The term shūkanshi (Japanese: 週刊誌, lit. 'weekly magazine') generally refers to weekly magazines published in Japan, including politically provocative weekly tabloid newspapers.
As noted by Watanabe and Gamble in the Japan Media Review and in their book A Public Betrayed, the genre is "often described as bizarre blends of various types of U.S. magazines, such as Newsweek, The New Yorker, People, Penthouse, and The National Enquirer".[1]: 71
In Japan, weekly magazines have been a source of anti-semitic articles, including Shukan Bunshun, Marco Polo, and Shukan Shincho, which have repeatedly published articles denying the Holocaust.[1]: 170 Shukan Shincho was ordered by the Supreme Court of Japan to pay damages to a Soka Gakkai member for publishing an unsubstantiated allegation of murder,[2] and has been criticized for sensationalistic stories regarding a disputed Paleolithic settlement site in Japan.[3] The magazine has also been rebuked for publishing the names and photographs of minors who have been accused of criminal acts, even before their trials began.[4]
Alongside a small percentage of solid investigative reporting, tabloids publish celebrity stories constructed from anonymously obtained "leaks" to fill their pages. The habit of publishing information that is already known but written in deliberately emphatic tones to make it appear as sensational news is also common. Variants of sensationalism are interviewing neighbors and acquaintances of the person concerned and reconstructing his entire family history by deliberately emphasizing some details and leaving out others to obtain the most sensationalistic portrait possible of the protagonist of the story, or republishing known facts by having them commented on by presumed experts capable of distorting completely the episode they are talking about. Finally, among the methods used to collect material is to publish hearsay, rumors and other unreliable sources as news. What makes it particularly difficult for readers to navigate the Shūkanshi articles is that investigative articles of considerable quality are accompanied by articles that are at least questionable, with the consequence that the reader struggles to understand how much credit each article deserves.[1]: 90–91
The problem of excessive coverage by some media, accompanying references aimed at slandering, has become so serious that it has become the subject of a study by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Attention was drawn to the cases of wrestler Hana Kimura, who committed suicide in December 2020 due to online slandering, [5] and two-time Olympic champion Yuzuru Hanyu, who announced his divorce due to media slandering.[6] Among the objects of the study there is an article which, analyzing the Hanyu story,[7] highlighted how the writers have an interest in publishing articles "characterized by extreme titles and negative content" because these titles and contents attract the attention of the public, and “the more access the media article or YouTube video receives, the more advertising revenue it generates”, giving priority to the “concept that interest (attention) is economically superior to quality of information”.[8]