The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Davewild (talk) 18:46, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1640 Nemo[edit]

1640 Nemo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Consensus is to fully discuss asteroids numbered below 2000. Boleyn (talk) 09:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:47, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect. Nothing of interest found on Google scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per WP:DWMP: there are a few small scraps of information available including a probability of impacting Mars in the future,[1] but there doesn't seem to be enough content to satisfy WP:GNG. Praemonitus (talk) 17:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.