Hi Thisisarealusername! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TIGSource is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TIGSource until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI that I noticed there's a duplicate draft of the TIGSource article, and I nominated it for deletion, but if I'm reading the alerts correctly, it's possible that only articles can be nominated for speedy deletion this way. Instead, can you go to the draft and ask that it be deleted by adding the code ((Db-author))? And I'm voting weak keep for the article, after linking to it from other articles that mention TIGSource. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:24, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, thanks!Thisisarealusername (talk) 12:40, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Woodroar (talk) 19:31, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northway Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rebuild. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Eli Piilonen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DMySon (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You must stop editing while logged out. Your IP edits to the same pages as your logged-in edits are a violation of WP:SOCK. If you persist, your named account and your IPs risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This message from a Wikipedia moderator seems to me like a textbook example of how to NOT approach newer editors and the reason why Wikipedia is essentially written by the same group of grumpy men who enjoy these kind of conflicts that constantly and unnecessarily arise here. I have, since creating this account, accidentally made some minor edits while logged out - something I believe could have happen to even experienced editors. If there was a way of "claiming" those edits that was apparent to me I would have, but alas, there doesn't seem to be one once the damage is done. However, nothing whatsoever about those edits suggest "sockpuppetry" or any attempt at anything deceitful, unless you assume I'm a total idiot, which I'm sure might seem like a reasonable assumption based on your day-to-day job as a moderator, but obviously violates WP:AGF and is just a nasty way of approaching people. The policy WP:SOCK states: "Sockpuppetry takes various forms: Logging out to make problematic edits as an IP address." My edits were not in any way "problematic" but obviously constructive, so your accusation is just wrong. The "anonymous" edits were in reality the exact opposite of anonymous, as it's obvious they were made by me and reveal my IP to any user wanting to look into for example where I currently am.

I understand being constantly reviewed and criticized as a moderator, which I understand is an unpaid position, sucks, but I don't believe anybody is forcing you to do this at gunpoint. I think you should seriously reflect on what you did here and what kind of effect this type of moderation has on the whole Wikipedia project. I seriously considered just not logging in again because of your extremely unfriendly and unnecessarily threatening message. Thisisarealusername (talk) 23:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you edit while accidentally logged out, you can contact the Oversight team to have the IP suppressed (so the addresses are hidden from public view, and from administrators). I hope this helps. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads-up! Thisisarealusername (talk) 01:18, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheBirdsShedTears. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 03:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you state above is not true - none of my recent contributions have been undone, so I don't know what you're talking about. If any of my edits appeared promotional to you, I must inform you that's you misreading the article/edit based on your limited understanding of the subject.Thisisarealusername (talk) 03:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for any confusion and mistake. However, I draftified the two articles related to game developers. This was the reason why I notified you. Also, introducing promotional wording such as "best and foremost" makes no sense. Thank you and happy editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheBirdShedTears, please don't post warnings on other user's pages willy-nilly in the future. It's very unfriendly and this is clearly a case of you misunderstanding what I wrote. The words I used were "best known for..." and "first and foremost". That's talking about what somebody is most known for, it's not a superlative used to describe anything they've done.Thisisarealusername (talk) 17:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thisisarealusername

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jordan Magnuson for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hatchens (talk) 01:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thisisarealusername,

Thank you for creating Coil (video game).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

More references will help this page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Whiteguru)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 02:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Florian Himsl, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 03:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Tyler Glaiel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 03:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I disagree with your assessment that this article and Florian Himsl are not "suitable as written to remain published." I can't quite figure out if there's a procedure to move them back that doesn't include submitting it for review (which I don't think is necessary therefore a waste of time) - can I just move them back? Or could you perhaps link me to info about the procedure? Thanks. Could you also refrain from moving more articles I've created into draftspace? I'm continuously improving them. Thisisarealusername (talk) 03:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBirdsShedTears:From Wikipedia:Drafts:

"The community has also allowed for new articles to be moved to draft space as an alternative to deletion. Below are a set of best practices to follow when draftifying an article in these circumstances. As part of the review of new pages, an unreviewed page may be moved to draft if:

the topic has some potential merit, and

the article does not meet the required standard, and

there is no evidence of active improvement.

or when the author clearly has a conflict of interest (per WP:COIEDIT)."

(my emphasis). So I believe you made a mistake in moving these pages. Can you please move them back? Thisisarealusername (talk) 03:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draftspace policy also states that you should move back pages into article space if the original creator of the article disagrees with the move. Please don't move ANY pages into draftspace again if you can't follow this policy, you wasted more than 30 minutes of my time having to restore the pages because you apparently couldn't be bothered. Thisisarealusername (talk) 17:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Miracle Designs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 03:58, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WhoAteMyButter:, per WP:DRAFT, articles should only be moved to drafstpace when "there is no evidence of active improvement." (direct quote). Could you please undo your move? The last edit to the page was a mere 2 hours before your move.Thisisarealusername (talk) 04:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Thisisarealusername:: Ah, sorry. My mistake; didn't realize the time. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 04:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WhoAteMyButter:Thank you. Could I maybe request your help in moving the above two articles (Draft:Florian Himsl and Draft:Tyler Glaiel back into the main namespace also? I made edits to them 3 and 7 minutes before they were moved to draftspace, clearly out of process, but there's unfortunately no formal way of requesting the undoing of such a move.Thisisarealusername (talk) 04:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask the mover. I don't know about those articles, and I'm not in a position to muddle around in someone else's move; ask them to do it instead. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 04:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think your ping of TheBirdsShedTears didn't work because you added it after: you need to start a new line with the ping and sign it too. Help:Fixing failed pings may help. A surefire way of doing it is linking their userpage in your edit summary. If you don't have a COI, you can move the page back into the mainspace, as draftification is not a backdoor route to deletion. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sdrqaz, I am not sure why WhoAteMyButter ping me? TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBirdsShedTears Look a little further up at #July 2021 and #Tyler Glaiel moved to draftspace. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:49, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tyler Glaiel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Glaiel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 06:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kian Bashiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kian Bashiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 06:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Miracle Designs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GermanKity (talk) 07:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dean Moynihan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harrow.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pico's School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I saw that you were interested in documenting flash games, and I was wondering if you would be interested in writing any strategy guides for notable flash games over on [[Wikibooks:Subject:Strategy guides ]]?

Thank you for your time! --Mbrickn (talk) 03:57, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bombernauts, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to User:Thisisarealusername/Bombernauts where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the directions at the top of the page. Please refer to WP:NGAME for guidance on required sources. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Stander is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Stander until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clop (erotic fan art) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clop (erotic fan art) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

晚安 09:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thisisarealusername. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dean Moynihan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Stander is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Stander (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 16:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thisisarealusername, I can't find the exact prompt I used for the art nouveau image. However, I found the exact prompt for another image I uploaded, which I've added to the description here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AI-generated_fan_poster_for_Station_Eleven.png

The prompt is, "station eleven movie poster, apocalypse, science fiction, adopted parent, graphic novel". I hope this is helpful.

Sorry I couldn't find the prompt for the other image, but I've generated *so* many images with similar prompts. I couldn't find that exact image on MJ to verify which particular version I used. Esmerome (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gretel and Hansel have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Liliana ^(UwU) 03:48, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look again, the edit was most certainly constructive.Thisisarealusername (talk) 03:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hedgehog Launch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hedgehog Launch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was curious, are you planning on finishing the Bombernauts page? I'm not familiar with the game, though it may be notable enough for mainspace inclusion - when its written. BOTTO _(T•C) 16:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]