly sorry but this needs to be entered. He was a politician (Grand Council of Aargau) which is enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article. There are several citiations citing him as "Grossrat" which is the legislator. Theanonymoustypist (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Theanonymoustypist It looks to me like you manually commented that at the bottom of the AfC decline message, so I don't think bradv will get a notification about it, and he probably won't notice you said anything. You can resubmit the article if you like, and leave your comment at the top of it (like my earlier comments are). AfC reviewers will notice it there for sure. -- asilvering (talk) 01:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I re-reviewed the draft, and am inclined to accept it unless asilvering or Bradv have objections. Members of Swiss cantonal parliaments pass WP:NPOL so he is notable, and there has been considerable sourcework since the February decline. While the sourcing is not perfect and there are still unsourced spots and some poor grammar, it seems good enough considering the subject is dead and there is a corresponding article in de.wiki. Curbon7 (talk) 04:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm curious how you can say this is automatically notable when List of members of the Grand Council of Aargau (2021–2024) is full of red links, and previous elections don't even have such lists. But if you think it's notable go ahead. – bradv 04:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WP:NPOL says that state-type legislature members are "presumed notable". Since it's AfC, not AfD, my interpretation of the guideline is that if there's a "presumed notable" we should accept unless there are other major problems, and let AfD have at it if anyone is inclined to take it there. Re: the redlinks specifically, I'd expect a lot of red links on anything about Switzerland or Austria tbh. Germany topics are usually better-covered. -- asilvering (talk) 04:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perhaps you're right, but notability requires verification, and the sourcing on this article is abysmal. Maybe someone can find some better sources and then it can survive an AfD. Either way, if anyone thinks this is worthwhile then they should accept it and we can go from there. – bradv 04:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, there is an easy explanation about those many red links within the Swiss cantonal legislatures. The cantonal parliaments are part-time only and many of those politicians write their entries themselves (when they are actually interested in having one). Then this is mostly only in one or two official languages. I already started to translate a lot of articles (National Council) into English since there is also a lack (and this would be comparable to the House of Representatives in the US).

As far as the 'Samuel Frey' article goes. There aren't many sources you can cite directly because the cantonal archives with further records aren't entirely digitalized. I have added several citations right behind the office from the newspapers archive (the only one that's digitalized a majority of Swiss newspaper from the 19th and 20th century) - there is a picture attached to the article which shows his acceptance into the legislature. Further he founded a major Swiss company which is very well-known. Please admit this article into Wikipedia - it's relevance is obivous. Theanonymoustypist (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've tried to explain above that sources from cantonal archives are not typically acceptable on en-wiki. We require published, secondary sources. "Relevance" is a de-wiki concept. en-wiki, for the most part, only considers the sourcing in articles, not anything inherent to the subject itself. -- asilvering (talk) 14:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Correct, but six sources referring him as "Grossrat" by notable newspapers such as NZZ should be enough to get this article admitted. Period. Theanonymoustypist (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry, but that is not consistent with notability guidelines. You're welcome to believe and to argue that it should be enough, but it currently is not. -- asilvering (talk) 14:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Honestly, this is ridiculous. There are the only sources that are obtainable in this article. There is an acceptance letter copied (including the origin of this from the State Archive). He is relevant alone in the politician category - but how to proof? Are you proficient of the German language? There are also so called 'state calendars' attached which are used for official governmental communication (eg about new members where he is mentioned in 1901 through 1919). If this is not enough how would any article proof here. Theanonymoustypist (talk) 14:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

just to add usually one source (from the State - the government agency in itself) should be enough Theanonymoustypist (talk) 14:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have no problem with that, though you may want to check for verifiability (I haven't, and I recall there were a bunch of archival sources involved earlier). As an fyi, de-wiki has a very different notability system than en-wiki, so a corresponding de-wiki article doesn't necessarily mean much here (there are a lot more SNGs on de-wiki, basically). That's not a problem in this particular case because we have WP:NPOL. -- asilvering (talk) 04:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

also for you Cantonal legislators are usually admitted without problem (I've translated a few of those). Secondly, this person founded a major Swiss company and was very active as philanthropist. Absolutely notable and normally there is no discussion to admit such an article rather easily. Theanonymoustypist (talk) 13:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hi I’ve just come across this discussion. I believe Samuel Frey is notable and I’d be prepared to move the article back to mainspace. However the problem with it is that it has excessive unsourced detail. If you are cinten5 for me to remove the unsourced parts, I’ll move the article over. Mccapra (talk) 21:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I can do that Theanonymoustypist (talk) 21:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tell you what - I’ll edit it to bring it into line with other bios and see if you’re happy with my changes. Mccapra (talk) 06:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ok I’ve finished. See what you think. Mccapra (talk) 07:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, its fine to me. Just get the article submitted. Thank you! Theanonymoustypist (talk) 14:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

done and now in mainspace at Samuel Frey. Mccapra (talk) 16:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cantonal Council of St. Gallen, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jan Marsalek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federal Criminal Police Office.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Justlettersandnumbers. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, James Fillis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeff Gordon (politican), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 00:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Academia Engiadina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Date of birth needs to be backed up with a source. In the "Personal life" section, the sentence "She is a daughter of Didier Guyot" can be confusing, as the subject of the previous sentence is Kanye West, and the "she" should be changed to "Géraldine Guyot".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexandre Arnault and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. For such simple files as File:Fellows Auctioneers Logo.svg you may use ((PD-textlogo)) instead of ((Non-free logo)). This is better since the use of free files are less restricted than non-free files. Jonteemil (talk) 01:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from nl.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. It looks as though the en.wiki article may be a part-translation from one or more other wikis. If you can confirm whether you translated material for this article I’ll add the template to the talk page for you if it is needed. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 21:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Auberge Resorts, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:44, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dottikon ES, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Academia Engiadina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Bahr, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Bahr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adam Dunsby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newtown, Pennsylvania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lenz & Staehelin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helen Berggruen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Berggruen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Edwardx (talk) 22:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the ((edit COI)) template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - Hipal (talk) 19:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dottikon ES".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Seawolf35 (talk) 16:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sibel Arslan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Margaret Chanler Aldrich, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Margaret Chanler Aldrich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rokeby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bateel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Caraluzzi's, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mike Egger, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Philippe de Weck, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:16, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

To meet the inclusion criteria, multiple references via independent, reliable sources that provide extensive coverage specifically about Bateel are required. Anything related to Bateel is not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bateel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cantonal Council of Schwyz, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hans Steiner (Jurist), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weld family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Weld.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Newman (film producer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bedford, New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. Thank you for your work on Olivier Zschokke. ARandomName123, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work on this article. Happy Holidays!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|ARandomName123)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo. Du hast den Geburtsort mit Zürich angegeben. Aus welchem Beleg stammt dieser?[1] Danke. Gruss KurtR (talk) 00:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reporter (meine "geboren und aufgewachsen" gehört zu haben, liegt aber bereits eine Weile zurück) Theanonymoustypist (talk) 16:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Danke für Deine Antwort. Ich hatte die Reportage auch gesehen, aber schon lange her. Kurz reingeschaut jetzt, dass er dort aufgewachsen ist kommt grad am Anfang, hier. Ob später noch der Geburtsort kommt? Mag jetzt nicht die ganze Doku sehen. Ist es ok, wenn ich den angeblichen Geb.Ort wegen Unsicherheit rausnehme? KurtR (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ich habe die Dok nochmals geschaut jetzt, habe keinen Geb.ort gehört, nehme ihn daher raus. Gruss KurtR (talk) 18:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Theanonymoustypist,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Darren Henault for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

9H48F (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. Thank you for your work on Jacques Pitteloud. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jay Rockefeller, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Krehbiel family, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. Thank you for your work on P. E. Guerin. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krehbiel family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krehbiel family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fred Zepelin (talk) 03:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Theanonymoustypist. Thank you for your work on Vocational Training (Switzerland). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]