The India Star
		Dear Weaveravel, thank you for your contributions to WikiProject India-related articles, especially your recent edits to the article about the partition of India. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 19:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Anupam: Thanks! I never could expect this to be achieved! --Weaveravel (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Islamic Unity of Afghanistan Mujahideen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Battle of Jalalabad

Mohammed Daoud Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Louis Dupree

United States Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kunar

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at a new article I created today, Lawik dynasty. Thanks, Khestwol (talk) 20:00, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Khestwol: It's a good article and well referenced. Thanks for creating it. Good to informatize the ancient history of Afghanistan. --Weaveravel (talk) 20:30, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately, information about it is already available on Afghan Civil War (1989–1992). Maybe you can expand it to create the new article. Unfortunately I cannot find enough time to do it myself. But maybe in the future I will edit. Thanks, Khestwol (talk) 14:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Khestwol: Yes, there is info about it but considering it's a highly important event it deserves an article of its own. I actually wanted to create the article myself but I too don't have the time for an entire article currently. But thanks anyway. --Weaveravel (talk) 18:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi In British empire page the new map is misguided. Afghanistan was never a colony of British empire. The map that have been recently changed (vandalized) should be restored to previous map. It seriously undermines the credibility of Wikipedia. Thank you.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hindu Kush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:43, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Weaveravel. I hope things are good for you. The edit you did to Haqqani network at 20:10, 8 September 2021‎ unfortunately reverted some edits I had done (which I presume you did not really mean to revert) as well as reverting other people's edits. I have undone that edit of yours to get things back to a better state, but I am finding it difficult to figure out what parts of your edit may have been good. The next edit you made, at 20:30, 8 September 2021‎, is intact, so don't worry about that one. You might want to check if there are parts of the first edit that you want to reinstate, but please do it carefully. It may be better to make several smaller edits, rather than one big one, to make it easier for others to follow what you are doing and why. All the best. Nurg (talk) 03:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nurg: Hello. I realize that a mistake was made by me here. There were a few new users or IPs that removed or altered key content at the top, namely the alledged allies of the group (it was reliably sourced as well) and the sentence about their deadly attacks (sourced, again). I was certain this was due to such editors removing without valid explanation or purposefully doing it for their own agendas, especially with the sensitivity of the topic and it being in the global news. Anyway, I did not see your edits at all, so I am sorry for reverting those with the batch. I did a whole rollback because I noticed several different editors having made changes. But thanks for letting me know now and for reinstating your edits. Also if you notice right now, there's been another new user that has put a long paragraph in the Ideology entry of the infobox. Stuff like these are exactly the reason why I requested protection for this article because many are making it messy. Do you agree it needs protection? --WR 19:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have reverted that long paragraph in the Ideology entry of the infobox. I have also done some other repair work. I think the article is back to a reasonably good state. You might want to check the 'allies' part of the infobox – I am not as familiar as you with that material. If you make any changes in the infobox, be careful with the referencing, as there are some named references, where the detail of the citation is in the body of the article, not the infobox (e.g. <ref name=Coll_201-202/>). Also note the spelling of "alleged" (not "alledged"). I don't mind if the page is protected, but I am not sure how important that is. Certainly a close eye needs to be kept on the article for a while. Nurg (talk) 00:48, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tips. I have been checking and at the moment the infobox seems to be in a good state. Also the page has now been protected as I gave evidence. Hopefully more patrolling will be done to prevent this again. Also I am thinking if Northern Alliance needs protection too, because the infobox (the "Allies") I have noticed have changed continuously in the past few weeks, I couldn't even keep track. --WR 15:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nurg: while Haqqani network is now protected, it doesn't take much to become autoconfirmed and I fear some non-IP users could still make problems. So yes it needs a close eye. But we're humans and we have our own lives and cannot always keep track. --WR 18:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Afghanistan Barnstar of National Merit
		Thank you for all your high-quality edits to Afghanistan-related articles. You have vastly improved Wikipedia through your efforts.

Dunutubble (talk) 22:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dunutubble: I send my thanks to you for awarding me this barnstar! Always glad to improve Wikipedia especially with Afghanistan related articles. --WR 16:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spīn Ghar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Logar and Watershed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is significant amount of evidence I have added in the TALK page [1] of Second Anglo-Afghan War where it clearly states in all 8 references that Afghanistan was a PROTECTORATE state. Will you be ok to add correct information and references in the infobox of the article? Same for article British protectorate, where Afghanistan has been incorrectly added under Protected state instead of Protectorate state. 199.82.243.102 (talk) 11:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Weaveravel. In this edit you did to Soviet–Afghan War you added a reference named "nsaarchive", but that reference is not defined in the article. Perhaps you meant to use a different reference, possibly "nsaessay". Are you able to correct it please? Thanks. Nurg (talk) 20:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, done. It was indeed "nsaessay". I double checked the ref to confirm. --WR 11:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've done the move that you requested. Well done for spotting the inconsistency. Dr. Vogel (talk) 16:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DrVogel: Thanks. There is another follow-up request if you could check again. --WR 16:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep done that one too :) Dr. Vogel (talk) 16:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. --WR 16:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again WR, I just wanted to let you know that somebody left a complaint on my talk page about this move. Dr. Vogel (talk) 17:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --WR 12:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Siyar Bahadurzada, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 22:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is regarding your edits, such as Special:Diff/1059254714. As per documentation of Template:Twenty Year Society invitation:

This template should be substituted (otherwise it will not display the signature line and it will place the page into Category:Pages with incorrectly transcluded templates).

The invitations that you've incorrectly transcluded have to be fixed, like so: Special:Diff/1067238542. —⁠andrybak (talk) 13:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Ziar and Shahzar are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Since disambiguation pages are intended to help readers distinguish between similar titles, a disambiguation page with only one entry is useless. I have redirected Shahzar to Shahzar Rizvi. If disambiguation is needed in the future, Shahzar could be converted back into a DAB page. Leschnei (talk) 13:18, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Afghanistan conflict (1978–present) into Afghanistan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TylerBurden (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Taibeh Ahmadi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:48, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aslam Watanjar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Weaveravel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Taibeh Ahmadi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:American models of Afghan descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:08, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]