My logged out contributions are at Special:Contributions/45.251.33.0/24 from sometime in July 2020 till 19 or 20 July 2021 (I don't remember which date) (some edits were by other people on the same range, though about 85-95% are mine) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.251.33.192 (talk) 05:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC) Updated by Tube·of·Light 04:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tube of Light! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Pekka Lundmark, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Joseph2302 (talk) 09:41, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia C series (Cricket wireless), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 20:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I saw that you were edit warring on Genie (feral child). The term "mentally retarded" is outdated and considered to be offensive. Please read Retard (pejorative). And do not edit war. Thank you. Pack My Box (talk) 21:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Pack My Box:. Thanks for taking the time to discuss this with me. I do agree that the term is considered to be offensive but as per my understanding, WP:Presentism implies that the old term should be used if most of the reliable sources available use it. However, I am not in a position to take the time to discuss this, so I'll avoid that article and leave it for other editors to discuss. TubeOfLightTalk Less, Smile More 01:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I would not change a direct quote but there is no need to retain offensive terms. That essay does not mean that we should not use modern terminology. Regardless, edit warring is not the way. Thank you for your reply. Pack My Box (talk) 02:42, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the section about the founder, Dawnn Karen recieving racial descrimination as I thought that was the reason the article was marked as being written from a non- neutral point of view. Could you help me understand what it is that doesnt sound neutral? I am not being compensated for writting this article at all so I want to make sure it doesnt appear that way. Thank You

Hi, SophiaEx. Sorry for reverting your edits. I just now chose to read the sources you removed and I found that they were not relevant enough to be included in the article. I assumed that your edits weren't productive because your explanation didn't seem to be true (since Wikipedia has had problems with other people removing negative information and they tend to use similar edit summaries). If you said that the information you removed wasn't relevant enough to the article, I would have understood what you wanted to do and wouldn't have reverted your edits. Tube·of·Light 15:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC) (PS - Next time, please remember to sign your talk page messages with four tildes (like this ~~~~) so that editors will know that you have written a message to them. Wikipedia's software will convert that into a link to your userpage, a link to your talk page and a timestamp. You can read Wikipedia:Signatures for more info)[reply]

PPS - You can now remove the info I re-added to the article. Tube·of·Light 15:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Did not notice it was you, I hope you are well and welcome back to Wikipedia. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 08:06, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tube of Light! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How much disruptive editing/vandalism would warrant page protection?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tube of Light! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to deal with an editor who is dismissive when messaged about editing behaviour, and being rude (borderline personal attack) in edit summaries?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uh... wait a minute ! Why you reverted my edit ? I know my phone, and I saw the video quality, 720p at 30 frames, and for my phone's selfie camera's video, is set in 720p at 30 frames... my phone model : Nokia 3. ÉOLE79000 (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, am I ready to revert your edit ? Best regards, ÉOLE79000 (talk) 20:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rahul Bajaj, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 11:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the editing of the Outfit7 article 😞 I only added what i heard was true. Bye, take care! OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 16:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When nomintating articles on secondary schools for deletion, it is best to use Newspapers.com. WP:SIGCOV is found there more often than not. A Google search is rarely sufficient. Scorpions13256 (talk) 18:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Linus Media Group. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Picard's Facepalm (talk) 15:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi this is surfmaster23 i would like to address the reason behind removing the picture from 2023 cricket world cup final. That image will be deleted after 7 days, so i urge you to please change the image with File:Cricket 6.jpg, for some reason i cant edit that page. Surfmaster23 (talk) 12:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I have replaced the image. If possible, can you tell me who is the batsman and the bowler in that specific image so that I can add it to the image caption? Tube·of·Light 12:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So Mitchell strac is bowling to Rohit Sharma who is on Strike and non striker is Shubman Gill. Surfmaster23 (talk) 14:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just asked a question and you reverted it. I just wanted to know when Season 6 of TT&F will come out. I don't understand and according to YOU my edits are vandalism, yet they aren't, so what did i do? TeratingaKevinBaughsNewFriend (talk) 15:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page isn't meant to be used for asking about future seasons of TV shows, it is meant to be used to discuss only content issues and edits to the contents of the article. Using the talk page for a purpose it is not meant for constitutes vandalism and will result in such content being deleted. Tube·of·Light 15:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, but why did you revert all my edits? Some inform a lot, but mostly basically nothing. TeratingaKevinBaughsNewFriend (talk) 20:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You made only one edit which I reverted. Everything else you wrote hasn't been reverted. Tube·of·Light 02:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]