Happy New Year!

UncleTupelo1,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 05:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 05:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Designated Player Rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martín Ojeda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Klasila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Klasila until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jogurney (talk) 14:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Euan Purcell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about former soccer player which fails WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Arvizu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Arvizu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jogurney (talk) 23:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryce Lebel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryce Lebel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jogurney (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikola Petković (footballer, born 2003) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, UncleTupelo1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sebastian Joffre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Joffre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 20:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benjamin Lopez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Lopez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your recent work to create new Talk pages. If you're only adding WikiProjects, please do not add a header or a signature to the Talk page. If you are adding a section of text, then add a header and sign the talk page. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 14:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. No problem - understood! UncleTupelo1 (talk) 14:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, UncleTupelo1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miles Fenton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find info on some of the players in MLS Next Pro. Can you add those players when you have the chance? Thanks. Freefalling660 (talk) 00:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure there's a consensus that MLS Next Pro counts as a fully pro league even though it's third tier on par with the USL League One. I think only the players with a decent amount of coverage due to college, SuperDraft, previous career, etc, will meet the notability guidelines. UncleTupelo1 (talk) 10:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant adding players to the rosters of the team not creating pages. Freefalling660 (talk) 10:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I'll probably try and go through them all at some point! Thanks. UncleTupelo1 (talk) 12:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I found most of them. Freefalling660 (talk) 13:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. The match reports on https://www.mlsnextpro.com/ have all the player details such as name, age, squad number, nationality (usually defaults to US, so sometimes worth double checking). Any player 18 or younger is probably an academy player unless they've been announced as a pro signing. UncleTupelo1 (talk) 14:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help in getting this Draft Published. Draft:Muzamil_Mahmood_Dar KashmirValleyEditor (talk) 09:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:St. Louis City SC draft picks has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 14:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When did this happen? Freefalling660 (talk) 22:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happens a reasonable amount? Player for player trades. Sadly no GAM or TAM involved :( UncleTupelo1 (talk) 22:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keegan Smith (soccer, born 1993) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keegan Smith (soccer, born 1993) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023–24 Nottingham Forest F.C. season, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carson Porter has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FC Cincinnati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuya Kubo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kemy Amiche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goussainville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deshawon Nembhard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deshawon Nembhard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tampa Bay Rowdies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ariel Martínez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm missing a lot of them for teams. Freefalling660 (talk) 23:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Eliot Goldthorp article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 19:26, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stefan Defregger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uhai (talk) 08:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:San Diego Loyal SC squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You duplicated a draft which had existed for 3-and-a-half days by the time before you created your article - please be more careful in future. I have merged now. GiantSnowman 18:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello UncleTupelo1!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Numbi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Numbi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gio Magaña-Rivera, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gio Magaña-Rivera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]