I have added a "((prod))" template to the article Antonio imbert barrera, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod))
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Greswik 12:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Copied from my talk page:
Help to this wikification-challenged user from wikipedia, fix my contributions to article. Anglican and orthodox had new patriarchs.
((helpme))
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I have no idea what you are talking about. Does it involved a specific article or Talk: page? Jayjg (talk) 21:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Garzo. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You must surely be aware that calling me a 'catamite' is a serious personal attack. Further such comments will lead to your account being blocked — Gareth Hughes 14:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
If you make personal attacks, like [1], this account will be blocked, just as your other names Guillen (talk · contribs), Eliecer (talk · contribs), etc, have been. Wikipedia does not permit the use of sock puppets for the purpose of evading bans, so consider this your warning that you are editing on borrowed time. --BigDT 14:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)