Welcome!

Hello, Yadsalohcin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Classic keelboat classes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Boyd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Classic dinghy classes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | 1920's || [[Snowbird (sailboat))]] || ((convert|15|ft|6|in|m|abbr=on)) || plans from Rudder magazine (1921) || Tom Broadway, G.V.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:09, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Todd Ferrier.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 SAMI  ^talk 12:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Classic dinghy classes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Holt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 08:01, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yadsalohcin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hello, Yadsalohcin. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 15:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

Fiddle Faddle 15:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Todd Ferrier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:51, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rameswaram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marshfield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parliament in the Making, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acts of Union. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yadsalohcin, thanks for the insightful tables on Parliament in the Making and Elections in the United Kingdom. Once the right column headings are laid out with all the key information, it is much easier for other editors to contribute and for readers to understand the topic. Whizz40 (talk) 21:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Garagepunk66. Yadsalohcin, thanks for creating String Quartet No. 3 (Dvořák)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs addition of comprehensive body of text and more references and sources. Worthy topic that needs expansion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Garagepunk66 (talk) 01:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlie Skarbek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amphibious warfare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gonzaga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a redirect Borlase Smart, and added a few incoming links. He should probably be mentioned in the St Ives School article too. Thanks for starting the article. DuncanHill (talk) 12:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yadsalohcin. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Howard Bishop, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: ((proposed deletion/dated...))
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —swpb^T 13:35, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karel Ondříček, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Theatre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your edits which extended the primary source that extended the citation I added in September 2015; nothing in the website verifies the original name, or the 1904 date for FIM, or "arrange touring facilities for members".--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 16:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts. The 1911 TT \ ACU Wiki page should be disregarded as WP is an unreliable source, and should not be used as a form of synthesis. It was completely uncited original research, added in this change, in August 2006. They wrote anything they liked back then. I spend much time nowadays disbelieving WP articles, and having to delve into the past. The IoMTT.com is a primary source and can be useful for results, but should not be relied upon for historical content as we don't know who's writing the stuff (and when) and they could have sourced it from WP, so WP:CIRCULAR. I'll add it to my list (of things to keep an eye out for). rgds,--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 23:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into History of the formation of the United Kingdom. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 18:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Diannaa, you are quite right, in my haste to fill what seemed an important gap, I stole some of this from the pages you've identified. Albeit with some selectivity and rewording in order to gain a degree of consistency of depth of treatment across the 3 Regional Assemblies. Thankyou for your help with Attribution of Content.Yadsalohcin (talk) 21:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of microcars by country of origin: U, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Whilst trying to edit from a public wifi connection- on a train...)

((unblock-auto|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Cygnes64". The reason given for Cygnes64's block is: " Wikipedia Checkuser.svg CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse. Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement). : Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet|Bbb23|6955770))

Could you try again? It seems the problem has been fixed. PhilKnight (talk) 01:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Phil it seems to be working now, tho' I'm probably operating from a different IP address anyway. Thanks for looking; will get back to my originally intended edits when time allows!Yadsalohcin (talk) 00:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, due to a recent merger the order of parameters for ((ill)) has changed. The new order is to have the article title first (e.g. ((ill|Joker|fr)). Primefac (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yadsalohcin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When you translate, please add Interwiki.Xx236 (talk) 13:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See left down, Languages. I have done it.Xx236 (talk) 13:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... well, OK the article's not the biggest issue in the world today, but animal welfare is important and here are some people doing their best to help, so it seemed it would be good to help them by recording what they're doing... and they specialise in Pot-bellied pigs, not just an individual animal, but "a breed of domesticated pig" etc. I see under CSD-A7 "This criterion does not apply to species of animals, only to individual animal(s)". So as the article is about a breed, hence neither about (an) individual(s) nor about the entire species, perhaps it falls in some grey area... Not-so-speedy deletion? Not deletion at all?--Yadsalohcin (talk) 22:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article North Mountain Animal Sanctuary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable, fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:RS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Willows Animal Sanctuary, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.willowsanimals.com/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"A bit more about ..."

Thank you for quality articles such as Robert and Léon Morane, Odin's Raven and string quartet music by Dvořák, for adding scores and refs, for helpful corrections and links, often adding "A bit more about ", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1744 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yadsalohcin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This page was converted to a redirect because of "lack of independent notability", according to the page history. If you can verify differently, just go to the last edit & rv. On a (distantly) related note, any help you can offer on Hirohata Merc, hot rod, & custom car would be appreciated. Also any good online sources on altereds; I've had a devil of a time finding anything on the history. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 21:09 & 21:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Quercus furuhjelmi, Yadsalohcin!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add a taxobox and take care to focus on this species before discussing the comparison between different oak subgroups.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 10:25, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of these refs are suitable:

http://psychiatric-disorders.com/bipolar-disorder/famous-people-with-bipolar-disorder/

http://samoonmd.com/celebrity-advocates-for-bipolar-disorder/

Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baiba Skride, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orfeo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yadsalohcin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to The Coroner (book) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Cabayi (talk) 10:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit on Draft:Jacaranda_Books. Yesterday I made an update after doing a huge research effort, which is still unfinished. I tried to keep all your contributions and added comments about where to expand with more information, comments with more information found still to make part of the text and a historic context section. I'll be glad to have your review on the content I already published, as your contributions on the on going research.

Feel free to delete this section. Thank you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gatsbimantico (talk • contribs) 10:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gatsbimantico (talk • contribs) thanks for the massive progress on Jacaranda_Books- sorry I'm not going to have the chance to do much on it (e.g. the quotations etc.) for a coupla weeks... regards Yadsalohcin (talk) 20:57, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Yadsalohcin: Thanks for adding some content to the above and fixing the ref tags. Any help is appreciated. I'm currently creating this article People of the Red Orchestra and using it to find out how many groups there were before I finish updating the Red Orchestra article. When I started I never realised how much work had been done in the post war years to determine what Red Orchestra was and its meant update had become substially bigger. I plan to create articles for as many of these folk as possible. Any help is appreciated. scope_creep^Talk 16:25, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited River Monnow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osbaston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, DPL bot, absolutely right, mea culpa, now fixedYadsalohcin (talk) 14:03, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colophon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, DPL bot, absolutely right, mea culpa, now fixedYadsalohcin (talk) 14:03, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Riley Kestrel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saloon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:49, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Listeria thailandensis.

User:Nick Moyes while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please be careful not to copy/paste content from copyrighted sources. A slight rewording on your part would be helpful, please.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Nick Moyes)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nick Moyes (talk) 23:55, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating MG 18/80.

User:Doomsdayer520 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the MG 18/80.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Doomsdayer520)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacaranda Books and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jacaranda Books, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:41, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for improving Márta Kurtág! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of migrant vehicle incidents in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to List of migrant vehicle incidents in Europe has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Diannaa 🍁 (talk), I would be grateful if I could have the text of my recent edits- with apologies for the haste with which they were rushed through at the end (I would be happy to rework these before making any use), overall it involved considerable effort and for some of the earlier entries I thought I had managed some acceptable 'putting the descriptions into my own words'. Could it be placed in my sandbox? Yadsalohcin (talk) 11:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry no, I can't put it in a sandbox, as all of Wikipedia is subject to the same copyright rules, including sandboxes and drafts. The content is available at the source document http://www.irr.org.uk/news/roll-call-of-deaths-of-asylum-seekers-and-undocumented-migrants-2005-onwards/ — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yadsalohcin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 23:42, 28 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft lacks evidence of significant coverage of the publisher in independent sources; a large number of the sources are press releases by Jacaranda itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacaranda Books and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jacaranda Books, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 pandemic in Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardigan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deep state, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shadow government.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to Jacaranda Books, following my research on this topic, I'm exploring bio pages of writers published by Jacaranda.

Found this draft article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Esuantsiwa_Jane_Goldsmith

And all of these existing ones: Anthony Anaxagorou Fiston Mwanza Mujila Irenosen Okojie Bernice McFadden Rest in Power: The Enduring Life of Trayvon Martin Anietie Isong Stephen Bourne (writer) Radhika Jha Uzma Aslam Khan

It will be cool to have your eyes on them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gatsbimantico (talk • contribs) 03:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yadsalohcin- Thanks for your participation on the Bhakdi article. I can't access that GA article. I'm wondering if we might change the wording on the bit you added re Mainz distancing itself. Without seeing the original text, I would normally think something like this would be expressed The U of M issued a statement to the effect that it does not support/agree with B's views..., but I would not want to edit what you put without seeing how it was presented in the GA. Eric ^talk 15:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eric ^talk, and thanks to you for your work on the Bhakdi article too. My apologies to you and the wikiworld if I was inaccurate or misleading with my edit- after all the raging on the talk page and the delay before being able to re-instate lost text I was perhaps over-eager and hasty in my addition, which came out rather too informally. I have been trying to avoid being inflammatory or contra-BLP policy, but on this occasion my wording was a bit hastily thrown up and I can see it might be taken in a way I had not intended. Alternative ref supplied as I now realise I had based the words on sight (some days ago) of the reference web-page's title and summary, so 'accessed' would have been better expressed 'header accessed' or similar.Yadsalohcin (talk) 18:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on List of Welsh Government COVID-19 press conference videos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GeraldWL 07:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Welsh Government COVID-19 press conference videos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Welsh Government COVID-19 press conference videos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeraldWL 12:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. George's Priory, Thetford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Bigod.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Kralizec!, thankyou for your actions in regard to the block placed on User talk:120.29.98.80. Having checked the words at Wikipedia:Blocking policy I am none the wiser as to case history or typical blocking durations, however I am concerned that 31 hours is a relatively brief period. During this time, those making bona fide edits, in particular to update information regarding the spread of certain covid variants (specifically 501.V2 variant and Lineage P.1) will not to be doubling their efforts in order to check for and delete spurious entries from the 'rogue' user every time they perform an edit, and provide warnings to the user talk page. I think in particular of myself and the user 'User:SpookiePuppy'. In the last week, the edits from User:120.29.98.80 have all had to be reverted (as far as I know all of those (few) not tagged as 'reverted' have been reverted manually). The fictitious entries from the user have continued despite all the reversions and despite comments in the edit summaries and despite the warnings posted at their talk page- you may draw your own conclusions about this, but the kindest explanation I can imagine is that the user has no interest in such niceties as info sent to them via their talk page and the notification icons and no interest in checking previous edit summaries as to why contributions have been reverted. But that doesn't entirely fit with the fact that they have progressed from unreferenced contributions to falsely referenced ones, after certain edit summaries 'called them out' for such behaviour, which suggests to me less charitable explanations. So, without wishing to sound unduly like Judge Jefferies in my approach, I cannot help feeling that, in order to reduce the efforts required by bona fide contributors, a block measured in months (I wanted to say 'or years') would be more appropriate than one of 31 hours. Best wishes, Yadsalohcin (talk) 23:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norma (constellation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radiant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm Prof Oliver Pybus, co-developer of the Pango SARS-CoV-2 lineage nomenclature system. Thanks for your work on the Wikipedia pages about this. I wonder if you could help us clarify the system on the site (we are not Wikipedians). Specifically, we need separate pages for the "Pango nomenclature system" and for "Pangolin". The former is the set of rules used to name the lineages, whilst latter is a software tool that implements those rules, and confusion arises if the two are conflated. See https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-021-00872-5 for an initial attempt to clarify this. I'd be happy to be contacted at oliver.pybus@zoo.ox.ac.uk to discuss this with Wikipedians maintaining these important pages. Thanks again. Oliver — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.27.144 (talk) 13:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For defending Wikipedia from repeat vandalism, in particular, the significant contribution of the reversion of disruptive edits on the pages of variants of SARS-CoV-2. SpookiePuppy (talk) 20:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen this?
Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 12:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WuXi AppTec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Tucker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using the translations you have for the titles of references, from wherever you taken them from. There are a number that are riddled with mistakes that are obvious to those who know Chinese. – robertsky (talk) 08:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usually where I have any doubts about a translation I try the reverse translation to check things are not getting too distorted. I generally abandon matters when it's beyond my knowledege or ability to deduce the most appropriate translation. However, for this article, if I recall, a number of extra time-pressures arose and in haste I committed some less-well-checked trans-titles into the article. My apologies. Mea maxima culpa. Yadsalohcin (talk) 20:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ships for the rescue of refugees in the Mediterranean Sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mare Jonio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ships for the rescue of refugees in the Mediterranean Sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SAR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sea-Watch 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Augusta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Humanitarian Pilots Initiative, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could update your "on Wikipedia for 0 days" box. – Sca (talk) 19:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC) ;-)[reply]

Thanks for this suggestion. Long ago, I tossed in a number of such infoboxes, hoping that they would auto-update, but as they don't, and I don't feel much need for striving for self-advertisement, I have deleted them now. As of Late 2021, the number you require is... just over 2,500. Yadsalohcin (talk) 20:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Joachim Metallmann, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Current Events Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I wanted to ask you, to please, stop recreating section "simlar flags" in the article about the White-blue-white flag. Articles about flags arent' supposed to have sections about similar or "identical flags". For example, here is a bunch of red and white flags from around the world, of which, non has a section about the ""simlar flags" in its articles:

• Flag of Poland
• Flag of Monaco
• Flag of Indonesia
• Flag of Brandenburg
• Flag of Hesse
• Flag of Thuringia
• Flag of Greenland
• etc

You can see the same thing for other colour schemes such as blue-yellow-red:

• Flag of Romania
• Flag of Chad
• Flag of Andorra
• etc

Flag having huge similarities with other flags is normal and regular occurrence, and adding such information into articles about flags, usually fall under the "trivia" category, which is not welcomed on Wikipedia. So please, stop. Sincerelly, Artemis Andromeda (talk) 20:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yadsalohcin! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, MOS for Flag pages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute on the Environment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute on the Environment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ElKevbo (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yadsalohcin

Thank you for creating Polte ammunition factory.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:09, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for improving the list of compositions by Graham Waterhouse. The recordings were only meant to serve as an explanation for the abbreviations in the list. Can you find a way to bring them above the table? (not the details, but the abbreviations) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for fixing this- apologies for the misunderstanding Yadsalohcin (talk) 19:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yadsalohcin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joachim Metallmann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yadsalohcin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anton Kuprin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yadsalohcin. Thank you for your work on René Moineau. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 20:30, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yadsalohcin, I hope your doing well. I just thought it'd be necessary to properly thank you for going over my decently sized edits to Kinburn Spit recently, and for correcting the errors you find in them. I wrote and rewrote most of the page semi-recently, and it's good to know that there are people reading the page and maintaining besides myself. I hope you have a very happy New Year 🙂 Johnson524 (Talk!) 02:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Asperitas (cloud), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Todd Ferrier, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Todd Ferrier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page NORWAC, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dave.Dunford. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Wherryman's Way have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Dave.Dunford (talk) 16:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for drawing my attention to this, it was an inadvertent error and certainly not an act of intentional vandalism. I hope you can see what I was aiming for in the latest version of the Wherryman's Way article. Yadsalohcin (talk) 17:37, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yadsalohcin. Thank you for your work on Al-Hassan camp. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yadsalohcin. This edit didn't clarify the refs, it broke them. See Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors and the documentation for ((sfn)) templates for more details. They refs have to match the setup in the cite exactly, I've updated the cite to match the refs and fix the errors in this edit. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 15:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]