Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into U.S. Presidential IQ hoax. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Polyamorph (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Witha cap R [1] Carptrash (talk) 16:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Carptrash: Perhaps, but Wikipedia's style guide is pretty clear (see MOS:JOBTITLES). Also, this issue has been thoroughly debated here and here. Woko Sapien (talk) 16:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And strictly speaking, the website you linked to isn't an official U.S. government website, but a non-profit that works in U.S. civics. Either way, you're welcome to voice your objection at the Manual of Style talk page. --Woko Sapien (talk) 16:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, that's fine, I saw what I thought was a un-thought-out edit and since it turns out to be a thought-out edit I'm okay with that. Carptrash (talk) 23:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi sorry, juut letting you know actions you have done have been undone on a page named Chip Roy for grammatical reasons. Msaskiw (talk) 22:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Woko Sapien,

I'm looking at starting a task force of Wikipedia editors to work on the pages of candidates up for election in 2022. Many congressional member pages have very few votes or political positions (for example, compare Michelle Steel and Steve Chabot against Nicole Malliotakis), and so I think it would be a great resource for us to flesh out a lot of these pages ahead of the election to better support people who come to Wikipedia for information before they vote.

I see you've been active on a couple of congressperson pages recently so thought you might be interested. If you are, please message me on my talk page. Once I have a couple of interested editors I will work on building a task force page so we can coordinate our work. No worries at all if you're not interested or too busy. Thanks for everything you do for the Wikipedia communtiy!

Wildfire35 (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, it looks like the change from EVEN to Even of all PVI ratings per MOS has been reverted manually in a number of pages. Are you sure that MOS:Caps really apply here, considering that EVEN is the official term used by Cook PVI [2], the ones who created it, and literally every other political newsletter? This is to say that the all uppercase EVEN is the only version we find in all sources. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 06:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@CX Zoom: It seemed clear to me MOS:Caps (specifically MOS:ALLCAPS) applied here, since EVEN is not an acronym, abbreviation, Unicode, etc. It's literally just the word "even". As far as how Cook renders it, I'll point out the official government profile of Justin Trudeau says he is the "23rd Prime Minister". But on his Wikipedia page, it is rendered as the "23rd prime minister" because the consensus is that MOS:JOBTITLES takes priority over the official source. All that said, if people feel that strongly about it remaining in all caps, I'm not going to edit war over this. I was just being bold.--Woko Sapien (talk) 14:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@CX Zoom: I'll also point out that the reversions seem to be the work of a single IP user, and not a mass reversion by multiple editors. --Woko Sapien (talk) 16:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add ((Sockpuppet)) tags to userpages unless an SPI, CU or admin investigation has reached a conclusion to that effect. And even in that case, it is advisable to leave it to the CU, admin or SPI clerk's discretion as to whether the page needs to be tagged. Abecedare (talk) 20:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abecedare that's my bad. This was my first sockpuppet investigation request and I wasn't sure if I needed to manually tag the accounts in question (like the way you have to manually tag categories for category rename requests). I'm sorry for any trouble that caused and won't do it again. Woko Sapien (talk) 21:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Woko Sapien,

I have noticed that you recently edited the Wikipedia article on the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, and uncapitalized the words "Secretary" and "Commerce". I had recently edited the article by capitalizing those 2 words. Could you please explain your reasoning for this uncapitalization.

Sincerely,

A.FLOCK, Wikipedian

A.FLOCK (talk)

@A.FLOCK: Hi there, the reason for undoing the capitalization was because it technically violates MOS:JOBTITLES — a rule that I'll openly admit is enforced on Wikipedia haphazardly. While capitalization is acceptable when denoting a title (Bob Blow was appointed Secretary of Affairs last July or Secretary of Affairs Bob Blow was appointed last July), the manual of style dictates that lowercase must be used when denoting a description (The current secretary of affairs is Bob Blow or Bob Blow is the worst secretary of affairs ever).

Generally speaking, the rule of thumb is that if it has a modifier before it (the, a, an, many, etc.), it's being used as a description, rather than a title. There are a few exceptions, like when the title is being used as a substitute for the person's name (The Secretary of Affairs gave a speech after he has appointed in July has a modifier, but is referring specifically to Bob Blow).

In the instance of "The United States secretary of commerce is the head of the United States Department of Commerce..." secretary of commerce is describing the officeholder, but not the title or any particular individual who's used it. A workable alternative that could use capital letters would be something like "The title of Secretary of Commerce is used by the heads of the United States Department of Commerce", but that's rather wordy.

Anyway, I hope that helps clear things up. My apologies if you thought I was edit warring; I hadn't seen that you changed it a month earlier. --Woko Sapien (talk) 13:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Woko Sapien!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! I'll give it a look. Woko Sapien (talk) 15:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perfectly fine. We have them across the project. Even have templates for them. 24.97.185.90 (talk) 17:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's a funny way of saying "screw the official guidelines, I'll do whatever the hell I want." But hey, whatever floats your boat. Woko Sapien (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You appear to be gaming the system here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase

Completely appropriate RS-supported edits were made, that you deleted, without appropriate reason. Gaming the system is not one of the purposes of page protection. Kindly reconsider your approach. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:116B:2588:AD54:DF88 (talk) 21:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What have I done to "game the system" exactly? Woko Sapien (talk) 21:14, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have characterized -- as mentioned above -- completely appropriate RS-supported edits .. which you deleted, without appropriate reason, as ones that were cause for page protection. Which of course they were not. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:116B:2588:AD54:DF88 (talk) 21:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see Talk:Tom_Suozzi#Page_protection for further information. Cheers! Woko Sapien (talk) 22:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]