Hi,

Just to drop you a note here regarding Template talk:Hulk‎. The navigation box should not be added to a talk page. And it definitely should not be placed on it's own talk page.

If you are trying to point out a change that should be made to the template, please state that and that alone. But what you are currently doing can be seen as vandalism or disruptive editing.

Please, consider this as you are editing.

- J Greb (talk) 03:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Following up,

• Templates are transcluded, that is only ((tl:Hulk)) has to be added to a page for the navbox to be added. Cutting and pasting the entire template creates problems.
• Navboxes do not need to be add more than once to an article. What you did to Red Hulk was unneeded.
• Articles that are about spin-off media for comics only deal with the material from that spin-off. This means that the information for character names and aliases in List of Spectacular Spider-Man characters is limited to what has been seen in the show. Please do not add, or re add, comic book continuity information there.
• Template talk:Hulk — Stop trying to add the navbox to this page. It doe not belong there, period. Your last batch of 5 has been reverted. If you continue try and add it, the edits will be considered disruptive editing and most likely vandalism. Such editing conduct can result in you being blocked from editing.

- J Greb (talk) 11:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just some other recurring problems to let you know about...

Navigation boxes

There have been discussions regarding what types of characters should and should not be added to the navboxes. In an attempt to keep the 'boxes user friendly, the consensus was to just stick with the notable, major characters in the 'box and include a link to the comprehensive lists. Both ((Spider-Man)) and ((Hulk)) have a link to the "foes" list article, so please don't add minor characters such as:

• She-Venom;
• Toxin;
• Ravage;
• Halflife; or
• Agent Pratt

And a note on Rhino, Marvel has a history of "loaning" characters across titles. The consensus has been that, in general, such characters don't get placed in the 'boxes for the heroes they were "loaned" to. Rhino is a Spider-Man character, and as such should not be included in the Hulk navbox.

Continuity points

Most of the articles and lists are very specific about that their primary focus is. Some are dealing with the comics, others specific television series. The continuity points, such as alter egos, should be limited based on such a focus. That means that the names should be limited to what is presented in that specific continuity. If a name isn't used or indicated in some way, a default assumption of the name used in the parent continuity is warranted.

With the Rhino, that means the O'Hirn name only exists for the Spectacular Spider-Man television show continuity. It does not get appended to or replace the real name attached to the main article with out a cite of where, in the comic, the name was revealed as the Rhino's "true" name. O'Hirn also does not get applied to spin off continuities that were published or released before the show was.

Infoboxes

Two things here.

First, both ((Supersupportingbox)) and ((Superherobox)) only exists as redirects for ((Infobox comics character)). Please use that 'box.

Second, "supports" generally is reserved for characters that only appears in a supporting role for main or titular characters. So something like "|supports=Hulk" is appropriate for Betty Ross — Betty has never been a main character, and is generally only appears in Hulk stories as a supporting character for the Hulk, the main character — is OK. But "supports" should not be added to the following:

• "Villains" to indicate their primary foe — example: The Leader would not get "|supports=Hulk";
• Characters that in some way also function as a main character — Hercules, who has been a main character as a solo and as an Avenger, would not get "|supports=Hulk"; and
• Minor characters that serve as henchmen to a villain — Flux should not have "|supports=General Ryker" on the grounds that both Flux and Ryker are "villains" in Hulk stories.

The last point has some room, but the "supports" would still be for the main character.

- J Greb (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this is now to the point of being a warning:

Stop adding She-Venom and like character articles to the navigation templates as you have don at ((Spider-Man)).

Continuing to add these characters in the face of consensus and without bothering to engage in discussion is seen as disruptive editing. This type of action can result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. - J Greb (talk) 19:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Warning

Stop adding innapproriate articles to navigation boxes as you insist on doing with ((Spider-Man)) and ((Hulk)).

Continuing to re-add such articles before bringing it up on the talk page a generating a consensus for the change will result in you being blocked from editing.

- J Greb (talk) 20:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you may have noticed that your edits, like this one, have been reverted from the article: Archenemy. (I noticed because I have the page on my watchlist.) It may be a good idea to discuss the addition on the talk page and/or to add a reference, so it is not reverted. Joshua Issac (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And to clarify something: The article includes a list of selected examples. It is not meant to be an exhaustive list. Spider-Man is already listed with the long standing, iconic paring with the Green Goblin. Additions in that are not needed or warranted. If you feel this needs to be changed, bring it up on the talk page for discussion. Otherwise it becomes a situation of edit warring or obstinate, disruptive editing. - J Greb (talk) 19:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That really is enough with the Spider-Man and Iron Man examples. The singular examples are sufficent for the purpose of the article. Additions are not needed, period. - J Greb (talk) 02:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at WP:LEAD and the the manual of style used for comic book characters. Adding asides such as "a superhero", especially in cases where it's going to be a grey area, makes the lead more complicated than it needs to be.

With the infoboxes, stop and ask yourself if the character you are going to put in there is the protagonist of a comic book title. If they are not or have note been, don't add the field.

And with the Rhino: stop Overwriting O'Hirn into the infobox unless you can provide a citation for that name being part of the main Marvel continuity. If such a cite doesn't exist, propose the change on the talk page. Otherwise, making the type of edit you want there is adding false information to the article, which is vandalism, which will get you blocked if it happens again.

Thank you,

- J Greb (talk) 02:21, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Ogress (comics), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogress (comics). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Doczilla _STOMP! 07:49, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mysterio(Daniel Berkhart), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mysterio(Daniel Berkhart) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mysterio(Daniel Berkhart), please affix the template ((hangon)) to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not put links into headers in articles. There are a set of templates, of which ((seealso)) is a part, that exist to point to an article that is an expansion of a specific section. These are placed in the section in question, just under the header.

Also, it is unnecessary to link to a page that is a redirect to the article you are adding the link to.

- J Greb (talk) 20:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Patchwork (comics), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.leaderslair.com/gammapeople/patchwork.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:49, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Grey (comics) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TallNapoleon (talk) 22:01, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Patchwork (comics) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TallNapoleon (talk) 22:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sandman was never referred to as "William Baker" in the feature film. As for Spectacular Spider-Man, have they ever used that name? Nightscream (talk) 23:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The continued changing of alter egos for Rhino and Sandman, as you have done in the following:

• Rhino (comics) — [1]
• List of Spectacular Spider-Man characters — [2]
• Spider-Man 3 — [3]
• Sandman (Marvel Comics) — [4]
• Spider-Man: Friend or Foe — [5]

has become more than disruptive. Adding misinformation or or spurious information does not help articles, and is considered vandalism. If you can provide a source for the changes you are making, please provide themon the talk pages of the relevant articles and suggest a change or addition.

- J Greb (talk) 23:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please clarify why you were posting "**The Abomnation and the Leader the archenemies of the Hulk " to this talk page?

If you are bringing this up as a request to make a change in the template, it is common practice to start a new thread. With this in mind, your comment has been moved to Template talk:Hulk#New discussion?.

Please do not insert text into or edit other editors comments on the talk pages. Doing this is "putting words in their mouths". They have made their statements, please respect them. It's also not a good idea to create a non sequitur on a talk thread, and the comment you added did just that.

- J Greb (talk) 02:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Orgess (comics)

This was clearly intentional recreation of content which was deleted per consensus.

In addition, there have recently been several complaints about your edits.

Consider this a warning: If you recreate a page which has been deleted per consensus, or continue other disruptive or tendentious editing, you may be blocked. - jc37 07:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Hotshot (comics), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.rapsheet.co.uk/RapsheetMain/Character2.asp?UniqueId=1303. As a copyright violation, Hotshot (comics) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Hotshot (comics) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Hotshot (comics) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Hotshot (comics) with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Hotshot (comics).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. J Greb (talk) 15:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Agent Pratt, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.leaderslair.com/gammapeople/pratt.html. As a copyright violation, Agent Pratt appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Agent Pratt has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Agent Pratt and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Agent Pratt with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Agent Pratt.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. J Greb (talk) 17:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pushing it on Archenemy. What's there currently is nine. Changing it just because you don't like it is not improving the article. It's disruptive, it's tendentious, and it's fast approaching the point of being blocked. - J Greb (talk) 22:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Multiple reasons. The overriding one is the insistence on adding and re-adding inaccurate or misleading information into multiple article without engaging in discussion when your edits are removed. These and other disruptive and/or tendentious editing practices have been amply pointed out to you here on you talk page.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text ((unblock|your reason here)) below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J Greb (talk) 18:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Returning from a block and doing exactly what got you blocked is a good way to get blocked for a longer time. - J Greb (talk) 02:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Rhino (comics) here is a continuation of the disruptive edits for which you received the 3 hour block. If you can provide a source where the comic book character has used that name, please post it and you reasoning for including it on the article's talk page. Continuing to "just add it" will result in another block.

You edit to Abomination (comics) here reads as either an accident, or vandalism. Please be more careful in you editing and consider using a sandbox to make sure you've got the bugs worked out before adding something to a live article.

- J Greb (talk) 21:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Continuation of the disruptive and tendentious editing practices that resulted in the October 5 block.. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text ((unblock|your reason here)) below. J Greb (talk) 22:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archenemy - To repeat: the article lists simple examples. It is not meant to cover all situations. If you feel a character is more appropriate for the Spider-Man examples, please suggest the change, and your reasoning on Talk:Archenemy.

Doctor Octopus - For any comic book character's infobox, the "alias" field does not include nicknames. Please stop adding them.

Electro (Marvel Comics) - The primary focus of the article is the comic book character. Inclusions of the name used in one of the TV shows in the infobox isn't appropriate. Even if it is a "nickname" variant of the name used in the comics. (see above)

Electro and Jackal (Marvel Comics) - If you are going to add information that changes the meaning of a sentence or paragraph, cite where you got the information from.

Carnage (comics) - Throwing "insane" in is POV judgement call (the above tow are as well if your reasoning is "My interpretation of the episode is...") and has no place in the article.

And for the record, this is still disruptive editing since these issues have all been pointed out to you in one for or another multiple times.

- J Greb (talk) 22:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If your edits are continually reverted, then you must discuss if you wish them to remain, per the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle.

In looking over your contribution history, not only don't I see discussion, I don't even see explanatory edit summaries.

If, after you return from this block, you continue this disruptive editing, even after having been repeatedly warned and blocked, you will likely be given a lengthy or indefinite block. - jc37 05:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me state first that I have no opinion on (I don't care) what the content changes are.

But even after being warned to discuss rather than revert again. What did you do? You immediately reverted again.[6]

So you're blocked for a week. Please spend that time reading over the pages I outlined above, especially WP:CON, WP:BRD, and WP:DE. - jc37 20:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, within hours of you block expiring you're back to doing the same thing.

So here we are again.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Resumption of Disruptive editing. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text ((unblock|your reason here)) below. J Greb (talk) 00:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back.

Now, please

1. Discuss adding character article to comic book navigation templates.
2. Do not add templates to articles by copying the code from the template. you only have to add the template name between (( and )) in the article.
3. Do not create links in the headers of articles. If a section is acting as a summary of a larger article add either ((main)) or ((seealso)) after the header.
4. Don't create new articles by simply copying an old one under a different title.

Thanks,

- J Greb (talk) 02:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Before attempting to push a particular POV based on a minority portion of a character publication history. please consider discussion the changes on the articles talk page.

Thanks.

- J Greb (talk) 23:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ben Reilly has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ollie Fury _Contribs 23:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Ben Reilly constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Lazylaces (Talk to me 23:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Spider-Man. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Moving a character that for the bulk of it's use was a "supporting character" in the stories to the "Villains" section based on a minority use of the character is pushing a particular point of view. If you fee the article is misplaced in the template, please start a discussion about it on the templates talk page. - J Greb (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Blood Spider. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. It hsas been pointed out to you many times - do not add navigation templates by cut and pate. The same goes for "copying" paragraps or sections from one article to another as you did with your additions to List of Spider-Man enemies. Please, stop this. - J Greb (talk) 23:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Spider-Man, you will be blocked from editing. If you continue to POV push with your edits, you will be blocked. - J Greb (talk) 23:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked for 3 months due to consistantly receiving warnings concerning disruptive editing, and just simply not heeding them, even after several other blocks.

You were very nearly blocked indefinitely. And if this continues after this block expires, you likely will be. - jc37 00:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry for editing again, but im telling that those two charaters i found were Hulk related.

Actually, this has resulted in your block be extended by a month and the IP being blocked for the duration of your block since you have been editing disruptively using the IP and have gotten short blocks there as well.

If this happens again after the blocks expire in mid March, it is extremely likely that you will be blocked indefinitely.

- J Greb (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have sources for these new Kiddy Grade characters I'd like to see them, but I am highly doubtful since it is already known that Ascule and Que Feuilles are GTO agents, not US marines and given that the United States is not even a power in this interplanetary fictional future anyway.. Shiroi Hane (talk) 13:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well i though that will be cool, because i'm i big fan of USMC, so add some other charaters but those were minor edit's, but i'm cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamstrother (talk • contribs)

• Might I suggest contributing to a fanfiction archive rather than an encyclopaedia in that case? Marking edits as "minor" when polluting an article with fabricated information makes no difference to the end result. Shiroi Hane (talk) 23:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First off, welcome back.

And something similar to Shiroi Hane's edit comment for removing your bulk edit to List of Kiddy Grade characters...

Your edit to L (Death Note) has been reverted. This is since part of what you changed was cited information. On the specifics:

• Nationality - This maybe fair game given L (Death Note)#Nationality. Though "Unstated" or "Unclear" looks like a better choice than "Unknown"
• Date of Birth - Since this, like the date of death, is cited. Either provide information that the current read of the cite is wrong or that another source uses a different year. In either case, it may be worth while taking that to the talk page for confirmation/hashing out.
• Age - Same issue as the DoB.

- J Greb (talk) 14:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah i just wanted to be creative okey but i don't care, those were just minor edit's nothing to worry about. okey? Oh and L i though he was from england, and his birthday and age, i changed it because absolute anime made his age 24, sorry.

• You have to use the primary sources for the age and nationality info. The nationality of L is mixed, as the authors said. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eureka Seven, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 05:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm merging that one back into the characters article. Also the title you used has a misspelling and has (Death Note) in it (When there is only one Teru Mikami out there), so it is not plausible as a redirect. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Also the birthdays you put in the article do not reflect what is in the How to Read publication. If you are referring to the anime birthdays, please find a Wikipedia:Reliable source that states the anime birthdays. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You said: "she was also believed to be the clock woman in the final chapter " 1. I do not know who the "clock woman" is supposed to be. I read the final chapter; is this supposed to be the woman at the religious ceremony? 2. What is above is Wikipedia:Original research, which is prohibited by the encyclopedia. If you find a Wikipedia:Reliable source which states that, then it will be allowed. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Kiddy Grade characters‎, you will be blocked from editing. Shiroi Hane (talk) 09:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

suspected sockpuppet of 70.233.112.2 and 173.57.187.153. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Shutokei. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cliché Online (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Alucard (Hellsing), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Light Yagami are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Farix (Talk) 23:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Avatar (2009 film), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  GSK (talk ● evidence) 08:56, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

People have a way of deleting information like your recent edit there, claiming Wikipedia is not a game guide, and whatnot. Not sure how you could have an encyclopedic article about a game without revealing information about it, but no sense arguing about it these days. Anyway, your contributions would surely be appreciated over at the Wikia for this [7] if its not there already. Dream Focus 16:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your edit - actors are listed in order of billing/importance/size of role. Clooney and O'Donell were the stars, Arnold was a supporting character. Exxolon (talk) 18:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for Persistent vandalism, and ignoring two years' worth of repeated warnings, and six past blocks, the most recent violation being this edit to Thunderbolt Ross. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text ((unblock|Your reason here)), but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Looking over your recent edits:

• You still have a problem understanding the consensus about what is valid to add to a navigation template for a comic book character.
• Until you show you understand how to add a navbox to an article, please refrain from trying. They are not meant to be added by copying the code of the template into the article.
• You still seem to be adding unhelpful material or personal preferences/interpretations to article. you have been blocked for this before and continuing it is disruptive.
• This is damaging an article and can be seen as vandalism.

- J Greb (talk) 21:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ratonhnhaké:ton, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.connorkenway.com/index.php/about-connor.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 20:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed that you've twice added Goth Subculture categories to Invader Zim, here and here. Since you're not using edit summaries, and there is no mention of goth in the article, it's unclear why you think the show qualifies to be this category. Please use the article's talk page to discuss your rationale, and please do not resubmit the content until consensus is achieved. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:19, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Williamstrother. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Williamstrother. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ogress (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogress (comics) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 03:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]