Hi Washington Lincoln! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the PPSh-41 page. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2019 (UTC) Hello, I'm Le Petit Chat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, M1917 Browning machine gun, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 11:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Weapons of the First Indochina War, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding ((U|I dream of horses)) to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Weapons of the First Indochina War, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. N0nsensical.system^(err0r?)_(.log) 08:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of military by country equipment. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of militaries by country. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of militaries by country. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Schazjmd (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See also;

• Lists of military equipment
• List of countries by level of military equipment
• Lists of currently active military equipment by country

fyi - wolf 22:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Weapons of the First Indochina War, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I just wanted to let you know I've reverted your edits to Disney Channel Games because there is currently a consensus against including the information you added, since a lot of it is unsourced and it's very difficult to find any sort of sources, particularly reliable ones, for the information you added (it also looks like you might have copied the information (without attribution/credit) from the pre-redirect versions of the different year articles that used to exist, given the duplication of category links and such, but...). Further, a lot of the page looks like it might have incorporated formatting and styles that are against the Manual of Style (at a glance I noticed things that might be violating stuff like WP:ACCESS for example), but my reversion was mostly because of the consensus thing right now. Just wanted to let you know my reasoning in case you ever revisited the page and noticed your additions gone. It's theoretically possible to get the consensus to change if you have a good enough (and policy-aligned) argument that you can bring to the talk page and convince people toward a different consensus, but it's likely the consensus won't change. Thanks and good luck as you build skill in editing and policy! Have a good day. - Purplewowies (talk) 13:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of World War II weapons of the China".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of World War II weapons of China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of World War II weapons of China until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 09:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Weapons of the First Indochina War, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Polish–Soviet War weapons, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 19:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln,

Thank you for creating Weapons of the First Indochina War.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Boleyn)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Polish–Soviet War weapons, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 13:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Weapons of the Cambodian–Vietnamese War, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 15:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Polish–Soviet War weapons".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bell 505 Jet Ranger X, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 20:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Douglas AC-47 Spooky, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 05:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at M2 Browning, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Weapons of the 1947–1949 Palestine war, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi — regarding your newly created article People's Liberation Army rank insignia:

1. Why is this article needed, given that there are already articles on the various service branches, which display the insignia?
2. If you've copy-pasted the contents from those articles, you need to attribute the sources per WP:COPYWITHIN.

Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Weapons of the 1982 Lebanon War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:54, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dwight D. Eisenhower, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Weapons of the Spanish Civil War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Colt's Manufacturing Company, you may be blocked from editing. Loafiewa (talk) 14:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to List of military special forces units, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. - wolf 17:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I must say your talk page is full of warnings and notes now. You seem to continually be adding unsourced information to the encyclopaedia, and even information that is outright incorrect. Take this as your final warning, if you continue to add unsourced information, or add incorrect information to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 19:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at George Washington, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. *Washington was not a 6-star general. That designation does not exist in the Armed Forces of the United States. Shearonink (talk) 02:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged General Political Department (Vietnam) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Joseywales1961)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 ^Talk 17:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As reviewing administrator, I did not delete the article. an infobox with information is enough content to avoid speedy as "no content". But it is not good practice, so now please expand it into the form of an article. -- DGG ( talk ) 18:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on General Political Department (Vietnam) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 23:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, General Political Department (Vietnam), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on List of wars involving Vietnam 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Battle of Thổ Chu Islands, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Vietnam People's Air Force. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rastinition (talk) 09:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of equipment of the Vietnam People's Air Force, you may be blocked from editing. Do not add youtube and facebook. Rastinition (talk) 10:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC) Please stop using sources like facebook or youtube, otherwise you will always be rolled back by someone. PS:((ping)) worked --Rastinition (talk) 11:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for contributing to the article Draft:List of equipment of the Vietnam People's Air Force. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.

Thank you for contributing to the article List of equipment of the Vietnam People's Air Force. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.Rastinition (talk) 22:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Liz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of equipment of the Vietnam People's Air Force have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of equipment of the Vietnam People's Air Force. Rastinition (talk) 12:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_equipment_of_the_Vietnam_People%27s_Air_Force&diff=1018469499&oldid=1014105190

In this case,you remove baomoi.com and add facebook.com.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_equipment_of_the_Vietnam_People%27s_Air_Force&diff=1026942998&oldid=1026616504

In this case,you add youtube.com.

I need you to explain the reason. Rastinition (talk) 22:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see you moved several articles today from draft to article space, though some of them (such as Draft:Weapons of the Six-Day War) did not appear ready. I also know this isn't your first time with this issue. I would recommend that you submit new articles to WP:AFC for review first. I would also strongly encourage you to start communicating on talk pages, especially to respond to comments addressed specifically to you. I know that as of know, you have only posted one single (angry) talk page post since joining. I know this because I replied to it. Communication is not an option on Wikipedia, I've actually seen editors blocked for refusing to communicate, especially when their editing becomes problematic. Anyway, this is just advice... take it or leave it. - wolf 15:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Vietnam–Cambodia conflicts (1975–1978), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you see the "show preview" button next to the "publish changes" button? You should use the "show preview" button before saving. When you use "show preview", you will see an "duplicate parameter" errors at the top of the page. You need to fix these errors before saving. thanks! 98.230.196.188 (talk) 17:06, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Weapons of the Cambodian–Vietnamese War, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Weapons of the Chinese Civil War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your article Weapons of the Cambodian–Vietnamese War, has again been moved to draft. I'm not sure how many times this has been now, (for this or any of your other lists), but this merry-go-round of pages creations and moves needs to stop. You also need to start communicating on article and user talk pages, especially when people raise concerns about your behavior and/or the articles you keep creating and moving. Otherwise, if this continues, you can expect a report to be filed at one of noticeboards seeking sanctions against your account. I will again suggest, (make that strongly encourage) that you submit new articles to WP:AFC instead of just repeatedly moving them to mainspace. Again, this is advice, take it or leave it. - wolf 18:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Target has been protected. If the draft is accepted, it can be unprotected by an admin. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please discuss contention changes on the talk page of the article. We don't go into that level of detail with military leadership for any other large conflict article; I don't see why we should here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Three different people, including me, have now reverted you at Falklands War in your attempts to add this excessive detail. All three of us have been telling you to take it to the talk page before proceeding again. You are not doing so. Your edits have become disruptive. Please stop. Continuing as you have will very likely result in being blocked (not by me, as I consider myself involved, but a report will be made with the recommendation you be blocked until you are willing to engage in appropriate discussion). If you have questions, ask. Proceeding as you have is not an option. I hope I've been clear. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't use facebook.com or WP:RSPWP. If you want to add something,you should use reliable sources not use self-published sources,like facebook.com.Note that vi.wikipedia can't be used as a reference to en.wikipedia.I only pay attention to the reference,there are some problems with the reference you are using, so I am here.If you don’t want to see me, please don’t use Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources--Rastinition (talk) 12:09, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you want to protect the page, please go to WP:RPP.Don't fake one by yourself.--Rastinition (talk) 12:44, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ToBeFree: not sure if you're aware of the recent history here, but there have been issues with repeated page creations on an almost CIR level, page-move warring, and a continuing refusal to communicate. Up until now I was aware of just one rather hostile tp post, then a second one, only today, which reinforces the issues with communication (with ESL now added in). Preferably before the block expires, could you take these issues into account, or at the very least discuss this, and perhaps future expectations, with this user? Thanks - wolf 00:51, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Thewolfchild, thank you very much for the description of the problem and the links – the 24 hour block for edit warring was just the simplest method available to stop the disruption for a moment. I wasn't aware of many other issues specifically, just of a general communication problem. I'll keep an eye on the situation, and please keep me updated too. If disruptive editing continues, I'll re-block indefinitely.

Washington Lincoln, you may be blocked for disruptively ignoring community concerns and should ideally take the time to answer the messages here on your talk page, civilly, before continuing to edit. You are not strictly required to answer the messages, but if you continue behavior that you have been warned for, or even blocked for, in the past, then the lack of communication is disruptive enough to justify a block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I concur with ToBeFree. The behavior exhibited is wholly incompatible with editing here. I am quite troubled by the insistent addition of unreferenced or poorly referenced content, combined with personal attacks, combined with edit warring, and topped off with this utterly fallacious attempt here to apply an ArbCom ruling shows a rather determined intent to edit outside of the expected norms. You can either conform to our policies and guidelines here or you will be blocked indefinitely until such time as you agree to do so. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Đại Việt–Lan Xang War (1479–84) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Đại Việt–Lan Xang War (1478–1480). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 05:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln,

You are edit-warring and editing disruptively. If you don't move this to the article talk page, you are going to lose your editing privileges. Don't force your opinions into the article, if an editor disagrees with you, you need to come to a consensus on the talk page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  --Hammersoft (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We're well past the point of final warnings now. You have shown a persistent intention to edit war in an attempt to have things done your way on the project. You have consistently ignored warnings, fallaciously attempted to apply ArbCom rulings, inserting unreferenced/poorly referenced content, and engaged in personal attacks. Throughout this, you have rarely engaged in any collaborative discussion. This isn't how Wikipedia works. This block is for three days. If, after the block expires, you resume your disruptive behavior again I will make the next block indefinite. This has gone on long enough. You can either conform to our Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines or not be part of this project. Your choice. If you have any doubts about how you are conducting yourself on the project with regards to those policies and guidelines, ask questions FIRST before taking action. We will be happy to help. But, continuing as you have means you will be subjected to an indefinite block until you agree to abide by our policies and guidelines. I hope I've been clear. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Washington Lincoln (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm sorry i was worng i should move this to the article talk page went you warning me i never make that mistake again

Decline reason:

I'm surprised to see an automatic expiration on this block; please wait for it to expire instead of making people reconsider this decision. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• It wasn't my position to deny this unblock, but if it were I would have denied it. Washington Lincoln, your unblock appeal has done nothing to address the serious issues behind why you were blocked. All you're saying is you won't make "that" mistake again. You've made a lot of mistakes, and don't appear to be taking onboard the advice given to you at multiple places on this talk page both in this thread and many times before. Your behavior is well outside the norms we expect of editors here. It is wholly incompatible with editing here. There wasn't a single mistake. The edit warring is just the latest. Not only were you blocked for edit warring, no sooner had that block expired and you were at it again. You need to really think about what it is you want to do here in relation to the whole idea of working collaboratively here. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Vietnam Self-Defence Militia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Washington Lincoln, in light of everything that's transpired since I last suggested it, I will again suggest, (make that strongly encourage) that you submit any new articles to WP:AFC. If you have a good reason why you believe you shouldn't have to, I would like to know what it is. In fact, I would like to see a response to this comment, any response, just so that I know you are willing to discuss issues when arise. Thank you - wolf 20:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Washington Lincoln, I see you've been actively editing since I posted my comment to you just above, but you still refuse to communicate. Along with that, this was in regards to this ongoing issue with you creating articles that aren't ready for mainspace, and repeatedly move-warring them out of draft while apparently not making any improvements and refusing to discuss issues with the articles, or your behavior, on any talk page.

Instead of engaging in discussion, I see you have again(!) moved the above noted article back to main, just hours af6er Onel5969 move it to draft and posted comments above, and again it appears you've made no changes to the article or attempted to communicate, with anyone. Pinging ToBeFree and Hammersoft, as they had warned you about this and they should be made aware. In the meantime, I again will strongly encourage you to stop these disruptive, circular moves and start engaging with other editors on talk pages. - wolf 13:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As you've seen, I've moved the article back to draft space. I have also removed [1] material that you re-added [2] after it had already been removed for being uncited [3]. Also, after the article had been moved back to draft space because it wasn't ready for mainspace [4], you moved it back to mainspace without doing anything to improve it [5]. Further, despite multiple efforts of people to engage you, you're not communicating...just proceeding ahead with undoing the edits of others without discussion, without rationale. Apparently, the only reason is you disagree, and think they're wrong, but refuse to communicate about this. This is not collegial editing. You've been warned about this many times before, and have failed to heed these warnings. I am therefore blocking you yet again, in part for edit warring and in part for refusal to heed many warnings regarding your editing behavior. If you resume this pattern of editing yet again after this block expires, the next block will be considerably longer. The consequences of your actions are yours and yours alone. You've had many warnings. Continuing as you have been is not an option. If you have any doubts about your actions after this block expires, then please ask for assistance by adding ((Helpme)) to this talk page followed by your question. We will be very glad to help. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  --Hammersoft (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Looking back at my earlier comments, I now see I said I would make the next block indefinite. I'm not going to do that. Honestly, I wish I'd remembered that. Consider this as having got off light. The next block will be indefinite. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:26, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Country data Pashalik of Yanina has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Constantine ✍ 15:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Country data Pashalik of Yanina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A number of "Vietnamese military insignia templates", which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 4#Vietnamese military insignia templates. Nigej (talk) 12:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have again moved one of your creations to article space when it is not ready. As before, I will again suggest, make that strongly encourage you to first submit articles through WP:AFC. Whether's it's sourcing, writing, spell-checking, ESL or general competence, you need to have other's check your work. This is not news to you. Pinging Hammersoft on this. - wolf 20:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(sigh) Once again you have continued to attempt to create articles that are seriously lacking in sources to support the information in the article. This article you are attempting to make is just another iteration of Weapons of the Cambodian–Vietnamese War, which you attempted to edit war into mainspace before. The level of WP:IDHT is completely unacceptable. Your willingness to continue to edit war to have your way in the face of multiple warnings is unacceptable. Your unwillingness to provide appropriate sources to back up claims in your various attempts at creating articles is unacceptable. Your unwillingness to engage people in these discussions shows a distinct desire to not work with this community, but rather given the above serious problems a desire to work against the community. This is flat intolerable. I am therefore indefinitely blocking you. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for edit warring, refusal to engage with the community in the face of serious concerns, ignoring warnings, and addition of unsourced content despite many warnings and three blocks.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  --Hammersoft (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Washington Lincoln (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm sorry i was wrong. I shouldn't move page from draft to article went i violate the level of WP:IDHT. I never doing that again.

Decline reason:

You're very likely to be a sock of User:Huy Victory, and you've got other socks, such as User:Ulysses Sherman. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Washington Lincoln, in December you said "I'm sorry i was worng i should move this to the article talk page went you warning me i never make that mistake again". Yet, here we are two months later and you've done exactly the same thing again. You're past promises at this point. Given that you are apparently socking as well, you're far beyond acceptable behavior now. Whatever socks you use from this point forward will be tracked down. Your behavior here is flat unacceptable. IF you make another unblock request, you had better layout what your intentions are moving forward, how you intend to abide by the incredible number of warnings given to you on this user talk page, respond to the serious problems of your sockpuppetry, and convince us you can earn our trust. If any further unblock requests come and fail to address these issues, there's a reasonable chance that your access to this talk page will be suspended. I hope you act wisely. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Air Medal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, List of equipment of the Vietnam People's Public Security, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Washington Lincoln. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  -- RoySmith (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of wars involving Vietnam 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Rastinition (talk) 18:08, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Weapons of the Six-Day War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Rastinition (talk) 18:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Thổ Chu Islands".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Rastinition (talk) 18:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vietnam–Cambodia conflicts (1975–1978), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vietnam–Cambodia conflicts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List military equipment of Cambodian–Vietnamese War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Thổ Chu Islands".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Weapons of the Six-Day War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:PLAN Officer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:PLAAF Officer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:PLAAF Ranks of Enlisted Personnel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:PLAN Enlisted and non-commissioned rates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leaders of the Korean War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Type 55 (Enlisted and NCOs) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Type 88 (Enlisted and NCOs) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Washington Lincoln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leaders of the Korean War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:PLAAF Civilian cadre badges has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]