The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000.  Sandstein  15:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1903 Adzhimushkaj[edit]

1903 Adzhimushkaj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect: per WP:DWMP. No suitable sources available to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk) 16:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. I don't see the independent in-depth coverage of this body needed to satisfy WP:NASTRO. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.