1989 British film
| We Think the World of You |
|---|
 |
| Directed by | Colin Gregg |
|---|
| Written by | J. R. Ackerley (novel)
Hugh Stoddart (screenplay) |
|---|
| Produced by | Tomasso Jandelli
Paul Cowan |
|---|
| Starring | Gary Oldman
Alan Bates
Max Wall
Liz Smith
Frances Barber |
|---|
| Cinematography | Michael Garfath |
|---|
| Edited by | Peter Delfgou |
|---|
| Music by | Julian Jacobson
Jeremy Sands |
|---|
Production
company | |
|---|
Release date | 22 September 1989 (UK) |
|---|
Running time | 92 min. |
|---|
| Countries | United Kingdom
United States |
|---|
| Language | English |
|---|
| Budget | £1.36 million[1] |
|---|
| Box office | $20,998 (US) |
|---|
We Think the World of You is a 1988 film directed by Colin Gregg and starring Gary Oldman and Alan Bates. It is adapted from the 1960 J.R. Ackerley novel of the same name. It was produced by Tomasso Jandelli and Cinecom Pictures.
Plot
In post-war London an aimless young married bisexual man, Johnny, is sent to prison. He is forced to entrust his beloved Alsatian dog, Evie, to the reluctant care of his down-trodden parents and older, middle-class ex-lover and best friend, Frank. After a series of visits to Johnny's parents' home, Frank bonds with the dog whose mischievous spirit reminds him of his incarcerated friend. As it becomes apparent to Frank that Johnny's father is beating the dog, who is left for days on end in a small yard, a class war erupts over Evie's welfare, exacerbated by Johnny's manipulative and antagonistic wife Megan, whose sole aim is to claim Johnny back from Frank on his forthcoming release. A set of tragi-comic relationships evolve with the dog coming to represent the hold they have over each other.
Reception
We Think the World of You has not garnered enough reviews at Rotten Tomatoes to produce an overall rating. Roger Ebert gave the film 3/4 stars, writing: "This is a film that rewards attention. It is wise and perceptive about human nature and it sees how all of us long for love and freedom as well as how the undeserved, unrequited love of an animal is sometimes so much more meaningful than the crabbed, grudging, selfish terms that are often laid down by human beings."[2]
