RE Lucas Perny -- until an administrator closes the AFD, the discussion is still open, and the AFD notice should not be removed. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Lucas Perny. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating the Lucas Perny article after the community decided it should be deleted is disruptive, and disrespectful to Wikipedia's community processes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Your persistent attempts to recreate the article, previously deleted through the AfD process, are seriously disruptive. Further attempts will get you blocked from editing! Favonian (talk) 10:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Favonian (talk) 10:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lucas Perny, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://deletionpedia.org/en/Lucas_Perny.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Lukáš Perný (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)) below. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]