1635: The Papal Stakes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did a search for this title and there are no reliable sources that show that this book passes WP:NBOOK. I had initially redirected it, but it's been challenged under the premise of "it exists", so to be fair I'm bringing it here. Unless we have 4+ reliable sources suddenly get published, I'm going to doubt that this will pass notability guidelines anytime soon. The author is notable, the overall series is notable, but this particular entry? Not notable outside of the series enough to merit its own article at this point in time. If anyone can find sourcing for it I'm open to alternatives, but there's a dearth of RS here. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero references, zero indication of wp:notability. The article material is basically "it exists" and then a plot summary. North8000 (talk) 14:12, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a total failure of every single criterion of WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What the heck? All the other books in the series have individual articles; what makes this one special? It doesn't (yet) have a review in Publishers Weekly? —WWoods (talk) 02:00, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]