Thanks for uploading Image:Radioaskew.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: ((TemplateName)).

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ScottKramer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use ((GFDL-self)) to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as ((Non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -SCEhardT 16:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! If you wish to discuss whether Radio Askew is an article worthy of remaining in Wikipedia, plase come to the discussion page (see the link in the AfD info box) and weigh in. Merely deleting the AfD info box does not stop the deletion process. If anything, it increases the chances of the article being deleted, since readers of the article would not be aware of the debate. —C.Fred (talk) 17:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like he said, removing the tag means people don't know the article is in danger of being deleted. If the article is worth keeping, you should want as many people to know about the deletion as possible, so they can try to stop it. Even though you removed the tag, the discussion continued at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Askew, where the actual decision is being made. If you think the article deserves to be kept, please come to the discussion to explain your reasoning, and keep editing the article to improve it, but do not remove the AfD notice again. NickelShoe 19:05, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, the View Askew chat forum is a pay site, so I can't comment into your thread there about the AfD process. Searching for the site on Google won't affect the outcome at all. The number of results returned when searching for a term on Google are used as an indicator of a web site's popularity, which is a criterion for notability. In the case of Radio Askew, I think it's notable—and should stay on Wikipedia—because it's available through the iTunes Music Store; that's why I changed my vote to keep. The slam-dunk would be a link on the VA or News Askew websites; I have cited the news blurb at NA in the article and noted that a Clerks II snippet appeared in episode #25. Has RA gotten any other press coverage? Film magazines? Newspapers? Wired? —C.Fred (talk) 03:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Radioaskew.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Breno ^talk 11:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Willwilkins.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Breno ^talk 11:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC) --Breno ^talk 11:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Kmanscott.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radio Askew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Askew (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:38, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]