click here to leave me a new message
please leave new messages at the bottom of this page and remember to sign your posts by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Lucca–Ponte a Moriano tramway moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Lucca–Ponte a Moriano tramway. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 12:46, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ballycotton Lighthouse has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ballycotton Lighthouse. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 03:46, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Dan arndt, the potential copyvio sentence was copied from the Ballycotton article into Draft:Ballycotton Lighthouse. It looks to me like the external site you found had themselves copied it from that existing Wikipedia page, so I don't believe this represents a copyright violation on the part of me or other Wikipedia editors. Since the statement was not backed up by any citation I've gone ahead and removed it from the draft article in any case. I've left it in the original Ballycotton but feel free to remove from there if you've got outstanding copyright concerns. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 07:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ballycotton Lighthouse has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ballycotton Lighthouse. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 07:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ballycotton lighthouse has been accepted[edit]

Ballycotton lighthouse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 13:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AFC comment[edit]

With all due respect, your comment here is not correct. Notability is a reason to decline drafts, and it is entirely possible that the other stations that have articles are not actually notable, either. Please read WP:NTRAINSTATION. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucca–Ponte a Moriano tramway has been accepted[edit]

Lucca–Ponte a Moriano tramway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tails Wx 02:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Singia railway station (November 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:NGEO- no source talks about the station other than saying it will be "state of the art" in one or two sentences- Railway stations need significant coverage in many sources to meet WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Singia railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 18:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, UkPaolo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 18:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rupdia railway station (November 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

The comment the reviewer left was:

Of the three sources apparently in English, one doesn't resolve, one doesn't mention the station by name and one contains a passing mention. Sourcing need to be better than this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rupdia railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kinnegar railway station has been accepted[edit]

Kinnegar railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 20:08, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy birthday!
Hi UkPaolo! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! Ezra Cricket (talk) 02:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ezra Cricket (talk) 02:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

Have a happy birthday, UkPaolo! Supplied by the Wikipedia Birthday Committee, have one free cake! Enjoy! Best wishes to you on your special day!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]