How we will see unregistered users[edit]
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"Ulster unionism" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ulster unionism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Ulster unionism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Heanor (talk) 19:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Listed buildings in Midhopestones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benchmark.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Socialist Action (United States) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialist Action (United States) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Toa Nidhiki05 15:57, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement[edit]
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Updates to bureaucrat minimum activity requirements[edit]
Hello Warofdreams.
Following a discussion at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard, the minimum activity requirements for bureaucrats have been updated to also include the the recently updated minimum editing requirements for administrators (i.e. at least 100 edits every 5 years). This will be enforced beginning in January 2023. Should you no longer wish to volunteer as a bureaucrat you may request removal at SRP and.or let us know at WP:BN.
Best regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Bureaucrat Chat[edit]
Your input is requested at the freshly-created bureaucrat chat. Useight (talk) 03:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2022 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article International Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This group only appears to be notable insofar as its relationship to the International Marxist Group, the article for which already contains most of the relevant information and could easily have the rest moved over to it. Given that this article only has one inline citation, which is a permanently dead link, I propose this article be deleted.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
American Flint Glass Workers' Union[edit]
WarofDreams - Thank you for creating American Flint Glass Workers' Union. As info, some copies of the union's monthly magazine, The American Flint, are posted online. TwoScars (talk) 15:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Expansion[edit]
I have expanded Listed buildings in Dronfield which you created. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- It's a great improvement, always really good to see the articles you create on listed buildings. Warofdreams talk 11:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:British Roller Derby Championships.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:British Roller Derby Championships.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tiger Bay Brawlers.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Tiger Bay Brawlers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Omaha Rollergirls.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Omaha Rollergirls.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ScottishFinnishRadish bureaucrat chat[edit]
Hi Warofdreams, I have started a bureaucrat discussion for ScottishFinnishRadish's RfA. It can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ScottishFinnishRadish/Bureaucrat chat. Thanks in advance. Acalamari 01:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for October 20[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Greig (MP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Provost.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Merge to (your master list of architecture)?[edit]
The new user tool pointed me in the direction of one of your articles. I noticed you created many articles and I suggest that they be consolidated into your master list as follows I did not want to do anything too radical. Also I could use your input and help..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1040s_in_architecture and others including https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1030s_in_architecture etc...
Merge to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1000s_in_architecture
or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_architecture
Flibbertigibbets (talk) Flibbertigibbets (talk) 23:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- I've not looked at those articles in years, but thanks for your message! I think there is too much material to merge to the overall timeline, and 1000s in architecture is about that specific decade, but the articles could potentially be merged to an 11th century in architecture, along similar lines to those on the 10th century in architecture and many earlier centuries. Warofdreams talk 23:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- If you want to help me work on it; I am fumbling around a bit (its a bit over my skill level).. Or if you want to leave it alone that is fine too. I will remove the merge tag.. Or I could look to find sources.... or I will just work to consolidate into 11th century architecture. I am more than willing to follow your lead and get some experience points in the process.. PS its good to meet an early Wikipedian regards Flibbertigibbets (talk) Flibbertigibbets (talk) 00:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Lucienne Abraham for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucienne Abraham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
LordVoldemort728 (talk) 12:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in December 2022[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Cardiff Arms Park - a decision[edit]
Hi Warofdreams,
There has been a discussion around whether Cardiff Arms Park should have been split into separate articles or reverted back into one single article (as it was when it became a Good Article). See the original article. I requested comments (RfC) from other editors for this discussion. It was agree with Mn1548 (who made the Bold edit) that 1st December should be the last day for discussions. I am well aware that it can't be an purely an arithmetic calculation as to the final decision, therefore tomorrow, or sometime afterwards, can you consider the pros and cons of the discussions on both sides and make a final decision. I hope you can help. You had welcomed me to Wikipedia on 19 July 2007. SethWhales talk 22:11, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'm happy to take a look at it. I will probably have time tomorrow. Warofdreams talk 23:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you Warofdreams. SethWhales talk 05:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings[edit]
|
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC))) | 
|
Donner60 (talk) 06:53, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, happy Christmas to you too! Warofdreams talk 21:44, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 26[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St Helen's Square, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lenda.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023[edit]
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year, Warofdreams![edit]
Warofdreams,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 03:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 03:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Bureaucrat chat - invitation to participate[edit]
The RfA for MB has gone to a bureaucrat chat. Please join in the discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
February 2023 Labour Edit-a-thon[edit]
| 2023 WikiProject Organized Labour/Online Edit-A-Thon | |
|---|---|
 |
Hello, Warofdreams! During the entire month of February there will be an ongoing edit-a-thon on all labour related projects across English Wikipedia and sister projects. Register to track your edits and sign up on the edit-a-thon's project page as a participant. To invite other participants paste ((subst:WPLABOR/2023)) on their talk page! This event is organized by WP:WikiProject Organized Labour |
Myotus (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for January 31[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Listed parks and gardens in the East Midlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grendon.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Listed parks and gardens in the East Midlands - as an example[edit]
Hello, War of Dreams, I don't think our paths have crossed previously. I have been doing some work on the Monmouthshire gardens recorded on the Cadw/ICOMOS Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in Wales. It started to occur to me that what might be helpful is to have by-county lists (and corresponding Categories) for each Welsh county, which would follow the approach used for [[Category:Lists of listed buildings in Wales]] and [[Category:Lists of Scheduled Monuments in Wales]]. I then thought I'd see what England had done, and I find you are doing something rather similar. So, my first question is, did you intend to do the same for Wales at some point? If you do, I shall leave well alone. But if you don't, would you be willing to advise on my attempting it? I have to confess that many of the more technical aspects of Wikipedia are beyond me and I would certainly need help in setting up the lists and categories/sub-categories. Grateful for any advice. KJP1 (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for messaging! I've not yet finished work on the parks and gardens in England, so I haven't got as far as thinking about Wales. I'd be happy to help and advise - it doesn't necessarily have to follow the model I've used for England, which is based on the articles on grade I and grade II* listed buildings - e.g. Grade II* listed buildings in the City of York. Warofdreams talk 00:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- That's very kind. I have made a start, and it seems to have worked out ok. However, I made an initial mess by giving the sub-cat an inappropriate title. I've made, and used, a new one, [[Category:Registered historic parks and gardens in Monmouthshire]]
but the first failed attempt continues to lurk here,[1]. Does your mop allow you to zap it? If not, I'm a bit unsure where to flag it. AfD doesn't seem quite right?I shall now create sub-cats for the other Principal Areas (counties), and shall then shamelessly copy one of your lists to create Listed parks and gardens in Monmouthshire. Thanks again for your time and help. KJP1 (talk) 08:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)- Great, looks like it's all going well at the moment, just let me know if and when I can help. Warofdreams talk 00:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- That's very kind. I have made a start, and it seems to have worked out ok. However, I made an initial mess by giving the sub-cat an inappropriate title. I've made, and used, a new one, [[Category:Registered historic parks and gardens in Monmouthshire]]
Always precious[edit]
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Frank Hurt[edit]
There's a name I haven't heard for awhile. Brough back memories of two decades ago... thank you. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 11:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Glad the article was of interest! Warofdreams talk 00:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:National Association of Head Teachers logo.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:National Association of Head Teachers logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Advance trade union logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Advance trade union logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Brian Renfroe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
One article in a local news outlet is not sufficient to show notability (WP:NBIO), not seeing much else out there.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Brian Renfroe for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Renfroe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary[edit]
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi, I've listed Left-Wing terrorism in Articles for Deletion. You were involved previously when it was discussed and you may be interested. AlanStalk 09:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
The article List of UK by-elections (1979 - present) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This contents of this list are already covered in the much more expansive and useful page Lists of United Kingdom by-elections. I don't think replacing it with a redirect would be appropriate in this case, as it would be inconsistent with the redirects List of UK by-elections (1979–2010), List of UK by-elections (2010–present), and the other redirects to the list pages which do not redirect to the list of lists.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pppery/Bureaucrat chat and join the discussion when you have an opportunity. Maxim (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women in Red[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Joseph Crawford (trade unionist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The subject of this article is of questionable notability and much of the article is not backed up by valid sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epa101 (talk) 21:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023[edit]
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article South Riding of Lindsey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Already covered in Parts of Lindsey
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:54, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - November 2023[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article IWCA (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
"Radical Party of Great Britiain" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
The redirect Radical Party of Great Britiain has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 24 § Radical Party of Great Britiain until a consensus is reached. Liz Read! Talk! 21:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rock and Roller Queens logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Rock and Roller Queens logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings![edit]
.JPG)
Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Town halls[edit]
Hi - Many thanks for your work on town halls. I think that Holmfirth Civic Hall is a great find and probably should have been drafted early. I am a bit more concerned about Stocksbridge Town Hall which looks as if it needs quite a lot of work to demonstrate significant coverage per WP:GNG. I will take a look tomorrow and see what I can do. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 23:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks also for your work adding details and generally improving the articles which I've created. I agree that the current sources on Stocksbridge Town Hall are poor. I've rather optimistically written the article because apparently there's a proper history of the building in History of Stocksbridge by Jack Branton, but I don't have access to that book. Warofdreams talk 23:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- As you will have seen I have expanded Stocksbridge Town Hall and added a bit of historical background to the article on Castleford Civic Centre. The Castleford one already had good coverage so that was pretty easy. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 18:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Dormskirk that's some great work, thank you. I'll most likely be adding a few more articles on town halls soon and would welcome your contributions to them, should you have the time. Warofdreams talk 23:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, that's fine. Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi - I notice that you have included Skegness Town Hall in the List of city and town halls in England. There are now 670 town halls in the list and for all the other 669 we have images (and the same for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland). I have previously used the availability of an image as a key criteria for selection and in a number of cases I visited the town hall first before writing the article. Skegness is a bit out of my way and, as you have recently added a few town halls in the Lincolnshire area, I wondered if it was near you? Is there any chance you could take a photo before we include it? Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Dormskirk Sadly I won't be in Skegness any time soon. Perhaps someone from WikiProject Lincolnshire might be able to take a photo? As it's a large and listed building, it's surprising there is no photo on Commons or Geograph, and the only ones on Flickr are under non free licences. I've got no objection if you want to remove it from the list until there's an accompanying photo. Warofdreams talk 02:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi - Many thanks for that. I have as you suggested opened a section on WikiProject Lincolnshire in the hope that someone responds. In the meantime, I have uploaded a (rather poor quality) image originating from Geograph, pending uploading of something better. I will take a look at the article itself later today. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 09:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Dormskirk Sadly I won't be in Skegness any time soon. Perhaps someone from WikiProject Lincolnshire might be able to take a photo? As it's a large and listed building, it's surprising there is no photo on Commons or Geograph, and the only ones on Flickr are under non free licences. I've got no objection if you want to remove it from the list until there's an accompanying photo. Warofdreams talk 02:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi - I notice that you have included Skegness Town Hall in the List of city and town halls in England. There are now 670 town halls in the list and for all the other 669 we have images (and the same for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland). I have previously used the availability of an image as a key criteria for selection and in a number of cases I visited the town hall first before writing the article. Skegness is a bit out of my way and, as you have recently added a few town halls in the Lincolnshire area, I wondered if it was near you? Is there any chance you could take a photo before we include it? Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that's fine. Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Dormskirk that's some great work, thank you. I'll most likely be adding a few more articles on town halls soon and would welcome your contributions to them, should you have the time. Warofdreams talk 23:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- As you will have seen I have expanded Stocksbridge Town Hall and added a bit of historical background to the article on Castleford Civic Centre. The Castleford one already had good coverage so that was pretty easy. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 18:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
London meetup bicententary[edit]
FYI, the 200th London Meetup is happening tomorrow, Sunday 14 January. You may be interested as you were present at the very first one (pictured)! Note that it is now at Penderel's Oak on High Holborn by the Great Turnstile. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I won't be in London tomorrow, but I hope you have a great meetup! Warofdreams talk 23:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 16[edit]
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Allerton Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothick.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Spartacist League (Sweden) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spartacist League (Sweden) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AlexandraAVX (talk) 22:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
"San-Pédro" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
The redirect San-Pédro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 6 § San-Pédro until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris talk! 21:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)