This is an essay on the reliable sources guideline. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.

Shortcut WP:1.5

This essay is currently orphaned. Few or no project pages link to this page. This may result in the page having low readership and little or no improvement. Please help by introducing links to this page from other related project pages.

1.5 sources is a term^[1] that relates to the use of sources that cannot strictly be categorised as being either primary sources or secondary sources, mostly in fiction-related articles: interviews with key people, DVD commentary, etc.

It is often a matter of personal preference whether one sees such a source as a primary source that cannot provide any significant real-world perspective or whether one sees it as more of an independent, secondary source which can and should be used to add context and perspective.

For such situations, 1.5 sources can serve as a neutral term to start negotiations from a middle-ground, namely that such source-related issues have to be decided on a case-by-case basis, and how an individual source is used is more important than categorical judgements.

• No original research § Primary, secondary and tertiary sources
• Identifying reliable sources
• Notability
• Manual of Style/Writing about fiction