Hello, Willuconquer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/documents/rc_pc_chrstuni_pro_20051996_chrstuni_pro_en.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — CactusWriter | ^needles 10:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Institutions connected with the Holy See, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/institutions_connected/index.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Institutions connected with the Holy See and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Institutions connected with the Holy See with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Institutions connected with the Holy See.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Institutions connected with the Holy See saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — CactusWriter | ^needles 10:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you have been copy-pasting information from copyrighted websites into Wikipedia. I have rolled back another violation at Pontifical Council for the Laity. As you can see, I've have also placed tags on Roman Catholicism in the Bahamas, Roman Catholicism in Haiti, Institutions connected with the Holy See and Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. It is not permissible to take other people's writing and place it on Wikipedia without their expressed written consent to give up all their rights. Infringement of another's copyright is taken very seriously. Please read WP:Copyright violations for further info about this. If you have copy-pasted other info, please remove it or rewrite it using your own wording. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Regards. — CactusWriter | ^needles 10:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your statement concerning the public domain of Vatican writings may have merit. At the moment, however, I am uncertain. I think it will depend on whether these are works of the Holy See rather than the Vatican State. Their website seems to indicate ownership of all copyrights. I'll ask for some clarification of this from the Wikipedia copyright experts. — CactusWriter | ^needles 12:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The articles have been blanked again pending resolution of the matter. Please do not restore the text before verification has been supplied that this material is public domain. See Talk:Institutions connected with the Holy See for response to your comments and please contribute any additional information you may have there. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Willuconquer. The Vatican website holds copyright to all their information, so those additions you made needed to be deleted from the three articles. The good news is that the copy-pastes on the Roman Catholicism in the Bahamas and Roman Catholicism in Haiti come from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia which is in the public domain. I've removed the templates from your talk page and an administrator has removed them from the articles. (You are, of course, free to remove the other ones here as you wish). Please remember to add references to the sections you copied, and place this ((catholic)) template at the bottom of the page which will note there is info in the article from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia. As far as copy-pasting is concerned, even if it is public domain, it is frowned upon per WP:Plagiarism guidelines. It is always best to use your own words. As well, the Catholic Encyclopedia is written from a Catholic viewpoint and the information can require alteration to provide a neutral POV. If you have further questions, feel free to ask. Good luck. — CactusWriter | ^needles 12:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Human rights in Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Greenmaven (talk) 03:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gerhard Ludwig Müller may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Foundation|Ratzinger Prize]], often considered the [[Nobel Prize]] of Theology, in June 2013.<ref> [http://attualita.vatican.va/sala-stampa/bollettino/2013/06/21/news/31229.html#BIOGRAFIA%20DEL%20REV.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kirtimukha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genesis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Es ist vollbracht.

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the content you included in Es ist vollbracht has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:50, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Willuconquer, I have moved the article you created to draft so you can improve it as it is not yet ready for mainspace but the subject looks like it could be notable. The specific problem was that the youtube source doesn't appear to be from a reliable channel and as such is not acceptable as a reference, two other sources appear to be dead already, other references do not seem to be specifically about the subject. The inline citations should be more specific and verify the content that it is specifically cited for. After you make improvements or if you disagree that there is a problem, you can submit it (using the button at the bottom of the AFC template that I've added to the top of the draft) and someone else will have a look. If you move it back to mainspace without going through the process, and if I'm right, it might be nominated for deletion by another new page reviewer. Regards! Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 05:43, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vorvong and Sorvong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 04:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Preah Ko Preah Keo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nandi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Violon Sneha, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 09:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer,

Thank you for creating Violon Sneha.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add independent sources to show that the song meets notability guidelines for songs.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Jmertel23)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Jmertel23 (talk) 21:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube is not a WP:RS. Please see WP:BIO and WP:MUSICIAN

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Song Senghorn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Song Senghorn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 12:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer

Thank you for creating St. Michael's Church, Sihanoukville.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article, but note that other editors have called for more citations. The "History" section has many statements that are not supported by footnotes.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Doomsdayer520)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

☆☆☆ DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Song Senghorn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Décadas da Ásia. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:05, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both here and even here. If I'm somehow mistaken, please let me know, eg via the email link on my user page. I edit The Signpost and am always looking for something unusual. Please see (in a bit) Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/In the media under "In brief". And I'll add "thank you" for everything you do. Peace. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 20:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mengly J. Quach Education, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 07:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chamroeun Vichea High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chamroeun Vichea High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_signed, Iflaq ^(talk) 13:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning. This page is part of a larger project to empower Cambodians to have more presence on Wikipedia and this speedy deletion request is not helping this effort. I'll try to improve on your NPOV comments. Willuconquer (talk) 04:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Private schools in Cambodia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chamroeun Vichea High School Official Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Official Logo of the American Intercon School in Cambodia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dharmasala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sacred fire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've noticed that you've sometimes used text from other existing articles when creating new pages. When this is done, attribution to the source articles must be made to respect the Creative Commons licensing requirements. Please see the details in following template message, thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 14:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Paññāsa Jātaka you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Supreme Court of Cambodia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baksei Chamkrong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kampong Thom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for writing and contributing about Cambodia Lydangin (talk) 03:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cambodian words and phrases indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judiciary of Cambodia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Civil, Public ministry and Administrative act.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Legal history of Cambodia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Fall of Angkor. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 06:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) because of copyright violations in that area.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 17:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Today I noticed your creation of Battle of Pailin, which was copied from at least 15 of the cited sources. I deleted it as a copyright violation; you cannot copy from your sources, all text you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. You have received several warnings for copyright violations previously going back to 2009; it seems like you do not understand that you cannot copy from sources, so I have to block you. If you want to be unblocked, you must commit to no long copying from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 17:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there Moneytrees! Thank you for your vigilance. I share your concern and try my best to stick to the rules and practises of Wikipedia in that field. I think you'll appreciate the work invested into creating such pages, that I am creating about Cambodia every day, and sometimes, the drafts I keep I synthetize too quickly I confess not editing original materials that I would originally have planned to integrate as references rather than full text. I wonder if you could tell me how better to appreciate the length of quotes so that it qualifies as "no long copying from sources"? I hope you can help me get back to work promptly. Thanks for your help and understanding. Willuconquer (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the work in areas that need more coverage and hope you will continue to do so. The problem isn't with quotes however, it's that you copied large amount of content from your sources without quoting them or anything. The content you pasted in was presented as text in the article, as if it had been written for the article instead of copied from sources. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Moneytrees Alright, that happens as a involuntary mistake on my part on a rather long article and I would be happy to amend it. Rather than deleting the article in bulk, and blocking without a chance to amend it, would it be possible to show the lines missing references or context or copying too heavily on unreferenced sources? thanks. Willuconquer (talk) 23:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand what you are asking, there was no issue with missing references or anything like that; the problem was that you copied content from other sources into the article you were working on. Even if you cite the source you are copying from, it is still a copyright violation. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 01:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Moneytrees I am ready to improve on that, avoiding the opposite flaw of original research, and knowing that the topics on which I am writing are also topics for which people have faced backlash here in Cambodia. How do we go forward? is there anyway to look back at the article and fix the incriminating passages ? Willuconquer (talk) 01:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring copyright violations isn't allowed, but I could point you towards a report made by a bot that brought the article to my attention. Click on "iThenticate report" to see the overlap between the sources and your article. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 01:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was helpful. I had not realized how large the copy-paste from the Human Rights Watch report was. Again, it is also a way of keeping myself safe in the current political situation but I understand I need to amend. Apart from that, don't you think the 30+ references quoted are within reasonable length? What's more, and that's my fault (I should have drafted it better before posting it), this report was made on the first version posted, not the last which I had already edited with added references and clean-up of some copyright breach. Can you unblock me so I have an another try at this? Willuconquer (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Apart from that, don't you think the 30+ references quoted are within reasonable length?" I would say no, as looking at the deleted article, almost everything you copied from your sources are not portrayed as quotes; see MOS:QUOTE. For something to be considered a quote, there needs to be "" quotation marks around it, or it needs to be in a template such as blockquote. While you may have intended the content you copied over to be quotes, it looks like straight copying to an outside observer. Having an article made entirely up of quotes is discouraged anyways, see WP:QUOTEFARM.

There's some good news if you want to rewrite the article; you are only currently blocked from mainspace and drafts, so you can still write stuff in your user space. You should be able to create a rewrite at a page like User:Willuconquer/rewrite, and I'm fine with you trying to rewrite the article there. I'm even willing to restore the references from the deleted article, and I can provide pointers along the way with your rewrite. If you are able to produce a rewrite with no copyright issues, that would go a far way in getting you unblocked. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Moneytrees yes, please restore the references and I'll do the rewrite in that space. thanks! Willuconquer (talk) 00:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and I added the infobox, categories, and navbox back too. If you have any further questions, please ask... Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 02:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Progress on rewrite

I took a look at your progress on User:Willuconquer/rewrite, it's looking good so far. I'll note that the sentences "set an ambush that killed Haruyuki Takata, a Japanese policeman working for" and "Yasushi Akashi and the UNTAC Force Commander Lieutenant General John Sanderson were forced to turn around after trying to reach Pailin, which was a massive embarrassment for the United Nations at the time" are too similar to https://cne.wtf/2019/12/08/war-stories-from-the-northwest-79-94/ and should be rewritten. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:43, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no issues found with this edit Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 01:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I am done rewriting the article, I hope you can have a look, and if you think fit, unblock me. Would be handy as I am giving a talk tonight with Wikipedia Khmer at a student center in the Northwest of Cambodia. Thanks for your time and concern. Willuconquer (talk) 09:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I'm late, I've reviewed the recent edits to the rewrite and can verify they have no copyright issues. I have unblocked you and have moved it into mainspace. Your work on the rewrite is impressive, thank you for that. If you have any future questions about copyright issues, feel free to ask me. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice and patience. Constructive criticism helps us all improve our own standards. I wonder if you could tell me about copyright issues, I am trying to make a map of the Anlong Veng trek where the last Khmer Rouge lived in hiding. What's the Wiki procedure to edit a copyright-free map? Willuconquer (talk) 08:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Upload can be used to upload an image of a map you've created or is otherwise copyright free, there's some instructions there on labeling the image with a license compatible with Wikipedia's. If you are trying to update an existing map, C:Commons:Overwriting existing files has some guidelines on the matter. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That link will be useful. Thank you. Willuconquer (talk) 06:23, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for an excellent article on Khleang Moeung. Are you aware of Coedes's mention of this figure in his article "First Foundation of Phnom Penh"? It's one page 11, and is in the context of Ponhea Yat's foundation of Phnom Penh. Apparently Yat put a neak ta shrine under a fig tree on the riverbank outside Wat Unnalom; Coedes says the neak ta was named Neak Ta Prap, "dont il fit le Khlang Muong." In a footnote he says that the name Prap is obscure "even to Cambodians", and I wonder if the Pech name might be a distortion of this. He explains Khleang Muong as signifying protection of the kingdom. I also wonder if Norodom, when he built his interim palace next to Wat Unnalom, was influenced by this shrine. I remember a shrine in that location around 2002-2005, but it's long gone now. The article is here. 12:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I was not aware of all that! I'll try to integrate it to the article as soon as I am no longer blocked.Willuconquer (talk) 09:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer

Thank you for creating Grande Inscription d'Angkor.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer

Thank you for creating Num ansorm.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your work on Wikipedia, and I have learned so much from you and acknowledge your contribution to Cambodian content. Looking forward to having another cup of coffee with you (mine is cold though) (: Lydangin (talk) 06:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, when I was patrolling I came across the Heortology article. It appears that after you removed the redirect you added authoritative information with no citations. please consider returning to the article and adding the correct citations for each piece of new information. Bruxton (talk) 20:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Khmer keyboard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://ipom.fr/2019/07/02/disposition-du-clavier-wikipedia-2/ and https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1094201631&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unicode.org%2FL2%2FL2002%2F02073-cambodian.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – 333-blue at 09:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @333-blue please avoid using bots too speedily. That section of a longer article was taken from a previous article on Keyboard layouts in order to extend into the main article on Khmer keyboards, as indicated in a further edit. That section from the old article may have been translated into a very poor French on that other platform. Please confirm that you will look at this more closely. Thank you. Willuconquer (talk) 09:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Chen Zhi (businessman), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:44, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Noem Chhunny, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae i am ready to edit the page but please be more specific. No Chunny happens to be the one of the rare lay Cambodian Buddhist leader to have a page on Wikipédia. I think his place is more important than you might reckon. Have a look at his Facebook page of you don't know him. Willuconquer (talk) 15:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I said nothing of his importance, his Facebook is irrelevant. This is nothing more than a raging advertisement. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer

Thank you for creating Trasak Paem.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer

Thank you for creating Law of Cambodia.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Willuconquer, A significant proportion of this article appears to be copied verbatim from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08729b.htm., a source that is clearly marked "Copyright © 2021 by New Advent LLC". I have removed the offending passages and marked the page as patrolled. I strongly suggest that you read Wikipedia's policies on this subject, including Wikimedia:Terms of Use and WP:CV. Gderrin (talk) 10:13, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Lace". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

How about this? Many pages integrate content for this source whose copyright has expired. Willuconquer (talk) 11:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Willuconquer, an administrator has redirected the article to draft with the edit summary "Mixture of copyvio, very poor paraphrasing, misinterpreted sources, ... Needs total rewrite to be acceptable". "Copyvio" means the artice included text that was word-for-word, the same as in a source. To understand "poor paraphrasing", you should read this. "Misinterpreted sources" probably means you do not seem to have understood the text you used. I think this is an interesting subject, but it probably does need to be rewritten. It would be probably better to start the article again, keeping it short, without close paraphrasing, and using your own words. Gderrin (talk) 12:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll try my best. But how about the possibility of incorporating text from this public domain source? Copied verbatim is what "incorporating" means and I want to make sure that what you are up against. Willuconquer (talk) 12:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liturgical lace was just another article in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Catholic Encyclopedia topics. I think it might have been hastily deleted. Willuconquer (talk) 15:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably read WP:CLOP again, especially the section "When is close paraphrasing permitted?", and all of WP:QUOTE and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. You might find it easier just to write the article again, in your own words. Gderrin (talk) 22:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. Thank you for creating Three Sundays of Commemoration. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great article!!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Scope creep)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 17:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. Thank you for creating Jean Desbois. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Netherzone)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 02:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Liturgical lace, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chen Zhi (businessman), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians in Phnom Penh

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians in Phnom Penh indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.

Liturgical lace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bearcat (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chen Zhi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Bearcat (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create categories at the form "20st-century". I see that you've attempted Category:20st-century Buddhist monks at least twice, but the ordinal form of the number 20 is 20th, not "20st", and the correct category Category:20th-century Buddhist monks already exists. Bearcat (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! Willuconquer (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sacred Heart into Month of the Sacred Heart. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. Thank you for your work on Austroasiatic carrying basket. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. Thank you for your work on Sāstrā sleuk rith. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willuconquer. Thank you for your work on Num kreab. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn thanks for the continuous support brother Willuconquer (talk) 04:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn:, @Willuconquer: please have a more attentive look at the preparation section. I tried my best, but the second part is too incoherent for me to fix. How can freshly steamed rice be "mixed with palm sugar to a fine powder"? Is the rice dried after steaming? What does "grease or cooking oil is mixed with the red part of the boiled duck or egg and applied to the palms of the hands and on the trunk" even mean? Trunk of what? Are boiled or raw eggs used in the recipe? Is boiled duck one of the ingredients? And everything that follows after that. "press the flour into flatbread" I thought it was a cracker, not a flatbread. And how can dry flour be pressed into anything that holds together? At which point and how does the dough become flour again and why does already dry "pressed flour is then dried in the sun"? It very much sounds like an unedited machine translation from Khmer.. –Turaids (talk) 18:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Turaids As a new page patroller my focus is not on the content of the article, but on the notability of the article. My review does not meant that the article doesn't have any problems. If you have concerns on the article, you could just do the edit for yourself per WP:BOLD and discuss that with other editors if contention happened. Have a great day! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I fixed what I could, but boldness is useless when it comes to deciphering incomprehensible text. –Turaids (talk) 04:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Willuconquer, and thank you for creating Aurelia Spinola. I detected it was translated from the French Aurelia Spinola. In order to clarify a translated article's attribution, it is necessary to state it is a translation in the first edit comment. It is also useful to include a "translated" template on the article's talk page. See Help:Translation for details. I've taken care of the attribution of Aurelia Spinola but you should bear this in mind for future translations. If you intend to translate more articles about women, you might be interested in joining WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. I was not aware of that. I find the translation tool has becomore more useful to use. Willuconquer (talk) 07:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to pay particular attention to pronouns, etc. I needed to change "his" to "her" several times.--Ipigott (talk) 07:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]