Archives

Archive 1

Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Please stop, it's not required and confusing. See WP:SHIPS guidelines. Also please note ship names should be italicised Lyndaship (talk) 08:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Vitaium,

Please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion. A G13 tag can only be applied six months after the last human edit and it is too soon for Draft:"Sacrifice". You need to check the page history with every draft. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to MV Guanabara, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 14:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Vitaium: I had to revert your new article. It was unsourced and I had to revert it. If you create a new article, it might be worth creating it is an sandbox first. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 08:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

But Oceanic-class ocean liner represents 6 ships, not a redirect to individual ship. Vitaium (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Player choosing their house in Brookhaven RP.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've been added where the image come from and who is the copyright holder. Vitaium (talk) 12:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Player choosing their house in Brookhaven RP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! You created the Brookhaven RP article, however you didn't establish that it was notable at all as all the sources are self-published sources which do not establish notability. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 00:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why now is a redirect? Vitaium (talk) 00:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It provides the all information about Brookhaven RP Vitaium (talk) 00:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The main reason the article was redirected was due to the game not having individual notability. The article you created relied upon entirely on one primary source; to prove individual notability (WP:GNG), articles requires reliable, third-party sources. Panini!^🥪 01:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Abyssinia-class ocean liner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

anachronistic and inaccurate

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abyssinia-class ocean liner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abyssinia-class ocean liner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lyndaship (talk) 07:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I have just submitted an article, it is showing it is in review, I am new here and don't know anything, I read somewhere, I should contact admin and tell him to review my article, so if you are an admin, can you please check my article: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Mayank_Vikash# Regards, Saurav D2325292 (talk) 11:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your draft submission was declined because articles about BLPs must be veriable and notable, not unsourced. For more information, see WP:BLP or contacting the admin. Vitaium (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Vitaium

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Miraheze for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 ^Talk 14:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Britannic-class ocean liner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources I can find refer to these ships as a class. This nomenclature appears to be a piece of original designation by the article creator.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 05:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi I’ve reviewed your article and I can’t see a single source that uses the term “Britannic-class ocean liner” or anything similar. Where does it come from please? Mccapra (talk) 04:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The source is from plimsoll.southampton.gov.uk/shipdata/pdfs/31/31b0176.pdf and Harnack 1949 Vitaium (talk) 04:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The plimsoll link does not make any mention of a “britannic class.” Mccapra (talk) 04:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And what is Harnack 1949? Lyndaship (talk) 06:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Miraheze website screenshoot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Britannic-class ocean liner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britannic-class ocean liner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 11:25, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Airbus A330neo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mark83 -- Mark83 (talk) 12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Airbus A330neo you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Airbus A330neo for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mark83 -- Mark83 (talk) 12:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Newest Brookhaven RP thumbnail.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Newest Brookhaven RP thumbnail.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Vitaium! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 06:55, Saturday, October 30, 2021 (UTC)

Hi Vitaium! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 06:55, Saturday, October 30, 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Vitaium,

If you are going to tag pages for speedy deletion, please be sure you are not only familiar but that you know CSD criteria very well. Review this policy page. Know what name space each criteria applies to and when it is appropriate to use them and when it would be better to use WP:PROD or nominate an article for WP:AFD. Above all, if you can understand the sentences in an article, if they are written in English or another language, they are not "nonsense" or "gibberish". Gibberish would be a page that has "dkjlWIJ#($)NNKKK!!!!L)+ku$" typed on it. That would be considered nonsense.

If you have questions about the CSD criteria or tagging pages for deletion, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example, the German wiki is another. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 19:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Vitaium,

Please stop tagging pages for speedy deletion. You have clearly not reviewed Criteria for Speedy Deletion as I asked you to because you are tagging pages for reasons that are not approved. Having a draft in a foreign language is not grounds for deletion. You continually misunderstand what is meant by "nonsense and gibberish". Do not tag any more pages for speedy deletion until you have more editing experience because you are not doing it correctly. Spend your time improving existing articles and other tasks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:James A. Shorter, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 14:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bryophyta. Theroadislong (talk) 14:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Vitaium, I hope you are well. I see that Liz has approached you a few times to caution you about speedy deletion tagging ([1][2][3]). Unfortunately, it seems that you have not taken her advice to heart:

• This was clearly not an A1 (the subject is clearly identifiable) or an A7 (the subject is not a person, animal, organization, web content, or event).
• This was neither a test page, vandalism, an attack page, or unambiguous advertising (and the last two of these contradict each other)
• The same goes for this.

I also see that Theroadislong left you some other deletion-related warnings a few days ago ([4][5]); I share their concerns as well.

Since you have not responded to any of those concerns (or to most other messages people have left for you), I feel forced to be blunt: Your current conduct in deletion-related areas is highly disruptive. If I see more issues like this arise, I will block you. Please slow down, focus on making meaningful content contributions to existing articles, and only return to deletion tagging once you are certain you are sufficiently familiar with the applicable policies and guidelines, particularly WP:CSD.

I'm sorry that it has come to this. I appreciate that you are here with the best of intentions, and I hope this can be resolved without sanctions. Please let me know if you have any questions. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Charax gibbosus.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello I am Bobherry. Your RFPP here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#User_talk:2A02:C7D:9B65:A800:4529:70E0:809F:6FDE is not a valid reason for protection. Please be aware talkpages are very rarely protected as well. Please review WP:PP. Also just in case you are on the younger side I suggest reading WP:YOUNG it could help you some. If you need any help with anything or have a question please come to my talkpage. User talk:Bobherry. Thanks and have a great day and belated happy new year! Bobherry Talk Edits 03:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Vitaium. You have new messages at Pasadena, Texas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Pasadena, Texas (talk) 07:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Vitaium. You have new messages at Pasadena, Texas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Pasadena, Texas (talk) 07:35, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have frivolously accused me of being a vandal, and operating a vandal-only account. And your reasons as to why you are accusing me of this are very insufficient. Pasadena, Texas (talk) 07:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For requesting that revdel on my talk page! MerelyPumpkin (talk) 21:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Vitaium,

As the deletion discussion proposer, you can not close a deletion discussion. You can withdraw your proposal but that's it, even if it looks like a speedy keep or speedy deletion. I hope that's clear now. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Victus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corning. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 I invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari.

Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.

I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.

Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:YouTube Poop logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pyramids09 (talk) 19:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is completely unclear to me why you think that removal of the label propagandist on Laura Ingraham page, is vandalism.

The issue with the propagandist on the "Laura Ingraham page" only shows up on my android Wikipedia app. On a PC it does not show up.

But either way, how do we get rid of it on the android version? It is clearly not in the spirit of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaither (talk • contribs) 05:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Vitaium,

Most active editors do not appreciate other editors tagging their User pages for deletion. I'm sure you wouldn't like it if I went through your User pages and randomly deleted some. Besides, this page wasn't eligible for a CSD G13 so the tagging was doubly inappropriate. But I advise you to spend your time in article, talk, draft and project space and not busy yourself with other editor's User pages. I can't think of a good reason why you would even wander through another editor's User space so please find other activities to keep yourself busy. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list

The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 02:43, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Vitaium! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 01:26, Friday, December 2, 2022 (UTC)

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:

1. The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
2. They are beginning a new project, Edit check.

Talk pages project

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.

An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

New Project: Edit Check

The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pinus sylvestris you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 16:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Poaceae a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Grass. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. See also previous RM discussions at Talk:Poaceae; a new consensus will be needed to move this page. DanCherek (talk) 03:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@DanCherek  Thanks But I actually wanted to copy and paste all of its content to grass in order to comply with WP:COMMONNAME Vitaium (talk) 03:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I know. But that has been previously rejected, for example at Talk:Poaceae#Requested move 28 May 2020, so another RM is needed prior to such a move. Even if there is consensus for a move, you shouldn't do so by copying and pasting. DanCherek (talk) 03:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Pinus sylvestris you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pinus sylvestris for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 12:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Vitaium. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Mass message senders.
Message added 04:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Please provide the content in a seperate page for me to substitute and also add a message delivery list using a shell on the MMS talk page. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 04:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, thank you for your contribution on CSS. However, the image is quite large (especially for phone users). I think using just one or two selectors, perhaps one with multiple rules, will convey the same information but take up much less space. Lightbloom (talk) 18:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Lightbloom When I switch to desktop view, the image is not that big. Vitaium (talk) 22:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's because the image is much longer than it is wider, so for phones and other devices that display in portrait it will take up much more of the screen's proportions. Lightbloom (talk) 22:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Anaxial. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Swan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 15:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Anaxial But whooper swan is in the subgenus Cygnus while mute swan is in the subgenus Olor, how is it possible then the type species is mute swan? Vitaium (talk) 23:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you have a better source, then by all means provide it. Although I will note that for the correct type species designation to be Cygnus cygnus you'd have to demonstrate that the genus name Cygnus was in use before it was first coined, which seems unlikely - but that's a matter of the correct name, not the identity of the species. Either way, we need a reliable source, and, if you have one, that's absolutely fine. Anaxial (talk) 06:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]