The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1 GAME[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been speedied twice and created 3 times now... but the author continues to recreate it. It looks like a blurb from the organization and does not indicate notability. I also don't find any outside sources.

If this is speedied again it needs to be salted, or this needs to run so that it can be speedied as a recreated article. I can't see the deleted versions but the newest one does not address any of the problems (may actually be the exact same, not sure). Shadowjams (talk) 21:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt - Almost entirely unreferenced and clearly not notable.Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt per nom and per Sir Sputnik. I also added the article for the founder of the corporation, whose name only resulted in the usual suspects after an extensive Google search. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both, salt 1 GAME - Googling for either term provides no substantial third party links (just Facebook, Twitter, Linkdin etc), so both subjects fail the general notability guidelines. 1 GAME definitely needs a touch of salt, the founder's article will be watchlisted in case this too gets repeatedly recreated. Bettia (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt as above. Giant Snowman 16:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Whose Your Guy (talk) 07:33, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.