Hi -- I saw you're starting a review of the Windows 2.1 article. Good Article reviews are not easy to do until you've had a fair amount of experience editing here, as one needs to understand the GA criteria -- easier once you've been through the wringer yourself a few times. Can I suggest that you don't complete that review, but instead edit a few articles till you've got something to the point where you can nominate it for GA yourself? Once you've got a GA to your credit I think you'll understand the reviewing process and will be in a good position to help out by reviewing. If you do decide to give up on the Windows 2.1 review, let me know and I'll get the article put back in the GA queue. Thanks, and if you have any Wikipedia questions I'll do my best to answer them. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 20:25, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then, completely understand your point, and in that case I will not continue the review. In that case, could you please put it back in the queue- I tried to figure out how to do it but I wasn't sure how to. Also, just wondered if you could give me some tips on what articles to edit and how to get good information as the first result for the topic usually is the wikipedia page. Vifvuv (talk) 14:45, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure -- I'll get the article put back in the queue later. As to what articles to work on, do you have any particular interests? Music, history, science, other topics? One way to find an article you can improve is to look at WikiProject quality lists. WikiProjects are usually tagged on article talk pages. So for example if you were a fan of video games, you can go to this page to find relevant articles that are undeveloped, and perhaps end up on SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs, which needs a lot of work. Other projects can be searched in a similar way. You can find resources for video game articles at WP:VG, and other WikiProjects have something similar though they vary in how active they are and how many editors are involved. Any questions, just let me know. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Thanks a lot for this help! :) Vifvuv (talk) 22:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can you clarify on what you mean by "non-constructive" when you reverted my edit that the flight recorders will be sent to Singapore on the Yeti 691 page? SBS6577P (talk) 04:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that, my friend was toying around with my laptop while I was in the toilet. There is absolutely nothing wrong with your edit. Vifvuv (talk) 04:29, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]