Hi Vedaanty

I saw that you edited my contribution to the wire Article and removed all reference to the gist of the story which was that Amit had Xcheck privileges. I do not think this should be excluded. Can you please provide me the Wikipedia clause under which this has been removed or I will be reverting your edit Hagennos^Talk 02:48, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The citation had nothing to do with the content mentioned. Not to mention, the sentence did not make any sense grammatically and was extremely difficult to read. Vedaanty (talk) 03:58, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The citation specified was an explanation on what actually XCheck was so it was relevant as it was cited against XCheck and not the whole article or page. Not sure what you meant by grammatically incorrect. I am going to put the content back with change in wordings Hagennos^Talk 18:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bharatiya Janata Party seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! The previous terminology was biased, especially calling Swamy a leading figure of the party, when the fact is that he has not held many internal party positions and no major position nor has he been a cabinet minister. Calling him a leading figure then portrays an incorrect image and is the true editorialized comment. A better alternative would be to call him a senior member or simply a member. Vedaanty (talk) 02:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]