Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 St. Petersburg Open – Singles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mikhail Biryukov and Andrei Vasilevski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 St. Petersburg Open – Singles may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ))

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think that correct game ratio =37–48 (38.9%) is 43,53, or not? :) Best regard.--Misbeliever (talk) 23:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yimingbao. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled 2012 Baku Cup.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)) or ((db-g13)) code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: ((subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2012 Baku Cup)), paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 Australian Open – Men's Doubles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Matt Reid

2014 Australian Open – Women's Doubles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jessica Moore

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Australian Open – Wheelchair Men's Doubles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gordon Reid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Madrid Open (tennis) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *'''Most singles finals: 2,''']
• {|class=wikitable style=font-size:90%

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Akifumii. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2014 Open de Nice Côte d'Azur – Singles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please site your sources the correct way as well as add more to this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Akifumii^Talk 22:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Open de Nice Côte d'Azur – Singles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James McGee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to add some references to the article, so it will be easier for others to review. Remember that external links have to do nothing with references. OccultZone (Talk) 04:33, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to add some content and reliable sources in this. Why sections are empty ? A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 15:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you use some program/tool to update tennis pages or everything is done completely manual? You added unclosed sup tags recently. -- Magioladitis (talk)

Can you please help by closing the sup tags before saving? If you have questions I'll be glad to answer them. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Davis Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened an RFC on the question of appointment of Catholic bishops and the larger matter of inclusion of future jobs in infobox, list, etc. at MOS:BIO. Please see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies#Inclusion of future job positions in infobox, list, etc. Thank you! Elizium23 (talk) 18:51, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	2014 Tianjin Open – Singles
	Thank you to do this important edit. 333-blue (talk) 04:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page had nothing, why? -- 333-blue (talk) 04:53, 1 October 2014

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank for your edit, such as you did at 2015 Australian Open – Mixed Doubles. And I believe you can do more good edits! 333-blue 08:10, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start from the bottom

Rubyaxles (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Australian Open, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alejandro González. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain me, why we can't add flags to players going IN, while players going OUT have those flags? TheLightBlue (talk) 14:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thank you for your work on 2015 Delray Beach International Tennis Championships – Singles k_scheik (talk) 00:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Memphis Open – Singles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artem Smirnov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2015 ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament – Doubles, Yimingbao!

Wikipedia editor Callmemirela just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs sources

To reply, leave a comment on Callmemirela's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating 2015 Memphis Open – Doubles, Yimingbao!

Wikipedia editor Callmemirela just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

needs citation

To reply, leave a comment on Callmemirela's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Just a friendly reminder to close any ^{tags you may enter, as you did here, with} tags. Thank you in advance. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a ((Talkback)) message on my talk page. @ 01:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please close any <sup> tags you may enter. - Magioladitis (talk)

		The Running Man Barnstar
		For your work on your all tennis related pages Coderzombie (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your endless hard work on List of MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, 2015, its not a fun task, but you just keep on going. Keep it up! EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:43, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2015 Gerry Weber Open – Singles, Yimingbao!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please complete the article.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I've been looking at your contribution in tennis related articles which are very impressive. Well done and keep going. Cheers!!! Sammanhumagaint@lk 03:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Denver20. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2015 Aegon Open Nottingham – Women's Doubles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please Re-check your Page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Aegon_Open_Nottingham_%E2%80%93_Women%27s_Doubles and Changed the Mentioned

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Denver F. 13:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2015 Aegon Championships page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2015 Wimbledon Championships – Women's Doubles Qualifying, Yimingbao!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please complete the article.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating 2015 Wimbledon Championships – Men's Doubles Qualifying, Yimingbao!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please complete this article.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Please close any <sup> tags you may enter. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting my tagging because the issues mentioned in the tags warrant tagging and, as of posting, are unresolved. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain, why are you deleting my edits about Mayer withdrawal? TheLightBlue (talk) 20:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your long-term efforts to improve Wikipedia. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

EoRdE6 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate User Yimingbao to be Editor of the Week for exceptional hard work expanding and updating tricky tables and numbers for elections and sporting events. In everything from parliament to tennis tournaments, Yimingbao does an amazing job of doing the job no one really wants to do, filling in and formatting loads of numbers into simple readable tables in tons of articles, spending days getting each one right. In particular his work on List of MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 has been incredible, adding thousands of bytes of votes for candidates, taking careful time to format it into the table. Working on tables and sport statistic graphs is tedious and displays the responsibility of daily committment to edit minor changes. This nomination was seconded by Buster7.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

((subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box))

Yimingbao

Tennis

Editor of the Week for the week beginning August 9, 2015

Does the job of filling in and formatting loads of numbers into simple readable tables in many, many election and sporting event articles.

Recognized for

displaying the responsibility of daily commitment to edit minor changes.

Notable work(s)

List of MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, 2015

Nomination page

Thanks again for your efforts! . Buster Seven Talk 00:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Congratulations! Thankyou for all your hardwork. - NQ (talk) 23:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this links

http://www.700wlw.com/articles/local-news-119585/2015-field-set-for-western-and-13770372/

http://local12.com/m/news/features/top-stories/stories/Williams-Federer-head-standout-Western-Southern-field-168179.shtml#.Vc5Ahxp1HMI — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.174.60.72 (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2015 Rakuten Japan Open Tennis Championships, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wiki.ask2.org/wiki/2014_Rakuten_Japan_Open_Tennis_Championships.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2015 Erste Bank Open, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wiki.ask2.org/wiki/2014_Erste_Bank_Open.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:14, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 China Open (tennis), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wu Di. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Hopp(y) Gnu Ear
	Hoppy Gnu Ear to you! Hoppy Gnu Ear to you! Be Safe! Buster Seven Talk 15:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what's the reason for deletion encyclopedic information without moving it (eg. to the main article AO 2016)? Thank you. Cheers--Kacir 13:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2016 Australian Open – Women's Singles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. I'm not sure why you are engaged in content removal/editwar at 2016 Australian Open – Women's Singles. You never leave a summary to say why you are reverting multiple editors. The info is sourced, the info looks to be helpful and valid. Please stop and bring it to the talk page if you feel all these editors are wrong. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yimingbao, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yimingbao and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Yimingbao during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 333-blue 14:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Your page was not deleted via MFD, if you would like the history deleted and it to be turned back to a redlink just put this on the page and it will be removed: ((u1)) . Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 02:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2016 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championships, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://digplanet.com/wiki/2015_U.S._Men%27s_Clay_Court_Championships.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey , if he could be given a page where there is a complete list of players for the tournament. Thank you in advance and best regards.--Baarttekk5020100 (talk) 20:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Wimbledon Championships – Men's Doubles Qualifying, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darren Walsh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2016 Swiss Open Gstaad – Doubles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please supply references. You may wish also to add what sport this article is about.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know how to edit, DON'T EDIT. You're putting the result, but in a wrong mode. Nobody can see the numbers in the page. 177.142.80.172 (talk) 22:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From what I've seen over the last number of months, Yimingbao is a very competent editor and creator. To say he doesn't know how to edit is a bit off the mark
F1lover22 talk 11:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove this fact? --User:Tomcat7 (talk) 15:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just enquiring as to why you deleted my edit?: World Number 1 Novak Djokovic withdrew because of a wrist injury. This will therefore be the first Masters event in his career whereby Andy Murray will be the number 1 seed. TurboGUY (talk) 03:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you remove the sup-closed tags? I agree with you that they are not really necessary. But there is a Bot that will readd them again later. So the only thing that you will reach with your edits is to create some unnessary Bot-Activity later that night.--Intimidator (talk) 23:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, why have you removed World Number 1 Novak Djokovic withdrew because of a wrist injury. This will therefore be the first Masters event in his career whereby Andy Murray will be the number 1 seed? You give absolutely no reasons? TurboGUY (talk) 02:45, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yimingbao,

I have seen you are posting a lot of tennis results and I guess you enjoy to do that.

I am launching a new sports results website and I am searching for new contributors, would you like to contribute with that in the Tennis section ?

Let me know. Thanks!

Mantiko1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mantiko1 (talk • contribs) 11:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 US Open – Men's Doubles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santiago González. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2016 Wuhan Open – Singles, Yimingbao!

Wikipedia editor MB298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating.

To reply, leave a comment on MB298's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi,

I've been putting flags next to the names in the replacements of withdrawals in tennis ATP tournaments. You have been reverting those edits and keeping flags only next to the names of the players withdrawn, and not the player replacing. Is there a reason for that? Logically there ought to be a flag for both players there.

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scribble scramble (talk • contribs) 06:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please close markup properly, eg:

'''6'''

instead of

'''6

And

'''7<sup>7</sup>'''

instead of

'''7<sup>7

Read more about this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tennis#Text_formatting_on_tournament_and_draw_pages

Rubyaxles (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yimingbao. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Archbishop of Kraków has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Elizium23 (talk) 14:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Devopam. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2016 Korea Open!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add relevant secondary references to the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Devopam (talk) 13:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not going to help, at least don't undo good edits, like this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2017_Australian_Open_%E2%80%93_Men%27s_Singles&type=revision&diff=761135230&oldid=761135141

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tennis#Text_formatting_on_tournament_and_draw_pages

Rubyaxles (talk) 04:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 Australian Open – Women's Singles. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I see that you have been asked politely a few times about your removal of markup closing tags. This is a little more formal. Do not do this in the future. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding disruptive editing. The thread is User:Yimingbao. The discussion is about the topic Tennis draw pages.

Rubyaxles (talk) 06:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for 31 hours for disruptively continuing to remove the proper formatting from articles, as you did in this edit. This has been discussed at both Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis#Text formatting on tournament and draw pages (permalink) and WP:ANI#User:Yimingbao (permalink). You were asked to explain your actions but did not do so. If you continue doing this against consensus and without any explanation, the next block will be longer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Mattlore. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2017 Ecuador Open Quito – Singles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi there, I have reviewed 2017 Ecuador Open Quito – Singles. I think you need to expand the introduction so that readers unfamiliar with the subject will understand what this article is about.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mattlore (talk) 20:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yimingbao (talk) 15:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you can, please use proper wiki syntax when making tennis edits:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tennis#Text_formatting_on_tournament_and_draw_pages

Thanks, Kleyw (talk) 00:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just warning you now before I bring this up again. You were recently blocked for removing closed tags, and I see you are already doing it again with the Miami qualifiers. Don't remove the tags again or you will just get blocked again. I don't see the problem with leaving them there. Why do you keep removing them? Adamtt9 (talk) 16:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And he refuses to close his quotes again and again. I just warned him once again. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at 2017 Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters – Doubles and Men's Clay Court Championships. Closing markup is required. This was shown to you above at User_talk:Yimingbao#January_2017_2 January 2017.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I see you have been warned and blocked about markup language multiple times in the past. Even February 15th. You MUST CLOSE those bolding markup quotes. This diff is one of many recent errors on your part. Please close all markup. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 Barcelona Open Banco Sabadell – Singles. So what.... 15 minutes later you create a new page with the same markup problems? This must stop! This markup is incorrect as you've been told, and we have to keep correcting it. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm letting you know I have reported this last instance to administration. It's great you create and add to articles, but terrible that you keep ignoring warnings about proper syntax. You've left me no choice by doing it 15 minutes after the last warning. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters – Doubles. Once again... this article and 2017 Gazprom Hungarian Open – Singles, and 2017 Barcelona Open Banco Sabadell – Singles... after kind mentions and warnings. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I've blocked you for three days because you're still stripping out the proper formatting from articles, as in this diff. You were told several times that this is disruptive, and you were blocked for it previously. If you agree to stop doing this, I'm sure you can be unblocked very quickly. Once you're unblocked, you should engage with the other editors, either here, at WikiProject Tennis, or WP:VPT#What problems occur by not closing bold or italic markup?. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend you start closing tags. You were just blocked three days and were already blocked previously, and with this edit, didn't close your bold tags. Continuing to ignore these warnings will just lead to a longer block, so please, to avoid this, just close the tags. It isn't so difficult. Adamtt9 (talk) 12:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2017 Estoril Open – Singles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KDS4444 (talk) 01:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2017 Istanbul Open – Singles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KDS4444 (talk) 01:56, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 Istanbul Open – Singles, 2017 J&T Banka Prague Open – Singles, 2017 Grand Prix SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Singles, 2017 Estoril Open – Singles, and 2017 BMW Open – Singles. You have been warned and blocked multiple times for not following standard wikipedia protocol in closing your html markup. This disrupts multiple bots as talked about at the Village Pump. Any newly created articles or additions filled with improper closing html will be treated as disruption and promptly removed or redirected. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:04, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 BRD Bucharest Open – Singles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 BRD Bucharest Open – Singles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - MrX 14:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for submitting proper wikicode in your recent edits to tennis articles. 👍 - dcljr (talk) 01:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2017 China Open – Women's Singles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this. What was you source? If they were the external links, could you please make that clear in the article?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 06:23, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to the above? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yimingbao (talk) 15:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2017 China Open – Men's Singles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Same question for this one :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 06:24, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to the above? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yimingbao (talk) 15:35, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2017 Kremlin Cup – Women's Singles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 1 issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 05:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yimingbao (talk) 15:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you created a new page of 2018 ASB Classic that already existed as a draft since a month? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.153.176.160 (talk) 10:11, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issue is moot now. Yimingbao (talk) 15:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yimingbao. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you please add your sources to 2018 ASB Classic? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:15, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2018 ASB Classic, Yimingbao!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged as only having primary sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep to the official ATP rankings in the 2018 Diema Xtra Sofia Open article, the live rankings is not official. Tnx for the consideration. Regards, gogo3o 06:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2018 Delray Beach Open, Yimingbao!

Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time creating this page. It is appreciated.

To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^{Babymissfortune} 05:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2018 BNP Paribas Open – Women's Singles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as would benefit from being WP:INLINECITED.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 16:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yimingbao (talk) 15:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've sent you eight messages but have had no response. Can you please respond to them? Please be aware that WP:Communication is required, not optional. Please also see WP:BURDEN and WP:V.

You have also re-created 2018 Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters – Singles but the creator had redirected it because it wasn't ready for the mainspace. It has no verified information at all. Do you have sources for it? There was no edit summary explaining why you were doing this. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That is now ten ignored messages and you've continued editing. You have also not responded to a message from another editor below on the same issue. We are trying to discuss what to do with the article rather than simply reverting your edit - please communicate. Communicating with other editors who have raised concerns is a matter of policy, shown at WP:DISPUTE and WP:CONDUCT and explained in detail in the essay WP:Communication is required. WP:V is also at the heart of Wikipedia. You are now risking a block. We're trying to build an encyclopaedia together - please just discuss issues. Boleyn (talk) 06:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware that the page wasn't ready to be published, I just thought it was there before and was deleted by mistake. Feel free to do whatever with it, I really don't have a problem any which way. Apologies for having apparently committed some kind of major offense. I just thought it's obvious that the page is a blank draw for a tennis tournament that is going to take place in a few weeks, I had no idea that this was a controversial proposition.

Hi, I'm the creator of 2018 Rolx Monte Carlo and 2018 Rolex Monte Carlo – Sinlges, and I saw you removed my redirect from 2018 Rolex Monte Carlo – Sinlges and I wondered why. Greetings, thomediter (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do whatever you like with the page, I really don't have any intention of stepping on anyone's prerogatives here. Just trying to update tennis results.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 06:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Yimingbao, I've blocked your account indefinitely because you're failing to communicate. If you want to continue editing here, please read WP:COMMUNICATE and provide us with a pledge to abide by the guidance there. You can see WP:GAB for instructions on how to submit a successful unblock request. Swarm ♠ 13:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Yimingbao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello all, I sincerely request that my account be unblocked. I acknowledge that I was not in compliance with the communication policy, but it was out of ignorance and not bad intent (I also acknowledge that ignorance of the law is no excuse). I was not in the habit of checking my talk page because I had unpleasant experiences with abusive and harassing messages in the past, and therefore I was not aware that I had not responded to questions that were asked of me. I also was not aware that I had done anything controversial recently: as you can tell from my history, I am primarily interested in updating the tennis-related pages in terms of results. Since these are usually factual in nature, I was not expecting that anything I did was particularly open to discussion. I am sincerely apologetic and pledge to abide by the communication policy in the future if I am unblocked. Thank you for considering my request.

Accept reason:

Great! With the blocking admin's consent, I've lifted your block. Happy editing, and thanks for understanding the concern. Yamla (talk) 20:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Swarm: This unblock request appears to fulfill the requirements you set out to be unblocked. Do you agree? --Yamla (talk) 12:17, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Yep. Sounds good to me. Swarm ♠ 19:48, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both!

Hello Yimingbao, as someone who has been active in tennis related pages, I value your contribution immensely and I believe you are an asset to Wikipedia. However, I was shocked to see that you have been banned a few times and it seems to me that although you know editing, you need learn some ropes about Wikipedia. I suggest you go through Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure, that'll help you out in dealing with Wikipedia, as well as other editors. Thank you for your contributions and hope you continue to do that in future. Feel free to reach out to me if you need any help. Coderzombie (talk) 08:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Coderzombie! I basically treat editing the tennis pages as a way to unwind - it's 100% fact-based, the pages I create are always based on precedent, and anybody who disagrees with my edits can always undo them, so it's been a shock when I've been blocked, but that's life (or that's Wikipedia). Thanks for the resource, I'll try to check it out when I get a chance.

Yes, I understand that. Most of tennis page related editing does not require citations. I personally think your block was just a case of miscommunication, so if you had basic idea about Wiki, it can be avoided. Coderzombie (talk) 12:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you give the whole list of players participating in this tournament? Baarttekk5020100 (talk) 17:32, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the list, but I usually get information like that from tennisforum.com.

Yimingbao: On talk pages, at the end of the message you should use "~~~~", that will leave your signature. Coderzombie (talk) 19:28, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2018 Istanbul Open!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please stop creating unreferenced articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:04, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boleyn, I'm sorry to have incurred your displeasure again, as before I was really not trying to be a trouble maker. I thought that it would be relatively uncontroversial to spin off the previous year's tournament page (which had **no tags**) into this year's, but apparently that is not acceptable. I'd love to know why the 2017 tournament page is apparently OK, but the 2018 page that I created from it is deemed to have problems that are so significant that it may cause my access to Wikipedia to be blocked again. But maybe you're telling me that I should just get out because I can't do anything right. Which is perfectly fine, I can take a hint. Yimingbao (talk) 23:30, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yimingbao, I have only just seen this message. Please WP:PING me if you are sending me a message. All articles should have their sources clear in the article. There are thousands of articles still needing sources, and thousands more that still need tagging as unreferenced. That doesn't mean those pages are OK. It's simple: please add sources to all articles you create. It is not the page where the 'problems...are so significant that it may cause [your] access to Wikipedia to be blocked again', your block was for refusal to communicate or address the concerns other editors brought to you. You have still not addressed those concerns - I and others have contacted you about several of your creations, which you still haven't added sources to. Boleyn (talk) 16:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yimingbao (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:V and WP:BURDEN. Your creation of unreferenced articles has led to a previous block, so I am disappointed to see you doing it again. Please add clear references ('External links' means 'suggestions for further reading' and can be helpful, but we need to know what your sources were, and preferably WP:INLINECITED.) Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to stop creating pages, since I obviously cannot do it to your satisfaction. Please feel free to delete this one. Sorry to be such a disappointment. I remain faithfully yours, etc. Yimingbao (talk) 02:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yimingbao, there's no reason to be frustrated. We are here to help. When you create a page, you can always link official atpworldtour.com website as a source, which is primary and reliable and should be sufficient. Also, there'll be an article about defending champions winning the last year's title etc, that'll be a good starting point. As I have said previously, feel free to contact me if you need any help. Coderzombie (talk) 05:58, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As an example, I have added a reference to Monte Carlo doubles page. Have a look, that should help. Coderzombie (talk) 06:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your patience Coderzombie, but I'm going to find something else to do with my time. As I said before, updating these pages was a way for me to unwind, but I ended up spending almost an hour yesterday (over a weekend!) trying to come up with responses to all these suggestions (and the implied threats and not so subtle references to previous blocks contained therein) and it made me stressed out all night, so I really don't need this. Thanks again for your kindness. Yimingbao (talk) 12:22, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't consider them threats. Wikipedia has a few basic rules for editing and creating pages and we all have to stick by them to maintain Wikipedia standards, that's all. Everyone has to understand basic etiquettes of communication. Hope you reconsider your decision and continue editing. Coderzombie (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yimingbao, there is no need to stop creating pages and I am glad to see you have continued to edit since the messages above. It is simply that we need it written in the article where you got your information. If you let me know where you got the information for the articles I've contacted you about, I'm happy to add the sources myself. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Yimingbao, thanks for creating 2018 Italian Open – Women's Singles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 05:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - nice catch on 2018 Italian Open – Women's Singles! I was the one who made the erroneous Muguruza edit - I was just referring to https://live-tennis.eu/en/forecast-wta-ranking and thinking points only, completely forgot about how the counting with Premier 5 tournaments worked. Thanks! Savvy10 (talk) 03:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yimingbao,

I have seen you update many Tennis Tournaments results, filling the draws for both ATP and WTA events. I would like to know if you would be interested in joining an international multi-sports website where you could contribute posting Tennis results weekly. I am currently searching for one or more users to take care of the Tennis section. Just for passion, so no salary and no time obligation, just whenever you want :) Let me know if you are interested to join us! Thanks!

RoadToTokyo2020 (talk) 14:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RoadToTokyo2020, Thanks for thinking of me. This sounds like the kind of thing I do around here already, but I'm kind of reluctant to take on further "responsibilities" even if there's no formal time obligation involved, so I think I'll pass. Best of luck with your endeavors! Yimingbao (talk) 15:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am the one who keeps putting back the middle name. If you look at sources, she is more often referred to as Leylah Annie Fernandez. Even her ITF profile goes with the middle name. Only the WTA drawsheets don't include it, but a Google search gives more results with the middle name than without it. Adamtt9 (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair, but I think the easiest rule of thumb is to go by the draw, rather than what any other source does. Players often change the way they are referred to between their ITF and WTA days: Daria Kasatkina used to be Darya Kasatkina, Anna Karolína Schmiedlová went back and forth with using or dropping the Karolína, Catherine Bellis was often called CiCi but is now always referred to as Catherine, etc., etc. So I'll respectfully continue to disagree with the insertion of the Annie. I'm selfishly hoping she won't have much of a career so this won't be a recurring problem. Yimingbao (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2018 Western & Southern Open – Women's Singles, Yimingbao!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The article currently lacks context. I had to click one of the links to figure out it was even a tennis event. Please add location, type of event etc.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

I respectfully disagree with this assessment. This is clearly marked as a subpage to give information for the women's singles draw and the requested information on the tournament is easily accessible from the main article, to which a link is prominently provided. I would also point out that the page is consistent with every other tennis draw page on Wikipedia. I stand by what I have done, but of course anybody is free to edit this page (or even delete it) if they disagree with the way it is set up. Yimingbao (talk) 22:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Learn more about page curation.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 21:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was my fault you had to re-insert info into ATP World Tour Masters 1000. I'm not sure what happened as I only wanted to revert it 4 edits because of a mistake inserted by "Richardpei." I have no idea how it went back before your useful edits. Sorry about that. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for clarifying. Yimingbao (talk) 14:16, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2018 Guangzhou International Women's Open, Yimingbao!

Wikipedia editor SkyGazer 512 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work! It would be great if you could fill in the blank fields.

To reply, leave a comment on SkyGazer 512's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 14:50, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2018 Oracle Challenger Series – Houston – Women's Doubles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article has the same sourcing as all other tennis draw pages on this site, so I completely disagree with your assessment. It's not worth my time arguing about this, however, so I've deleted everything. Carry on, there's nothing to see. Yimingbao (talk)

Hello, Yimingbao. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2019 Australian Open – Men's Singles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 14:12, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yimingbao, I'm working through the backlog of unreferenced articles. Can you please respond to my previous questions on your talk page? 2017 China Open – Women's Singles is also awaiting references. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 10:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried my best, please advise if individual issues remain unresolved. Yimingbao (talk) 15:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your swift response, your work is much appreciated. Boleyn (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agnieszka Radwanska actually was still listed in the WTA rankings from 12/3/18 and was mentioned in the Australian Open's own press release announcing the direct entries

https://ausopen.com/articles/news/worlds-top-players-set-australian-open-2019

She should probably be considered to be a withdrawal... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Picname2 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me! Yimingbao (talk) 02:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2018 New York Open, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I completely disagree with your assessment. Yimingbao (talk) 02:57, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2019 Argentina Open, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I completely disagree with this assessment. I don't know what could be more reliable than the website of the ATP Tour (which runs the men's tennis tour) and the official page of the tournament itself. Yimingbao (talk) 02:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2019 New York Open, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I completely disagree with your assessment. I also note that you are the only reviewer who regularly objects to my pages. Perhaps you should stop reviewing them. Yimingbao (talk) 02:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A case of WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2019 Argentina Open and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2019 Argentina Open, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yimingbao! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody else can deal with this from now on, I'm out. Yimingbao (talk) 12:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A case of WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2019 New York Open and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2019 New York Open, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I give up, somebody else can do this from now on. Yimingbao (talk) 12:17, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2018 New York Open and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2018 New York Open, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 16:26, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That page was on there for more than a year before some overzealous Javert deleted it. I don't even care, never creating another page. You win. Yimingbao (talk) 17:05, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yimingbao,

Thanks for creating 2019 Open Sud de France – Singles! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Boleyn)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 15:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yimingbao,

Thanks for creating 2019 ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament – Singles! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add blue-linked categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Boleyn)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yimingbao, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ {talk} 02:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well deserved! Keep doing the good work! Coderzombie (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, both! Yimingbao (talk) 13:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. First of all, thank you for your edits on the US Men's Clay Court Championship. I have a question regarding to the doubles ranking. So is the rankings used to determine the seedings of a tournament just a combination of their doubles rankings, or is the ATP Doubles Race to London being used as a reference? --Ui56k (talk) 11:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ui56k. The relevant ranking for determining seedings at any ATP tournament is the combination of both players' rankings as of the relevant date. The ATP Doubles Race to London is only relevant to determine qualification for the year-end championships (and maybe the seedings at the ATP Finals too, but I'm not sure about that). Hope this helps! Yimingbao (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Please do not just undo my edits without considering the reasoning behind them." Since the info I added was relevant and you did not provide a reason, there was nothing for me to consider. Deleting rlevant info is vandalism, please don't do it again. The source I used was https://www.rolandgarros.com/fr-fr/article/2019-5-matchs-mardi-28-mai. I didn't add it in the article (not so simple, on a phone), but I mentioned it in the commentary of my edit, so if you had been acting in good faith you couldn't undo my edit on the base it was unsourced. Anyway... there's a mistake I'll let you correct: rolandgarros.com claimed that the last 40 year old at RG was an Australian in 1978. But that guy only turned 40 at the end of he tournament, Karlovic is older. Reuters got it right, Karlovic is the oldest since 1973. 151.67.2.2 (talk) 16:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tennis project was getting pushed around by the wiki-police for have horrible leads in tennis articles... especially the sub pages of tournaments. All the mens and womens singles and doubles at the Grand Slam tournaments have been fixed to make sure the first sentence is the players, the score, the sport, the actual discipline and year, etc.. That is the most important aspect to readers. Defending champion info comes after the winner info. We still have to fix doubles and mixed double to give them a detailed lead, and then we'll work on lesser tournaments. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for letting me know, and apologies for reverting to the old style that I thought was the standard. Yimingbao (talk) 12:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Maria Sharapova as a wildcard in the women’s singles. Her name is added to the players list on the official Australian Open website. Her ranking doesn’t allow her direct entry into the main draw and because she is a former world number one and former champion she can receive a wildcard. Coloursred1 (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I never touched anything that had anything to do with Sharapova, you're blaming the wrong person. Yimingbao (talk) 00:15, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2020 ATP Cup, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines, especially WP:LIVESCORES. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flix11 (talk) 02:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2021 US Open – Women's Singles, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Per WP:LIVESCORE do not update sports scores until the conclusion of the game/match. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your dedication to Wikipedia, but in many of the tournament articles you create you include categories that do not exist. Please do not do this (see WP:CatDD); it means another editor has to come along behind to clean up those articles. Thanks in advance, UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:12, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, there. I noticed you reverted my recent edits on the Indian Wells Masters singles and doubles draws subpages. You said, that Colwidth is the preferred choice for tennis draws and col-2 is no longer in use. Did you mean no longer in use as the preferred styling method for draws list specifically or, in general? Because from what I can tell, Col-2 is still being used on many other Wikipedia articles. Unless, there was a discussion on said topic, that I was not aware of. Qwerty284651 (talk) 03:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerty284651: Thanks for the question on col-2 vs. colwidth in the tennis draw pages. I create many of these pages, and I remember being told a couple of years ago to use colwidth instead of col-2 by someone at some point. I can't find that correspondence right now, it might have been an exchange in an edit history.

In any event, if you look at any tennis draw page going back ten years (or even longer), the seeds columns all use colwidth instead of col-2, so if only for the sake of consistency, I don't think the 2021 BNP Paribas Open pages should be any different. If you'd like to start a discussion somewhere else, I'm fine with that, but I see this as a settled format and see no need to fix something that isn't broken. I don't mean to start an edit war, but I'm changing the format of the columns back for that reason. Yimingbao (talk) 11:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yimingbao I figured it was a long-time accepted standard, but, in my opinion, the singles draws could be split into 2 rows for the reason to save up on scrolling, especially, on mobile devices and be more concise. Yes, given the colwidth parameter it is accepted as a one row list fo the seeded palyers, but I still believe that can be changed through consensus, mayhaps on WP Tennis Project. Also, on a side note should, in your opinion, the ranking points tables for all 4 draws in Masters articles per year, not just for this Masters tournament, be listed in the main article or in their respective draws subpages or be removed altogether? Qwerty284651 (talk) 12:50, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerty284651 I'm glad we're having this exchange. I've been editing tennis pages long enough to remember that the seeds used to be listed in the col-2 format that you prefer, I just don't know or remember how everything migrated to the colwidth format, but I think someone might even have gone back and changed a lot of the old draws. I don't have a preference for the ranking points tables for the Masters tournaments. They frankly don't make a lot of sense this year because of all the COVID-related changes to tournament schedules and ranking systems in 2020 and 2021. I just did my best to edit the tables after somebody else put them there. You're right that there's some inconsistency there, but I don't have strong feelings about what to do. Yimingbao (talk) 14:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wоuld you be willing to discuss this on the Tennis Wikiproject page, regarding this very issue, or not? Qwerty284651 (talk) 02:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerty284651 Probably not, I rarely (if ever) participate in discussions on Wiki, it's just not how I choose to spend my time. Yimingbao (talk) 12:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yimingbao Fair enough. It's a good thing I asked first. Qwerty284651 (talk) 13:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yimingbao I want to know, why, in God's name, did you revert my edit in the number 1 wta players tennis page, because of some discrepancy in the Adjusted rankings drop date from Indian Wells 2021. Since when are Rankings points won from defending one's Masters title, albeit in non-consecutive years, stackable. Like, no? What? Why? How? But? Huh? Care to explain the conundrum? Qwerty284651 (talk) 03:42, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerty284651: This is not a question for me, it's a question for the WTA. If you look at the official WTA rankings for Oct. 18, Mertens is listed as no. 1: https://www.wtatennis.com/rankings/doubles. I don't pretend to know the answer to the conundrum of why both Indian Wells tournaments are counted, other than the WTA decided so and they run the rankings. That's what's happening for the singles rankings as well (that's the only way the ranking points as listed this week make sense). I also don't pretend that I can maintain a parallel universe where I know better than the people who actually run the rankings system. If you have a beef with this, please take this up with the WTA. I explained in my edit that this was reflected in the official rankings. If that is not a good enough source, I don't know what is. Also, I thought we were having a reasonably civil discussion about the seeds format, so I don't know why you are suddenly taking this hectoring tone with me when I did absolutely nothing wrong. Franky, I expect an apology, or at least the courtesy of not messaging me again unless some civility is maintained. Yimingbao (talk) 11:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yimingbao: Look, I do apologise. My approach was inappropriate, for which I am sorry. It's just that, I have been struggling with other parts of tye Tennis side of Wikipedia. GNG disputes, page merging, edit warring, now this squabble with the rankings. It is too much. Sorry for lashing out. You can take my apology as sufficient or not. This is up to you to decide. As for me. I will be heading out to the ITF site to see what is the deal with the double ranking points.... Hopefully no hard feelings. In good spirit. Best, Qwerty284651 (talk) 15:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was more angry at the fact the IW ranking points being stacked, not your subsequent edit revert thereof. I shot the messenger. What I should have done is shoot the message. Qwerty284651 (talk) 21:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerty284651: Thank you for acknowledging that, I appreciate it.

@Qwerty284651: Heads up that I just edited number 1 wta players again. Hsieh is back to no. 1 on Nov. 8 after the 2019 Indian Wells points for Mertens (and everybody else) were dropped (https://www.wtatennis.com/rankings/doubles). The decision to drop those points on Nov. 8 was announced back in September(https://www.wtatennis.com/news/2243322/wta-announces-ranking-system-adjustments). Again, don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger.

@Yimingbao: Well, the WTA has finally decided to drop the 2019 IW points. Now all ranking points are back to normal. Qwerty284651 (talk) 14:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I didn't know you could update 2022 Australian Open – Women's Singles that fast, here's a barnstar. Severestorm28 01:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your addition of "(First round)" just to get your attention to the fact that we don't capitalize in those parentheticals. I just edited about 16.000 articles to fix that, so getting it wrong in the 2022 articles stands out a weird now. Dicklyon (talk) 05:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dicklyon: Duly noted, although surely there was a more polite way to say what you had to say. Those parentheticals were all capitalized until you decided they shouldn't be, so I have no idea why it's so "weird" that I failed to notice that you woke up one day and decided to change the way things had been done in 16,000 previous articles. Yimingbao (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've been working on it for months, as you can see in discussions at the project talk page, and I recently completed it, on enough articles that anyone with tennis articles on their watchlist would likely notice. Doing one more pass, I found a handful of editors including you, active on 2022 articles, who seemed to have missed the point. First I just fixed a few, but then they kept coming, so I decide to try a more intrusive strategy to get your attention. Thanks for responding. Dicklyon (talk) 20:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1089242785/1089246873 - please don't add these URLs. See WP:AWSURL. Thanks! - GreenC 20:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Libéma Open, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anastasia Tikhonova. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Yimingbao,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Timothytyy (talk) 05:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

Yimingbao,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 05:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 05:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis § ITF Men's/Women's World Tennis Tour. Timothytyy (talk) 03:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma Yexin. Timothytyy (talk) 13:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating tennis-related articles. However, please do not create articles over draft, i.e. create articles that already exists in draftspace, e.g. 2023 French Open – Women's doubles. The page you created has been history merged with the draftspace article. In the future, please check if there is a draft before creating an article. Thank you. Timothytyy (talk) 02:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. It's frustrating to deal with articles that are created so badly that they have to be moved to and from draft space - I think I might just do less in the future if this keeps happening. Yimingbao (talk) 11:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: I figured out how to move articles from draft space back to main space, so I don't think I'll (need to) create over existing drafts again, even if the drafts in question are bad ones.Yimingbao (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timothytyy: I am in a bit of agreement with @Yimingbao here though I can see both sides. Draft articles should be improved instead of just creating new articles but it is hard to do so when the user is creating articles like this that are so empty and full of errors that it may be just better to start a new one from scratch. Adamtt9 (talk) 16:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know that you can actually improve the draft and move it to mainspace? Do you know how troublesome it is to have a creation over draft? Yimingbao and Adamtt9, the easiest way is to replace the draft with your new content and move it to mainspace or simply by blanking the page and starting over again. Creation over draft is against the policies as there are a lot of technical difficulties, so it is strongly discouraged. Timothytyy (talk) 00:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timothytyy: If you look at my responses above, you'll notice that (a) I thanked you for your message and (b) I then followed up to say that I had figured out how to do exactly what you suggest. I'm at a loss as to why you're now taking such a hectoring tone with the repeated "Do you knows??". Yes, I do know (now) and I already let you know that I know. Geez Louise, we're all just trying to do our best here (other than the user referred to by Adamtt9, who's repeatedly messing everything up). I sympathize with (and apologize for) the administrative problems I inadvertently caused, but to be clear, I wasn't being (or trying to be) uncooperative. I also didn't solicit adamtt9's response, although I appreciate his sense of shared frustration.Yimingbao (talk) 11:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yimingbao, sorry for letting you misunderstand, but I didn't mean to criticize you. You might notice that I didn't ping you because I believe you have understood. My message was a simply a reminder about one of your small mistakes, I didn't assume BADFAITH. I was replying to another user, so the "do you knows" and explanations aren't directed towards you. Also please understand my frustration about repetitive needs for merges. Anyway, sorry for upsetting you, and keep up your hard work at article creations! Timothytyy (talk) 12:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add URLs that contain "&Expires=". For example, I removed it from 2023 French Open – Boys' doubles in this edit: Special:Diff/1158833506/1158836405. These URLs DO NOT WORK EVER or only for a few hours then stop working. That's what "Expires" means, they expire and stop working. I've removed many of these URLs from the "French Open" articles. More information at WP:AWSURL. Also ping User:FlashD2002 you might be adding them also. I get notified every time one of these URLs shows up. -- GreenC 14:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK good to know. Thanks. Yimingbao (talk) 16:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yimingbao,

pls allow me to briefly introduce myself.

I am editor at the Dutch (nl) Wikipedia, specializing in (women's) tennis.

Yesterday, when working on the current Tampico WTA 125 tournament (Abierto Tampico), I noticed that 2023 Abierto Tampico – Doubles was still missing. For once I decided to fill in that blank. I copied last year's article, shifted the year, and replaced the names and scores by the current values as read from WTA draw.

Thinking I had done well, I was surprised by these interventions and subsequently even this notification of its removal to draft space.

Being an outsider to en-wiki procedures, I don't feel being equipped to follow up on this matter. Could you possibly be so kind as to improve the article and get it back to main space? Since all but the final is completed, this shouldn't be too much work, I guess?

Thank you for your understanding and co-operation. Pommée (talk) 15:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pommée: Hi Pommée, thanks for reaching out, I've restored the article to main space after filling in the final results, adding a short lead-in paragraph, and adding a reference. Hopefully that addresses the concerns of the person who sent it to draft space. Yimingbao (talk) 18:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for helping out! Pommée (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Yimingbao,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Timothytyy (talk) 00:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, happy new year to you too! Yimingbao (talk) 13:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Timothytyy (talk) 00:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,

This question isn't about Wikipedia but is rather a more general one. So, I was reading this website and looking for future rankings. I noticed that since Rohan and Ebden are not defending their title at Qatar Open this year, therefore both would lose points, but Bopanna more than Ebden. Does that mean that the week starting February 26, Ebden would become the new doubles World No.1 ? PrinceofPunjab^TALK 14:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PrinceofPunjab Hi, thanks for the question. I think you (and the linked website) are right, Ebden will have more points than Bopanna after Doha. If they achieve a good result in Dubai the week after, however, they might be tied on points again, and Bopanna would go back to number 1! It's an interesting scenario. Yimingbao (talk) 16:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yimingbao Thanks for your answer, its exciting times for doubles tennis! PrinceofPunjab^TALK 04:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]