This user may have left Wikipedia. Tikiwont has not edited Wikipedia since August 13, 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following: Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. Please specify a descriptive "Subject/headline" for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed. Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. ⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Archives

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Yash Agarwal (talk) 20:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your advice. I understand. I am also a scientific researcher and hence I am trained to be neutral and present as they are! Are there any mentors here?!Reply[reply]

Could you delete the redirect Kemalism so i can move Kemalist ideology there? Kemalism is far more used than Kemalist ideology.--Chauahuasachca (talk) 13:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC):Reply[reply]

I've deleted it and restored just the current redirect, thus removing the trivial history and the obstacle to a move. For uncontroversial housekeeping requests you can in general use the template ((db-move)). Now that we are here, I'd suggest to open a talk page section. After all the article was there for a number of years and it might be less controversial than you assume.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WidgetsUSA (talk) haz givn u Lolcat! Lolcatz promot teh WikiLovez and hoapfully thiz one tuk away ur sadz. Spredd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Lolcat, or if tey hav one, give a cheezburgr for teh Lolcat 2 snak on!

Keep up teh grate work, 'cuz yo gotteh be grate!

Spredd teh goudnez of Lolcats to all cheezburgr buddiez by addin ((subst:Lolcat)) to their talk paj wit frendli messuj to all!

WidgetsUSA (talk) 14:59, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WidgetsUSA (talk) has given you a Cheeseburger! Cheeseburgers promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Cheeseburger, whether it be someone you've had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating!

Spread the goodness of Cheeseburgers by adding ((subst:Cheeseburger)) to their talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cheeseburger on the giver's talk page with ((subst:burger-munch))!

WidgetsUSA (talk) 15:01, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, maybe with some extra calories i get to be more active again, but then there is vacation coming up....--Tikiwont (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chagos Islands national football team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chagos Islands national football team (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

This is an article previously delete at AFD (twice) that you restored so giving you a courtesy notice that I have taken it back there. GiantSnowman 09:44, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have entered a Dispute Resolution regarding the above cited Puerto Rican prisoner. I noted you also had concerns about the article. Your input could be helpful.

For now the question is simple: I state OLR was convicted of robbery, robbery is a violent crime, therefore, OLR convicted of a violent crime. The opposing side began with stating that OLR was never accused of violence, now they say he was never convicted of violence. Rococo1700 (talk) 21:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In October 2012 you contributed to the discussion that led to Wikipedia Reference Desk becoming a redirect to Wikipedia:Reference Desk (Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 October 8#Wikipedia Reference Desk). The redirect was nominated for deletion on 22 August and you are invited to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 August 22#Wikipedia Reference Desk. Thryduulf (talk) 12:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 11:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Non-random. Since you had some involvement with the Non-random redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 20:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We have two templates that are approaching the same scope and purpose. According to wiki history you are the originator of

, the other is

this is to inform you we are seeking input for scoping or merging both templates. Thanks IamM1rv (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You've got mail Rajendrarajun (talk) 09:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When I was browsing on Zap2it, there is Mickey Mouse Clubhouse Season 5 beginning with Mickey's Monster Musical^[1].

Mamb000b (talk) 08:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The thoughts of yekishim originate from the writings by artist-filmmaker Daryush Shokof in 1990.He is born, in Tehran, Iran in 1954 and developed his arts and cinema and philosophical thoughts in the west.He used two words (yeki) meaning (one) and (shim) meaning to (become)from the persian language to combine them and created the word yekishim which should mean (to become one).In yekishim he describes with surprising new perspectives the differences his thoughts have with many other philosophies, religions and or thoughts rather than the common codes and relationships yekishim has with what we know as religions and thoughts delivered to us by great many creators of religions, messengers, prophets, phiosophers ,thinkers and writers alike. Yekishim starts with superiority and not the inferiority or helplessness aspect of mankind,s existance on earth or in the universe. It begins with our abilities to reach answers rather than our inabilities to know and find out why we are here, where do we come from, where do we go to thereafter and all the same questions mankind have been entangled with for centuries. In his yekishim Shokof explains the importance of human being,s existance as the answer to all questions rather than being told or directed by higher forces what to do in order to achieve final peace,harmony,balance,life, love,and liveliness on earth and or afterwards in the universe. Yekishim is created with human beings as the core solutions and not the puzzle.Death is not the end and the Heavens is not the final place where all people end who have done right or good in order to find all the answers. Daryush Shokof starts his Yekishim by saying we are the answers and can solve al the mysteries aboutthe creation only if we unite and hence does not begin with the eternal question what are we here to do as inferior beings who need to follow a higher order,s recommendations to reach the truth. in yekishim he does not set rules and regulations from higher grounds but simply suggests if we want to know the truth about our existance on planet earth, the answer is very simple and it is rather on earth. He simply suggests that we human beings unite both in hearts and minds as human race and we will know all the truth about the creation, and thus abstraction will cease to exist. that is all.Thereafter he writes a long manifest with much poetic touch giving descriptions and details about almost every element in the universe and or on earth to brighten a light at the end of the road to reach yekishim which again returns to the very first and simple suggestion of his that to unite both in minds and hearts and we will have all the answers. Therefore, he has a bold reason to set racism as the greatest evil in the universe because this one creation of evil and satan can keep up seperated and therefore prevent us knowing the truth about our existance and the creation forever. For Shokof racism is the only true evil force that can keep us in abstraction and darkness forever. Unity of mankind in hearts and mind for Shokof is ofcourse not an easiest task to achieve but he is convinced it is a most clear, clean and obvious path to reach the truth. He continues with this simple obsession about unity of mankind we will have clear reasons to continue life beautifully, positively, and peacefully on earth until we all finally reach appreciation, respect, love and admiration for one another which in turn opens the door to the truth for mankind forever. Shokof,s holy book is not in print yet, but much can be read and found about his maximalism, and yekishim on the net and in some web sites.The text to his yekishim is also available on the net but not in a print. However, his perhaps most descriptive work to validify his yekishim is his very first feature film seven servants with the late legendary actor Anthony Quinn in his final lead role who also agreed the movie is so visual that it will not be entirely understood until 21st century.His film Seven Servants was not released until nearly 15 years after it was made and due to some incredibly strange situations but is now free to watch on utube as well. below are some of his original thoughts in very brief mention that can be useful for further studies of his long manifest about yekishim and maximalism;

1. we human beings are not inferior to God or Satan, but we are rather the Solution to the eternal conflict between these two forces. with our unity , we bring them back together which prepares the phase of Final Unification.

2.The Heavens is just a phase of resting in Peace and harmony. all those in Heavens do not necessarily know the truth about Creation. God will unfold the story of Creation to all mankind Only after we have reached Yekishim (Unity) on earth.

3.Racism is the greatest evil in Cosmos. it delays the phase of Unity , therefore reaching Yekishim would be impossible and We will never find the truth about the story of Creation. thereafter Abstraction will remain forever.

4.Suicide is never necessary once we realize that there is a job of becoming United for all people on Earth. so, therefore the current state of boredom, helplessness, uselessness, meaningless repititions of life cycles shall not confuse or frustrtate us anymore in continue of Life on Earth. there is a lot of work to do for Unity of mankind on earth.we will not have one second of uselessness of wasting time in our daily life. the beauty of reaching out for Unity will keep us all energized and alive for as long as we all live.

5.Once the mankind apprehends the notion of Unity to be the ultimate goal on Earth, there will come new life cycles and habits and traditions that will free our minds from the boring repetetive habits and traditions we currently undergo by living on Earth. soon, there will be a revolution in how mankind lives on earth (from eating, and drinking to sex and love and duties and work and ideals,....to the smallest details as shopping and or playing games), once the goal of becoming United becomes the spectrum and the main reason for all of us by existing on Earth.

• [[1]]
• [[2]]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Henrich Pette Institute. Since you had some involvement with the Henrich Pette Institute redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. marilyn.hanson (talk) 15:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Organizations based in Namibia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Research institutes by type, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry for bothering but there is a persistent vandalism on Yang-Mills theory page from an anonymous IP. I keep on rollback.--Pra1998 (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Tikiwont, I hope you are well.

I would like your help about a deleted page. Miklós Palencsár's page, this page was on for more than 5 years, without any problems. I would like to know what can I do to get back the page on?

These are the reasons why the page should keep on.

- 3 special world unique books in the business and a sport - founder and creator of a world special psychological system, the first decision-making system - first business mentor is Hungary, and create special “business mentoring” what is a special type of business development - leading business man in Hungary - founder of the first business development magazine - published close to 100 hundred business articles - keynote presentations

Thank you in advance. Alencar.rossoni (talk • contribs) 20:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Invaders(song). Since you had some involvement with the Invaders(song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:53, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]