User:Utfor is a doppelganger of User:Iceblock created due to forgotten password. Please post to User talk:Utfor instead of User_talk:Iceblock, even if User:Iceblock is mentioned in the diff in question.

Hi, Utfor. I was thinking that the many names for specific splits might better be added to the diagram under splits spare, or some entries left out altogether. The informal names for splits, though not formally 'wrong' under Wikipedia principles but obscure names probably don't reach the threshold of notability, and make the glossary read more and more like a list of trivia rather than a serious glossary about the concepts and principles underlying bowling. I haven't resolved the issue in my own mind, but please give it some thought. Thanks for contributing. —RCraig09 (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:RCraig09 Thank you for your feedback. I have reverted the glossary for now. What do you think about moving the entries to split (bowling), or do each split need a few sentences of comments? Without comments, will it be trivia even in the split (bowling) page? Utfor (talk) 19:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Utfor: I am copying this discussion to Talk:Glossary of bowling so other concerned editors may weigh in. Let's continue any discussion there. —RCraig09 (talk) 19:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Warning triangle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:55, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning triangle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Long roll. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 28#Long roll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Skin food requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Utfor,

Please do not create nonsense redirects like this one. It's a waste of time for other admins to tag and delete pages and, to be honest, it just brings more scrutiny to your edits and your account as editors look for other mistakes you might have made. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] I am sorry for not understanding this is unwanted. Utfor (talk) 00:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect No waiting. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 4#No waiting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect First night. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 4#First night until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Utfor,

I don't know anything about editing "Modules" so I'm not going to edit this page and instead would like you to remove Category:Wikipedia userboxes from the page. This page has been protected from creation and according to WP:REDNO, red link categories must either be created or removed from the page. Since this category can't be created, that leaves removing the category from the page which I'm requesting that you do. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this now. Thank you for the notice! Utfor (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you find an answer to this question? If not, WP:VPT may be the place to ask.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't. I will try at VPT, but not right away. Thank you for the message! Utfor (talk) 16:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason = parameter for Template:Merge. The entries at Eggs and Bacon were already at Bacon and eggs, so you could have just redirected one to the other. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Active hours has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]