Season's Greetings Wen D House, welcome to Wikipedia!

I noticed nobody had said hi yet... Hi!

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

You might like some of these links and tips:

• some General guidance.
• Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
• Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
• Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
• Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
• Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
• Use the Show preview button
• Provide an Edit summary
• Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
• Take a look at Consensus of standards
• Create a User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, -- Alf ^melmac 11:04, 27 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Line 1:

Adding the word "among" to the phrase is wrong IMHO. If you disagree I suggest request a ref or clarify, will revert for 14 days and put on my watch list while I try to find a ref in my spare time. Omeganumber (talk) 11:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OrphanBot took out a chunk of the intro from this site when it removed the image, losing a fair bit of basic info. Might be worth having a look at OrphanBot's approach, as this may be due to some systematic problem which could seriously affect other intros. Also, if you could restore the intro info, that would be great.Thanks. Robma 22:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OrphanBot does occasionally remove too much when it's taking out a captioned image (maybe one edit in a thousand has this problem), but when it does so, you can find the missing piece inside the HTML comment with the removed image, and whenever OrphanBot thinks it might have removed too much, it logs a message on its talk page. What happened here was that OrphanBot removed the image, then almost two months later, an anon vandalized the intro --Carnildo 02:14, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good call on Bart D. Ehrman, even though it's a subtle change... I wish I could notice little things like that more often. --Allen 16:49, 26 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heh - yes, it was very imaginative - almost tempted to leave it. Maybe articles need a "utter nonsense" section? ;)

My best advice on that would be to use a sandbox in your own space like User:Robma/Sandbox, you'd be able to make more saves before c/p into the right namespace. --Alf ^melmac 10:04, 23 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unfortunately I've never been to the place myself, nor Scotland, nor the UK. I live on almost the exact opposite side of the world (New Zealand). I found an enhanced version of this image on wikicommons which has been recently voted as a featured picture. I wanted to see more info about this place and went to wikipedia where I discovered the page had no photos! So I put a non-enhanced version of the featured picture in. (The enhanced version looked too artistic and not realistic enough I thought, but if you're intererested it is: Image:Dalveen Pass from Comb Head-HDR.jpg; also this photographer has a lot of very nice photos of Scotland on Flickr.com) Cheers--Konstable 01:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Rob, you mentioned Digital Universe. This is probably not a viable alternative, unfortunately. I was interested in this too when I first heard of it, but was immediately appalled when I learned that the principals are Joe Firmage and Bernard Haisch, whose judgement in terms of what constitutes reliable knowledge appear to be questionable. Their wikibios can be unreliable, depending on when you read them (at least one of these has been extensively edited by the subject of his own WP bio, in ways which I believe are misleading and intended to slant the article in his own favor), but for an independent and reliable source, see the extensive information obtained from an interview with Firmage in Joe Firmage, A Master of the Universe at 28, Wants to Defy Gravity and Visit the Far Corners Of His Realm, Joel Achenbach, Washington Post, March 31, 1999. (As you can see, I found this story archived at a controversial anti-cult website run by Rick Ross, but AFAIK, Achenbach's Washington Post article has been accurately transcribed at the Rick Ross website).

"Autohagiography": this brings up another irony: I caught Haisch adding links to his own book to many existing articles and also editing articles about this fringe theories as an anon (from the dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net domain in the Bay Area, where he resides), and he wasn't very happy with me for "outing" him. In a message which he left on my user talk page (after he created a user account, Haisch (talk · contribs), apparently in response to my urging him to do that), he wrote

Make no mistake about it. Wikipedia has tremendous influence, and that is precisely why must be both accurate and fair. The Wikipedia is perceived as no mere gossip sheet. Your words could deprive my organization of a million dollar grant because of your implicit judgment of my scientific career.

— Bernard Haisch

In other words, Haisch admits to having a sizable financial incentive to slant Wikipedia articles in his own favor, and he claimed the right to do just that. IOW, according to Haisch, his own personal agenda is more important than the needs of the readers of Wikipedia. This attitude suggests that Haisch is not to be trusted to run Digital Universe wisely, since he cannot be expected to act to serve the best interests of its readers whenever this conflicts with his personal agenda.

Check out Haisch's reputation for fringe publications in places like Journal of Scientific Exploration, a journal which he edited for some years. (The article JSE has also been "sanitized" at times by Haisch to make it appear mainstream, but a glance at the contents of any issue should quickly disabuse you of that impression! Typical issues contain articles allegeding to "scientifically prove the existence of the afterlife", or the Yeti, or ghosts, or UFOs... things like that.).

At this time, I know of no viable encyclopedia project which is comparable to the Wikipedia.---CH 21:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Robma, great work on the name issue. May I gently suggest that in the references, you add the name of the agent who confirmed this info? Thanks! NickBurns 14:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oops! Just noticed her name was on the talk page. I just added it to the reference, too. Cheers! NickBurns 14:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As per accepted guidelines on List of Freemasons, names without Lodge citations are not accepted. If you have independent proof of his membership that does not appear on an anti-Masonic site (said sites fail WP:RS and WP:V), please post it on the Talk page for verification. However, given Mr. Noye's claim to fame, I highly doubt any Lodge would wish to be associated with him. MSJapan 02:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noye was reported to have been a member of the London Hammersmith Lodge in evidence given to a House of Commons committee in December 1996 (The Independent 19 Dec 1996 p 2). Does this pass your stated test for inclusion ? Robma 18:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ISTR that he'd actually been expelled although I can't remember the reason. However a newspaper report of a submission to the committee is unlikely to meet the requirements of WP:RS, you'd actually need a reference to the committee report if it's there.ALR 18:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There are a few places here and there online that mention Noye was a Mason, and that "was" would seem to be the operative term here - even though no reputable site seems to have proof of his membership (Hammersmith Lodge does exist), but they certainly would have expelled him, as stated above. MSJapan 20:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! You might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science--ragesoss 20:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

Could you have a look at the Speed of light article and the discussion? An editor in Hungary has decided that a formula is wrong and resents my efforts to clarify matters. He may have been the one who recently blanked the article. At least he has promised to make trouble.

Thanks. P0M 23:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your edit to alligator. The page has been subject to repeated moronic vandalism of late, and it was good to see something added that did not have to do with their genitalia. Where Anne hath a will, Anne Hathaway. 18:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Sarah Sands, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a one man campaign being waged against dining clubs one the grounds that they don't deserve articles. I see you've previously edited one such article, and was wondering if you'd care to lend your support at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dining_club ? Many thanks Grunners 18:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I see what you're getting at, but consider this: long before the twentieth century there were clear signs that science could and did product counter-intuitive results.
Wasn't the idea of Earth going round the Sun a surprise in its time? Didn't people think it common-sense for the sun to go round the earth?
Even in THH's lifetime there are examples, for instance, Faraday and Tyndall's work on dia-magnetism is surely counter-intuitive? Or the induction of electric current by moving magnets?

So (in my opinion) he ought to have known he was wrong! Actually the comments on common-sense have the character of hand-waving, though their repetition suggests he really did believe it. There are other indications that Huxley's ideas on science were much less sophisticated than Darwin's; Darwin was quite attuned to hypothetico-deductive thinking.

Regards, Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:12, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I suggest you ask Clint Howard or find his interview with Star Trek Communicator to confirm that tranya was in fact pink grapefruit juice. He'll tell you how it was one of his early challenges as an actor to drink it despite how he personally felt about it. (His expression in the scene changes as he says, "...as much as I," so he slipped a bit, though the overdubbed voice makes it sound more wistful.) I know I first learned it from a video interview he did, possibly for a reshowing of The Corbomite Maneuver on Sci-Fi Channel: a top-X-episodes showing as voted by fans. It will take a lot of digging through old tapes for me to come up with the clip if you deem it necessary. But where would I upload it without incurring the wrath of the copyright holder? 198.183.6.22 (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In case you did not see, someone added a tag "This biography of a living person does not cite any references or sources." on the article Sherab Palden Beru that you created. I think there is time to improve it, and would be happy to share work with you about this. I started recently to wikify and added 2 ref. It would be certainly important to find other ref than Samye Ling. I also believe we could work on summerizing the article. All the best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Robma! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,704 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the ((unreferencedBLP)) tag. Here is the list:

1. Sherab Palden Beru - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Trevor Grove - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

At the FAC for Speed of light, I've been asked for a citation for the section you added with this edit. Could you please provide one? I guess it's the proceedings of the 12th URSI General Assembly, but they don't appear to be available online.

Thanks in advance. ― A._di_M.^{2nd Dramaout} (formerly Army1987) 16:35, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You recently added this URL as a reference to History of cryptography:

cs.colgate.edu/faculty/nevison/.../fsem%20slides%20Final.ppt

The link doesn't work - presumably the ellipsis in the middle indicates some sort of copy error, ie something copied the visible portion from a limited width display, not the whole URL. Could you fix it please? Thanks Mitch Ames (talk) 14:03, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is an open WP:SPI case looking at sockpuppet editing primarily on the Johann Hari/ Talk page. As you edited the Johann Hari/Talk page between 2004 and 2011, your input is welcomed. Yonmei (talk) 22:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Derek Watkins (trumpeter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 04:16, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited John Edmund Kerrich, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nicholas Bernoulli and Hald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Ian Allan Publishing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trainspotting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are invited to the first ever Oxford Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Four Candles, 51 George Street, Oxford, OX1 2BE on Sunday 4 November 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Oxford related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gueschart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page V1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've removed your citation needed and replaced it with two refs - one online and one from an old OS map. I would have another, but I can't find the book at this moment. I've watched HH a few times - by accident, really, as I was really there playing complicated games on the edge of the forest with two young cousins (I never understood the rules, which changed even quicker than clubs change managers...). Peridon (talk) 19:58, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lin Homer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Audit Office (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, Robma. I see that you worked on the David Harding (finance) article back in January, and I'm reaching out because I'm looking for help with an update request on behalf of Mr. Harding's firm, Winton Capital Management. Because of my COI I will abstain from adding in these revisions myself; if you're interested in helping with this, I'd be very appreciative. The full request on Harding's Talk page explains the updates I've prepared. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 13:29, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, you're right! Thanks for taking a look, regardless. Speaking of Winton, I've also been making suggestions for updating the Winton Capital Management article as well, though my third and final request (see here) has gone a couple of weeks now without any reply. If you'd be willing to read that and consider those changes, let me know. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 19:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi again, Rob! Curious if you had time to look at the few updates I had in mind for the Winton article. If not, that's OK and I'll try someone else. But if you could, that would be rad. Let me know! If I don't hear anything by early week I'll probably keep looking. Best, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 07:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wittenham Clumps, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Barton and Paul Nash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mike Mainieri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Margaret Campbell, Duchess of Argyll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pan American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dollar cost averaging may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Averaging: Analytical, Numerical And Empirical Results. Financial Services Review, Vol. 2, Issue 1 (1992/93 pp. 51-61]</ref><ref>[Greenhut, J.G. Mathematical Illusion: Why Dollar-Cost Averaging Does
• Lecture%20Notes%20and%20Syllabus%20(MGF633)/Behavioral%20Aspects%20of%20DollarCostAveraging.pdf]</ref>. Middleton claims that DCA helps investors to enter the market, investing more over time

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dollar cost averaging, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volatility (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fascinating stuff this, thank you very much! QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Piers Gaveston Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piers Gaveston Society (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 02:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of HIV/AIDS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leopoldville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

the question I posed at Talk:Stylometry

Smallbones_(smalltalk) 20:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Douglas G Altman statistician.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Wen D House. You have new messages at Talk:Ryszard Kapuściński.
Message added 22:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jack Russell Terrier may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• From the civil war to Jack Russell breed by Chris Koenig, ''Oxford Times'' 25 January 2007]</ref>). Trump epitomised his ideal [[Fox terrier]],<ref name="co6">[[#coile2000|Coile (2000)]]: p. 6</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jack Russell (priest) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• From the civil war to Jack Russell breed by Chris Koenig, ''Oxford Times'' 25 January 2007]</ref>).<ref>((cite web|url=http://www.jack-russell-terrier.co.uk/breed/history_of_the_breed.html |title=A

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Antrea Net, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.alternativefinland.com/south-karelian-history/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Antrea Net and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Antrea Net, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Antrea Net. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Antrea Net with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Antrea Net saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Pamputt (talk) 23:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Wen D House. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note that I have re-opened discussion on the Talk page of this article and have raised the idea of administrator involvement. Given your previous input I would like you to be aware of the development, and ideally to chime in. -Chumchum7

Hello, Wen D House. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your addition to Helen Moore (academic) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 19:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Wen D House. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a discussion involving your edits at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Jose Miguel Bernardo Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:20, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'd welcome clarification on why the simple act of citing primary sources in biographies of living persons such as trial records is censured. I understand that (eg) misquoted such sources would be unacceptable, but what is the problem with the mere act of citing such sources, and what does the citing of secondary sources add ?

Robma (talk) 13:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See WP:BLPPRIMARY on this issue, which explicitly mentions "trial transcripts and other court records". The problem with such sources is that they always would need analysis and interpretation (e.g., is that part of the record credible? Was that an important aspect of the trial?), and it's not for us to analyze and interpret primary sources. That is something a (reliable) secondary source can add. Huon (talk) 00:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is both very short and difficult to understand. In its present form, it does not add value to the encyclopedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hipster effect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hipster effect, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Wen D House! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Wen D House. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Hipster effect.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:12, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I can't give too much of an explanation beyond policies/guidelines ... but Wikipedia doesn't do no original research and shouldn't perform its own analysis of primary sources. Rather it should rely on secondary sources to perform that analysis. For a more useful answer, you could ask at the noticeboard for the "no original research" guideline. Graham87 04:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello.

Please always use converters when adding imperial or metric units in articles. In English Wikipedia articles, both units of measurement need to be included, but not just one unit of measurement. See Template:Convert.

Thank you. 31.200.12.202 (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bon courage (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the ((Ctopics/aware)) template.

Bon courage (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I guess this is a pro-forma warning (as my single reversion of the article doesn't meet the "repeatedly changing content back..." requirement for an edit war). But point taken and thanks for the heads-up about editing "hot" topics !Robma (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]