Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Greetings Timtempleton I submitted draft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Chetu) which was rejected. I revisited it today, and in it's history, I saw that you have edited it. Much appreciated. Should I resubmit the draft, as before you another editor has edited as well? or should I further work on it?

@Zed J Alexander: I'm not seeing enough significant independent coverage in the article or with a simple Google search to demonstrate notability. If you remove the repurposed press releases and passing mentions, there's very little independent coverage of the company left. If you can find the best two in-depth profiles of the company in the media, post them here and I can review. The item you used to source the date the company was founded is a press release issued by the company - it's not independent. The awards and accolades are minor, as is the charitable donation they made. None of those items suggest that the company is notable enough to have an article. You are a brand new editor and have taken on one of the hardest tasks on Wikipedia. I recommend you take the time to read WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE to save yourself further frustration. And others have commented on your talk page that your edits suggest you have a conflict of interest. You face a long uphill climb from here. (Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this: ~~~~. Or, you can use the [ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtempleton:Thanks. I will look into the sources. And I agree that I have taken a tougher task and I was feeling much frustrated. However, ever since, the realization has dawned on me that editors, here, are trying to help me rather than accusing me, I am learning a lot more, which I might not have, if I didn't submitted the draft because of my idiocy.

I much appreciate all of you and your help. I will keep improving.

Timtempleton following are the links I could muster.

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210617005651/en/Chetu-Relocates-Headquarters-Amid-Rapid-Company-Growth https://therealdeal.com/miami/2021/06/18/software-firm-chetu-buys-sunrise-office-property-for-25m/ https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/national/delhi-hc-awards-rs-30-lakh-as-damages-to-3-software-giants Zed J Alexander (talk) 16:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Zed J Alexander: The first link is a press release. While those can be used sparingly to source non-controversial information, they do not add to notability, since any company can pay to issue a release, and it says whatever they want it to say. The second source is about a real estate transaction, but not about the company. The last source is about a fine levied on the company for using pirated software. In these three sources, there's very little information that can be used to build a good article. I think if you read WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE, you'll decide that the task you've chosen is too difficult for now. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:46, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtempleton: ok. Thanks for the help. I will do it. Zed J Alexander (talk) 21:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pentagon UFO videos on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of unicorn startup companies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anduril.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Prodigal Son (TV series) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (I think) for the edit notice, however I don't have any interest in Carvana aside from the seemingly advertising-ish and somewhat unctuous slanted article without any mention of negative (legitimate) facts. The statement on its revenue as an affinity with corporate sophistry. With respect to outdated information,

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/estimating-the-fair-value-of-carvana-co.-nyse%3Acvna-2021-07-13

which is recent and is fair in its underlying analysis

https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2021/03/22/why-uber-doordash-and-carvana-got-riskier-post-earnings/ or even

https://www.barrons.com/articles/take-profits-in-used-car-seller-carvana-buy-shift-and-vroom-instead-analyst-says-51624981662

I just thought context mattered not just PR spin, however in the end it doesn't matter much to me, because like the articles should strive to be it's a neutral issue and no I was not encouraging risky financial speculation as shorting a stock. Thanks for the heads-up and GF, I was never intending to spin anything.

KansasC785 (talk) 22:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC) KansasC785 (talk) 22:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KansasC785: Thanks for responding so quickly. It's not about PR spin. The point is more that we want to avoid any bias in either direction. I could cherry pick articles that supported an even higher valuation, and then the article (and every other business article) becomes a messy battlefield for stock speculators. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Meal delivery service—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. ––FORMALDUDE^(talk) 22:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:American Sleep Apnea Association Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ASHA organization logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Banc of California logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:18, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pythagorean triple on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Billie Eilish on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hibernia Networks logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:BTS on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timtempleton! I am Kristi, here on Wikipedia on behalf of my employer, Invitation Homes. I noticed in January you updated the Invitation Homes article. I have requested updates to the Invitation Homes "History" section, as the current one is outdated. If you are interested in reviewing the request, it can be found at Talk:Invitation Homes#HIstory. Thank you. Kristi at IH (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors September 2021 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2021.                  Current and upcoming events September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Drive and Blitz reports June Blitz: From 20 to 26 June, 6 participating editors claimed 16 copy edits, focusing on requests and articles tagged in March and April. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: Almost 575,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 24 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 15 to 21 August, we copy edited articles tagged in April and May 2021 and requests. 9 participating editors completed 17 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. New maintenance template added to our project scope: After a short discussion in June, we added ((cleanup tense)) to the list of maintenance templates that adds articles to the Guild's copy editing backlog categories. This change added 198 articles, spread over 97 months of backlog, to our queue. We processed all of those articles except for those from the three or four most recent months during the July backlog elimination drive (Here's a link to a "tense" discussion during the drive). Progress report: As of 18:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 468 requests since 1 January and there were 60 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Timtempleton

I am the subject of a page called John T. Madden. In short, you assisted me earlier when I was eager to have the page permanently deleted. The trolls are back and are shaming me again. Can you advise for the deletion process. I do not belong here in wiki and the shaming is taking its toll. I appreciate your consideration of this.

G4L21qtQD (talk) 14:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@G4L21qtQD: I nominated the article for deletion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John T. Madden (2nd nomination) After I nominated it, I remembered that there was an earlier discussion that was closed as no consensus. There may not be a different result, except we can request to semi-protect the article to keep the contentious material from being added back. In the meantime, in the interest of full transparency, you should disclose your connection on your user page or on the article talk page. See WP:DCOI. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bauhaus (band) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TT. I think you may have typed 5 tildes here rather than four because your user name doesn't appear. Just thought I'd let you know so you can fix it when you have the time. Best regards. MarnetteD|Talk 03:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD: Thanks! Going too fast to beat the dreaded edit conflict! TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 03:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome - whoo wee I sure do know about trying to avoid that edit conflict snafu :-) Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 03:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping me!

Cjs1 00:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Timtempleton. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Rogier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:American Gear Manufacturers Association.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CyberCoders logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:North Highland logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bastion Collective Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim. Thanks for your interest in the draft Ichon article. I'm intrigued by your suggestion that I try to qualify the article under WP:GNG. Can you explain a little more clearly what I should put on the article's talk page? Would I write something like this?

I believe Ichon meets the requirements for WP:GNG. Ichon has been the specific subject of articles by reliable, general-interest and special-interest publications including Reuters, La Presse (the largest French-language newspaper in Canada), Le Temps (the largest French-language newspaper in Switzerland) and GQ France magazine (where he was featured on the cover in February, 2021).

I am nominating Ichon under WP:GNG because his celebrity derives as much from his fashion sensibility and partnerships with fashion houses, as from his music.

Thanks for your advice, Tim!

Jayintheusa (talk) 01:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jayintheusa: As far as I know, we don't really have a way to nominate an article under a specific notability guideline. We just need to show in the defense that the person meets it. Most skilled reviewers should know this, but if someone is looking for musician coverage, they may miss the other info. It helps if the sourcing clearly shows the notability, which is why I suggested adding the other source. The best place to have a discussion would be on the draft article talk page, or if it's declined again, you can go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 01:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Tim!

Jayintheusa (talk) 02:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bauhaus (band) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Timtempleton:, i started/attempted the second nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 May Kado massacre (2nd nomination) but it wouldn't link up to related pages (25 total) such as Megab massacre, do you know how to link them up to the deletion discussion page? It's about 25 articles, not one. Thank you Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 02:05, 18 November 2021 T(UTC)

@Dawit S Gondaria: Looks like you got it straightened out, per WP:BUNDLE. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtempleton: Yeah what a ordeal it was! Luckily it worked out. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 00:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am Christina from Lone Star Funds. I have made a new edit request at Talk:Lone Star Funds and would appreciate your help in implementing these changes. I noticed that you have edited similar pages in the past and have an interest in this field. Thank you for reviewing my request and making updates to the Funds investment vehicles chart in the article. Thanks! ChristinaforLoneStarFunds (talk) 21:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2021 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2021.                  Current and upcoming events Election time: Our end-of-year election of coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before "Auld Lang Syne". Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: We have scheduled a week-long copy-editing blitz for 12 to 18 December. Sign up now! Drive and Blitz reports September Drive: Almost 400,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 27 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. October Blitz: From 17 to 23 October, we copy edited articles tagged in May and June 2021 and requests. 8 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. November Drive: Over 350,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 21 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. Other news It is with great sadness that we report the death on 19 November of Twofingered Typist, who was active with the Guild almost daily for the past several years. His contributions long exceeded the thresholds for the Guild's highest awards, and he had a hand in innumerable good and featured article promotions as a willing collaborator. Twofingered Typist also served as a Guild coordinator from July 2019 to June 2021. He is sorely missed by the Wikipedia community. Progress report: As of 30 November, GOCE copyeditors have completed 619 requests in 2021 and there were 51 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog stood at 946 articles tagged for copy-editing (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SpringHill Company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Alchemy on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim – I work with the investment firm Felicis and noticed you created the Felicis Ventures article. They changed their logo so I was wondering if I could trouble you to replace the old logo. Is there a way I can send it to you? Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:180:85C0:313C:4CC7:7971:B951 (talk) 20:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:646:180:85C0:313C:4CC7:7971:B951:  Done I just pulled it from your web site. Low res is better. I noticed that Google is pulling your old logo from Pitchbook - you might want to go to your Pitchbook profile page and submit an update request, in case Google doesn't pull the correct logo from your article. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Felicis Ventures company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

people and groups

Thank you for quality articles, beginning with your father, Robert Templeton (artist) 11 years + 11 months + 11 days ago, Sahana Software Foundation, Randy Barth, Mansour Group and Maven Clinic, for arguing patiently over years, - Tim, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2681 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:30, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tim,
I sincerely hope your holiday season goes well this year especially with what we went through last year. I'm optimistic that 2022 will be a better year for all of us: both in real life and on Wikipedia. Wishing you the best from, Interstellarity (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi – I’m with BETA Technologies, and noticed you created our article. I’d like to contribute some more recent photos, but understand that I’m not supposed to edit the article myself. Do you think you could help? I uploaded them and the links are:

ALIA: [1] Charging pad: [2] Tower: [3]

Thanks! Willguisbond (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Willguisbond TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your comment at Teahouse! The AfD is still underway, although it's still quite finely balanced in theory as some people keep coming in and making the same 'keep' point (i.e. he's in the Who's Who) while those for delete are quoting policies and providing coherent arguments. I imagine this is how it often goes and I guess it will be up to the closing admin. All the best, Emmentalist (talk) 11:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Table cell templates on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wavetek logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It looks like my message got archived, but you sent the following response to me on the teahouse:

"I took a quick look and think the draft still reads like an essay. The biggest issue is that none of the info about envelope encryption is sourced. You describe the technique in your own words, but link to commercial cloud computing company sites, a paywalled research paper, and an online glossary for a related term. You'll need sufficient sourcing to demonstrate that the term is significant enough for a standalone article. I googled envelope encryption to see if I could find some technical articles about the term, and was unsuccessful. You're probably better off merging the info to encryption, such as to Encryption#Uses. Then you need fewer sources to demonstrate notability."

Sorry for nooby formatting, as always. I had a piece of feedback that may speak to the cultural differences between cryptography and other fields you may be more familiar with. Maybe you will find it interesting. Notably: the research paper I linked was actually open-access (the link has access to a pdf of the paper), which is basically standard in math/computer science/cryptography. If I remember correctly, many other fields of science don't have this culture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A40585 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kids See Ghosts (album) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timtempleton! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Table of contents number is wrapping, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timtempleton! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Testing to see if I can replicate the TOC number wrapping issue. It appears to be because the question was very long, so I'll make this question long so it wraps too., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:A Discovery of Witches (TV series) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As you're currently listed as a host at the Teahouse, I wanted to make sure you're aware of the imminent rollout of new Growth Team Features which every new account will be getting by default. Each users will soon see a new 'Homepage' tab next to their User page. It contains two main elements which might impact on your involvement - and you'd be welcome to get involved and help out directly with one of them.

• Firstly, they will be offered a range of 'suggested edits', and encouraged to make simple improvements to pages that interest them. (Being aware of this feature would be helpful for all Teahouse hosts if you're likely to offer advice on tasks for them to start out doing.)
• There's also a 'Your impact' box to show them how many people have seen the pages they've just edited.
• Finally, each new user is randomly assigned a 'mentor' from a list of friendly, experienced editors, like yourself. If they get stuck, they can ask a question directly to them via a Your mentor box, and hopefully get a swift, friendly answer from that mentor. Currently, this feature is given to 2% of new users, but it's set to increase to around 10% in the very near future.

To spread the load on our current list of around 65 mentors, I'm reaching out to ask if you'd like to help out and sign up as one? The workload is relatively small; User Panini! reports receiving four questions a month, on average, all of which were simple ones of the type we already get at the Teahouse, whilst I've had just one in the last 3 weeks. To view a list of every question asked of all mentors over the last 14 days, click here.

If becoming a mentor and being available to help new users on their first few days here interests you - just as have done at the Teahouse in the past - then please consider signing up at Growth Team features/Mentor list. But please only do so if you are genuinely willing to be available to help. Existing users can already 'opt-in' to seeing the Newcomer Homepage features via their Preferences.

Thank you! Nick Moyes (talk) 14:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying at the help desk. The article I’m looking at is Razmig Hovaghimian. I noticed the template instructions say that the tag can be removed without warning if there's no discussion on the talk page. It also looks like several others have edited it since the last paid contributions in December 2014, and nothing problematic was identified. Can you take a look and see if the flag should be removed, per site policy? Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecars98 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ecars98: Sure, I'll take a look. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timtempleton. My name is Lindsay and I work for ThoughtSpot. I made some non-controversial updates to the infobox and correcting tense/grammar, but have some suggestions that require independent vetting per WP:COI. To start, I've asked that the 2018 CEO appointment be added at: Talk:ThoughtSpot. It seems unlikely there are any editors closely watching the page that are likely to see my post and I was wondering if you wouldn't mind reviewing my requested edit and approving/rejecting it per the COI rules Linnoo614 (talk) 20:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Linnoo614: No problem - the WSJ source matches. You'll have a better chance of getting help in the future if you use the edit request template, per Wikipedia:Simple conflict of interest edit request. That signals others. You might want to fill out some of the missing ref dates. There's a hidden maintenance error that only shows up when you preview the changes. I can't find it but I see some bare refs - sometimes adding dates fixes it. I also removed your CFO from the key people field of the infobox. I only like to include CEO, Chairman or President, unless the person is a co-founder as well, as your CTO is, or if they have their own article. Having too many names suggests that the editor is an insider, and might get the article flagged. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your prompt and thorough responses! I appreciate that you are a volunteer donating your time to this. Next, I'd like to propose some content to beef up the Technology and Recognition sections, then I'll be out of your hair. Thanks again! 108.29.111.198 (talk) 02:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please look up the meaning of the term app and stop revert war introducing wrong term. Loew Galitz (talk) 19:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Loew Galitz: Please read the sentence following the section you keep reverting "Security vulnerabilities are identified and addressed during the development process, before the app is in use." That Is why I added the word app. Also, please take more care before editing. I had to fix your typo [[4]]. Also, you started an AfD without WP:BEFORE and now it still sits there despite your belated attempts to withdraw it. You are creating more work for others. Perhaps English is not your first language, but WP:COMPETENCEISREQUIRED. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)}

App is a slang for "application software" . there is also "systems software", for which security issues are even more dramatic. MAybe English is not my fdirest language, but software is not you language either. YEs I did AfD with BEFORE. It took me nontrivial time to find good refs because the author convinced me that the company is not a fluke. I also found the article in hebrew wikipedia, and it took me some solid efforts because google is overwhelmed with PR hype about the startup. I took some serious efforts to rescue the article, and now you are pouring accusations onto me. This is not good, colleague. Loew Galitz (talk) 19:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Loew Galitz: If your immediate default response is vulgarity and hostility, your participation here will not be welcome. Tread carefully and dial it down a bit. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:43, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. As you said I am not a native English speaker and I was under the impression that the s-word is not a vulgarity, hearing it everywhere on TV, movies and ytube. Anyway I recognize my mistake of not explaining myself in the article talk page in the first place. I accepted your opinion that the term "developer" may need disambiguation and fixed the article in a way I hope you will find acceptable. Apologies again. Loew Galitz (talk) 00:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kajabi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inc..

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Massive Attack on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I stumbled across two short descriptions you added which were copies of the article titles; I've fixed them. Maybe you were just tired, but in case you didn't know: WP:Short description says "avoid duplicating information that is already in the title". (If an article's title says all that's necessary, the keyword none should be used to record that fact.) The guide also says it's best if the short desc is 40 characters or less (because of its use on small phone screens). Cheers -- R. S. Shaw (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@R. S. Shaw: thanks - I didn’t know the guidelines. I thought something was better than nothing. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 05:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors April 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the April newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2021. Election results: Jonesey95 retired as lead coordinator. Reidgreg was approved to fill this role after an 18-month absence from the coordinator team, and Baffle gab1978 was chosen as an assistant coordinator following a one-year break. Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu continued on as long-standing assistant coordinators. January Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up, 16 editors claimed 146 copy edits including 45 requests. (details) February Blitz: This one-week effort focused on requests and a theme of Africa and African diaspora history. Of the 12 editors who signed up, 6 editors recorded 21 copy edits, including 4 requests. (details) March Drive: Of the 28 editors who signed up, 18 claimed 116 copy edits including 25 requests. (details) April Blitz: This one-week copy editing event has been scheduled for 17–23 April, sign up now! Progress report: As of 11 April, copy editors have removed approximately 500 articles from the backlog and completed 127 copy-editing requests during 2022. The backlog has been hovering at about 1,100 tagged articles for the past six months. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Timtempleton. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Rogier".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flavan-3-ol on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:In the End on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Picsart (software company) logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned raster image that was not used to create the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlaster^talk 14:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hypothetical Axis victory in World War II on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:32, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors June 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2022 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since April 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Blitz: of the 16 editors who signed up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, 12 completed at least one copy-edit, and between them removed 21 articles from the copy-editing backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 27 editors signed up for our May Backlog Elimination Drive; of these, 20 copy-edited at least one article. 144 articles were copy-edited, and 88 articles from our target months August and September 2021 were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: our June Copy Editing Blitz, starting at 00:01, 19 June and closing at 00:59, 25 June (UTC), will focus on articles tagged for copy edit in September and October 2021, and requests from March, April and May 2022. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 07:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 209 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,404 articles. Election news: Nominations for our half-yearly Election of Coordinators continues until 23:50 on 15 June (UTC), after which, voting will commence until 23:59, 30 June (UTC). All Wikipedians in good standing (active and not blocked, banned, or under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Timothée Chalamet on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timtempleton! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:12, Tuesday, June 14, 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:SiTime company logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neato Robotics, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neato Robotics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Kashmir Files on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim, I need help submitting an updated image for the Blazemeter wikipedia page.

file:///Users/cjuhl/Downloads/logo-blazemeter-reg.svg Cjuhlperforce (talk) 16:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Webb's First Deep Field on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LiveRamp company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BlueVine company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Insurtech, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as es:Insurtech, an article on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 23:46, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr vulpes: Thanks for the heads up. Somebody hijacked my simple redirect. I restored it. Let me know if you have any problems with the redirect. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 01:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Timtempleton, sorry I should have checked the history before nominating for deletion. Glad everything worked out! Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 01:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current [[Emplifi]] page is almost completely unsourced promotion and tags. I disclosed a COI and proposed [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JordanJulian19/draft a replacement] that is just a few paragraphs long and summarizes all the biggest press articles about the company. I was hoping you might be willing to review the draft as an impartial editor with no affiliation to verify whether the overhaul would be an improvement for Wikipedia and its readers. Best regards. ~~~~ JordanJulian19 (talk) 11:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JordanJulian19: You actually want the wiki code showing, so people can click on the links. I reviewed your draft, made some structural revisions and some minor edits, and loaded it for you. I also uploaded the logo. I didn't see a source for the Czech Republic being their HQ. There was more Socialbaker history that you might want to include, but only if it's properly sourced and not promotional. You can put other edit requests on the talk page using the COI edit request template. See Wikipedia:Simple conflict of interest edit request. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:10, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bev (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bev (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

多少 战场 龙 (talk) 10:52, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ragy Thomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragy Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

多少 战场 龙 (talk) 10:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Category talk:Books by publisher on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Carta company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No indication of notability, the sources cited are all just routine business reporting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stone Point Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Timtempleton! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TimTempleton. A while back you were "summoned from the Help Desk" to resolve an issue on Talk:Jonathan D. Gray#Some edit requests. Thank you for your help then. More recently, I was in a discussion with IAmChaos about a different edit request, but that discussion was cut short. Would you mind taking a look at that edit request; Talk:Jonathan_D._Gray#Career_section_edits_request and implement it if you agree it improves the article. Thanks so much, ThomasClements Blackstone (talk) 12:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Andy Ngo on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:/e/ (operating system) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, TimTempleton! You mentioned in the Teahouse you would willing to provide some feedback on my draft of a new article on web presence company Newfold Digital. I wasn't sure if I tagged you correctly on that thread, so I thought I would include that draft here, just in case. I would very much appreciate any and all feedback and guidance! You can find my draft here. Zach at Newfold (talk) 21:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zach at Newfold: Discussion moved to article talk page. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tim. I noticed that you did a cleanup of Lori Greiner a few years ago, and participated in a discussion on its talk page. You'll see that there's been some debate since then, particularly about which sources and content should stay or go. If or when you have time, can you please review the article as it currently stands and make any changes you deem appropriate, even if that includes reverting edits I made? Thanks, in advance, for any help you can provide. Stoarm (talk) 08:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be canvassing. While Timtempleton is welcome to help, I don't see why this one editor was singled out who apparently has made only one edit to the article, and participated in a brief discussion on the article talk page at the time. --Hipal (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest Hipal (aka Ronz) properly educate himself on the behavioral guideline he invoked so that he will fully understand what constitutes canvassing. Stoarm (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Stoarm: - I don't even remember editing this article, and had to reread the talk page to see what I did. I'm always happy to help, but it's asking a lot of me to just go in and parse all the recent edit history and drama, while figuring out exactly what I'm supposed to be deciding. I see that @Hipal: suggested starting a discussion on the talk page to discuss specific issues. That seems to be much better in the spirit of collaboration, and should make it easier for me to review and weigh in. I'll watchlist the article and discussion and go from there. If you can't reach consensus and I can't move the needle, you can always try a RFC, but hopefully it won't come to that. If this gets too heated, maybe take an editing break for a few days and then come back with a more positive demeanor. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 18:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) And for the record, I chose to contact Tim because I saw the great help he provided on the Greiner talk page and, by browsing his historical contributions, discovered he's an excellent editor in all respects. He is very smart and knowledgeable, and has demonstrated a great ability to analyze and solve problems in a friendly, professional, and efficient manner. The Greiner article should be a piece of cake when compared to some of the other problems he's fixed. Stoarm (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tim, thanks for the reply! You don't have to go through all of the recent edit history. I was hoping you could look at the article as it stands at this moment and simply evaluate the content and especially the sources to determine which should stay or go, or be changed. Quick background: Hipal/Ronz and I have a long, unproductive history this year (see talk page of Scott Baio) and collaboration between us will never work. So, what I'm proposing is that I will back out of editing Lori Greiner completely if you will take my place and collaborate with Hipal/Ronz to clean up the article. There's actually not much content. As I said, if that involves trashing any edits I contributed, then so be it. You are far more experienced and talented than me at solving an ongoing dispute like this. Thanks much. Stoarm (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim. Thanks. I think the edit-warring and disruption might be best settled first. I was planning on going to BLPN until an admin got involved. --Hipal (talk) 20:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hipal: @Stoarm: - hopefully you can work together. I took a quick look at the article and everything looks fine to me casually. Sources look good, content seems neutral, no flags, nothing really stands out. So had I not gone to the history or the talk page I wouldn’t give it a second look. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking it over.

I appreciate Stoarm's offer to step back. Thank you, Stoarm.

I've provided a detailed description of the dispute from my perspective on the article talk page in a new section. --Hipal (talk) 22:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tim, I just want to make sure we're on the same page about resolving this matter. You said, "hopefully you can work together". I'm not sure to whom that was directed, but as I stated above, I will definitely not attempt any further collaboration with Hipal. That is why I presented you my proposal to stop editing the article if you will take my place in the collaboration to address Hipal's objections. However, I read your assessment of the current version of the article ("...everything looks fine to me casually. Sources look good, content seems neutral, no flags, nothing really stands out"), so I'm not sure where you stand at this point. Can you explain what your next steps will be in resolving this matter, if any? Sorry for any confusion. Thanks. Stoarm (talk) 03:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Stoarm: Sorry – in the back-and-forth, I missed your comment about backing off. I’m saying that the article looks fine to an outsider who doesn’t have time to go through the edit history and read the talk page to try to understand what the dispute is. If the dispute can be summarized on the article talk page, I can review and see what’s going on. I worry that we’re going in circles. Let’s move this all to the Lori Greiner talk page. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 07:42, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize. A lot of information was thrown at you, so thank you for your patience. The dispute is this: refs. Hipal has contended for a long time that a number of the refs are promotional and were orchestrated by Greiner's "PR machine". As a result, he doesn't believe accomplishments that are currently included in the article are real. He apparently doesn't even believe she's an inventor, since he refers to them as "inventions" on the article's talk page. This skepticism brings WP:TRUTH to my mind. Anyway, you'll see Hipal's current objections on the Greiner talk page. I'll leave that to you two to work out. I won't be participating in the discussion. Thanks, again. Stoarm (talk) 09:54, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate editors not attempting to summarize what they think my perspective is, in order to avoid misrepresentations. I consider the attempts above to be misrepresentations. --Hipal (talk) 17:11, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timtempleton, I am working on improving the Tezos article. I noticed that you recently made some edits on the page, and thought you may be interested in reviewing my edit request on the Talk page. I would appreciate it if you would implement the changes, as I am not editing directly due to my COI. Of course, I welcome any feedback you may have. Thanks for your time, Marko at Tezos (talk) 13:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Marko at Tezos: I'll take a look when I get a chance. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Coin Coin Chapter Three: River Run Thee on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your help! -- Lucretius (talk) 08:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors October 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up for our July Backlog Elimination Drive, 18 copy-edited, between them, 116 articles. Barnstars awarded are noted here. Blitz: Participants in our August Copy Editing Blitz copy-edited 51,074 words in 17 articles. Of the 15 editors who signed up, 11 claimed at least one copy-edit. Barnstars awarded are noted here. Drive: Forty-one editors took part in our September Backlog Elimination Drive; between them they copy-edited 199 articles. Barnstars awards are noted here. Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz begins on 16 October at 00:01 (UTC) and will end on 22 October at 23:59 (UTC). Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 303 requests for copy edit – including withdrawn and declined ones – since 1 January. At the time of writing, there are 77 requests awaiting attention and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,759. We always need more active, skilled copyeditors – particularly for requests – so please get involved if you can. Election news: In our mid-year election, serving coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tenryuu were returned for another term, and were joined by new coordinator Zippybonzo. No lead coordinator was elected for this half-year. Jonesey95, a long-serving coordinator and lead, was elected as coordinator emeritus; we thank them for their service. Thank you to everyone who took part. Our next election of coordinators takes place throughout December. If you'd like to help out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself or other suitable editors (with their permission, of course!). It's your Guild, after all! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tenryuu and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Baffle☿gab 03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim, You have just answered me on Tea House regarding Edit Notice. I don't understand what you answered. Can you eloborate it. And I am using Safari on iPad.

Doubt I asked on Tea House: Hi..I edited my Edit Notice. But it still shows the previous one. Is there any way to refresh it. Eagle Site (talk) 23:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at Teahouse. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 03:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Contentsquare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contentsquare (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 19:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AlphaSense is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlphaSense until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 00:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:American Sleep Apnea Association Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:American Sleep Apnea Association logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fivetran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fivetran (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 15:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TimTempleton, I am writing to ask you to remove or strike your comment directed towards me [5] in this discussion, because the way it is phrased seems to be an ad hominem and personalized comment that does not focus on the content. In some ways, it also appears to ask for personal details, i.e. whether or not I have sufficient business experience, as if this is relevant to e.g. reviewing press releases and comparing them to available sources, recognizing secondary context and commentary, or determining what is independent and reliable coverage. My preceding comment with additional detailed analysis of sources [6] was an attempt to respond to your previous comment that seems to assert another editor is gaslighting [7]. Also, this AfD was brought to my attention by your ping on the article Talk page, and we have worked together before, so ultimately I am asking you to continue assuming my good faith in my interpretation of the guidelines and sources, even though we disagree about this article. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beccaynr: he attacked me a well in a similar manner, which was really nasty and very poor. Beyond the pale. If you want to take to Ani I will come up as well. I don't think trying to reason with him will work, as I suspect he's not even read the NCORP policy and why it was brought in the first place. Your excellent analysis as per falls on deaf ears. scope_creep^Talk 16:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beccaynr: Comment struck. I'll add more sources, but it was unpleasant when Scope immediately responded to my good faith ping by nominating the recreated Contentsquare article for deletion, so quickly that there was no possible way he had time to read the new sources I found. It was a knee-jerk, bad faith nomination. When I called him out on it, he proceeded to start targeting other articles I wrote. He has a history of doing this, and it's disruptive. I pointed this out in another discussion, for context,and he tried to delete my comment. I'd rather spend time creating new content than rehashing old articles,and I don't need this drama. I have no blocks. He has one, for this exact same behaviour. More people need to know this so he can learn to not be so disruptive. From my interactions with him in the past, he needs to be more thoughtful and careful. I'm not going to post diffs, but there are examples in his AfDs that show he clearly isn't reading and understanding the sources. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate you deleting the comment at the AfD, there are comments you are making about scope creep that seem to be personal attacks and should be reconsidered and removed immediately. Beccaynr (talk) 17:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edited to make less personal. But the disruptive patterns are there for anyone to see. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From my view, the insufficient support for NCORP notability was straighforward to assess at the time of nomination [8], and the current AfD discussion is further demonstrating the soundness of the initial assessment. We had also already thoroughly discussed this article and NCORP at a recent AfD that resulted in a consensus to delete. And from my view, a comment like this [9] at AfD could be considered disruptive, including because it focuses on the contributor, not the content. Beccaynr (talk) 18:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to tone down my anger and take the high road here while Scope feigns innocence, with a long history of targeted, abusive behavior, that has gotten him blocked before. Did you not see the new SIGNIFICANT (highest funding in French tech history) Contentsquare coverage that came out after the previous deletion discussion, that was immediately ignored by the nom? I'm sure if you spent hours working on an article with new sources and politely notified everyone from the earlier deletion discussion, and were immediately accused of polluting the encyclopedia and being paid, and the article was immediately nominated before the sources were considered, you'd be pissed off too. I look at the rude, grammatically incorrect comments and can only assume I'm dealing with a person with anger problems. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 07:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any idea what he's talking about? [[10]] TechnoTalk (talk) 02:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TechnoTalk: I think so. I just sent you an email. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 06:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)). Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 11:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. Noting check user block with a VRT ticket thrown in for good measure. All above my pay grade. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kareo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kareo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SmartSE (talk) 13:45, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norman Ciment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Ciment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SmartSE (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AlphaSense company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 12:15, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Contentsquyare company logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Executive DBA Council has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently an advert by a now blocked undeclared paid editor followed by some SPAs. Apologies if a legit editor has been here but I haven't seen it in the history.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fivetran company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ragy Thomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragy Thomas (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

多少 战场 龙 (talk) 08:11, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fortra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 13:15, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie: @Kentuckyfriedtucker: As editors of technical company articles, I thought I'd ping you. I've been accused of UPE and have been blocked. Articles I wrote have been mass targeted by Scope creep, formerly User:SwisterTwister, and his army of foreign socks, including User:多少 战场 龙. Fortra, previously Help Systems, is one of the first RPA companies and is therefore noteworthy. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortra if you have any thoughts. There's significant media coverage, but I trust you'll make the right decision. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 18:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is obvious WP:CANVASSING. If you weren't already blocked I would report it. I will not be weighing in on that discussion, and I encourage Kentuckyfriedtucker not to weigh in either. MrOllie (talk) 18:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie: It's not canvassing if I have no idea whether or not you will help by offering a neutral yet informed opinion. And you refused. So that's that. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 18:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was an obvious attempt to sway the outcome and is a clear violation of Wikipedia:Canvassing#Campaigning. - MrOllie (talk) 18:52, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No - you are blocked because you had been using TechnoTalk to double !vote in AFDs (as well as other things). The question is of course, why would you do that unless you are being paid? SmartSE (talk) 18:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and if you carry on making unjustified accusations against other editors, you should expect to lose the ability to edit this page too. SmartSE (talk) 18:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse: If I invest hours in creating content, it's only natural that I'd want to keep it from being deleted, especially by editors who misapply notability guidelines and collaborate off-Wiki with brand new socks to target articles, while the admins choose to look the other way. Not everything is for pay. I think my edit history speaks for itself, and I'm proud of my contributions. I'm in the to ten for teahouse and help desk edits, and have helped hundreds of novice editors. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments here quite clearly violate both WP:CANVAS and WP:ASPERSIONS. You may use your talk page access to appeal your block, but that is pretty much the only thing you should be using it for. If you make any more inappropriate comments, I will revoke it. --Blablubbs (talk) 22:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Security First Corp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dead company. No instrisic encyclopedic or historical worth. Refs fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 21:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Broadcom Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Refs fail WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. Refs are interviews and routine coverage along with passing mentions. Non-notable. Been on the cat:nn list for three years and never been updated.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 21:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katherine Power is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Power until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 21:13, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Broadcom Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadcom Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 09:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LoJack company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Charity Navigator logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clique Brands is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clique Brands until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 08:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HelpSystems logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethos (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethos (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 11:32, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felicis Ventures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicis Ventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 11:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Broadcom Foundation logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Beqom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and WP:SIRS. Refs are routine business news, PR, press-releases along with dead refs. UPE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 00:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WeLink is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WeLink until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 00:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Playground Sessions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NCORP References are routine business news, PR, press-releases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Playground Sessions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playground Sessions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 09:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Numecent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numecent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 12:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ZenFi company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ZenFi Networks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZenFi Networks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 19:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Clique Brands logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ethos company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Felicis company logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Front (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. Routine coverage of PR and Press releases, funding news, hiring annoucements is mostly non-independent. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 13:51, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bluevine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluevine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 13:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Trace3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 14:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WeLink company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deutsch LA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deutsch LA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

多少 战场 龙 (talk) 13:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Who What Wear corporate logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ZenFi company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Playground Sessions logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bluevine company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Front company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Trace3 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Poptent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Defunct company. Fails WP:NCORP. No historical or enclycopeadic value.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 14:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article American Realty Advisors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. References are investments, expansions, PR and routine annoucements of appointments as well as stocks listings and company formation documentation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 12:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notarize (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notarize (company) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 12:06, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gimbal, Inc. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. References are funding and acquisition news, partnership and appointments, all of it routine coverage that fails WP:SIRS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 12:09, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:American Realty Advisors logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maven Clinic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. References are acquisition, funding, X of Y articles (2), interviews with founder/ceo, press-releases, listicles and PR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 12:13, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Navin Chaddha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SIGCOV.WP:BIO. UPE. Coverage is mainly interviews, or his commentary, which isn't significant or indepth. WP:BEFORE finds nothing of significance. Forbes coverage is either 404 or contributors. No secondary coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 12:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Insteon (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are company blogs, patents, aquisitions, company documents, partnership and press-releases. Fails WP:SIRS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 12:51, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Notarize company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Navin Chaddha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navin Chaddha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 00:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Insteon (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insteon (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 00:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maven Clinic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maven Clinic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 00:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Maven Clinic logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toba Capital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toba Capital (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 20:55, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Silversmith Capital Partners has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. Brochure article, routine coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 20:57, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silversmith Capital Partners is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silversmith Capital Partners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 23:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Toba Capital logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Silversmith Capital Partners logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TimTempleton, You may recall implementing an edit request in April 2022 I made via the edit request system for the Lush (company) page. The request was in relation to our stores in Ukraine and Russia after the war began. Firstly, thanks for taking the time to look at my edit and implement it. Since then, it seems an editor has reverted the edit you made. I'd really appreciate it if you could take another look here to see if you think the revert is warranted. A little bit of background, on another edit request we got the following comment from an IP editor, "you want to use paid-media to post PR-virtue signals on an independent, editorially moderated, free educational resource. While there are plenty of active editors who are dumb enough or greedy enough to let you do that, I will not be one of them." Both this comment and the revert came from UK IPs, that had no other edits other than to carry out those tasks, which suggests the IP editor is now carrying out their treat of "not letting us" post edit requests? RuanaLush (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RuanaLush: This editor is checkuser blocked indefinently. Why are you posting this? scope_creep^Talk 15:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Broadbean (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are routine business news. Fails WP:SIRS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 22:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Timtempleton. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stone Point Capital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Deel company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Move-up home has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia should not be turned into a dictionary, however this article contains no encyclopaedic information of value beyond a simple dictionary definition of the subject term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Covad Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:06, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Timtempleton. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stone Point Capital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a redirect from Pardot in order to create a page specifically for the company. It had been acquired by ExactTarget for $100M and I had thought to build out a page specifically on it. Such a meaningful company in both Atlanta and in the marketing technology landscape that it'd be a shame to have it redirect to a random and arguably much less notable amorphous Salesforce product name. Since I'm a lesser experienced editor I wanted to run this by you just in case your afd gun is loaded and ready! :) CaseyChesh (talk) 01:03, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CaseyChesh: Timtempleton was Checkuser indef'ed almost a year ago. Meters (talk) 04:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MullenLowe Group.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aydin Senkut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

the sources are not good; the author is blocked for UPE and sockpuppeting

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brent Saunders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Saunders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 02:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cylance company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WatchGuard Technologies logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sarcos company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect NOTOC has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 30 § NOTOC until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]