Welcome!

Hello, Vyacheslav84, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Russian; did you know there is a Russian Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! Jac16888 ^Talk 18:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Добро пожаловать!

Здравствуйте, Vyacheslav84! Добро пожаловать в Википедию! Хотя мы и приветствуем попытки улучшения Википедии, к сожалению, Ваши правки сделаны на английском, уровень которого недостаточен для действительно полезного вклада. Кажется, Вы лучше владеете русским; знаете ли Вы о существовании русской Википедии? Возможно, Вы предпочтёте вносить вклад в её развитие. В любом случае, добро пожаловать в проект и спасибо за усилия! Jac16888 ^Talk 18:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Letter Zyu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Land and Press

Project 1231 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Fleet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Subterrene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Doc balt flot1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SMX-25 - Diving frigate.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Подземоход Требелева.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vyacheslav84. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 16:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

It appears that a few of the images that you have uploaded recently have fallen under our non-free content policy. Under this policy, we can only use the image that contains the smallest resolution. It appears that the image that you have uploaded is of a greater resolution than another one located here, thus it will be deleted soon. Also, if there is an image that falls under our non-free content policy, please also add a non-free rationale tag to the image to justify its use. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask! Mike V • Talk 03:18, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on biased users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Jac16888 ^Talk 19:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Soviet Union military bases abroad, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Split and Dahlak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Seb az86556. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to File:Siberian Military District.JPG because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Wrote both licenses - may at first or second save. article on the removal of what is the difference? --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 06:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No. You're not "writing licenses", you're posting your (losing) arguments from the deletion discussion into the file-nameapace. That's not what it's for. Please stop. If you feel you have anything new to say, go to the discussion. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:40, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• blocked from editing - Fuck you. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 06:48, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected The uprising in the Iga Ninja to Iga Province#History because the latter article is more clearly written and gives more historical information. Why are you opposed to the redirect? Papaursa (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Information from the sources enough for a separate article The uprising in the Iga Ninja. I created anchor article for other editors. If you do a redirect, the article would not write other editors. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 10:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yiddish language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vyacheslav84. You have new messages at VQuakr's talk page.
Message added 04:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

VQuakr (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maya cave sites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As I said in my edit summary you did not provide actual citations to the author's books (like page numbers and such) making it very difficult for anyone to verify your claims. What you did do was provide links to purchase those books. Given that the two books are by the same author it does look a little spammy even though I'm sure that wasn't your intent. Also the edit felt a little shoe-horned in and was more about promoting the author than providing encyclopedic content. These two things can be fixed with proper citations and adjusting the tone and perhaps finding a way to rewrite it so that it isn't just a list of things but actual prose.

Also, please read WP:OVERLINK. Terms like: Japan, history, night, ambush, noise, room, samurai and probably some others should not be wikilinked as either they are obvious terms than anyone reading the English Wikipedia should know or they have already been linked to earlier in the article. Thanks. SQGibbon (talk) 03:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello. I can specify the page. 2. This is a book on the history of science kandita Japan. 3. Extra links I can remove. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 03:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vyacheslav84, you have had your section reverted twice, and in both cases you have re-reverted it. That is rather non-constrictive and pretty much edit warring. Try to discuss the issue instead (and that means discussing it on the talk page of the article).--ZarlanTheGreen (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 15:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Talk:Ninja#problem --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 15:17, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Project Daedalus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knight against Samurai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knight against Samurai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nick-D (talk) 01:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Knight against Samurai, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Norman, Teutonic and Chevalier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ion thruster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Magnetoplasmadynamic thruster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Power and Newton

Hall effect thruster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Power

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic WP:ANI#Map_in_Westarctica.27s_article. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  JodyB _talk 15:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vyacheslav84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

opponent first changed the text of the article and refused his discuss after the first cancel. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 16:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nothing in your unblock request justifies edit warring. You are better to discuss your own behavior than that of another editor. Chillum 16:16, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please look at our edit warring policy. It describes when reverting repeatedly is allowed an when it is not. Your best best at getting unblocked is to address your own actions and convince the reviewing admin that the block is no longer preventative. Chillum 16:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Escargoten in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. This is the English Wikipedia. Discussions using the Cyrillic alphabet are not useful. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Project Daedalus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absorptivity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the relevant talk pages - the question has been outstanding for months now, and there was very little interest in keeping the meaningless articles. There's a closely related outstanding RfC at Talk:Liberland where you can explain your stance with regard to the most popular of the three. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 07:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• This issue should be addressed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 10:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vyacheslav84. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SMX-25 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMX-25 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:HopsonRoad 13:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vyacheslav84, thank you for providing additional references at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMX-25. Unfortunately, rather than providing the bare citation in the form of "French ships of the future: SMX-25 and ADVANSEA" in Army Herald, 2010 (in Russian), you provided entire quotations. I feel that it would help the other editors, who are pondering the question of deletion to just see the reference and be able to click on it, as occurs at other AfDs. Would you mind if I converted the references, as above? I'll look for your reply, here. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 21:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can change the quotations on the headings of articles. --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 10:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vyacheslav, I made an entry at DCNS (company)#Submarines and underwater weapons, using the following citation, which you provided: Barreira, Victor M.S. (2011), "Developments in French Naval Industry", in Verma, Bharat (ed.), Indian Defense Review, Lancer, p. 188, ISBN 9788170621829.

If the article is deleted, this is where the redirect could go. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 15:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you! --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 05:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SMX-25 - Diving frigate.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vyacheslav, I put the image into Semi-submersible naval vessel, where I hope it will be allowed to remain. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 10:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 10:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vyacheslav84. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Block forever - it will be better. --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 14:15, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Look; I'm sorry it's gone this far, but there's no need to depress yourself over it. Where you went wrong wasn't only the fact that you repeatedly launched the same big thread in loooooads of different venues (which then looks little different to spamming, I'm afraid), but also, because you had to be told the same thing a few times, that then looks like you have a difficulty in communicating. You know, you stopped listening and ignored everyone else. Now, I'm not saying you did, just that that is probably how it looks, and doubtless did so to the blocking admin. Blocks are preventative, and I guess at that point in time, since your repeated appearance at various noticeboards and the like were disrupting the otherwise smooth flow of things, they had no other way of stopping the disruption other than to remove you from it. But remember that if you appeal your block. On the other thing- look, you're not having much luck with the Westartica article, I know; but two tings to also remember. One, things change, and notability changes too- what is not yet deemed notable ay well be in the future. Two, we have literally millions of articles. There must be plenty of other things that you might be interested in Serial Number54129^{...speculates} 14:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was not going to copy this topic to other places after [1], but I'd rather go to the indefinite block due to disrespect for me, than something to explain. And yes you can remove this here User:Vyacheslav84/GN which I planned to translate for Wikipedia? --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 14:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I ask you to impose on me an indefinite unit on my own. I asked the block for my own wish, so good-bye. --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 14:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vyacheslav84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I ask you to impose on me an indefinite unit on my own, it will be better than explaining something

Decline reason:

Very well, since you asked... Yunshui ^雲_水 15:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• User:Vyacheslav84/GN - remove. --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vyacheslav84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

--Vyacheslav84 (talk) 09:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason provided. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vyacheslav84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my desire

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since the initial block has long since expired, and since the extension to indefinite was granted at the user's request, I don't see any reason not to honour an unblock request at this time. I'm therefore lifting the block, although obviously if the behaviour that led to the initial 31-hour block re-occurs, any administrator should feel free to re-impose it. Yunshui ^雲_水 12:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Ach, I missed the fact that it was a self-requested indef - my apologies, Vyacheslav84. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, thanks. Can I ask you something? --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 14:38, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sure, just ask here - I'm watching. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • [2] - can you still help here? --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 14:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vyacheslav84! I hope that you will stay active in En:Wikipedia. I'd be glad to assist you in any project that you initiate. It's probably best to start in a sandbox. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 14:51, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• [3] - can you still help here? --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 14:54, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vyacheslav84, it's unclear to me and probably to the admins looking at your post, what you are trying to restore. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 15:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 04:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for as per your request.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Vyacheslav84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my desire

Accept reason:

welcome back  Dlohcierekim (talk)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks! --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 08:12, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks. --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 13:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dissolution of the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissolution of the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Normchou ^💬 22:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of The old-age-security hypothesis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of The old-age-security hypothesis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 04:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.reddit.com/r/whatsthatbook/comments/vvozlf/an_old_thriller/ and https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/query.php?parent_id=113689&type=ykts Vyacheslav84 (talk) 10:55, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kingdom of Enclava and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 25#Princedom of Ongal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks, I'll post it. --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 16:50, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]