Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring and sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Good work on 2013 Nanga Parbat tourist shooting. Keep it up. Ask me if you need any help. Your Pakistani brother here too. Faizan 07:57, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Pakistani films of 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Internet censorship in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torrent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pervez Khattak administration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malakand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Nanga Parbat tourist shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Wiki.0hlic. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 22:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan
	Hi Wiki.0hlic! We are currently in the process of establishing a User Group for Pakistani Wikimedians with the following objectives; act as a hub for Pakistani editors working across the Wikimedia projects, act as a voice and representative for the Pakistani Wikimedian community, organize meet-ups, establish a Wikimedia Pakistan Chapter, acquire funding for various on-wiki and off-wiki activities including photo competitions, workshops and other public outreach events, and collaborate with the wider Wikimedia community. As an approved User Group, we will be recognised by the Wikimedia Foundation and officially supported by the Wikimedia movement. If you reside in Pakistan or actively work on Pakistan-related topics and can help in functional activities of the Pakistani User Group, please join the official planning group mailing list. For more details about the proposed user group, please visit the official page at http://pk.wikimedia.org. Together we can promote free knowledge in Pakistan!

You are receiving this message because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohenjo-daro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Punjab Metrobus Authority Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Wiki.0hlic!

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk
Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject PakistanReply[reply]

Hi Wiki.0hlic!

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July.
Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Wiki.0hlic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I notice you've been adding content to the team articles for teams which play in the Pakistan Super League. Could you consider splitting those sections off into articles dealing each each team please? Fo example, Islamabad United in 2017 could be created as an article rather than a redirect along the lines of Islamabad United in 2016. The detail of the season can go in that article then which will allow us to have a short summary only in the main article?

As you seem to be a major contributor to the team articles it makes more sense if you were to do so. Thanks. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2017 Census in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nowshera. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Punjab Metrobus Authority Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Wiki.0hlic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good work on the maps for the provincial assembly election! In case you are thinking of creating one for Balochistan, just wanted to warn you that a page for the provincial election in Balochistan doesn’t currently exist, so if you want to we could create one together, like we did for the senate election? Masterpha (talk) 17:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Masterpha Thanks! I know. I was meaning to reach out to you on this. I think we should definitely make one. You can start working on the page and I will begin working on the map. Once I am done with the map, I can come and help you with any work remaining to be done on the page. Do leave a link to the page in the conversation here.

Appreciate all the work you have been doing on the election pages!

Best,

Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 17:59, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! There seems to be a dilemma regarding the JUI (F) meta color. Whilst I understand that black is a suitable colour for it, the problem is that PPP also has black as their colour. Both parties having the same colour might cause confusion, as can been seen on the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa section of the senate election. Are there any alternatives to black that would be acceptable, or should we leave it as it is? Regards, Masterpha (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Very valid point Masterpha, whenever there is such a clash of colors when I make election maps, I go with the nature of the stake. For example, in Sindh, Senate, Punjab, and National levels, PPP has the primary stake because of its magnitude. In this case, it gets black and JUI gets a neutral color. The situation is reversed with JUI's position in KP and Baluchistan. Therefore, I recommend to force a non-meta color on JUI candidates - I have used the following hex in the Senate 2018 map: E3E80F. In fact, I will do it right now. Best, Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 19:24, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. Thanks for pointing it out! Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 19:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Constituency NA-7 (Lower Dir-II), Wiki.0hlic!

Wikipedia editor Chetsford just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great!

To reply, leave a comment on Chetsford's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Chetsford (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You need to hold on to your horses regarding delimitation. My suggestion is to move all old pages for the constituencies where delimitation happened to "page's former name" with years (1998-2018) next to the name, then create new pages for new constituencies and add (2018-Present) in the title. Do not move the old constituency names to new ones, it would confuse the hades out of people. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SheriffIsInTown I am working with two official documents: the old delimitations and the new ones, and comparing the delimited areas. In almost all cases, the new delimitation is exactly the same as the older one apart from when a new constituency is created or an older one abolished. When there is a new constituency, I make a new page. And if a constituency is abolished, I tag it as abolished on the old page. And then on the moved pages, I mention the areas of the old constituency that have been distributed in the newer ones. As for the old constituencies name still being there, I will deal with them on the second pass-through. I am keeping them there for my reference so that when I add more info to these pages regarding the delims, I mention that before the new numbering it was called NA-XX - to guide people who are more familiar with their older constituencies. Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 20:56, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SheriffIsInTown, Here is how things would look like when I am done with the 2nd pass.

Can you tell me the name of a constituency you tagged abolished, I want to see how it looks like? I think we should move the abolished constituency to article name with years (1998-2018) and completely new constituencies with years such as (2018-Present), the ones which change slightly, those can keep same names detailing the information in the article about what areas it included before 2018 and after 2018.

Pinging @Worldbruce: as they have done great work on Bangladesh constituency pages, if they can share their knowledge and expertise about how to better manage Pakistan pages. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 21:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@SheriffIsInTown Constituency NA-102 and Constituency NA-103, Constituency NA-98, Constituency NA-79 and Constituency NA-59. Only in the case of the merger between NA-102 and NA-103 was a totally new constituency created. In other cases, the abolished constituencies got absorbed in one or more of the older constituencies. Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 21:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, Worldbruce! Wiki.0hlic, you are doing good, I just wanted to make sure that we have a proper plan before too much work is done otherwise we will have to rollback a lot of it. I am still not very sure about the names of abolished constituencies but that can be changed later if we decide to do that. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Actually, if we follow WP:COMMONNAME which we should, the word constituency is never mentioned by sources as part of the name, we should drop it from the article title. For old constituencies, we should keep the region reference in the title, for example, Constituency NA-102 should be moved to NA-102 (Hafizabad I). Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, SheriffIsInTown. So, you are proposing that the constituency pages should use this nomenclature: NA-XX (District-XX)? I was also thinking the same, but the older pages had Constituency appended to the title so I stuck with that.Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 14:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, but you can finish your current work then we can act upon this idea. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:01, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sounds good, SheriffIsInTown, I will ping you when I am done with the first pass-through. Regards, Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 15:04, 11 May 2018 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Roger that! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pinging SheriffIsInTown. Whew, done with the constituency moves. You can go ahead and move the pages that still have the word constituency in their names. They will only be located in KPK, Islamabad\FATA, and Punjab. However, there are constituencies in these areas that I have done after our earlier discussion, so they will already have the constituency tag not present in their titles. In fact, all of Sindh and Balochistan constituencies and about half of those from Punjab and KP won't have the word "Constituency" in their title. The rest you can fix. Best, Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 20:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC).Reply[reply]

I do not see constituencies for Chitral, will you create the pages later, for example NA-1 (Chitral-1). Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SheriffIsInTown, I have created all of them. Here is the Chitral one: Constituency NA-1 (Chitral). You will just have to re-move the page and remove the word "Constituency" from the title. Please use this Wiki template. Just click on the old constituency name and you will be redirected to the new one. If there is "constituency" in the title, work your magic! :) Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 21:04, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It looks like you already moved all of them or am I wrong? On the side note, do you know which old constituency covered charges 7 to 13 of municipality of Peshawar, now part of NA-31 (Peshawar-V)? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SheriffIsInTown, yes, I have moved most. Been working on them. Previously the urban portion of Peshawar (municipality of Peshawar (incl. Hayatabad), and Cantt) were divided in three constituencies, NA-1, NA-2, and NA-3. With NA-3 having a major chunk of rural areas of Peshawar distt and some areas of the municipality. Now the new NA-5 is carved out from a contiguous urban section formerly in these 3 constituencies, in view of the population size. It hasn't come from a single constituency.Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 16:32, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're messing things up for the rest of us. You need to fix pages such as Constituency NA-99 (Chiniot-I). --Saqib (talk) 17:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please elaborate, Saqib. Here is the plan so far: First pass: Compare old and new delimitations and move pages. Second pass: Update constituency data along with information on which old constituency does the new one relate to. Third pass: Categorize pages, and add area info. Currently on First Pass with half of Sindh done and Balochistan left. If you are referring to the old constituency names still being there, they are going to be removed during the second pass. I am keeping them for reference so I can add info on old constituency number. Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 18:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay fine. --Saqib (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You was supposed to update the pages after renaming them. I don't see quite some; NA-184 (Muzaffargarh-IV). --Saqib (talk) 10:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Wiki.0hlic, thanks for creating Constituency NA-139 (Kasur-III)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 05:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Constituency NA-136 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Warburton

NA-117 (Nankana Sahib-I) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Warburton

NA-118 (Nankana Sahib-II) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Warburton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Did NA-55 take areas from old NA-57 and NA-59 both? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 09:37, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, SheriffIsInTown, mainly the old NA-57. NA-59 was diluted between the new NA-55 and NA-56 almost equally.Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 10:49, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So, that means, half of NA-57 and half of NA-59 went to NA-55, same way with NA-56? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 13:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nope, SheriffIsInTown, all of NA-57 and half of NA-59. For the new NA-56, it is all of old NA-58 and the other half of NA-59.Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 15:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is this additional area added after 2018 delimitation or is that total area for this constituency? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 08:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@SheriffIsInTown:, Old NA-51 previously included just Gujjar Khan tehsil, in the new delims a small area of the new Kallar Syedan tehsil is included in it. The rest of it stays with the Murree constituency (old NA-50, new NA-57) like the previous delims.Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 17:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The areas for this constituency came from both old constituencies (NA-48 and NA-49) or just one of them, if so then which one? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) SheriffIsInTown From what I know, NA-54 is the same as NA-48. --Saqib (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Actually, ICT got an extra constituency. According to Wiki.0hlic's updates NA-53 is same as NA-48 and NA-52 is same as NA-49. NA-54 is an extra constituency, I am assuming that it took some areas from both NA-48 and NA-49 but I am not sure. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:56, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SheriffIsInTown I know its a new constituency. NA-54 comprises of census charge no 3, 4, 5, 13 and 14 of ICT. These charge charge were previously part of NA-48. --Saqib (talk) 18:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Saqib: So, 48 was divided into 52 and 54 while 49 continued unchanged into 53? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:32, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@SheriffIsInTown: Its areas only came from NA-48. Translating the census charges to areas; it includes anything East of '10' sectors (E10, F10, G10, H10, I10) as well as F8 and F9 and E7 through E9. The new NA-53, meanwhile contains the remaining urban portion of Islamabad, while carving into the semi-urban and rural territory of old NA-49 (Sohan, Chattar, Bara Kahu, area around Rawal Dam and likes).Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 18:46, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SheriffIsInTown I suggest you consult old and new delimitation.--Saqib (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you both for your replies, I had the new pdf but not the old one. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

... willing to rename the pages on provincial assembly seats as well? --Saqib (talk) 17:36, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Saqib: - currently, no. Very busy with work-related stuff. - Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 06:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, please remember not to link common terms like "politician". Tony (talk) 07:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siraj Raisani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siraj Raisani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 06:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, where in the source is polling percentage and time mentioned? Jibran1998 (talk) 16:15, 26 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Time is when you update the result (adjusted to the UTC time). Reporting % = Total seats reported on +2 (for the 2 postponed ones)/272 . Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 16:22, 26 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

...a total of 328 votes were polled for the election of deputy speaker, out of which 327 were declared valid while one was rejected. --Saqib (talk) 13:05, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Saqib: - the rejected vote isn't counted as a valid vote. Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 13:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't think you can remove properly sourced material just because one source (Geo News) says it's not true. --Saqib (talk) 12:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Infobox kabaddi league season has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Wiki.0hlic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your participation is welcome but don't make edits like this. Nothing makes their estimates "neutral" since they are only referring to the statements of non-officials. If you want to know the "neutral" sources then you would need to wait for more days or weeks. Shashank5988 (talk) 15:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Shashank5988: Thanks for the clarification, appreciated! - Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 15:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 05:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article At-Tahur Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/At-Tahur Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stop fucking up the edits please for god's sake!!! Human (talk) 18:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@A Simple Human: No ones doing that. Edit conflicts can occur on rapidly updating articles. Learn some manners. - Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 18:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I get it. But since you're here for a decade and I'm here for only 2 years, you are more experienced and should of helped me about my mistakes instead of assuming things about me. I said that out of frustration. You know mate, spending childhood in Australia inflicted anger issues in me. Can't help. Human (talk) 18:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you please point exactly to what you are vaguely alluding to in this edit summary? I don't believe the word I deleted is appropriate - or necessary - in a non-living bio, where there is a definite start and end date stated. Also note children are technically not 'born' named - this occurs later in a formal civil sequence and/or naming ceremony. You can respond here. Thank you.--86.29.222.228 (talk) 22:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@86.29.222.228: - Lead is the initial section of a Wikipedia article that has to conform to certain guidelines. In the case of a different popular and birth name, your edit conflicted with what is an accepted format in Wiki articles: [1], [2], [3], [4, [5].

Thank you for confirming there is no written substantiation to support this - as I strongly suspected - only ...what is an accepted format in Wiki articles.--86.29.222.228 (talk) 14:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Everything isn't codified in WPs. We can't have hundreds of biography articles following different formats because one of the contributing editors on them thinks it is appropriate to do so. - Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 18:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ایک اہم بات چیت کے لئے اس نمبر پر مجھ سے رابطہ کریں

صفر تین چار سات تین پانچ چھ صفر چار دو دو — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.50.235.30 (talk) 01:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings,

Please do visit Talk:Cynthia D. Ritchie#Slander of Benazir Bhutto to examine discussed edits, if you find topic interested requesting your opinion, there.

For neutrality purpose opinion request is being made to users who significantly edited different sides of Pakistani political spectrum articles.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 12:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Wiki.0hlic. Thank you for your work on M-12 motorway (Pakistan). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 21:10, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to [[User:Wiki.0hlic|<b style="color:#01A0CA;">Wiki.0hlic</b>]] [[User talk:Wiki.0hlic|<span style="color: #01A0CA;"><sup>(talk)</sup></span>]] ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature. See WP:SIGFONT for more info.

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please give your opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pakistani politics.Ameen Akbar (talk) 19:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please note that where material has been entered in text without any refs, it is subject to deletion, and you should not revert the deletion without providing RS refs. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:580A:5E2E:EDD0:6C24 (talk) 23:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi

According to Pakistan's constitution, Ministers of state are not members of the cabinet. We should add it Panam2014 (talk) 15:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]