This user may have left Wikipedia. Till has not edited Wikipedia since 15 June 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

A 'Request For Comment' for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found here. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) here. At this time, Proposal 1, 3, and 5 have received full (or close to) support. If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the General discussion thread. Please note that Proposal 2 has been withdrawn and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard Proposal 9 as it was never an actual proposal.

If you are trying to clean those out, this link shows every article.—Kww(talk) 15:24, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Till. You have new messages at Pine's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

--Pine^✉ 04:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Till. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 11:27, 28 March 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

 — AARON • ^TALK 11:27, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Till. I just want your help, and I'm afraid that User:Widr don't give other editors permission to revert, especially music genres. Pink's 2008 hit "So What" is actually a pop rock song (as in the infobox and composition section), but suddenly the word "dance-pop" appeared on the main section, it doesn't make sense. Thus, I don't think it has "dance-pop" influence, because it has not supported by citation (does not support genre notes). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.177.33 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are right - it should be pop rock instead of dance pop. Till 08:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring "Stronger" (Sugababes song) to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:01, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you :) Till 01:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I congratulate you on your efforts and success in making "Push the Button" (song) a featured article. You worked very hard! —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 16:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Penguin, and thanks again for going through the entire article voluntarily :) Nice to see you back from a well-deserved break too. Till 03:15, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Till. You have new messages at Talk:Freedom (Sugababes song)/GA1.
Message added 14:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

 — AARON • ^TALK 14:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Push the Button (Sugababes song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Talk:Change (Sugababes song)/GA1 review. — Robin (talk) 20:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay thanks Till 01:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welkom. — Robin (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring "Change" (Sugababes song) to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! — Robin (talk) 11:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks :) Till 12:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 8 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Change (Sugababes song), which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Change (Sugababes song). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Allen3 ^talk 22:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, here's the issue. You're right that "The topics seem to be closely interrelated and relevant", but wrong that this means that NFCC#8 is met. If what you're saying is true, then you would be, for instance, justified in using a non-free image of a dead singer in every article about their music or a non-free image of a dead author in every article about their books- the topics are clearly closely interrelated and relevant. In fact, in most cases, what the singer/author looked like is not going to be relevant. NFCC#8 requires that an image is "used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." The question is this- does knowing what that character looks like significantly increase reader understanding of the topic? No, certainly not. Would readers be unable to understand the article without the image? Yes, clearly. Further, you've added the image to the article again, and again you've not even attempted to write a rationale for the use of the image. I've seen users blocked for doing that. I'm going to remove the image again- while I'm happy to discuss the inclusion, could you please not add it back- the NFCC explain that the onus is on you to demonstrate that the image should be included, and so until you have, it should stay out. J Milburn (talk) 10:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We have to use reasonable judgement, and reasonable people may disagree, but in this case it's pretty clear. Sure, someone may never have watched the PG, but this article isn't actually about the cartoon, it's about a song. The fact that you're citing the picture of the Grammy in Cry Me a River (Justin Timberlake song) shows that you really are not clear on what the issue is here. That's a freely licensed image, unlike the one you're trying to insert, and so is not subject to the same, deliberately strict, rules. You're welcome to use free images pretty much wherever and however you like. The case with non-free images is not even close to that. If you had a freely licensed image of the character, I would have no problem with that. If you're keen to have an illustration, you may be able to find a free image of the character's voice actor or of the show's creator. J Milburn (talk) 10:09, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, random question? Are you a fan of Little Mix? Do you perhaps have the CD liner for their DNA album? - littlemixlove (talk) 20:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 12 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Just a Little Bit (Mutya Buena song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mutya Buena's single "Just a Little Bit" contains Motown influences? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Just a Little Bit (Mutya Buena song). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

I've restored Phoebe Brown because she is notable for more than one event and thus cannot be redirected.--Launchballer 18:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 18 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Angels with Dirty Faces (song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Sugababes' song "Angels with Dirty Faces" was promoted through Cartoon Network's animated television series The Powerpuff Girls? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Angels with Dirty Faces (song). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's still there for older dates, but no new entries have been added for quite a while. A lot of charts got dropped on the latest overhaul.—Kww(talk) 13:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited She's like a Star, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stronger (Sugababes song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chorus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, with regard to your post on my talk page, I have fallen away from doing audio samples for about the last year or so. Maybe a little longer. Much of what I was doing involved cleanup of non-standard uploads. I did that heavily for about six months and then sporadically for another year or so, and I have all the tools to do it still, and I don't think I'm totally done with it, but for the last year or so I've been heavily involved with article creation especially with WikiProject Earthquakes. It's been taking all my time, aside from maintenance, on WP. So for now, I will keep it under consideration, maybe down the road. Or, if you're feeling adventurous, there's some discussion on how to do the samples here. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 01:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That is fine and thanks for considering. Till 09:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new ((help me)) request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I set my Twinkles preference to not keep a log of my CSD tags but it has not changed. Till 09:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I believe you have to bypass your browser cache for the change to take effect. See Wikipedia:Bypass your cache. Huon (talk) 10:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Too Lost in You, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acoustic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, Till. I currently have an FLC out for Taio Cruz discography, but reviews have not been pouring in, to put it mildly, and since I can only have one open nomination at a time I'm struggling to get other projects finished (it has been out for nearly two months now). I understand you're a busy editor, but would you able to give me some comments at the FLC, so I will know how to improve it and hopefully finally get it passed? Your ideas and time would be greatly appreciated. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 16:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you opine on this matter? Regards — Robin (talk) 14:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Till; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'd be inclined to say that both are violations- there's also potentially problems in both articles with excess cover images. Unless the bonus covers are in some way significant in their appearance, their use probably doesn't add significantly to the article, and so they fail NFCC#8. As for getting the images deleted quickly- if you simply remove them from the article, they'll be tagged as orphans and deleted within a few days, providing nobody reverts you. J Milburn (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I noticed you've made edits to Leona Lewis articles. I thought you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Leona Lewis We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Leona Lewis and her discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You.  — AARON • TALK 10:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fair- thanks for your note. The lead length isn't the biggest problem in the world, and the Discogs sources (which I did notice) are used only to report that the song appeared on particular releases- a long way from controversial information, so I was happy enough to let it slide. The YouTube problem I missed, and I wasn't aware of the badchart point. Thank you for bringing them to my attention; I will add to my review. J Milburn (talk) 15:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. The Cœur de pirate discography is currently at FLC. I have worked extensively on it and hope that you can leave some comments to help it reach Featured List status. Thanks! :) – Underneath-it-All (talk) 01:05, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited My Man (Jade Ewen song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 29 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article New Year (song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the original members of the Sugababes performed "New Year" during their first gig in over ten years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/New Year (song). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm trying to work out why you object to my edits, and exactly what "This wrongs the references" means. I presume you objected to me removing the '|publisher=' fields, this is actually done in line with the practice laid down in Template:Citation/doc#Publisher, which states "publisher: Name of publisher; may be wikilinked if relevant. Not normally included for periodicals." Other facets of the edits is the italic rendering of the publications. You will find that the italicisation or otherwise are in line with WP:ITALICS, as well as the styles adopted for each of the publication per their Wikipedia articles. I'd like to understand from your viewpoint how this makes the references "wrong". Regards, -- Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 08:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your "edits" are not fixing the articles at all. Many reviewers at GA are adamant that the references should include the publisher with the work, so no, your removing them is not helping. And the page you cite says that they're normally not included, not prohibited. Till 09:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring ""Angels with Dirty Faces" (song)" to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! — Robin (talk) 16:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Robin ^^ Till 03:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welcome. — Robin (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Till. You have new messages at Talk:Caught in a Moment/GA1.
Message added 14:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

On hold  — AARON • ^TALK 14:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 11 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of awards and nominations received by Sugababes, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Sugababes won their first Brit Award in 2003 for Best British Dance Act? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of awards and nominations received by Sugababes. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass 00:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Till. You have new messages at Talk:Too Lost in You/GA1.
Message added 16:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

I've reviewed the nomination.  — AARON • ^TALK 16:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Till, Some time ago you commented (and opposed) at FAC on the S&M (song) article. The article is now back at Peer Review, having gone through something of a good copyedit by me, and a further ce/review by Cassianto. The original nominator Aaron is still very much involved in the process and we would both be delighted if you would give any comments you could at the PR, prior to the next attempt at FAC. Many thanks if you are able to help. - SchroCat (talk) 20:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As per the above, the article is now at FAC. If you have the chance we'd be delighted to hear your comments. If you're too tied up with other bits and pieces, then it's not a problem at all. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Soul Sound you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Soul Sound you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Soul Sound for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Soul Sound you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soul Sound for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi

I saw you were once looking for data for irish certified prior 2005. Did you find a source? Szaboci (talk) 09:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Saw you had a lot of contributions to Wikipedia but haven't been here since June. I've added you to the page above, but if you come back, please remember to take your name off it, or alternatively, you can undo the edit with a summary that you don't want to be listed (that way it'll be there in your edit history for anyone else who becomes tempted to list you there). God bless, LazyBastardGuy 17:06, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am inviting you to leave me some feedback, 18 months after you opposed my RfA. Do you still believe I am not fit to be an admin? Do you believe I have been able to improve past the concerns you have brought up? Do not be afraid of being too harsh, I am specifically welcoming criticism as I believe it is the best way to improve and I am always looking to learn from my mistakes. I am particularly looking for feedback as to whether you have objections to myself lifting the self-imposed 1RR restriction I had agreed to towards the end of my RfA. If you don't have time to comment, don't fret it either, this is nothing I'll lose sleep over. :) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 19:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sugababes - No Can Do screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:16, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on So Fresh: The Hits of Spring 2012 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ilovechristianmusic ^{(Tell Me Something!)} 23:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "Someone like You", a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 17:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'll start work on this one today. You nominated the article at WP:FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 13:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sugababes songs

Thank you for quality articles about Sugababes songs such as Push the Button and Angels with Dirty Faces, for lists such as List of awards and nominations received by Sugababes, for pruning and for a clear user page, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

We miss you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello

You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia.

That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements.

Please subscribe!

All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hey Girl (Justin Bieber song). Since you had some involvement with the Hey Girl (Justin Bieber song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho (talk) 17:55, 7 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tempt, Tease and Touch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tempt, Tease and Touch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Aoba47 (talk) 19:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]