archive

I'll be inactive for the next few months, but will probably be back eventually.

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You moved Arbitration to Arbitration in the United States on 13 September 2006. NOT a good idea. As I expected, we now have a total mess in both Arbitration and Arbitration in the United States, as the articles have gotten totally out of sync over time, and NO ONE has the time, energy or patience to clean this mess up. Especially not lawyers like me who actually understand arbitration, since I'm too busy applying my mind on behalf of the paying clients. I challenge you: Do you have the integrity to clean up the mess you created? --Coolcaesar (talk) 09:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To quote you from back in 2006: "But I agree that with such a strong difference in the meaning of the term "arbitration," perhaps the article needs to be split." So at that time, you certainly didn't think it would be a bad idea. What on earth does any of this have to do with 'integrity'? And no, I don't have the time to do very much on Wikipedia at present. -- Arvind (talk) 17:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good to see you back. Kanatonian (talk) 05:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am working on Tamil Brahmi right now, when I get time. Thanks Kanatonian (talk) 14:23, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is done, when you are back please look at the artle in the main space. Kanatonian (talk) 19:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also can u make me a list comparing all letters of tb with ashokas 1,2,3 and bhatti?Kanatonian (talk)

Sir, good to know you have come back from your sojourn. I look forward to your kind guidance in editing and paraphrasing wiki articles. You may like to take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulothunga_Chola_III, where I have some contributions and was also guided enormously by User:Akerans. Pls. let me know what you think of the edits and quality of the article. I am looking for some sources material on Kulo-III's achievements in art and architecture (it was he who constructed the 4th great Chola Temple, the Sarabeswara at Tribhuvanam on the outskirts of Kumbakonam, among others). Kindly suggest some books or sources that I should look at and source material/data from. Thank you in advance, Sir. Srirangam99 (talk) 06:09, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Vadakkan. You have new messages at Talk:Ahalya#Ahalya_as_a_stone.
Message added 16:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Thanks for your comments. More of your constructive comments is welcome. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tamil Language Flag 2.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anubes666 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was vectorizing some flags and result is here. Can you improve File:Tamil Language Flag 2.svg? Hosmich (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Tamils for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. —SpacemanSpiff 07:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Mowni (basket) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2008, not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:24, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Political integration of India for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Nassar(actor) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 1 § Nassar(actor) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Adolf Hitler at Berchtesgaden.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 23:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]