Hi, Wrrsimone. Welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!
For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.
Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 01:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Council for Higher Education in Newark, (CHEN). Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.
Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.
Here's an example of how to add references:
He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>
== References ==
((reflist))
That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.
Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put ((helpme)) at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.
Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 01:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
((subst:submit))
to the top of the article.)
Hello Nolelover, Thank you for your email. I have followed your instructions on submitting a revision. I am new to writing articles and didn't appreciate the issues that can arise. The first responce spoke about me not including any references which was operator problems on my part. later, I got dinged on close paraphrasing. In updating my article I went thru the list of items identified in the Duplications Detection list. Hopefully, i got them all.
thanks, Wrrsimone (talk) 02:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
((subst:submit))
to the top of the article.)
Hello A412, Regarding my article "Council for Higher Education in Newark", I am confused about two things: First I made numerous changes in the text since first posting the article but I still have the "close paraphrasing" heading over the article. Using the Duplications detector list, I've worked my way down the list to the point where the remaining items are mostly proper names, e,g, Rutgers-Newark, which obviously can't be removed. My question then is: How do I get the close paraphrasing critique re-evaluated, and if it is re-evaluated how will I know if it fails again? My second issue is that one reviewer cited my article as being redundant since such an article (mine) already exist, which only adds to my confusion.
If I was more experienced I would love to help in a process that led to a tighter process for evaluating candidate articles but I don't have the experience. Nonetheless, and speaking as a novice, I think such a tightening would go a long way in helping interested parties to get their feet wet in writing articles.
Thank You for your time Wrrsimone (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Chzz ► 20:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Hi. When you recently edited Newark Light Rail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PATH (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
I've reverted your change to New Jersey Institute of Technology due to relative time references. The rationale can be found here: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Relative_time_references. If you think I've made a mistake, please feel free to discuss it here. The entire section is inconsistent in this regard (which I assume is why you reworded it in the first place) and I hope to make some improvements soon. Or if you have some time, feel free! - Ginotech (talk) 23:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New Jersey Institute of Technology may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:59, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Council for Higher Education in Newark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Council for Higher Education in Newark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:05, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New Jersey Institute of Technology may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
I don't know who you are but your objection to the link I implement is inconsistent with general practice. For example, exactly the same type of linkage is implemented at numerous college wiki entries. There may be some obscure rule that discourages such linkage but either it applies universally or it applies not at all! Try typing MIT or RPI into the search box and see what you get. Again either the rule applies to all or it doesn't apply. I look forward to you (non-automated) response. Wrrsimone. Wrrsimone (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
I would remind the person who placed all the external links in the NJIT article at the end of the sentences in which the items are located that, while this is generally good practice, IT IS NOT MANDATORY AND WHEN IT MAKES SENSE, EXTERNAL LINKS CAN APPEAR MID-SENTENCE. Remember: bots are bots! Wrrsimone (talk) 16:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
The graybeards and the bots (NingaTech) win! I quit! So long Wikipedia Wrrsimone (talk) 19:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New Jersey Institute of Technology may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
FYI, the NJIT hockey team may be Division II in the ACHA, but the NJIT team and the ACHA have nothing to do with the NCAA, so to link it to NCAA Division II would be erroneous. The ACHA structure has its own format, several lower level NCAA teams play in their Division I and many NCAA Division I teams (such as NJIT) play in lower divisions.UCO2009bluejay (talk) 00:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New Jersey Institute of Technology may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Wrrsimone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Wrrsimone. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I don't want to sound discouraging, I really don't, but I've just seen your new 'article' on Sboxnjitawards at New Page Review. I realise it only went live a 15 minutes ago, and that you're still working on it. But, in future, please could I ask if you'd consider preparing articles either as a draft, or in your sandbox, right from the start? It's just nonsense as it stands, and another New Page Reviewer might well propose it for deletion at any moment. I'm hoping you're going to make some serious improvements to it in the next half hour or so, because, if not, I'm going to move it into draft for you to work on there. I'd like to ask you to consider that this is an encyclopaedia, and that all our mainspace articles do need to have a degree of quality and structure almost immediately. Any questions, just shout. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 22:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello Nick, It's been a while since I used sandbox and obviously somehow I unintentionally produced a new "article". I appreciate your picking up on it so quickly. Regards Wrrsimone (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Wrrsimone. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northeast Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Do you have a connection to New Jersey Institute of Technology? ElKevbo (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Sorry I didn't respond sooner. I didn't expect a follow-up question. No. I never worked for NJIT nor have I ever had a job or a contract that involved NJIT in any way. I was a student there. That's it.Wrrsimone (talk) 18:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Jersey Institute of Technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FTE.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 00:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 18:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you are the original creator of Council for Higher Education in Newark. Afaik this organization no longer exists so I changed the page so as to refer to it as in the past tense. I wonder whether the page is really merited at this point, to be honest, and would like your opinion on that. If any of this is incorrect or wrongheaded please let me know. Best wishes. KeeYou Flib (talk) 17:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
In looking over Southland's website, I noticed it has a section entitled "Former Associate Members" but there's no "Current Associate Members" section, which seems like an omission. Wrrsimone (talk) 19:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)