Thank you for your contributions to Depp v. Heard. Now that you have registered an account, please be careful to only edit when logged in moving forward. Best regards, and happy editing!TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 00:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I accidentally logged myself out while clearing cache and left a few comments on the IP. really sorry about this. There-being (talk) 01:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi friend, I appreciate your effort and concern. I found this clearly labelled diff. Is this what you referenced? GregKaye 13:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I think this topic's more starship's thing but there's some reference to it out there: #Depp-Heard verdict sets off debate on #Metoo impact GregKaye 13:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I was incorrect in stating that sentence was authored by you, then I'm sorry for my mistake. I quoted the sentence directly and you can see exactly what the sentence is and I explained as best as I could why that sentence does not summarize the underlying sources accurately. There-being (talk) 13:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's super cool.[1] GregKaye 17:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There-being: Please, see WP:3RR. You're way over the limit of reverts, so I would suggest that you discuss your proposed changes at Talk:Twitter Files Investigation. Best, MarioGom (talk) 13:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/There-being. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 15:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Twitter Files. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. jp×g 02:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/There-being. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Bbb23 (talk) 13:43, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]