This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for helping with the Pollock article. Geology1001 (talk) 06:22, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Wronkiew, I agree with your proposition of deleting the Commissioning (disambiguation) article that I have recently created. My intention was to facilitate the life of visitors who were looking for Project Commissioning, normally shortened to simply Commissioning in the Engineering and Project Management communities, but I suppose that the existing redirection form Commissioning to Commission (where the user may choose the option of Project commissioning, among many other alternatives) is sufficient, even though a little akward. Being so, can you proceed with the deletion right now? I suppose you have the admin rights required to do this. Antonio Prates (talk) 00:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm not too familiar with Editor Review and the archiving process, but with this edit DustyBot removed the whole discussion and left only the ((discussionbottom)) template. I don't know if this is a malfunction or not, but I thought it seemed strange that everything would be removed like that and figured I should bring it to your attention just in case. MelicansMatkin (talk) 16:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
DustyBot also made a seemingly slightly odd edit here with the 2 ((discussiontop)) templates inserted.--Rockfang (talk) 22:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)