Archives

Archive 1 (13 Dec 2006−13 Feb 2007) Archive 2 (14 Feb 2007−27 Apr 2007) Archive 3 (1 May 2007−20 Mar 2008) Archive 4 (29 Mar 2008−27 Aug 2008) Archive 5 (27 Aug 2008−16 Jan 2009) Archive 6 (20 Jan 2008−…)

I noticed that you placed a review box in Planescape: Torment. I'm glad you did, but I was curious as to why you made it collapsed by default. I'm just used to seeing it displayed proudly. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 07:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Responded on my talk page. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 06:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there! In case you haven't seen, Planescape: Torment has been nominated as a Good Article, and the review has been placed on hold; some issues need to be resolved, so have a look at the review page and discuss the issues and let's get to work! BOZ (talk) 20:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In April, 2007, you added some tags to the BNU (software) article. I've tried to work this out but would like it if you would take a look and see if it is better in the area(s) you point to. I don't have a writing background but am a long time (30+ years) coder and hardware person. I've used the software in question along with the other related software for many years and, actually, still do, today ;) Your assistance, since it was you who placed those tags, is appreciated. Discussion is welcome :)

Thanks!

Wkitty42 (talk) 23:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

Glad to hear that Planescape: Torment is being worked on. It's a great game that deserves a great article!

I took shots of the articles that you requested: [1] [2] --SubSeven (talk) 19:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Twinkle error, it would seem. It's not like they are uncommon. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 18:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wait, they are two separate images. Check the filenames. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 18:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not really, users sometimes do it to try and avoid scrutiny the second time around (not that that is necessarily what has happened this time). — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 18:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The citation was already given at the bottom of the paragraph, so there's no need for a citation-needed template. Jonas Poole (talk) 16:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It looks like Recognizance took the best of both suggestions and merged them together. It's a minor issue, but I was experimenting to see if I could get the column widths more precisely specified for a more uniform appearance. My current approach is to define a zero height row with no column spans in which all column widths are defined. The widths look good, but I cannot get the row to be a true zero-height (hidden) row. Any suggestions?

Standard Mandarin personal pronouns^[1]

Person	Singular				Plural
First person	我 wǒ 'I, me'				Exclusive		Inclusive
					我们 wǒmen 'we, us'		咱们 (zánmen) 'we, us' *
Second person	Normal		Polite		你们 (nǐmen) 'you (all)'
	你 (nǐ) 'you'		您 (nín) 'you'
Third person	Masculine	Feminine		Neuter	Masculine	Feminine		Neuter
	他 (tā) 'he, him'	她 tā 'she, her'		它 tā 'it' †	他们 (tāmen) 'they, them'	她们 tāmen 'they, them'		它们 tāmen 'they, them'

-- Tcncv (talk) 22:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nice (User_talk:Tcncv#Re: Precise width control for spanned cells). That did the trick. I went ahead and merged the your changes into the article. -- Tcncv (talk) 23:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just wanted to say your collums etc that you are doing on that page look much better! -Djsasso (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, as someone who participated in this, you may be interested in giving your opinion at this featured topic candidacy, which is currently seeking wider input before a decision can be made as to whether to promote the nomination. Thanks, rst20xx (talk) 01:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Twas Now! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your edits on Dungeons & Dragons video game-related articles. We could use your help at the D&D task force! Don't be shy, head over to the project page and help us enhance and increase the coverage of D&D video game articles on Wikipedia!

—  Levi van Tine (t – c) 14:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This...it's appreciated, but could you try to make your edit summary less point-y? I was a half second from reverting it as vandalism before I noticed it was actually a helpful edit (the summary screamed vandalism on first glance). Just an FYI. --IllaZilla (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Twas Now. You have new messages at Template talk:Neverwinter Nights.
Message added 07:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ache Records, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Tagged for months with notability concerns, still lacks reliable 3rd party references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 12:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey- I saw that you asked SubSeven for the magazine reviews and apparently got them. Now that the article is an FAC, could you either add the relevant information or forward it to me? The magazines were brought up in the review, so any help would be much appreciated. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks indeed. :) I'd also like to note, if you're interested, that Neverwinter Nights 2 is up for GAN. BOZ (talk) 22:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And I forgot, also Neverwinter Nights 2: Storm of Zehir was nominated for Good Article along with the main title. BOZ (talk) 18:59, 2 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Good Article review for Neverwinter Nights 2 has begun! There is some work to do, but overall it looks like we're in good shape. BOZ (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem - we'll probably get to those sooner or later, as they all have huge potential. :) BOZ (talk) 22:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Tango: Zero Hour, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tango: Zero Hour. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Chzz  ►  02:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Twas Now. You have new messages at Drilnoth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good job in adding the stats for Bobby Cunningham. I had already forwarded myself to improve the article and was going to put a request for anyone to add the stats as I can't really do them but you beat me to it. Well done! Unfortunatley it resulted in an edit conflict between my biography but I always copy my edits (or rather the entire page) in case of an edit conflict, so I suffered no loss. I was allowed to paste my biography again while keeping for stats. If my edit ended up causing an edit conflict on your part I apologise for that, I guess two minds two minds thought alike on this occassion. Anyways, nice job on the stats once more, page looks a lot better now than it did around an hour ago. Raphie (talk) 04:31, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hiya Twas Now, thanks for the 'diacritics removal' support. PS: I used to pipe-link them, but lost my patients 2-months ago. Now, I merely obliterate them. GoodDay (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If I may quote Jack Benny? Now, cut that out. GoodDay (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree that the italics would be better on that quote in Planescape: Torment, but that isn't one of the things listed at WP:MOSQUOTE... I'm actually unsure as to what should be done with it. Should the original text be preserved more exactly or should it use more standard formatting? –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Salut,
Je viens de voir ton edit sur la page de David Tal, ce qui m'a fait constater que tu contribuais sur wp:fr et que tu avais déjà participé à des traductions.
Est-ce que tu penses avoir le temps de faire une relecture de Battles of Latrun, qui est la traduction de l'AdQ fr:Bataille de Latroun (1948) ?
J'en suis le principal rédacteur dans sa version française. Il a été traduit par plusieurs personnes ici mais une relecture générale s'imposent avec sans doute des reformulations...
Merci d'avance !
Ceedjee (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Enchanted Hunters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 11:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your edit to the template ((The Fly)) added the Category:Fly films. First, I think this should have been done in a way which would not include the template itself in that category; maybe <includeonly> is the correct mechanism for that, but I'm no expert in template coding. Second, I'm not sure that all pages where this template appears should fall into that category, eg. The Fly (opera) or The Fly (George Langelaan); there's even a anonymous user page (User talk:81.106.67.236) which is now listed in that category. Thirdly, I don't understand the purpose of the piped category sorting term "τ"; it makes the list at Category:Fly films look odd to me. What do you think? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

whats the problem with the forsberg pics? is wikipedia considered commercial use now?? --Lvivske (talk) 02:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As the WP:RM process is being automated, it is necessary for there to be a template inline with the section. I opted to use the existing template, since it already did everything I wanted it to do (have a simple name and have the syntax that it has) — it just needed to be moved from the top of the page to the bottom. Furthermore, there are already plenty of boxes on top of talk pages, and the fact that there's a discussion going on about a page move can be reasonably inferred from the section listing. —harej 04:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The template indeed looked rather different, but David Levy objected on the grounds that it deviated from talk-page template standards. —harej 04:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For more information, see Wikipedia talk:Requested moves#Automation of requested_moves. —harej 04:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've started an article on Canadian hardcore punk if you're interested in helping. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 15:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

For rehashing the ancient country music stereotypes that grate on me like few other things do at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Only uneducated [bad word]s think that country music is hillbilly music about trucks, dogs and women; do you want to come off as an uneducated [bad word]? :-P Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See my condition, for supporting a Quebec amendment for diacritics. GoodDay (talk) 21:35, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's bad enough, that pro-dios editors hi-jacked English Wikipedia (never thought consensus). As for hockey articles, the fast majority fall under the Non-North American category. Please, let sleeping dogs lay. GoodDay (talk) 22:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No one hi-jacked anything. You really need to get it out of your head that it was some covert mission to add them to the wiki. Diacritics are used in english, you have been pointed to articles in the past that prove this. You just for some reason have a hate-on for them to the point of being WP:POINTy about it. Personally I would recommend that you ban yourself from talking about dios as it clearly raises your blood preasure. Oh and saying people who like diacritics hijacked the wiki is also an assumption of bad faith at best and a personal attack at worst. - Djsasso (talk) 03:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You need to get it into your head, we made an agreement concerning the North American/Non-North American based hockey articles (NA- dios no, N-NA- dios yes). There's no Quebec exception & there's no NHL player birthplace exception. Please, keep with the spirit of the compromise. GoodDay (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you even read what people say? We the hockey project do not have the authority to single handedly overrule wiki wide consensus nevermind actual english language use. -Djsasso (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do as you wish. GoodDay (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A new (Good)Day

In exchange for a Quebec amendment to the North American guideline, remove the diacritics entirely from the NHL Roster Templates. GoodDay (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We'll have to converse on my talkpage. Yesterday it was suggested I was canvassing & today, I've been adviced to stay away from the WP:HOCKEY talkpage (for being repetitious). GoodDay (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've seen you've been editing on the BioWare article, so as we have few members I was wondering if you'd like to join WP:WikiProject Video games/BioWare. You don't have to if you don't want to but if you don' I'd appreciated an answer, cheers! :) 'The Ninjalemming' 16:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your help on WPBW. --Thejadefalcon (talk) 10:02, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have implemented an Infobox Scientist in the lead of the Joseph Priestley article, effectively right-aligning the much-disputed placement of the image and left my rationales on Talk:Joseph Priestley. Because I strenuously disagree with the alleged consensus about violating guidelines about image placement and consensus across a wide body of other articles, I have offered to open an RfC for more editors' involvement. Madcoverboy (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have a user removing a few bands, and neglects to use the talk page before resolving. One recent edit claims that they're not punk, though they are a debatable form of punk (pop punk). I'm going to remove All-American Rejects however, I'll leave it to you to decide the third opinion on the fate of Fall Out Boy.--F-22 Raptor ^IV 22:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour, je recherche quelqu'un intéressé pour traduire complètement l'article Téléphérique de Grenoble Bastille. Je ne parle pas assez bien l'anglais pour faire une traduction parfaite. Je sais, c'est loin du Canada mais si tu veux le faire, laisse moi un message car je peux m'occuper de tout ce qui concerne la mise en forme, des liens qui n'existent pas en version anglaise... merci par avance.

Grenix (talk) 10:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You gotta be kidding me concerning that article. It is absolutely irrelevant where the players were born, may it be communist Soviet Union , Mexico or Mars... The important thing is how they feel, what they say.... If they consider themselves Canadians, Americans, Finns... This is usually the same country as a country for which they played. Fair would be to consider them according to their last appearance in any international tournament. If they didn't play for any country they can be considered according to where they played most of their career, where they have lived most of their lives, what citizenship they possess or really according to what answer they gave in interviews to question if they rather feel being Canadians, Americans or Russians...

This is very important because Slovaks are not Czechs, Canadians are not Americans, Latvians are not Russians. If you wanted to make it according to what country they were citizens of when they were born, .... there are many of Canadians who were born as British citizens, so they should have an UK flag next to their name don't you think? Jasooon (talk) 20:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please don't remove this template. You wrote no one is going to type "John Locke (musician)" when they're looking for the other John Lockes, but you can't read minds; and more importantly there can be many routes to arrive at a page, typing in the box being just one way. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nice work. That page looks a lot better now. Malcolm XIV (talk) 21:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or ((User WPVG)) somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

• Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
• Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Second Coming of The Cookie Monster has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding ((subst:Cookie)) to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with ((subst:munch))!

He had a contract didn't he? Which means he either plays with them or doesn't play at all unless they trade him. Or was he on a tryout only basis? -DJSasso (talk) 20:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on EUPHORIA (American band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shadowjams (talk) 05:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Indie music scene. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indie music scene. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Eek, I keep forgeting that those sections are no longer open to every NHL players. GoodDay (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 12, 2009. :) BOZ (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I notice you've changed layout of all team rosters in group A on Ice hockey at the 2010 Winter Olympics – Men's team rosters. Are you going to change the remaining teams as well? Also, you've removed Morten Ask from the Norwegian Roster. Ask was injured the day before the Olympics, and was replaced by Jonas Andersen. But in Wikiproject Olympics the consensus seems to be that athletes that has been selected for Olympic competition should not be removed from the team if they are unable to compete for any reason. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Olympics#Competitors that can't compete due to injury TrondM (talk) 23:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there.

I just reverted your change to the U.S. roster template, without realizing that you were doing the same to the other ones. Your change means that the same sentence will be repeated over and over in the rosters article. Is that what you intend? Seems kind of superfluous to me, as that's what the rosters article's all about. Don't you think it's a bit over the top?

Cheers

LarRan (talk) 16:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can revert my revert, if you wish. LarRan (talk) 16:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Category:1992 EPs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:1992 extended plays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Category:1994 EPs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:1994 extended plays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Category:1996 EPs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:1996 extended plays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Category:1998 EPs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:1998 extended plays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Category:2001 EPs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:2001 extended plays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Category:2007 EPs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:2007 extended plays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for copyediting Asia League Ice Hockey. I really appreciate!--Crossmr (talk) 05:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mitchell Herbert Ellis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

While I agree that an article like Defenceman doesn't need a WP:CANADA tag, I would like to mention that hockey is, in fact, Canada's national winter sport. Lacrosse is the national summer sport.  ;) Cheers! Resolute 04:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Twas now"...

lol I think I've seen than someplace...on a bridge perhaps;-) hilarious CJ DUB (talk) 04:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For tirelessly migrating about a gazillion St Louis Blues wikilinks ccwaters (talk) 17:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good job on creating this article, very nicely done! I see absolutely nothing wrong with this, and you even managed to cover all its related article links too. Great work on it all! Best, --Discographer (talk) 02:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for catching that. While I didn't notice the different versions on Allmusic, I had seen credits elsewhere, which match your current edits, but I had to 'pick" between one or the other. Obviously, with the alternate Allmusic credits, it's 2:1 that my version was incorrect. I will have the actual CD booklet in my hands in several weeks, which should also provide the rest of the personnel info (like who the heck the trumpet player was). – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 06:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 12:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed that there is an article on Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri in the November 2000 issue (7(11)) of PC Gamer in the Bargain Bin section. Could you look at it and tell me if there is any information in it that is up to the standards of WikiPedia? Thanks. Vyeh (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for adding the information into the article. Vyeh (talk) 13:04, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, someone has helped us find some photos. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chicago#Blackhawks_Parade_in_Chicago. Would you consider helping to add them to an appropriate section? ---kilbad (talk) 12:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Over 9000!. Since you had some involvement with the Over 9000! redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Uncle Dick (talk) 04:13, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, noticed you were listed in the reference library as having some issues of PC Gamer. If you still have the time and issues, I'd love to have the coverage for Anachronox in the April 2001 issue. There's more in the December 2003 issue, but you aren't listed as having that, IIRC. Thanks for considering! ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 02:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tim Osman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion (((db-...))) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 12:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re your contribution to Bon Iver, Bon Iver (did I just write that!?) You obviously havent read any of the discussion and clearly not looked at any of the citations. Or did you look online even?... Or try finding any music publications that call the album Bon Iver, Bon Iver. And please do not point me at the original press release (or anything that is copied from it). Thanks. Snoop God (talk) 17:38, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dipangkorn Rasmijoti Bridge. Since you had some involvement with the Dipangkorn Rasmijoti Bridge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Paul_012 (talk) 17:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Skyscraper National Park (Hayden album, alternative cover).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Everything I Long For (Hayden album, alternative cover).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey! I was looking for the review of Colin Mcrae Rally 2.0 featured on the page 85 of the April 2001 issue of PC Gamer. I would like to be able to have the review because i am developing the article about the game. Thanks :) — ΛΧΣ21™ 17:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:

154 Featured Articles 53 Featured Lists 7 Featured Topics 5 Featured Pictures

43 A-Class Articles 589 Good Articles 9 Good Topics

---

Content

Changes to Featured and Good content News items and announcements

Feature: "A-class: Is It Worth It?" Interview: Teancum

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment – talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shirley temple's pussy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirley temple's pussy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 21:50, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since you were involved in the original discussion to split the video game generation templates, I thought you'd want to be involved in the current discussion to merge them back.--Marty Goldberg (talk) 15:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I came across this post of yours and I was wondering if you got anywhere with it? - thewolfchild 05:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See my latest change at List of NHL statistical leaders by country. I had a better implementation before, using the "div col" temnplate, but that template started behaving strangely. The "mutlicol" implementation is ok, but better suited for situations where the number of sections aren't going to be changing very often. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 23:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Maybe this can help with the pain-in-the-ass Unicode page. - thewolfchild 21:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC) ‎Reply[reply]

Hahah, wow, good luck with that! — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 03:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Moan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Berry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ceux Qui Inventent (Fly Pan Am album).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 15:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Noise Floor (Bright Eyes album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Twas Now. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bruce Campbell Shelley. Since you had some involvement with the Bruce Campbell Shelley redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Lunar Landing Confirmed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No non-primary references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there! I noticed that, back in 2009 (diff), you added an award from PC Gamer's seventh annual awards to the article Combat Mission: Beyond Overlord. Lately I've been undertaking the project of adding awards and award nominations to VG articles—particularly the ones from PC Gamer, Computer Gaming World and Computer Games Strategy Plus. Unfortunately, my access to PC Gamer's awards is spotty, and I don't have any from the March 2001 (i.e. seventh awards ceremony) issue. Really sorry for making such a large request, but, if you still have that issue, would it be possible for you to scan the whole awards section? These awards/nominations are really important historical information, and it would be huge if I could add them to the appropriate articles. Thanks either way! JimmyBlackwing (talk) 22:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• This awards project of mine is still ongoing. I've managed to add winner and nominee information from PC Gamer's 1994–1999 and 2001–2005 annual awards to at least a hundred articles now. However, despite my best efforts, the prizes for 2000 remain elusive. If there's any chance of getting my hands on them, I'd be incredibly grateful. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 07:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Peter (Eric's Trip album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Twas Now. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Twas Now. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shirley temple's pussy. Since you had some involvement with the Shirley temple's pussy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Pincrete (talk) 14:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Twas Now. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is PC Gamer (US) May 2001.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

Hi, I emailed you because you're listed as a contact for PC Gamer (US) issues at WP:VG/RL, seeking an article from May 2001 issue. Thanks. Coolak (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Twas! Over on the WP:VG/RL page, you're listed as owning the April 2001 issue of PC Gamer US. There's an article in there called "The Adventure Continues" that covers adventure games in the early 2000s. This is a major focus of mine right now (I've already gotten Traitors Gate, one of the games discussed in there, to Good status), and I've been trying everything to get my hands on that article. I realize you're not super active anymore, but I'd be eternally grateful if you found the time to scan "The Adventure Continues"—it's really an invaluable source that I've seen discussed in many other articles from the time. Thanks! JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eerieconsiliation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eerieconsiliation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect San Dimas High School football rules. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 26#San Dimas High School football rules until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 14:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Mild and Hazy (Hayden album).jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. `~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 02:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]