I think you can move it to mainspace now. I've added significant amount of stuff. I suggest the article title should be "Witnesses and testimonies of the Armenian Genocide"...some redirect should apply as well...for example, "Witnesses of the Armenian Genocide" should be redirected. Also, don't forget to add it to the Armenian Genocide template. Proudbolsahye (talk) 21:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Երևանցի ^talk 21:36, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For a moment, you had the higher ground. Now it's you who is promising to revert, and not just him. It's better for you to agree not to continue the dispute until you get outside opinion. EdJohnston (talk) 16:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike him, dear EdJohnston, I'm open to any discussion. --Երևանցի ^talk 16:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promising to revert puts you down at the same level as him. This will count against you if admins need to decide what to do. It's not advisable to get into a 'who can be the stupidest' contest. EdJohnston (talk) 16:44, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure it's not. The guy has been acting the worst possible way and the admins are trying to keep some kind of "neutrality" I guess. I should probably leave the arena to users like him who can arbitrarily change the infobox of an ethnic group article and refuse to discuss anything and still not be blocked. Makes perfect sense to me. Maybe you guys need like 5 days to make a decision. Take your time man. --Երևանցի ^talk 16:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Armenian–Azerbaijani War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Zangezur and Nakhichevan

United Armenia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dro

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't say all or even most Armenians claim Babak is their, just little part (I saw it on Talkpage, some kid perhaps). Btw I don't agree with your conclusion that Armenian is by deafult "Apostolic Christian", Tigranes wasn't one. :) --HistorNE (talk) 19:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LOL you claim to fight against "ultra-nationalism", though you assume things on the comments of "some kid". Really? Tigranes the Great lived in 1st century BC. Christianity was adopted in 301 AD. Every Armenian after that date is a Christian and that's not my conclusion, it's a historic fact. --Երևանցի ^talk 19:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well considering comment I guess he's around 15. :) I don't fight actually, I collect them as other people post stamps. Some of my favorites from ex-Yugoslav region is that Alexander the Great is Slavic Macedonian, Christopher Columbus is Croat and Virgin Mary is Serb. Such funny claims are based on "analizes" by local "scholars", but fortunately not so accepted to keep them on national Wikipedias. I'm not sure how Armenian Wikipedia stands with own similar issues, but I must say Azerbaijani is complete disaster - just take a look at their template History of Azerbaijan: representative photo is victory of Naram-Sin Akkadian against tribes from Luristan in 23 century BC. After seeing such nonsense I feel bigger Armenian then you are, despite not being Apostolic Christian. :) --HistorNE (talk) 20:13, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to comment the Azerbaijani historiography, because my country and Azerbaijan are in a state of war and everything I say here will be used against me. I don't think claims such as the Alexander the Great one being a Slav should not even be talked about. Any guy who is a little familiar with ancient history should know that he is part of the Greek civilization, not Slavic. --Երևանցի ^talk 20:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		For your countless high-quality additions of articles related to Armenia and Armenian history. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I appreciate it.--Երևանցի ^talk 20:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Burney, Charles Allen. Historical Dictionary of the Hittites. 2004. p. 187. It does not contain the information you provided — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samirhuseyn (talk • contribs) 23:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that you had to deal with that. DYK has been very odd lately with long arguments about whether "woman" professor or "female" professor should be used, pulling an article from the prep area that was approved on July 16 just because of one editor's opinion about a hook, excessive nitpicking, and your nomination as well. Orlady could have simply removed "highly" and now because of that, the nomination sat there for days until I noticed it. SL93 (talk) 01:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even know what to say. Perhaps some people don't like when things go smooth, I guess. --Երևանցի ^talk 01:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		You did an awesome job on the Vazgen Sargsyan article. --1ST7 (talk) 05:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Երևանցի ^talk 05:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yerevanci. Your input is needed here. Thanks. Parishan (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited May uprising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nakhichevan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yerevanci, I'm contacting you because we need some Armenian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hy.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need assistance with a personal message for the Armenian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've been busy lately. Yes, just let me know how I can help you. --Երևանցի ^talk 21:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yerevanci, great! We're making some progress on translating the actual VisualEditor interface text into Armenian, but there's still some cleanup to be done. Here's where the magic happens: Translatewiki.net - Armenian.

The help documents haven't been started, though, and they are quite important. If you could do any work on the user guide or the FAQ, it would be very useful to the hy.wikipedians when VE is rolled out. Just click "translate this page" above the header to get started. Let me know if you have any difficulties. Regards, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. --Երևանցի ^talk 18:27, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, any little bit helps, especially from a native speaker. PEarley (WMF) (talk) 22:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at [1] twice, but I can't figure our why it says that I need permission to edit. --Երևանցի ^talk 00:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, yeah, forgot to mention - translatewiki.net doesn't recognize Wikimedia accounts (it really should), so you have to register (reg. page). After registration, you need to be "approved" as a translator, but I can fast-track that for you. Let me know if you decide to register. PEarley (WMF) (talk) 16:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

wow, time flies. I'll take a look at it again. --Երևանցի ^talk 03:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sure does. If you have time, the User Guide translation hasn't been started. No hurry. It looks like Armenian won't get VE deployed until at least October. (Unless hr.wiki users really want it sooner!) PEarley (WMF) (talk) 03:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wars involving Armenia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nakhichevan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article May Uprising, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that according to Armenia's first president Levon Ter-Petrosyan, Armenia would not have lost some of its territories if the country was Sovietized sooner? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Alex Shih^Talk 12:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yerevanci, I offered my version, if you have not any disagreement, I'll change the infobox.--Δαβίδ (talk) 12:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Read the tenth century works of Hovhannes Draskhanakerttsi and Tovma Artsruni and Matthew of Edessa's chronicle and you'll come across plenty of Atoms.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 18:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that, thanks for the enlightenment. --Երևանցի ^talk 18:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chess in Armenia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Sasata -- Sasata (talk) 01:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article United Armenia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 1ST7 (talk) 20:16, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article United Armenia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:United Armenia for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 1ST7 (talk) 22:15, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Witnesses and testimonies of the Armenian Genocide at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yerevanci. You have new messages at Talk:United Armenia/GA1.
Message added --1ST7 (talk) 03:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

On 6 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Witnesses and testimonies of the Armenian Genocide, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... Henry Morgenthau, who gave testimony of the Armenian Genocide, stated that the massacres of the past "seem almost insignificant when compared to the sufferings of the Armenian race in 1915"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Witnesses and testimonies of the Armenian Genocide. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reviewing my article. I answered you. Kudu ^~I/O~ 03:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yerevanci!

Again, congratulations for your work at Chess in Armenia! I wrote very similar articles at pt.wiki about chess in Spain, chess in Italy, chess in Arab world and chess in ancient Persia. As you see, they are very similar most of the part but Chess in Armenia is far better in statistics and team events. I will take this in consideration when I start improve then. If you need any help in other chess subjecs, please let me know! Regards, --OTAVIO1981 (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All those articles look awesome. Great work! Sure and also, don't hesitate to look at it yourself and let the community know how it can be improved. --Երևանցի ^talk 03:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I looked at how much you've done and it seems you know your way around here. Keep posting :D -LQN2 (talk) 18:58, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I appreciate it. --Երևանցի ^talk 22:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andranik Ozanian, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Agha and Nakhichevan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BRD quicte CLEARLY specifies that when you hae a BOLD edit reverted you DISCUSS. yOU don't argue claiming you don't need discussion. If you have a reason then cite that in discussion and get CONSENSUS.(Lihaas (talk) 02:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)).[reply]

On 22 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Armenians and Jews, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that many historians have compared Armenians and Jews? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Armenians and Jews. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello Yerevanci,

Could you please make Nigeria on this map--https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ethnicity_and_race_in_censuses.png --colored pink just like Myanmar (Burma) is? It is planning to hold a census with an ethnicity option in 2016. I tried modifying this map myself right now, but I was unsuccessful in doing this for some reason. This should only take a minute. Thank you very much. Have a good day and take care.

Sincerely,

Futurist110.

Futurist110 (talk) 20:00, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think you did it correctly. It just takes times (sometimes up to hours) to update the image to the new version. --Երևանցի ^talk 04:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit, please note the following WP policies:

Nationality: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies clearly states: "In most modern-day cases this will mean the country of which the person is a citizen, national or permanent resident, or if notable mainly for past events, the country where the person was a citizen, national or permanent resident when the person became notable."

Per WP:RS, the original source, i.e. the book, does supersede the newspaper articles that are merely based/cite from that source.

All the newspaper articles provided by Marek, are based on the same book: Stefan Kornelius, Angela Merkel: Die Kanzlerin und ihre Welt, Hoffmann und Campe, 2013, page 1915, ISBN-13: 978-3455502916. The book (all the articles are based on) states that he was a "German citizen" with "Polish roots" (...deutscher Staatsbürger ... polnische Wurzeln). That's exactly what the article should state, and not some adulterated teaser version from a newspaper that claims to state the revelations/content of that very same book, while it obviously does not. All of the articles Marek has provided have copied each others content. The current version is in clear violation with several WP policies. --IIIraute (talk) 23:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia
Thank you for quality articles on Armenian history and culture, such as Chess in Armenia, for creating maps, for letting us know visitors to the memorial, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:48, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! --Երևանցի ^talk 16:44, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Turkish people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the edit reverts regarding Aram Khachaturian and the explanatory comments accompanying them, and I thought I would point out that "one of the major musicians of the 20th century" is not the best writing in English. I know nothing about the source, but I do know something about English. If one wants to use "major musician", it would be more correct to write that he was "a major musician of the 20th century". Also, even though "major" and "great" are similar in meaning, their slightly different meanings convey a different attitude: "major" means "important" while "great" means "important, wonderful, outstanding". Finally, "major" has only one form: "major". "Great" has three forms: "great", "greater", and "greatest". Compare: He was "a major musician of the 20th century" and he was "one of the greatest musicians of the 20th century". Clearly, the second one expresses greater praise and admiration than the first.CorinneSD (talk) 22:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would assume that any any English native speaker would have a better command of that language than me. The source says: "Aram Ilych Khachaturyan was an Armenian Soviet composer, conductor, pedagogue, a public and musical figure, a People’s Artiste of the USSR, the author of the music of the Armenian Soviet Republic’s anthem and overall one of the major musicians of the 20th century." Because I didn't want to simply copy-paste it I wrote "one of the greatest", assuming that "one of the major" and "one of the greatest" are no different. Apparently, they are. --Երևանցի ^talk 01:59, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - I see another editor has "got here first" on this point. Corinne's absolutely right about the distinction. Just to say that we can't say someone's "one of the greatest" unless we find a citation which actually says this; and much as I - and I'm sure many other people - love Khachaturian's music, I have to admit that there's a very large number of composers I would expect to be cited as "one of the greatest" before our dear Aram. Alfietucker (talk) 23:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to have a list of your own and place Khachaturian wherever you desire. I find it quite surprising that you think there is a "very large number of composers" who are ahead of him, when he is compared to Prokofiev and Shostakovich, who are also called one of the greatest (or whatever word you want to use) composers of the 20th century. --Երևանցի ^talk 01:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well ultimately, as far as Wikipedia is concerned, it's not my opinion (or anyone else's) on relative "greatness" which matters - only what is verifiable from a reliable published source. But I don't want to come across as 'curt' by not saying more, so please forgive me if I explain myself, though this is to stray - as far as Wikipedia's concerned - into the realms of original research. For the background to Khachaturian's rise, which I believe was at least as much because of his non-bourgeois and ethnic background as due to his innate talent, I recommend Amy Nelson's Music for the Revolution - this really makes a lot of sense of the "discussions" Khachaturian was having as a student in the late-1920s. I hasten to add that, notwithstanding the motivations the Soviet State had for promoting Khachaturian's career, he was clearly a benevolent force: particularly as vice-chairman of the organizing committee of the Soviet Composer's Union, Khachaturian clearly understood far more about what composers needed for their creativity and well-being than did such Soviet officials as Platon Kherzentsev. This, I think, explains why he was so viciously attacked in 1948 - the supposed transgression of composing the Symphonic Poem seems to me simply convenient ammunition. A fair number of scholars are beginning to argue that 1948 was not at root about discordant music - that was, at best, a symptom - but about the far too autonomous role the Composer's Union and its organizing committee in particular was playing, awarding huge sums of money to Shostakovich and Prokofiev in particular via commissions and Stalin Prizes. Khachaturian's key role in this made him an obvious target. Until then, he was certainly promoted as a "titan" of Soviet music - largely due to having the approved ethnic and non-bourgeois background, so becoming an ideal Soviet-nurtured "star" the state could proudly "show off" and indeed export through his Piano and Violin concertos and such popular hits as the "Sabre Dance". Khachaturian's talent was, I think, rather greater than this implies, but still not as great as a composer as either Shostakovich or Prokofiev. Alfietucker (talk) 09:07, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I don't know much about his biography in order to agree or disagree with you, but the point is that he is a well known composer that lived in the 20th century. Whether you or me put him in the list of the "greatest", he is quite known. He might have been promoted as a star by the Soviet state for the given reasons, but that's a small detail in my opinion, because at last, every great composer (and other artists) had been in some way supported by the state. --Երևանցի ^talk 20:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At the risk of upsetting people who follow WPs injunction against opinion, I want to weigh in again on "one of the greatest musicians (or composers) of the 20th century". To say that is not to say anything about whether he is greater, or less great, than other great musicians (or composers) of the 20th century. There is no comparison implied here to other great musicians/composers of the 20th century such as Shostakovich and Prokofiev. There is comparison to all musicians/composers of the 20th century. I think there is plenty of evidence for this, and music historians can add the references. Also, the people who are most likely to read this article are those who know nothing, or very little, about Aram Khachaturian. If we remove every last shred of "opinion" such as this from Wikepedia articles, the articles will be dull and boring.CorinneSD (talk) 17:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yerevanci. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Vazgen Sargsyan at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! JudyCS (talk) 00:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Much appreciated. --Երևանցի ^talk 01:12, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You created the page but was it a spill over from another page that grew too long? It seemed well developed already. Alatari (talk) 01:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I created a new article because Ethnic cleansings was too long. I didn't actually make the list, all I did was a simple copy-paste. --Երևանցի ^talk 01:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Someone found some sources I had been looking for a few years back and I want to thank them.Alatari (talk) 02:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what? What happened? The listing in Ethnic cleansings is longer and more detailed than List of ethnic cleansings. Consensus to shorten the article wasn't achieved? Alatari (talk) 02:45, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just noticed that, it's strange. I thought the list was fully integrated to the list article. --Երևանցի ^talk 02:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interfase has been sanctioned per AA2, so this should be mentioned in the Editwarring report, and the IP needs to be notified of said sanctions. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:55, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See User_talk:EdJohnston#Question. Another user has already asked an admin if Interfase should be blocked under AA2 sanctions. --Երևանցի ^talk 19:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tatev ruined.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I e-mailed you something you should take a look. I notified you here to inform you sooner. TheShadowCrow (talk) 02:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will. --Երևանցի ^talk 02:40, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	You are doing very fine work, keep propagating the truth, spreading knowledge about our history, our people, our past and present achievements. Know that your work doesn't go unnoticed, it serves a great deal in educating the younger generations. I wish you continued success in your challenges. FortressNikopoli (talk) 01:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! --Երևանցի ^talk 02:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I did the best I could to wikify this article in English. Can you take a look, check the diffs, and reword as may be needed. Thanks. Quis separabit? 21:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll take a look at it. --Երևանցի ^talk 00:03, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me your opinion for capitalizing, Dashnaktsutyun equivilant and who can be considered fedayi here so that way I can make the needed changes today? Also, do you know if Wikipedia has a flagicon for the Hnchak and Armenakan parties as well? HouseOfArtaxiad (talk) 16:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 October 2013, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Azerbaijani presidential election, 2013, which you recently nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 17:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[2] Gatoclass (talk) 12:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ողջույն հարգելի Երևանցի մի հատ քո հայերեն էջ կմտնես........--6AND5 (talk) 16:02, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit waring? I'm only reverting sockpupped editings.--Δαβίδ (talk) 18:04, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go to sockpuppet investigation. Or try the talk page. Reverting is the last thing to do. --Երևանցի ^talk 18:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I tried talk pages many times, but that user dont want to discuss.--Δαβίδ (talk) 18:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Try other methods, like sockpuppet investigation. --Երևանցի ^talk 18:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Իսկ ինչ եք կարծում նախաբանի վերաբերյալ? Ես իմ խմբագրումը հետ եմ շրջել որ հետո խնդիրներ չառաջանան, բայց գտնում եմ որ այդ մասը պետք է հեռացնել:--Δαβίδ (talk) 18:32, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Չեմ կարծում թե դա հայ ժողովրդի ինքնության խոհրդանիշ կարող է համարվել, բայց դա չի նշանակում որ պետք է այդ էջը ոչ ստաբիլ վիճակում պահել: --Երևանցի ^talk 18:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ես հենց նամանատիպ հայտարարությունների մասին եմ խոսում, եթե դեմ չեք առաջարկում եմ հեռացնել այդ տողը:--Δαβίδ (talk) 18:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yerevanci. I've deleted most of your user subpages as you've requested. There were just two I was unsure of, as they were copy-pasted rather than moved into mainspace, and therefore your collaborators on them have not had their edits attributed correctly. Those users are User:TheShadowCrow on Wrestling in Armenia, and User:Proudbolsahye on Atatürk's cult of personality. [3] [4] The attribution could be corrected by performing a history merge of the user subpages and the mainspace articles. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 06:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the edits by TheShadowCrow were just minor formatting and spelling changes, so I've gone ahead and deleted that subpage. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 06:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

see for yourself. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just started this article, but can't find more good sources (wiki articles indicate that it's on an official Iranian list of cultural monuments, but I can't find the original doc). Any more info available in Armenian language sources? --Soman (talk) 23:08, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest. I found only one source. Here's some useful information from it. It's 6.5 meters high, it used to have 6 columns. It was built using "yellow stones" and basalt. The article confirms that it was built in 1625. The only wall that is still standing is the northern one, while the southern wall is completely ruined. Its size is 15x10 meters. It was renovated in the 1800s. There are tombstones around the church, perhaps of the members of a wealthy family that financed its renovation.

• "Ատրպատականի Հայոց Թեմի Առաջնորդը այցելել է Սալմաստ գավառի Սառնա գյուղի Ս. Աստվածածին եկեղեցին [The Head of the Armenian Diocese of Atropatene Visited the St. Astvatsatsin Church of Sarna village near Salmast]". Noyyan Tapan (in Armenian). 20 March 2013. Retrieved 17 October 2013.

--Երևանցի ^talk 23:31, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• • Thanks! I'll add the details to the article. This church belonged to the Armenian Apostolic Church, right? --Soman (talk) 23:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes--Երևանցի ^talk 00:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my followup at User talk:EdJohnston#User:NovaSkola. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:36, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chechen-Russian conflict, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Chechen-Russian conflict (Chechen rebel pictured) dates back as far as 1785? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chechen-Russian conflict. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Dear Yerevanci, Your added pics are not an Armenian Eternity signs. There are an Armenian Entity signs - superpositon left and right rotated Armenian Eternity sign. Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 00:22, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If so, you are free to remove them. --Երևանցի ^talk 00:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is not important, for me it is important that you properly recognize the signs of eternity. And yet, the sundial of Haghartsin is wrong, and what that fool them "corrected". Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 00:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is important. I do not want wrong stuff to stay there. I'm not an expert on this sign, I simply added those images because they look very similar to the eternity sign. --Երևանցի ^talk 02:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated the Deported Armenian notables in 1915 article for GA. Theres some concerns that need to be met. Check it out. Lets work on it together. Hope all is well. Proudbolsahye (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I'll take a look at it. Looks like there's a lot to do. The table need to be organized as well. --Երևանցի ^talk 20:50, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, the vast, vast majority of election articles use simple wikitables rather than the electiontable template. Rather than edit war, please could you start a discussion on the talk page about what to use. Cheers, Number 57 22:44, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 02:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Garegin Nzhdeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zangezur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm the guy who just did some minor edits on Ani. Through the comments on the successive edits you made, I understood you had some questions about my edits, so let me explain. I mentioned the 18th century as the period of abandonment in the infobox because of the following sentence in the "Sacking and desolation" subsection of the "History" section:

"A small town remained within its walls at least until the middle of the 17th century, but the site was entirely abandoned by the middle of the 18th. The depopulation of Ani was paralleled by the depopulation of its rural hinterland as a result of political unrest in the border region during the Ottoman-Iranian wars and a fragmentation of central control by either of the empires."

I considered this the end of the occupation, but I guess you're right with your correction to 1319. However, it's strange the earthquake of the year 1319 isn't discussed at all in the "Sacking and desolation" section, maybe someone could clarify this? --AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 15:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexander. I guess it might be right, but unfortunately there is no source to back it up so its safer to have 1319 for abandonment. I've been trying to improve the lead first of all that's why I added a sentence about the earthquake to the lead first. I'll try to work on the history section as well. Some parts of it are well-sourced, but other (e.g. the section you mentioned) lack sources. --Երևանցի ^talk 15:15, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that makes sense. I've just looked at your latest sequence of edits, and this is the first time I see another Wikipedian editing an article with the same enthusiasm and scrutiny as I have. Maybe it's because I mainly edit exotic and less popular articles, most articles on archaeological sites don't see much activity. However, I think the article's source text has become difficult to read and edit because of the clutter caused by the long references. In the articles I've written – Sybaris for example – I've used named references. This way all the content of the references goes in the References section and you just place a link to the reference in the text. Would you object if I convert all references in Ani's article to named references too? --AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 09:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you can go ahead and do it if it makes editing easier. --Երևանցի ^talk 22:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andranik you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 1ST7 (talk) 03:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yerevantsi, which one of the followings do you think would be the best for the infobox image of Yerevan:

Regards.--Zyzzzzzy (talk) 04:36, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barev! All three look good to me, but I personally prefer the first one. --Երևանցի ^talk 04:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Շնորհակալութիւն:--Zyzzzzzy (talk) 10:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Խնդրեմ --Երևանցի ^talk 16:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andranik you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Andranik for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 1ST7 (talk) 08:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andranik you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andranik for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 1ST7 (talk) 07:06, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yerevanci. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Andranik at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! I adjusted the images as you requested, and also returned the remaining dates to dmy format. I hope that's OK for you. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:19, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Երևանցի ^talk 06:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yerevanci, user V.Mekhitaryan added the same text again in that article. Please write him not to start edit waring.--Δαβίδ (talk) 17:38, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barev! Thank you for letting me know. Looks like this user simply doesn't understand that he needs to cite sources. --Երևանցի ^talk 18:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Etchmiadzin Cathedral at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent article. Thank you very much for expanding it.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Երևանցի ^talk 18:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Erzurum shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Yozer1 (talk) 16:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The user was blocked, but I would like to warn you as well as a neutral administrator. You made three reverts in the article today, and the fourth revert would get you blocked. (This is not going to happen today since I protected the article as well). Despite your statement on ANI, what you were reverting is NOT vandalism, you were simply involved into a content dispute and have chosen not to follow conventional dispute resolution avenues. Next time you might be blocked for edit warring as well.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Ymblanter Well, what do you call an addition of unsourced information? In my understanding "content dispute" is when the content is sourced by reliable sources. When a user simply alters the text without adding sources it is vandalism. Any Wikipedia user is entitled to revert addition of unsourced information, right? --Երևանցի ^talk 17:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please read carefully Wikipedia:Vandalism, it contains responses to most of your questions. Definitely not every user is entitled to remove any unsourced material they do not like, and they are certainly not allowed to edit-war about this removal.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia." Let's see. Yozer changed

"they began calling it "Artsn Rum" (Arzan ar-Rum, meaning Arzan of the Romans) in order to distinguish their former residence from their new one"

to

"they began calling it "Artsn Rum" (Arzan ar-Rum or Ard ar-Rum, meaning Land of the Romans in Arabic) in order to distinguish their former residence from their new one"

He deliberately changed the content without adding any source, apparently because he doesn't like it. --Երևանցի ^talk 17:23, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And you removed it because you did not like it. This is what we call an edit dispute. If he would blank the page, or replaced the word Erzurum with Fuckyou, this would be vandalism.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Aside) To be fair, Yerevanci only made two reverts in the article today by my count. The other one was two days ago. HelenOnline 17:26, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, this is correct. Still, they did not engage into a civilized discussion and prefer to edit-war.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yozer1 stated "The sources are easy to provide" and yet he did not provide any source whatsoever. As HelenOnline noted: "the onus is on you (Yozer1) to add the necessary WP:RS. Now I agree that "vandalism" is not the best description of his edits. My mistake. --Երևանցի ^talk 17:42, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Corsican people may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |region2 = ((flagicon|France)) (mainland [[France]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , Please notice, ip user 111.243.0.198 and ip 114.39.7.129 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/111.243.0.198 , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/114.39.7.129, Vandalism a lot of articles , please stop these ip user , thank youMBINISIDLERS (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In less than 24 hours you have made 2 reverts, suggest you self-revert while the talk page discussion is ongoing. [5][6](Lihaas (talk) 20:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)).[reply]

I don't see why I should revert my edit. Neither Egypt nor the Soviet Union have recognized the Armenian Genocide. Please see the article talk page. Thank you! --Երևանցի ^talk 20:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, there is a slight replication lag while your edits are reattributed. You might also have to go into your settings and change your signature to the new name. Andrevan@ 20:56, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will refrain from editing for a while then. --Yerevantsi (talk) 21:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Etchmiadzin Cathedral, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Etchmiadzin Cathedral (pictured) is considered the oldest cathedral in the world? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Etchmiadzin Cathedral. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for you work on the Cathedral of Etchmiadzin Alberto Fernández Fernández (talk) 08:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Երևանցի ^talk 01:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hopefully ping is working but I have added further comment related to the question, all the best. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:34, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've removed Armenians from the list of anti-government protestors. You are right, source is a blog link. But I'm really curious, why does it bother you to think that Armenians also joined the protests?Gezginrocker (talk) 01:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Armenians are an ethnic group of 8 million people. Did they all participate in the protests? Did all Istanbul Armenians participate in the anti-government protests? From what I know, only a small group of Armenian youth of Istnanbul joined the protests. If you or anyone else wants to add Armenians to the infobox it should be specified what group of Armenians took part. And please add reliable sources. Thank you. --Երևանցի ^talk 01:20, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can this picture be added to the Karabakh War page? It's a picture of Samil Basayev (left), Ibn Al-Khattab (middle) and Heydar Jemal (right) during the Karabakh War. http://forum.hyeclub.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2506&d=1332612292 This basically proves that Basayev, Chechnya, Al-Khattab (Afghanistan) and Jemal (Azerbaijan) were working together during the war. Ninetoyadome (talk) 18:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, no. It's a 20 year old picture and there's no way it's in public domain. I mean you can always try uploading it under non-free use rationale, but you need to prove that it has an encyclopedic value. Also, I don't think a picture is neccesary. I mean, nobody seems to argue that Basayev and radical groups from Afghanistan fought in Karabakh. --Երևանցի ^talk 19:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The whole thing would be the presence of Ibn Al-Khattab, the man in the middle, who Azeris claim was not involved in the war, but like you said it will probably be difficult to prove it's value. It was worth a shot. Ninetoyadome (talk) 06:00, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just want to ask you something. I just saw that in some Ukrainian media the protests are also dubbed " Єврореволюція". (I do not know Ukrainian but I can read something. I have some difficulties reading Ukrainian but at least it is Slavic with Cyrillic alphabet). Is Eurorevolution popular name for the protests in Ukraine right now? If it is, may be we have to add it together with the Euromaidan. Чао. Olsonspterom (talk) 01:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, "Єврореволюція" does seem to be another popular term used in Ukraine. I just added it to the article. --Երևանցի ^talk 01:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. Olsonspterom (talk) 01:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Komitas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick William University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yerevantsi, what's the problem with the Georgian name in this article? The area had been under Georgian rule several times in the course of history, including the relatively recent period of the Russian Civil War era, and there are many inscriptions in Georgian dating from the 12th to the 20th century. --Kober^Talk 04:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Lori_Province#Georgian_name --Երևանցի ^talk 04:28, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eastern Armenian may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Republic of Armenia]], [[Nagorno-Karabakh Republic]] as well as [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]) and by the Armenian community in [[Iran]]. Although the Eastern Armenian spoken by Armenians in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Great job on improving several articles under the scope of wp:Armenia. Keep up the good work! Alexikoua (talk) 22:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I appreciate it! --Երևանցի ^talk 22:50, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per your request, which was forwarded onto the illustration workshop, I've created the SVG image of Maria Theresa's signature.

You may find it at File:Signature Maria Theresa.svg. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Niamh (talk) 23:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's perfect. Thank you! --Երևանցի ^talk 23:24, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This was very important activity in 2013: http://www.arminfo.info/index.cfm?objectid=9C005840-5B26-11E3-9A420EB7C0D21663 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azatarar (talk • contribs) 20:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes. I will update soon. --Երևանցի ^talk 21:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Etchmiadzin Cathedral you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 09:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

to add up more to my edit history. ༆ (talk) 02:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that administrator Tznkai has advised me as follows: diff.Cihsai (talk) 20:17, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to add. Please review your edit history. --Երևանցի ^talk 22:16, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kafkasmurat (talk • contribs) 01:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Etchmiadzin Cathedral you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Etchmiadzin Cathedral for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 01:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! --Երևանցի ^talk 01:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shahbulag Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aghdam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a case involving the first punishment for denial. It's mentioned for 5 years. And it's reverted by European Court of Human Rights. It includes really important commets by the highest authority in Europe. It seems somebody is trying to hide this. It's much more relevant than any developement written.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenian_Genocide_recognition&oldid=prev&diff=588262220 --Kafkasmurat (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your good work at the Sirusho article. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 23:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mention it. I might work on it later too. --Երևանցի ^talk 00:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Victor Hugo by Étienne Carjat 1876 - full.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 04:04, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Yerevantsi: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Proudbolsahye (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply] Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year 2014)) to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Thank you. I wish a happy new year, too! --Երևանցի ^talk 01:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I just noticed that you expanded the List of places named after Armenia. Thanks for that. --Երևանցի ^talk 02:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this edit, which you mention in your statement at AE as by Jaqeli. That edit is actually by User:Хаченци and not User:Jaqeli. Please consider revising your statement. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 05:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my mistake. Thank you. I'll remove it now. --Երևանցի ^talk 22:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, before reverting please check what the official source says on Aznavour's name. and explain at talk what's wrong with Ducretet Thomson, which is one of the most important companies in Aznavour's discography [7]. And welcome to the article's talkpage. Lkahd (talk) 05:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Charles Aznavour#Birth name --Երևանցի ^talk 05:56, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of places named after Armenia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. . Lkahd (talk) 10:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thank you for taking the time to correct all my mistakes on Cambodian genocide, it is much appreciated. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating it. --Երևանցի ^talk 22:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your words are appreciated. Keep up the good work! --Al Ameer (talk) 00:43, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I appreciate your contribution in promoting this template Template:Dioceses of the Armenian Apostolic Church. I'm trying to find proper articles to place the template. In the near future, I will work on creating the articles on each diocese. Great thanks.--Zyzzzzzy (talk) 04:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! I've created Diocese of Artsakh, since it's one of the most important ones. If you need any help with anything just let me know. --Երևանցի ^talk 05:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yerevantsi,

It's Proudbolsahye. This is my new username. Etienne Dolet (talk) 18:03, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I hope you continue contributing to Wikipedia under your new name. We definitely have a shortage of users who actually edit and create and improve articles. --Երևանցի ^talk 18:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]