In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TrickShotFinn,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 39th Special Forces Detachment for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 20:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 39th Special Forces Detachment, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kuk Sul Do (Choon Sik Yang) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG, and written in a promotional tone.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 15:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kuk Sul Do (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 16:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! I wanted to draw your attention to this edit. Please understand that "it's" is a contraction of "it is"; whenever it's is used, a substitution of "it is" should make sense. The word "its" is a possessive denoting ownership as in "its head" or "its thoughts".

Actually, it's should almost never be used as stated in the manual of style: "Missing letters are replaced by an apostrophe in multiple-word contractions. Contractions should not be used in Wikipedia." Thus, occurrences of "it's" should be replaced by "it is". Just a heads up! --LilHelpa (talk) 22:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you are a new editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article SIG MP41. The infringing text has been removed because the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web. When creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Utter nonsense, but I'll give you benefit of a doubt... Granted this subject doesn't take a freaky turn somewhere. --TrickShotFinn (talk) 15:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SteyrPi18Early.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jumpytoo Talk 04:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DKW F102, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bosch and In-line engine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted and fixed. Thanks DPL Bot --TrickShotFinn (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shōrei-ryū, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tensho and Ohan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TrickShotFinn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:39th Special Forces Detachment, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TrickShotFinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "39th Special Forces Detachment".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Hatenkai, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:48, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freestyle wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TrickShotFinn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hatenkai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say thanks for creating the page on Robert Cheezic, my grandfather. It means a lot to me. If you don't mind me asking, how did you know him? Did you hear of him, or did you meet him?

Thanks, Max.

Well Hello Max, greetings from Finland. I discovered GM Cheezic when I was doing research on art of Tang Soo Do and the name "Cheezic Tang Soo Do Federation" caught my eye. Since I'm Finnish, the "Cheezic TSD" sounded kinda odd to my ear and I wanted know what the deal was. Also to make sure that it wasn't some troll edit, since the Tang Soo Do page is persistently plagued by non-constructive edits. Subsequently, I found that GM Robert Cheezic was quite a career martial artist and - to make sure Cheezic TSD woulun't be swiped away from Wikipedia for lack of notability - I made the entry for Robert Cheezic, based on the info I observed at the "references" section.

I myself I'm a big fan of Kyokushin-style Knockdown Karate, which was founded by a Zainchi-Korean (Korean Japanese person). So I also like finding stuff about Korean styles of striking martial arts as well, Tang Soo Do being one of them. Regrettably, there is no Tang Soo Do in Finland, but who knows if one day...

Best regards to you and your family. TrickShotFinn (talk) 08:10, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TrickShotFinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hatenkai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I think I asked some moderator/admin to delete it, but my request was not responded to. I came to conclusion that the info on Hatenkai could fit into Aikido styles anyway, so deletion of the original entry and draft was for the best. TrickShotFinn (talk) 08:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TrickShotFinnAvatar2015.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:55, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Roland Habersetzer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 16:31, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 813 (novel), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 23:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:813 (novel). Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've been looking for references. The Netflix series has added complexity to the search and I have, so far, failed to find anything. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I can only really find fan opinions on 813, but not academic ones for legitimate citations. That and I was mainly focused on other entries at the time. TrickShotFinn (talk) 17:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

a consideration is to seek to form a consensus to include selected works in the author;s article? Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 18:52, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For real, the more times you go back and forth, especially on content, the less likely there is to be any action. He's already said you need an IQ check, piped to eugenics, so if it just sits for a little bit it should get resolved. If there's more arguing between you two and things like that attack are lost in the noise, you're less likely to see a resolution anytime soon. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:37, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I just wanted to diffuse to ESPN claim for other observers atleast. I know where that guy's path is leading to and my mercy doesn't reach him anymore. TrickShotFinn (talk) 18:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your username implies interest in ball sports, but based on your user page you're more interested in martial arts. Minkai^(rawr!)_{(see where I screwed up)} 21:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JulieMinkai: TrickShot actually (sorta) has a double meaning. It is actually meant to refer to trick shooting, as I'm quite a accurate shooter in real life. Though I am aware just "trickshot" can mean completely different things. That and "Trick" refers to "thinking outside the box" tactics I use to do stuff. I'm generally perceived by my real-life peers to be quite crafty in strategy games and I'm often contacted to find stuff like books, movies that might be out of print. The username itself is a carry over from my days at Internet Movie Firearms Database, I used to be moderately active there circa 2013/2014-2019. Don't worry, I'm not a NRA nut or anything. I do creative writing, namely in spy fiction/military action genre, so I'm quite specific about what sort of firearms certain of entities use.
I used to be a avid firearms aficionado, but currently it's more of a love-hate relationship, namely due to gun culture that perpetuates around the web. My elder relative's child almost died at 2007 Jokela school shooting, which had always complicated things for me from my occupational education years. After the Cheeto Benito era school shootings in USA, combined with the snide, swellheaded attitude the gun guys around the web, I just didn't want to be associated with gun culture anymore.
The martial arts thing was initially a short phase in mid-2000s, until I re-discovered Bruce Lee and his philosophy circa 2012 - which completely revitalized my life at that point. Infact, that's about the part when I started to search other martial arts. Like with guns, I wanted the right martial art for right character personality. These days, the martial arts thing has taken over the firearms interest. -- TrickShotFinn (talk) 13:40, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wow, we do actually have an area of overlap lol...I created Stembridge Gun Rentals, which appeared at DYK earlier today. —valereee (talk) 14:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee: Oh OK. When I peeked at your contributions, I saw lots of cuisine, social causes, fashion people and wikipedia administration-related stuff with few glimpses of Stembridge Rentals. But y'know, I'm mostly martial arts + "getting towed in a trollercoaster" thanks to Jacee. TrickShotFinn (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Volk Han, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Work.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I noticed you were taking over the Takaku Fuke draft page and I'd like to let you know he is actually considered notable by WP:MMABIO. He was ranked as the number 2 heavyweight in the world by FightMatrix in 1994, which technically allows him to pass as a notable article. cheers ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 09:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RafaelHP: Gotcha. According to FightMatrix archive, Fuke was also a pound-per-pound Top 5 circa October 1994. --TrickShotFinn (talk) 10:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RafaelHP: Welp, User:Missvain thinks you're wrong. The Fuke draft declined on Dec 9th for lack of notability. Also possibly because the original author - who managed to submit the draft for second time before I worked on it - was blocked for being a scumbag who half-assed his entry writing and put all his effort in making people miserable over trivial bs. Is there something I'm missing or did Missvain bungle it or something? -- TrickShotFinn (talk) 12:14, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They definitely messed it up, I know that Jiri Prochazka was accepted as an article because he was ranked inside the top 10 by FightMatrix, even though he didnt have 3 top tier fights. I'd encourage them to read WP:MMABIO ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 12:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've inquired Missvain about this. Though it appears Pancrase is seen as second tier by WP:MMATIER - and not top tier, so Fuke maybe out in that regard. -- TrickShotFinn (talk) 12:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TSF: May I suggest that the route forward is to look with care at the citations and seek to ensure that they show notability. I would set aside the blocked combative editor as a reason for a decline. They are blocked, are in the past, and have no current relevance.

If I had the necessary knowledge for the arena this draft is in I would offer an AFC review, but I'm afraid combat sports are a blindspot for me. I would expect notability criteria to be somewhere in the Wikipedia:NATHLETE page Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:06, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NMMA may be what you need Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a minute, @Timtrent:... Is @RafaelHP: wrong about the WP:MMABIO thing? Because Fuke atleast meets the FightMatrix qualifications and the draft *had them* (Nov 28 v Dec 9 when checked) when Missvain checked them.[[1]] -- TrickShotFinn (talk) 18:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me as though one contains the other. I have given it a very cursory look. I am not competent to review the draft, however, nor to comment own whether a prior reviewer was right or wrong. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how I could be wrong, it's pretty clearly stated if the subject meets one of the three guidelines they are considered notable by WP:MMA. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 09:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Finn. Here are a few Wikipedians that regularly edit Japanese wrestling articles:

• User:Antny517
• User:Jose34683
• User:SeosiWrestling
• User:JeyReydar97
• User:MordecaiXLII

Hope this helps. 173.162.220.17 (talk) 19:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks! But it will be a hot minute till I can put this info to use. -- TrickShotFinn (talk) 16:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ademir da Costa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:37, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shrugh. Why does this keep happening every time when I turn my back at Wikipedia? -- TrickShotFinn (talk) 16:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Hsu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Hsu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Roland Habersetzer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Takaku Fuke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cassiopeia talk 03:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not clear that it meets WP:NMMA, as submission only appears to describe two top tier fights.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rin Nakai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rin Nakai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TrickShotFinn! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TrickShotFinn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:813 (novel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Large portion of this submission is unsourced. Please introduce additional references from reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fiat 15 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fiat 15, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TrickShotFinn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ademir da Costa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kyokushin World Cup in Weight Categories

added links pointing to Michael Thompson, Ryan Powell, Georgi Georgiev, Georgi Vasilev, Francisco Filho, Carlos Castro, Lars Jensen, Alexandre Rodrigues and Mark Goodwin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fakescientist8000 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

So many cn tags remaining. Please fix those, and message me on my talk once you do.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roland Habersetzer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Roland Habersetzer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cheers! Fakescientist8000 13:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rin Nakai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:40, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fiat 15, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of Taekwondo practitioners. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bajiquan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TrickShotFinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ademir da Costa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:56, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Walther P5, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TrickShotFinn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roland Habersetzer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TrickShotFinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roland Habersetzer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Franchi LF-57, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]