Hello, Tailoredcreditsolutions, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Tailoredcreditsolutions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type ((helpme)) on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:49, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Tailoredcreditsolutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:49, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (this is my introduction.) --Tailoredcreditsolutions (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I think the big problem here is that you're doing this under the name of your company. I'm not going to block you outright, but I do think that it would be a very good idea to get a new username. You can follow the directions at Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple for this. The problem is that since you're editing under a company name, it gives off the appearance that you're here to promote the business. Your AfC contribution doesn't seem like you're here to intentionally do that, but it still makes it look like you're here on behalf of a company. Changing it to your real name is a suggestion, but you can make your name almost anything as long as it's not outright promotional and/or offensive. (Or already taken, but that's a given.) For example, you could change it to User:CreditGuy. It's a way to show your interests while not coming across as representing a company. As far as userpage stuff goes, you can mention some stuff but you have to be a little careful. You could rephrase what's on the page as "I own a company called Tailored Credit Solutions that does various credit related services. My goal here on Wikipedia is to help edit and create articles on credit related topics." You could also add things, such as a few things that interest you and a little bit more about yourself. You don't have to add too much or anything that would completely identify you, but it'd help take the edge off any worries about you being here for the company. Anywho, I hope this helps. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:59, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that is very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.52.156 (talk) 10:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

• Add the text ((unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here)) on your user talk page.
• Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
• Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here)) below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

See also WP:SOLUTION. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Taikoredcreditsolutions was created c. half an hour before this account. Is there a connection? Could look like a simple spelling error. Best, Sam Sailor ^Sing 10:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I got the name wrong and wasn't sure how to change it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.52.156 (talk) 10:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Vickijgough (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

vickijgough (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

i didn't intend to advertise my business - I didn't realise that it was objectionable as it was only my user name. When I realised,I didn't know how to change it. I only chose it as it was aligned with the topic of my first article. I have financially contributed to wikipedia as I have found it to be a very useful source of information, and I wanted to add my own article contributions as well

Accept reason:

For username change; remember that you will not be allowed to write about your own organization. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I've put a request in on the username change page for you. I do believe that you were trying to operate in good faith as far as editing goes, which I've noted on the request. I can't change it myself, as you have to be a Bureaucrat to do it, but I hope they allow the name change. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:11, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Vickijgough, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Credit Control.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey, I declined this more because of the sourcing than anything else. The sources used just can't be used to show notability. The business dictionary website is the type that people might raise eyebrows at, but ultimately it's just a definition and doesn't really show notability. The other one, a listing of jobs, is generally considered to be the type that we shouldn't put on Wikipedia since it's in that weird limbo between "merchant source" and otherwise unreliable. Either way, both of these sources show that the job exists but doesn't really establish notability. A better source to use would be something along the line of coverage in a textbook, although there is an additional problem of whether or not the term should have its own article or should be included in the parent article about credit. If you can find enough sourcing that gives enough length to the profession we can justify its own article. It's kind of tricky when you get into the individual subjects like this. If the name change goes through, and I hope it does, I'd probably recommend checking into Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance to see if they can help find sources. What I'm running into as far as sourcing goes is that a lot of it is in textbooks, which don't always have previews up on the internet for me to see. WP Finance would not only give you a lot of like minded people to talk shop with as far as article editing goes, but they can help you find sources and whatnot. I'd probably recommend looking into joining if you get the name change- it looks like it'd be right up your alley. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Credit Control, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vickijgough. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Credit Control".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)) or ((db-g13)) code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: ((subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Credit Control)), paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]