Hello, Viktor O. Ledenyov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((Help me)) before the question. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:45, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:VIKTOR O LEDENYOV WIKIPEDIA CITY OF KHARKOV STATE OF UKRAINE 22062014.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:VIKTOR O LEDENYOV WIKIPEDIA CITY OF KHARKOV STATE OF UKRAINE 22062014.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like ((PD-self)) (to release all rights), ((self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL)) (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:45, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bar Castle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KJ ^{«Click Here»} 23:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Viktor O. Ledenyov,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Viktor O. Ledenyov should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viktor O. Ledenyov .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Viktor O. Ledenyov. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 08:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bar, Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bar, Vinnytsia Oblast, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pomeranian and Silesian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Yarra Valley Limo Wine Tours, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.yarravalleylimowinetours.com.au/about-us.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Yarra Valley Limo Wine Tours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Yarra Valley Limo Wine Tours. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Type II superconductor, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 11:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economic Club of Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Martin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

Materialscientist (talk) 23:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perhaps it is just a coincidence of surnames, but please ensure you are compliant with Wikipedia's policy on conflict-of-interest editing when adding content about Dimitri O. Ledenyov as you did at James Cook University. I would also suggest that the amount of content you are adding there is disportionate to the usual short sentence per person, as the presumption is that those added will have their own article to provide further information about their merits. Kerry (talk) 23:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see WP:SOAP, item 4. I believe this is what got you blocked the last time. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 04:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Viktor O. Ledenyov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melcous (talk) 06:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 11:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop adding pictures to this article it is getting excessive. You might want to look at other city Articles and see none have as much pictures. LibStar (talk) 08:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note, also, that your changes to the Vinnytsia article have been reverted. The only significant change was a redundant breaking up of the "Transport" section into further sections for which there is no reliably sourced content and, frankly, the new sections consisted of one line of trivia each... although you did use it as an opportunity to point out the distance from Vinnytsia to Bar, Ukraine. Please stop engaging in this kind of disruptive editing. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Vinnytsia.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Vinnytsia. Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 08:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kharkiv, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Start up. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Viktor O. Ledenyov, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Dr. K. 20:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for logging out to continue edit warring, as you did at Kharkiv. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Viktor O. Ledenyov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I make various contributions from multiple computing devices. The User:Dr.K. and User:BU Rob13 from Canada made no single meaningful contribution to Kharkiv, never ever visited the city and have no idea about the subject of discussion, but tried to delete and destroy the well presented information about the investment agencies in Kharkiv. I think User:Dr.K. and User:BU Rob13 have to try to write and create rather than to delete and destroy as far as the information about Kharkiv or any other subject is concerned.

Decline reason:

Since the block is because of things that you have done, not for things that Dr.K. and BU Rob13 have done, your opinions of their editing are irrelevant, and you have not given any reason at all why you should be unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you take the advice to read the guide to appealing blocks before posting this unblock request? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Viktor O. Ledenyov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The organization of personal attacks by "editors" with the hidden real names User:Dr.K. and User:BU Rob13 from Canada against Viktor O. Ledenyov in Wikipedia is absolutely unacceptable. The multiple attempts to delete the well written information with references, related to the investment in Kharkiv, can not be considered as valuable contribution by User:Dr.K. The cyber attacks by User:Dr.K. and User:BU Rob13 is, in my opinion, a real shame to the Canadian PM and the Government of Canada, which encourage this kind of activities in Wikipedia!

Decline reason:

Since the block is because of things that you have done, not for things that Dr.K. and BU Rob13 have done, your opinions of their editing are irrelevant, and you have not given any reason at all why you should be unblocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Viktor O. Ledenyov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It is difficult to see that the Wikipedia is being operated by the American spy agencies, which organize the cyber attacks on the users from other countries, delete the referenced information and attempt to use the Wikipedia for the brain wash propaganda purposes as ordered by Pr. Barack H. Obama

Decline reason:

I've revoked your talk page access for misusing the unblock template. Mike V • Talk 19:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My good Viktor Ledenyov, I've read your 'Forecast in capital markets.' and it's a good book with extraordinary breath of scholarship. Thank you for adding it to our capital markets article. I like your generosity in acknowledging the work of so many of your peers. Also I agree the multi disciplinary approach you and your brother champion promise to yield valuable insights on how to improve our understanding of the economy.

However, the book's let down by quite frequent use of poor English. I can give you some examples if you like, but don't want to write a too long post on your page unless you would welcome it?

What I will say now is that many editors here don't believe one should cite one's own work.

Also, there are strong disadvantages to editing here in one's own name. You should maybe think of abandoning this account, and coming back next year with a new account name that does not identify you. Otherwise the elite editors who control Wikipedia may permaban you.

Please understand I am only giving this advise as I'd like to see more of your work here. The Wikipedia desperately needs more scholars like yourself with good local knowledge of eastern Europe so we have good balanced coverage about the world. But it's probably best for such editors not to edit in their real name, especially if they are accomplished people like your good self. FeydHuxtable (talk) 10:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Forecast in Capital Markets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forecast. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Forecast in Capital Markets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book. WP:BK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianga (talk) 18:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop spamming references to your book across Wikipedia. See WP:REFSPAM and WP:COI for why. This editing is disruptive and you may be blocked if it continues. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Viktor O. Ledenyov. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 22:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Viktor O. Ledenyov. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

... and follow WP:COI--S Philbrick(Talk) 11:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Viktor O. Ledenyov. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We are not your webhosting service. Dozens of pictures, many of them nearly identical, some with little relevance to the city as a whole (as opposed to a particular religious group within the city) are not appropriate for this article. --Khajidha (talk) 12:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bar Photos

I did not see the above comment before posting this, so I will simply add this as a sub-section.

Hello, thank you for you contributions to WP. However, your addition of dozens and dozens of photographs to the Bar article is not helpful. Please see WP:GALLERY. Articles for do not have comparable galleries - that is because they are counterproductive and against policy. Articles are not meant to be scrapbooks of photos, and WP is not a place to post images that you have taken. The gallery does not help readers understand the city better, and it has therefore been removed. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 12:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bar, Vinnytsia Oblast, you may be blocked from editing. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 13:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Readding the material while logged out isn't really helping your case. --Khajidha (talk) 15:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 12:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Viktor O. Ledenyov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

there is no reason to block Viktor O. Ledenyov, who created the best Wiki pages!!!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A tag has been placed on User:Viktor O. Ledenyov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hayleez (talk) 14:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]