÷== Canadian Army Tactics School moved to draftspace ==

An article you recently created, Canadian Army Tactics School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles do not need references to be notable. See WP:NEXIST. trackratte (talk) 18:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Canadian Army Tactics School.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trackratte. You have new messages at Talk:Government_of_Canada.
Message added 05:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Kudu ^~I/O~ 05:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If so can you look at the lead of Government of Canada...as there have been so major changes.... it all sounds right but reads very oddly with its federal separation.--Moxy- 15:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting to Chief of the Defence Staff. I see that WildComet has again changed it to read "chief of the Defence Staff" which is incorrect. I have added a disputed tag to the page.

--Greenwood10 (talk) 23:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Wayne Eyre. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Defence Team Organisational Structure 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I recently attempted to revert your edit for the Arms of Canada on the page Armorial of sovereign states, and I erroneously justified this with the claim that you were attempting to use a non-free media image. I would like to apologize for this misunderstanding on my part.

Nonetheless I do think it is up for debate as to whether to alternative that you have added is an improvement on the previous image. I won't attempt to revert this any further, but I have left a note on the talk page explaining my position that this image displays a now-defunct variant of the Arms of Canada. While the previous image I added was not an official rendition, it was faithful to the blazon of the current Arms of Canada, and while I understand your desire to use an official rendition I think it would be misleading to display an image that does not include all the elements of the current version. Heraldic accuracy seems preferable to me over formerly official renditions, though I'm open to alternative views on this.

I also noticed you reverted a separate edit I made which added to link to the article Blazon for context on what is meant by a "heraldic description". I'm going to revert this because I assume this was in error while trying to revert my previous revert, but do let me know if there is an additional reason for this.

DanielMichaelPerry (talk) 22:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

بريطانيا العظمى امتداها المكتبة والارشيقف القومي

من بابالمضاهاه والاعتزاز بانتمائي اتت فكرة السعودية العظمى # 2001:16A4:229:5D24:89EF:4710:BB38:62B9 (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that you have reverted 3 times on Monarchy of Canada in the last 5 hours. As you know, editors are not permitted to revert on any one page more than 3 times in any 24-hour period. DrKay (talk) 20:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trackratte, I know you feel strongly about this issue. But please stop what you're doing. I don't want to see a fellow editor (you) that I've known for years, get blocked. GoodDay (talk) 20:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers to both of you. trackratte (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source you added doesn't say anything about the structure being a royal residence or a residence for the King. It says explicitly it is a "vice-regal" residence. See[1]. As you know vice-regal is the adjective for viceroy ie governor general or lieutenant governor. It does not mean king, queen, or royal. Wellington Bay (talk) 19:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The exact quote is "Marquess of Dufferin and Ava, Governor General of Canada 1872-1878, who also established the Citadelle as a vice-regal residence" (emphasis added). Evidently, whichever editor originally added that reference and claimed it referred to the building being the Queen's residence was taking liberties or didn't know what the word "vice-regal" means. Wellington Bay (talk) 19:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The exact quote is on page 119 and says "The Citadelle....has been also an official residence of the Queen in Right of Canada and the Governor General of Canada since 1872...". trackratte (talk) 23:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]