Archives (Index)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

I speak for most people that want to remove the year collages when I say that I'm getting a little frustrated at your persistence to keep the collage for 2022 in the page. I don't understand why people don't realize that the images break 4 different Wikipedia rules by being put on the pages. It is time to remove them, people decided on this a long time ago; the people who want to remove them outnumber the people who don't by 2 to 1. You said "where is the overwhelming consensus?" while bringing back the 2022 collage, well, it's right here[1]. I'm sorry, but the collages should not be added back into any Wikipedia page again, no matter how dull they make the article look. Please do not add the 2022 collage back. DementiaGaming (talk) 01:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DementiaGaming, the problem is the image was removed amid the RfC and then was challenged. The RfC has not concluded in a WP:SNOW or formal closure. Until that point, the removal was more or less a bold removal, which was challenged. It should not have been removed again until the RfC formally concludes. That's basic common sense per WP:BRD. Please self-revert and wait until the collage RfC formally concludes with a consensus. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remove the collage, 33ABGirl did after you reverted her change, so I will not revert her change until this is resolved. DementiaGaming (talk) 02:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then please WP:SNOW close the RfC, since you and 33ABGirl say there is an "overwhelming consensus", which is exactly what a WP:SNOW closure means. What I have heard is an "overwhelming consensus" has existed for 5 days and the discussion is still ongoing and hasn't been closed, meaning two things. Either no one has thought to connent "overwhelming consensus" to "SNOW closure" or maybe there isn't enough of a consensus for a SNOW closure. Either way, I am done discussing this issue with you at this time. Maybe in the future, we can discuss this more. Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 02:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, you're slightly missing the point. No matter what the consensus is, these collages will be removed. It doesn't matter how they are changed, they will always violate 4 different rules on this website due to consensus breaching, POV problems, etc. DementiaGaming (talk) 11:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that content disagreements are not vandalism, and to refer to others' edits as vandalism is considered a personal attack. Really, you and United States Man need to stay out of each others' faces. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These both look like Andrew5: 108.58.9.194 and 71.125.62.17. They both request page protection for 4 articles in this diff for IP block evasion. They edit the same articles and have the same general WHOIS information as many other socks. Care to open another sock case? The admin who protected the pages didn’t seem to actually investigate. United States Man (talk) 16:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is enough WP:DUCK evidence for an SPI yet. The main evidence is generally weather/sports edits on the same day, which neither IP has done. I bookmarked both of them down, so if I see anything similar to a DUCK evidence for them, they will go to SPI and that RFPP evidence would be included as well. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]